Yıl: 2013 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 21 - 36 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies

Öz:
Bu araştırmada, ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin insani değerleri ile motivasyonel inançları ve özdüzenleme stratejileri arasındaki açıklayıcı ve yordayıcı ilişkileri ortaya koymak ve bu ilişkilerden hareketle oluşturulan modeli test etmek amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini, İstanbulda yer alan altı farklı ortaöğretim kurumunda öğrenim görmekte olan 387 kız, 407 erkek öğrenci olmak üzere toplam 794 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Araştırmada veriler İnsani Değerler Ölçeği ve Öğrenmeye İlişkin Motivasyonel Stratejiler Ölçeğiaracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler doğrultusunda ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin insani değerleri ile motivasyonel inançları ve öz düzenleme stratejileri arasındaki ilişkiler Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ne göre AMOS 16 Programı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları insani değerlerin motivasyonel inançların; motivasyonel inançların ise öz-düzenleme stratejilerinin anlamlı yordayıcısı olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca araştırma sonuçları insani değerlerin öz-düzenleme stratejilerinin anlamlı yordayıcısı olmadığını ancak motivasyonel inançlar üzerinden öz-düzenleme stratejileri üzerinde dolaylı etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu sonuçlar değerlerin, öğrencilerin öğrenme ve motivasyonları üzerinde etkili bir değişken olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Orta öğretim öğrencilerinin insani değerleri, motivasyonel inançları ve öz-düzenleme stratejileri arasındaki yordayıcı İlişkiler

Öz:
The purpose of this study was to investigate the exploratory and predictive relationships between secondary school students human values and their motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning strategies and thus to test the relevant model was developed. A correlational filed study was used in this research. The sample of the research consisted of a total of 794 students studying at six different secondary schools in Istanbul. Research data were collected by Human Values Scaleand the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire . The exploratory relationships between secondary school students human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies were analyzed using the software AMOS 16 following the Structural Equation Modelling . Results indicated that human values were significant predictor of motivational beliefs and motivational beliefs were significant predictor of self-regulated learning strategies. Also, the study results indicated that human values were not significant predictor of self-regulated learning strategies, but had an indirect effect on self-regulated learning via motivational beliefs. These results revealed that the values were important variables that effect on students learning and motivation
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Avcı, M. (2006) Ergenlikte toplumsal uyum sorunları. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7 (1), 39-63.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.
  • Boekaerts, M. (1996). Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation. European Pyschologist, 1 (2), 100- 112.
  • Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today? International Journal of Educational Research, 31 (6), 445-457.
  • Boekaerts, M. (2002). Motivation to learn. Educational Practices Series, 10, 1-27. Retrieved February 5, 2009 from http// www.ibe.unesco.org/International/Publications/educational- Practices/EducationalPracticesSeriesPdf/prac10e.pdf.
  • Borkowski, J. G. (1996). Metacognition: Theory or chapter heading? Learning and Individual Difference, 8, 391-402.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
  • Çelik, G., Tahiroğlu, A. ve Avcı, A. (2008). Ergenlik döneminde beynin yapısal ve nörokimyasal değişimi. Klinik Psikiyatri, 11, 42-47.
  • Dilmaç, B. (2007). Bir grup fen lisesi öğrencisine verilen insani değerler eğitiminin insani değerler ölçeği ile sınanması. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
  • Dilmaç, B., Ertekin, E. ve Yazıcı, E. (2009). Değer tercihleri ile öğrenme stilleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 7 (17), 27-47.
  • Dilmaç, B., Kulaksızoğlu, A., & Ekşi, H. (2007). An examination of the humane values education program on a group of science high school students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7 (3), 1221–1261.
  • Dunlop, F. (1996). Democratic values and the foundations of political education. In J. M. Halstead & M. J. Taylor (Eds.), Values in education and education in values (pp. 68-78). London: Falmer Press.
  • Durmuş, Ç. (1996). Değerlerin meslek grupları açısından incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Eaton, M. J., & Dembo, M. H. (1997). Differences in the motivational beliefs of Asian American and non-Asian students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 433-440.
  • Effeney, G. (2011). The development of executive function and self-regulated learning in adolescent males. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Education, The University of Queensland.
  • Halstead, M. J. (1996) Values and values education in schools. In M. J. Halstead & M. J. Taylor (eds.) Values in Education and Education in Values (pp.3-14). London & Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
  • Jarvela, S., & Niemivirta, M. (1999). The changes in learning theory and the topicality of the resent research on motivation. Research Dialogue in Learning and Instruction, 1 (2), 57-65.
  • Koç, M. (2004). Gelişim psikolojisi açısından ergenlik dönemi ve genel özellikleri. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17 (2), 231-256.
  • Kuşdil, M. E., & Kağıtcıbaşı, C. (2000). Türk öğretmenlerin değerler yönelimi ve Schwartz değer kuramı. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15 (45), 59-76.
  • Magno, C. (2009). Self-regulation and approaches to learning in English composition writing. TESOL Journal, 1, 1-16.
  • Matthews, B. (2001). The relationship between values and learning. International Education Journal, 2 (4), 223-232.
  • Nesbitt, E., & Henderson, A. (2003). Religious organisations in the UK and values education programmes for schools. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 24 (1), 75-88.
  • Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and selfefficacy. Retrieved July 20, 2009, from http://www.emory.edu/ EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html.
  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33-40.
  • Pintrich, P. R., Roeser, R. W., & DeGroot, E. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents’ motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14 (2) 139-161.
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) (Tec. Rep. No. 91-B-004). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, School of Education.
  • Pintrich, R. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self- regulation (pp. 451-501). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (1996). Schools for talent development. A practical plan for total school improvement. School Administrator, 33, 20-22.
  • Rizemberg, R., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1992). Self-regulated learning in gifted students. Roeper Review, 15 (1), 98-101.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8 (2), 23-74. Retrieved March 9, 2009 from http://www.mpr-online.de.
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modelling. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Sharp, C. (2002). Study support and the development of selfregulated learner. Educational Research, 44 (1), 29-42.
  • Shaver, J. P., & Strong, W. (1976). Facing value decision: Rational building for teachers. California: Wadsworth Publishing.
  • Shearman, S. M. (2008). Culture, values, and cultural variability: Hofstede, Inglehart, and Schwartz’s approach. In The Annual Convention of the International Communication Association, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Sığrı, Ü., Tabak, A. ve Ercan, Ü.(2009). Kültürel değerlerin yönetsel kapsamda analizi: Bankacılık sektörü örneği. Ankara University Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1 (1), 166-192.
  • Snyder, R. (1997). An assessment of the reliability and validity of scores obtained by six popular learning styles instruments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, Utah.
  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayınları.
  • Uysal, F. (2008). Karakter eğitim programlarının değerlendirilmesi. Yeditepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Üredi, I. (2005). Algılanan anne baba tutumlarının ilköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin öz-düzenleyici öğrenme stratejileri ve motivasyonel inançları üzerindeki etkisi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  • VanZile-Tamsen, C. (2002). Assessing and promoting selfregulated strategy use. Journal of College Counseling, 5 (2), 182-188.
  • Warnock, M. (1996). Moral values. In J. M. Halstead & M. J. Taylor (Eds.), Values in education and education in values (pp. 45-53). London & Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
  • Whaw, K. M., & Abrami, C. P. (2002). Student goal orientation and interest: Effects on student’ use of self- regulated learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26 (3), 311- 329.
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectacy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 279-306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Wolters, C. A., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8 (3), 211-238.
  • Yeşil, R., & Aydın, D. (2007). Demokratik değerlerin eğitiminde yöntem ve zamanlama. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11 (2), 65-84.
  • Yılmaz, M. (2007 ) Öğrenme stilleri ve değerler eğitimi. Değerler Eğitim Merkezi Dergisi, 2 (1), 120–121.
  • Yılmaz, V., & Çelik, E. (2009). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 (3), 329-339.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25 (1), 3-7.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self- regulated learning from teaching to self- reflective practice (pp. 1-19). London: Guilford Press.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learning: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41 (2), 64-70.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284-290.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: American Pschological Association.
APA TANRISEVEN I, Dilmaç B (2013). Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies. , 21 - 36.
Chicago TANRISEVEN Işıl,Dilmaç Bülent Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies. (2013): 21 - 36.
MLA TANRISEVEN Işıl,Dilmaç Bülent Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies. , 2013, ss.21 - 36.
AMA TANRISEVEN I,Dilmaç B Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies. . 2013; 21 - 36.
Vancouver TANRISEVEN I,Dilmaç B Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies. . 2013; 21 - 36.
IEEE TANRISEVEN I,Dilmaç B "Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies." , ss.21 - 36, 2013.
ISNAD TANRISEVEN, Işıl - Dilmaç, Bülent. "Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies". (2013), 21-36.
APA TANRISEVEN I, Dilmaç B (2013). Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(1), 21 - 36.
Chicago TANRISEVEN Işıl,Dilmaç Bülent Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 13, no.1 (2013): 21 - 36.
MLA TANRISEVEN Işıl,Dilmaç Bülent Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, vol.13, no.1, 2013, ss.21 - 36.
AMA TANRISEVEN I,Dilmaç B Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2013; 13(1): 21 - 36.
Vancouver TANRISEVEN I,Dilmaç B Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2013; 13(1): 21 - 36.
IEEE TANRISEVEN I,Dilmaç B "Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies." Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13, ss.21 - 36, 2013.
ISNAD TANRISEVEN, Işıl - Dilmaç, Bülent. "Predictive relationships between secondary school students' human values, motivational beliefs, and self-regulated learning strategies". Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 13/1 (2013), 21-36.