Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 68 - 71 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue

Öz:
Amaç: Meme küçültme cerrahisi geçiren kadınların meme kanseri teşhis ve taramasında mamografinin bazı sınırlılıkları vardır. Bu çalışmada postoperatif değişikliğe bağlı meme dokusunda gelişen yapısal bozuklukların mamografiye nasıl yansıdığını araştırmayı amaçladık.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Meme küçültme operasyonu geçiren ve genel cerrahi kliniği tarafından meme kanseri taraması amacıyla mamografi çekilmesi istenen hastaların dosyaları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların yaş, cerrahi işlem, postoperatif takip süresi, çıkarılan doku miktarı, histopatolojik ve mamografik bulguları değerlendirildi. Hastalar 3 grupta incelendi: 40 yaş üzerinde glandüler doku ağırlıklı redüksiyon mammoplasti uygulanan (1. grup), 40 yaş altında yağ dokusu ağırlıklı redüksiyon mammoplasti uygulanan (2. grup) ve 40 yaş üstünde meme hipertrofisi tanısı almış ve opere edilmeyen (3. grup) hastalardan oluşmaktadır.Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama takip süresi 6 yıldı. Çıkarılan ortalama doku miktarı 1. grupta 1120 gr (6802070), 2. grupta 1220 gr idi. Ameliyat yaş ortalaması 1. grupta 45 , 2. grupta 35 idi. Histopatolojik incelemede tüm gruplar benigndi. Birinci grup hastaların tamamı BIRADS 1-2, 2. grup hastaların 28'i BIRADS 1-2, 4'ü BIRADS 3 ve 8'i BIRADS 0 idi. Üçüncü grup hastaların 35'i BIRADS 1-2, 4'ü BIRADS 3 ve 1'i BIRADS 0'dı.Sonuç: Kırk yaş üzeri hastalarda glandüler doku ağırlıklı meme küçültme cerrahisi uygulanmasının mamografi duyarlılığını artırdığı kanısındayız
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tıbbi Araştırmalar Deneysel Anestezi Cerrahi

Glandüler ve yağ dokusu alınarak meme küçültme cerrahisi uygulanan hastalarda mamografi duyarlılığının karşılaştırılması

Öz:
Objective: Mammography may have some limitations in the diagnosis and screening of breast cancer for women who have previously undergone breast reduction surgery. This study aimed to investigate how the structural defects in the breast tissue formed by postoperative changes are reflected on mammography.Material and Methods: The records of patients who had previously undergone breast reduction surgery and who were requested to undergo mammography for breast cancer screening by the general surgery clinic were retrospectively studied. The patients' ages, surgical procedures, postoperative follow-up periods, amount of removed material, and histopathological and mammographic results were studied. The patients were classified into 3 groups: those older than 40 years who underwent reduction mammoplasty targeting predominantly the glandular tissue (group 1), those younger than 40 years who underwent reduction mammoplasty targeting predominantly the fat tissue (group 2), and those older than 40 years who were diagnosed with breast hypertrophy and were not operated (group 3).Results: The mean follow-up period of the patients was 6 years. The mean value of resected tissue was 1120 g in group 1 and 1220 g in group 2. The mean age at the time of surgery was 45 years for group 1 and 35 years for group 2. All patients in group 1 were classified in Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 1-2; 28 patients in group 2 were classified in BI-RADS 1-2, 4 were classified in BI-RADS 3, and 8 were classified in BI-RADS 0. In group 3, 35 patients were classified in BI-RADS 1-2, 4 were classified in BI-RADS 3, and 1 was classified in BI-RADS 0.Conclusion: We believe that breast reduction surgery targeting predominantly the glandular tissue in patients older than 40 years increases mammographic sensitivity
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tıbbi Araştırmalar Deneysel Anestezi Cerrahi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • White DJ, Maxwell GP. Breast reduction. In: Achauer BM, Eriksson E, Guyuron B, Coleman JJ, Russell RC, Van Der Kolk CA, Eds. Plastic Surgery. New York: Mosby Co, 2000: 2705-2741.
  • Ayhan S, Başterzi Y, Yavuzer R, Latifoğlu O, Çenetoğlu S, Atabay K, et al. Histologic profiles of breast reduction specimens. Aesth Plast Surg 2002; 26: 203-205. [CrossRef]
  • McCarthy K, Carpenter SA, Georgiade GS. The breast: embryol- ogy, anatomy, and physiology. In: Georgiade NG, Georgiade GS, Riefkohl R, Eds. Aesthetic Surgery of The Breast. New York: Saun- ders Co; 1990: 3-17.
  • Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Ljung BM, Grady D. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnor- malities. Ann İntern Med 2003; 139: 274-284. [CrossRef] 5. Savaci N. Reduction mammoplasty by the central pedicle, avoiding a vertical scar. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1996; 20: 171-175. [CrossRef]
  • Keskin M, Tosun Z, Savaci N. Seventeen years of experience with reduction mammaplasty avoiding a vertical scar. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32: 653-659. [CrossRef]
  • Shen Y, Zelen M. Screening sensitivity and sojourn time from breast cancer early detection clinical trials: mammograms and physical examinations. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3490-3499.
  • Olsen AH, Agbaje OF, Myles JP, Lynge E, Duffy SW. Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program. Breast J 2006; 12: 338-342. [CrossRef]
  • Dogan L, Gulcelik MA, Bulut M, Karaman N, Kiziltan G, Ozaslan C. The evaluation of contralateral breast lesions in breast cancer patients using reduction mammoplasty. J Breast Cancer 2011; 14: 219-222. [CrossRef]
  • Demirkazık FB. Mammography and breast imaging basic prin- ciples. Hacettepe Medical Journal 1997; 28: 73-83.
  • Juarbe TC, Kaplan CP, Somkin CP, Pasick R, Gildengorin G, Pérez- Stable EJ. Are risk factors for breast cancer associated with follow up procedures in diverse women with abnormal mammogra- phy? Cancer Causes Control 2005; 16: 245-253. [CrossRef]
  • Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole breast US in the evalu- ation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001; 221: 641-649. [CrossRef]
  • Boice JD Jr, Persson I, Brinton LA, Hober M, McLaughlin JK, Blot WJ, et al. Breast cancer following breast reduction surgery in Swe- den. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 755-762. [CrossRef]
  • Muir TM, Tresham J, Fritschi L, Wylie E. Screening for breast can- cer post reduction mammoplasty. Clin Radiol 2010; 65: 198-205. [CrossRef]
  • Mendelson EB. Evaluation of the postoperative breast. Radiol Clin North Am 1992; 30: 107-137.
  • Australian Institute of health and welfare. Breast Screen Australia monitoring report 2004-2005, www.aihw.gov.au; 2008.
APA CAKIR M, KÜÇÜKKARTALLAR T, TEKIN A, SELİMOĞLU N, Poyraz N, BELVİRANLI M, Kartal A (2015). Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue. , 68 - 71.
Chicago CAKIR Murat,KÜÇÜKKARTALLAR Tevfik,TEKIN AHMET,SELİMOĞLU Nebil,Poyraz Necdet,BELVİRANLI MEHMET METİN,Kartal Adil Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue. (2015): 68 - 71.
MLA CAKIR Murat,KÜÇÜKKARTALLAR Tevfik,TEKIN AHMET,SELİMOĞLU Nebil,Poyraz Necdet,BELVİRANLI MEHMET METİN,Kartal Adil Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue. , 2015, ss.68 - 71.
AMA CAKIR M,KÜÇÜKKARTALLAR T,TEKIN A,SELİMOĞLU N,Poyraz N,BELVİRANLI M,Kartal A Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue. . 2015; 68 - 71.
Vancouver CAKIR M,KÜÇÜKKARTALLAR T,TEKIN A,SELİMOĞLU N,Poyraz N,BELVİRANLI M,Kartal A Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue. . 2015; 68 - 71.
IEEE CAKIR M,KÜÇÜKKARTALLAR T,TEKIN A,SELİMOĞLU N,Poyraz N,BELVİRANLI M,Kartal A "Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue." , ss.68 - 71, 2015.
ISNAD CAKIR, Murat vd. "Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue". (2015), 68-71.
APA CAKIR M, KÜÇÜKKARTALLAR T, TEKIN A, SELİMOĞLU N, Poyraz N, BELVİRANLI M, Kartal A (2015). Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, 31(2), 68 - 71.
Chicago CAKIR Murat,KÜÇÜKKARTALLAR Tevfik,TEKIN AHMET,SELİMOĞLU Nebil,Poyraz Necdet,BELVİRANLI MEHMET METİN,Kartal Adil Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi 31, no.2 (2015): 68 - 71.
MLA CAKIR Murat,KÜÇÜKKARTALLAR Tevfik,TEKIN AHMET,SELİMOĞLU Nebil,Poyraz Necdet,BELVİRANLI MEHMET METİN,Kartal Adil Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.31, no.2, 2015, ss.68 - 71.
AMA CAKIR M,KÜÇÜKKARTALLAR T,TEKIN A,SELİMOĞLU N,Poyraz N,BELVİRANLI M,Kartal A Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi. 2015; 31(2): 68 - 71.
Vancouver CAKIR M,KÜÇÜKKARTALLAR T,TEKIN A,SELİMOĞLU N,Poyraz N,BELVİRANLI M,Kartal A Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi. 2015; 31(2): 68 - 71.
IEEE CAKIR M,KÜÇÜKKARTALLAR T,TEKIN A,SELİMOĞLU N,Poyraz N,BELVİRANLI M,Kartal A "Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue." Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, 31, ss.68 - 71, 2015.
ISNAD CAKIR, Murat vd. "Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue". Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi 31/2 (2015), 68-71.