Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 32 Sayfa Aralığı: 158 - 179 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE KANADA'DA OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN GENEL PROFİLİ VE MESLEKİ GELİŞİM FAALİYETLERİNE KATILIM DÜZEYLERİ

Öz:
Bu çalışmada amaç, köklü okul yöneticisi seçme ve yetiştirme geleneklerine sahip ABD ve Kanada'daki mevcut okul müdürlerinin genel profillerini ve mesleki gelişim faaliyetlerine katılım düzeylerini incelemektir. Çalışmada nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden betimleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu kapsamda, 2013 Uluslararası Öğretme ve Öğrenme Anketi (Teaching and Learning International Survey [TALIS]) verilerinden yararlanılarak her iki ülkede görev yapan okul müdürlerinin demografik özellikleri (cinsiyet, yaş, eğitim durumu ve deneyim) ve aldıkları mesleki gelişim eğitimleri ve katıldıkları mentorluk, seminer, kurs ve gözlem ziyaretleri gibi profesyonel faaliyetler incelenmiştir. İlgili alan yazına göre, her iki ülkede yönetici seçme kriterleri; öğretmenlik tecrübesinin bulunması, eğitim yönetimi alanında yüksek lisans yapmış olmak, yöneticilik sertifikasına sahip olmak ve belirli mesleki eğitim programlarına katılım olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Çalışmanın bulguları da alan yazına paralel olarak, ABD ve Kanada'daki müdürlerin çoğunluğunun önemli ölçüde öğretmenlik tecrübesine sahip olduğu, öğretimsel liderlik ve okul yönetimine ilişkin program veya kurslara, çeşitli mesleki ağlara, mentorluk veya araştırma aktivitelerine ve konferans veya gözlem ziyareti amaçlı okul ziyareti aktivitelerine sıklıkla katıldıklarını göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN THE U.S.A. AND CANADA AND THEIR LEVEL OF PARTICIPATION IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

Öz:
The purpose of this study is to reveal demographic characteristics of school principals in the U.S.A. and Canada, and to investigate their level of participation in professional development activities. Descriptive statistics of quantitative method were employed in the study. Within the scope of the study, demographic information (gender, age, educational level and experience) of principals and professional activities taken, such as professional development, mentorship, seminar, observation visits and courses, were investigated, drawing upon 2013 Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) dataset. According to related literature, principal selection criteria in both countries include having teaching experience, master's degree in educational administration, administrative certificate and participation in certain professional development activities. Consistently, TALIS data showed that most principals in the U.S.A and Canada had a substantial level of teaching experience and frequently participated in professional activities such as, programs and courses about instructional leadership and school administration, network, mentorship, research activities, conferences and school visits for observational purposes.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ada, Ş. & Gümüş, S. (2012). The reflection of instructional leadership concept on educational administration master's programs: A comparison of Turkey and the United States of America. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 462- 474.
  • Anderson, M. E. (1991). Principals: How to train, recruit, select, induct, and evaluate leaders for America's Schools. University of Oregon, Eugene: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
  • Barnett, D. (2004). School leadership preparation programs: Are they preparing tomorrow's leaders? Education, 125(1), 121-129.
  • Björk, L. &Ginsberg, R. (1995). Principles of reform and reforming principal training: A theoretical perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(1), 1 1-37.
  • Blouin, P. (2008). A profile of elementary and secondary school principals in Canada: First results from the 2004-2005 Survey of Principals. Centre for Education Statistics. internet adresinden 11.03.2015 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
  • Bridges, E. M. (1992). Problem based learning for administrators. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, University of Oregon.
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, (2011). Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2010- 11 Edition. http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos007.htm internet adresinden 05.03.2014 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, (2014).Elementary, Middle, and High School Principals.http://www.bls.gov/ooh/management/elementary-middle-and-high- school principals.htm adresinden 12.05.2015 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
  • Bush, T. & Jackson, D. (2002).A preparation for school leadership International perspectives. Educational Management & Administration, 30(4), 417- 429.
  • Caldwell, B. (2002). A blue print for successful leadership in an era of globalization in learning.In P. Hallinger (Ed.), Reshapingthe landscape of school leadership development: A globalperspective. Lisse, Netherlands: Swet & Zeitlinger.
  • Caldwell, B. (1998). Strategic leadership, resource management and effective school reform.Journal of Educational Administration, 36(5), 445-461.
  • Capasso, R. L., & Daresh, J. C. (2001). The school administrator internship handbook: leading, mentoring, and participating in the internship program. Corwin Press.
  • Crisci, P.E. (1986). An achievement formula that applies the correlates of effective schools and there commendations of the "Excellence" reports to predict, monitor, and promote student achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 270 455).
  • Daresh, J. C., & Playko, M. A. (1997). Beginning the principalship: A practical guide for new school leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Fink, E. & Resnick, L. (2001).Developing principals as instructional leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 598- 606.
  • Fredua-Kwarteng, E. (2013). Exploring school principal preparation and development in Northen Canada: The Case of Nunavut's Educational Leadership Program (ELP). Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Toronto Üniversitesi Ontario Eğitim Çalışmaları Enstitüsü, Toronto, Kanada.
  • Fullan, M. (1991).The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press, New York.
  • Gordon, S. P. (2004). Professional development for school improvement: Empowering learning communities. Allyn& Bacon.
  • Green, R. L. (2010). The four dimensions of principal leadership: Leading for 21st century schools . Boston: Allyn& Bacon.
  • Griffiths, D. E. (1988). Educational administration: Reform PDQ or RIP (Occasional Paper No. 8312). Tempe, AZ: University Council for Educational Administration.
  • Gumus, E. (2015). Investigation regarding the pre-service trainings of primary and middle school principals in the United States: The case of the State of Michigan. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(1), 61-72.
  • Gümüş, S. & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2013).Eğitim yönetimi doktora eğitiminde uygulama temelli bir yaklaşım: Eğitim doktorası (Ed.D.). Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi [Educational Administration: Theory and Practice], 19(1), 7-29.
  • Hall, V., & Southworth, G. (1997). Headship. School Leadership& Management, 17(2),151- 170.
  • Hallinger, P. & Heck, R.H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5-44.
  • Hallinger, P. & Murphy, J. (1991). Developing leaders for future schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 514-520.
  • Hallinger, P. (2003). Reshaping the landscape of school leadership development: A global perspective. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  • Harris, S. L. (2006). Best practices of award-winning public school principals: Implications for university preparation programs. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 3 (2), 30-41.
  • Hess, F.M., & Kelly, A.P. (2007). Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal preparation programs. Teachers College Record, 109(1), 244-274.
  • Hoyle, J. R., English, F. W., & Steffy, B. E. (1998). Skills for successful 21st century school leaders: Standards for peak performers. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
  • Interstate School LeadersLicensureConsortium.(1996). Standards for school leaders. Washington DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. www.ccsso.org internet adresinden 2.10.2015 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
  • Jackson, B. L., & Kelley, C. (2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 192- 212.
  • Kelley, C.,& Peterson, K. (2000, November). The work of principals and their preparation: Addressing critical needs for the 21st century. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Albuquerque, NM.
  • Leithwood, K. &Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 496-528.
  • LeTendre, B., & Roberts, B. (10- 13 Kasım 2005). School principal certification requirements. University Council for Educational Administration, Convention, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Marzano, R. J.,Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Matthews, L. J.,& Crow, G. M. (2003). Being and becoming a principal: Role conceptions for contemporary principals and assistant principals. Boston: Allyn& Bacon.
  • Militello, J.A.,Stark, B., Tirozzi, G.N., Hersey, L.G., Flanary, R.A., & Fede, H. (2007). Changing Role of the Middle Level and High School Leader: Learning from the Past Preparing for the Future. Reston, Virginia: National Association of Seondary School Principals.
  • Murphy, J. (1990). The reform of school administration: Pressures and calls for change. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The reform of American public education in the 1980's: Themes and cases. Berkeley: McCutchan.
  • Murphy, J. (1992). The landscape of leadership preparation: Reframing the education of school administrators. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Murphy, J. (1997). Putting New School Leaderstothe Test. Education Week(19 November.).
  • Murphy, J. & Forsyth, P. B. (1999).Educational administration: A decade of reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: CorwinPress.
  • Normore, A.H. (2004). Recruitment and selection: Meeting the leadership shortage in one large Canadian school district. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 30, 1- 15.
  • OECD. (2010). Improving Schools: Strategies for Action in Mexico. OECD Publishing
  • OECD (2014), TALIS 2013 Results: An International Perspective on Teaching and Learning, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264196261-en.
  • Orr, M. T. (2006). Mapping innovation in leadership preparation in our nation's schools of education. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 492- 499.
  • Orr, M. T.,& Pounder, D. G. (2011). Teaching and preparing school leaders. In Sharon Conleyand B. Cooper (Eds.). Finding, preparing, and supporting school leaders: Critical issues, useful Solutions. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
  • Pehlivan- Aydın, İ. (2002). Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nde eğitim yöneticilerinin yetiştirilmesi ve yönetici geliştirme akademisi örneği. 21. Yüzyıl Eğitim Yöneticilerinin Yetiştirilmesi Sempozyumu Bildiriler: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayın No: 191
  • Peterson, K. (2002). The professional development of principals: Innovations and opportunities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 213- 232.
  • Sergiovanni, T. J. (2001). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (4th ed.).Boston: Allynand Bacon.
  • Shipman, N. J., Topps, B.W., & Murphy, J. (1998). Linking the ISLLC Standards to Professional Development and Relicensure. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Diego, CA, April13-17, 1998).
  • Şişman, M. &Turan, S. (2004). Dünyada eğitim yöneticilerinin yetiştirilmesine ilişkin başlıca yönelimler ve Türkiye için çıkarılabilecek bazı sonuçlar. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 13- 26.
  • Taipale, A. (2012). International survey on educational leadership. A survey on school leader's work and continuing education. Finnish National Board of Education.
  • The Alberta Teachers 'Association (2014). The future of the principalship In Canada: A national research study. http://www.teachers.ab.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/ATA/Publications/Research/T he%20Future%20of%20the%20Principalship%20in%20Canada.pdf adresinden 9.05.2015 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
  • Thomson, S.D. (1993). (Ed.). Principals for our changing schools: The knowledge and skill base. Fairfax, VA: National Policy Board for Educational Administration.
  • Turnbull, B. J., Riley, D. L., Arcaira, E. R., Anderson, L. M. & MacFarlane, J. R. elementary and secondary school principals in the United States: Results from the 2011-12 schools and staffing survey. National Center for Educational Statistics.
  • Usdan, M. D. (2002). Reactions to articles commissioned by the national commission for the advancement of education leadership preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 300-307.
  • Wallace Foundation. (2011). The school principal as leader Guiding schools to better http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knOwledge-center/school leadership/effective- principal-leadership/Documents/The-School-Principal-as-LeaderGuiding-Schools- to-Better-Teaching-and-Learning.pdf adresinden 23.04.2015 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
  • Walker, A., Bryant, D.,& Lee, M. (2013). International patterns in principal preparation: Commonalities and variations in pre-service programmes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(4), 405- 434.
  • World Bank (2014). Primary education, teachers (% female). Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.TCHR.FE.ZS adresinden 12.01.2015 tarihinde indirilmiştir
  • Zimmerman, S. (2002). Handbook of certification requirements for school administrators. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
APA GÜMÜŞ E, Bellibaş M (2015). AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE KANADA'DA OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN GENEL PROFİLİ VE MESLEKİ GELİŞİM FAALİYETLERİNE KATILIM DÜZEYLERİ. , 158 - 179.
Chicago GÜMÜŞ EMİNE,Bellibaş Mehmet Şükrü AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE KANADA'DA OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN GENEL PROFİLİ VE MESLEKİ GELİŞİM FAALİYETLERİNE KATILIM DÜZEYLERİ. (2015): 158 - 179.
MLA GÜMÜŞ EMİNE,Bellibaş Mehmet Şükrü AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE KANADA'DA OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN GENEL PROFİLİ VE MESLEKİ GELİŞİM FAALİYETLERİNE KATILIM DÜZEYLERİ. , 2015, ss.158 - 179.
AMA GÜMÜŞ E,Bellibaş M AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE KANADA'DA OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN GENEL PROFİLİ VE MESLEKİ GELİŞİM FAALİYETLERİNE KATILIM DÜZEYLERİ. . 2015; 158 - 179.
Vancouver GÜMÜŞ E,Bellibaş M AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE KANADA'DA OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN GENEL PROFİLİ VE MESLEKİ GELİŞİM FAALİYETLERİNE KATILIM DÜZEYLERİ. . 2015; 158 - 179.
IEEE GÜMÜŞ E,Bellibaş M "AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE KANADA'DA OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN GENEL PROFİLİ VE MESLEKİ GELİŞİM FAALİYETLERİNE KATILIM DÜZEYLERİ." , ss.158 - 179, 2015.
ISNAD GÜMÜŞ, EMİNE - Bellibaş, Mehmet Şükrü. "AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE KANADA'DA OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN GENEL PROFİLİ VE MESLEKİ GELİŞİM FAALİYETLERİNE KATILIM DÜZEYLERİ". (2015), 158-179.
APA GÜMÜŞ E, Bellibaş M (2015). AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE KANADA'DA OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN GENEL PROFİLİ VE MESLEKİ GELİŞİM FAALİYETLERİNE KATILIM DÜZEYLERİ. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(32), 158 - 179.
Chicago GÜMÜŞ EMİNE,Bellibaş Mehmet Şükrü AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE KANADA'DA OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN GENEL PROFİLİ VE MESLEKİ GELİŞİM FAALİYETLERİNE KATILIM DÜZEYLERİ. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 12, no.32 (2015): 158 - 179.
MLA GÜMÜŞ EMİNE,Bellibaş Mehmet Şükrü AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE KANADA'DA OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN GENEL PROFİLİ VE MESLEKİ GELİŞİM FAALİYETLERİNE KATILIM DÜZEYLERİ. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol.12, no.32, 2015, ss.158 - 179.
AMA GÜMÜŞ E,Bellibaş M AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE KANADA'DA OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN GENEL PROFİLİ VE MESLEKİ GELİŞİM FAALİYETLERİNE KATILIM DÜZEYLERİ. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2015; 12(32): 158 - 179.
Vancouver GÜMÜŞ E,Bellibaş M AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE KANADA'DA OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN GENEL PROFİLİ VE MESLEKİ GELİŞİM FAALİYETLERİNE KATILIM DÜZEYLERİ. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2015; 12(32): 158 - 179.
IEEE GÜMÜŞ E,Bellibaş M "AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE KANADA'DA OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN GENEL PROFİLİ VE MESLEKİ GELİŞİM FAALİYETLERİNE KATILIM DÜZEYLERİ." Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12, ss.158 - 179, 2015.
ISNAD GÜMÜŞ, EMİNE - Bellibaş, Mehmet Şükrü. "AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE KANADA'DA OKUL MÜDÜRLERİNİN GENEL PROFİLİ VE MESLEKİ GELİŞİM FAALİYETLERİNE KATILIM DÜZEYLERİ". Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 12/32 (2015), 158-179.