Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 483 - 488 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Comparison of lateral versus triceps-splitting posterior approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures

Öz:
AMAÇ: Suprakondiler humerus kırıkları çocukluk döneminin en sık dirsek kırığıdır. Kapalı redüksiyon ve perkütan çivileme altın standart tedavi ola-rak kabul edilir. Bununla beraber bazen açık redüksiyon gerekebilir. Bu geriye dönük çalışmamızın amacı suprakondiler humerus kırıklarında triseps kasını kesen posterior ve lateral yaklaşımların klinik ve fonksiyonel sonuçlarını karşılaştırmaktır.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Toplam 38 hasta posterior veya lateral insizyonla ameliyat edildi. Grup 1'de posterior insizyonlu 30 hasta, Grup 2'de lateral insizyonlu sekiz hasta mevcuttu. Kozmetik ve klinik sonuçları karşılaştırmak için Flynn kriterleri kullanıldı. Kırık kaynaması AP ve lateral grafilerle değerlendirildi. Hastalar ve ebeveynlerine dirseğini tam aktifolarak ne kadar sürede hareket ettirebildiği ve tedavi sürecinden tatmin durumları sorularak kayıt tutuldu.BULGULAR: Ortalama kaynama süresi Grup 1 ve Grup 2 için sırasıyla 44.1 gün ve 46.3 gün, tam veya tama yakın dirsek hareketlerine kavuşma süresi Grup 1 ve Grup 2 için sırasıyla atel çıkarımı sonrası 57.5 ve 55.7 gün olarak bulundu. Grup 1'deki 30 hastanın ve ebeveynin 21'i (%70), Grup 2'deki sekiz hastanın ve ebeveynin altısı (%75) sonuçtan tam olarak tatmin olduklarını ifade ettiler. Grup 1'deki 30 hastanın 21'i (%70), Grup 2'deki sekiz hastanın ve altısı (%75) her iki Flynn kriterlerine göre (kozmetik ve fonksiyonel) çok iyi grupta yer aldı.TARTIŞMA: Pediatrik suprakondiler humerus kırıklarının tedavisinde kapalı redüksiyon ve perkütan çivilemenin altın standart tedavi olduğuna ina-nıyoruz. Bu metodun uygulanamadığı olgularda trisepsi kesen posterior yaklaşımın daha kolay kırık redüksiyonu ve muhtemelen daha kısa ameliyat süresi gibi avantajlarından dolayı güvenli ve lateral yaklaşımla karşılaştırılabilir olduğunu düşünüyoruz
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

Pediatrik suprakondiler humerus kırıklarının tedavisinde trisepsi kesenposterior ve lateral yaklaşımın karşılaştırılması

Öz:
BACKGROUND: Supracondylar humerus fracture is the most common fracture of the elbow in children. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning is considered to be the optimal treatment strategy; however, in some instances, open reduction may be necessary. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare clinical and functional results of triceps-splitting posterior versus lateral approach in pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture surgery.METHODS: A total of 38 patients underwent surgery; Group 1 consisted of 30 patients on whom posterior approach was used, while lateral approach was used on the 8 patients in Group 2. Flynn criteria were used to evaluate cosmetic and clinical results. Fracture healing was assessed with anteroposterior and lateral x-rays. Patients and parents were asked to describe time needed for complete return of full elbow range of motion (ROM) and overall satisfaction.RESULTS: Mean fracture union time was 44.1 days and 46.3 days, and time required to regain complete or near complete elbow ROM was 57.5 days and 55.7 days after splint removal for Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. Twenty-one of 30 (70%) patients (and parents) in Group 1, and 6 of 8 (75%) patients (and parents) in Group 2 were totally satisfied with the results. Twenty-one of 30 (70%) patients in Group 1, and 6 of 8 (75%) patients in Group 2 had excellent cosmetic and functional results according to Flynn outcome criteria.CONCLUSION: In cases of pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture, early closed reduction and percutaneous pinning is preferred; however, when this method is not applicable, triceps-splitting posterior approach is a safe and comparable method to lateral approach with advantages of easier fracture reduction and shorter operating time.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Pescatori E, Memeo A, Brivio A, Trapletti A, Camurri S, Pedretti L, et al. Supracondylar humerus fractures in children: a comparison of experi- ences. J Pediatr Orthop B 2012;21:505-13.
  • Ladenhauf HN, Schaffert M, Bauer J. The displaced supracondylar hu- merus fracture: indications for surgery and surgical options: a 2014 up- date. Curr Opin Pediatr 2014;26:64-9.
  • Kao HK, Yang WE, Li WC, Chang CH. Treatment of Gartland type III pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures with the Kapandji technique in the prone position. J Orthop Trauma 2014;28:354-9.
  • Gartland JJ. Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1959;109:145-54.
  • Ersan O, Gonen E, İlhan RD, Boysan E, Ates Y. Comparison of anterior and lateral approaches in the treatment of extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 2012;21:121-6.
  • Cramer KE, Devito DP, Green NE. Comparison of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning versus open reduction and percutaneous pinning in displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Orthop Trauma 1992;6:407-12.
  • Basaran SH, Ercin E, Bilgili MG, Bayrak A, Cumen H, Avkan MC. A new joystick technique for unsuccessful closed reduction of supracondy- lar humeral fractures: minimum trauma. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2015;25:297-303.
  • Koudstaal MJ, De Ridder VA, De Lange S, Ulrich C. Pediatric supra- condylar humerus fractures: the anterior approach. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:409-12.
  • Bombaci H, Gereli A, Küçükyazici O, Görgeç M, Deniz G. The effect of surgical exposure on the clinic outcomes of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2007;13:49-54.
  • Lal GM, Bhan S. Delayed open reduction for supracondylar fractures of the humerus. Int Orthop 1991;15:189-91.
  • Gürkan V, Orhun H, Akça O, Ercan T, Ozel S. Treatment of pediatric displaced supracondylar humerus fractures by fixation with two cross K- wires following reduction achieved after cutting the triceps muscle in a reverse V-shape]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2008;42:154-60.
  • Flynn JC, Matthews JG, Benoit RL. Blind pinning of displaced supracon- dylar fractures of the humerus in children. Sixteen years' experience with long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974;56:263-72.
  • Omid R, Choi PD, Skaggs DL. Supracondylar humeral fractures in chil- dren. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:1121-32.
  • Ay S, Akinci M, Kamiloglu S, Ercetin O. Open reduction of displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures through the anterior cubital approach. J Pediatr Orthop 2005;25:149-53.
  • Kazimoglu C, Cetin M, Sener M, Aguş H, Kalanderer O. Operative management of type III extension supracondylar fractures in children. Int Orthop 2009;33:1089-94.
  • Diri B, Tomak Y, Karaismailoğlu TN. The treatment of displaced supra- condylar fractures of the humerus in children (an evaluation of three dif- ferent treatment methods). Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2003;9:62- 9.
  • Aktekin CN, Toprak A, Ozturk AM, Altay M, Ozkurt B, Tabak AY. Open reduction via posterior triceps sparing approach in comparison with closed treatment of posteromedial displaced Gartland type III su- pracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B 2008;17:171-8.
  • Reitman RD, Waters P, Millis M. Open reduction and internal fixa- tion for supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:157-61.
  • Danielsson L, Pettersson H. Open reduction and pin fixation of severely displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Acta Or- thop Scand 1980;51:249-55.
  • Gosens T, Bongers KJ. Neurovascular complications and functional out- come in displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Injury 2003;34:267-73.
  • Weiland AJ, Meyer S, Tolo VT, Berg HL, Mueller J. Surgical treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Analysis of fifty-two cases followed for five to fifteen years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:657-61.
  • Young S, Fevang JM, Gullaksen G, Nilsen PT, Engesæter LB. Parent and Patient Satisfaction after Treatment for Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in 139 Children: No Difference between Skeletal Trac- tion and Crossed Pin Fixation at Long-Term Followup. Adv Orthop 2012;2012:958487.
  • Ozkoc G, Gonc U, Kayaalp A, Teker K, Peker TT. Displaced supracon- dylar humeral fractures in children: open reduction vs. closed reduction and pinning. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004;124:547-51.
  • Gruber MA, Hudson OC. Supracondylar fracture of the humerus ın childhood. End-result study of open reduction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1964;46:1245-52.
  • Harris IE. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Orthope- dics 1992;15:811-7.
  • Ababneh M, Shannak A, Agabi S, Hadidi S. The treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. A comparison of three methods. Int Orthop 1998;22:263-5.
APA TÜRKMEN F, TOKER S, KESİK K, korucu i, ACAR M (2016). Comparison of lateral versus triceps-splitting posterior approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. , 483 - 488.
Chicago TÜRKMEN Faik,TOKER Serdar,KESİK Kayhan,korucu ismail hakkı,ACAR Mehmet Ali Comparison of lateral versus triceps-splitting posterior approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. (2016): 483 - 488.
MLA TÜRKMEN Faik,TOKER Serdar,KESİK Kayhan,korucu ismail hakkı,ACAR Mehmet Ali Comparison of lateral versus triceps-splitting posterior approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. , 2016, ss.483 - 488.
AMA TÜRKMEN F,TOKER S,KESİK K,korucu i,ACAR M Comparison of lateral versus triceps-splitting posterior approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. . 2016; 483 - 488.
Vancouver TÜRKMEN F,TOKER S,KESİK K,korucu i,ACAR M Comparison of lateral versus triceps-splitting posterior approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. . 2016; 483 - 488.
IEEE TÜRKMEN F,TOKER S,KESİK K,korucu i,ACAR M "Comparison of lateral versus triceps-splitting posterior approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures." , ss.483 - 488, 2016.
ISNAD TÜRKMEN, Faik vd. "Comparison of lateral versus triceps-splitting posterior approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures". (2016), 483-488.
APA TÜRKMEN F, TOKER S, KESİK K, korucu i, ACAR M (2016). Comparison of lateral versus triceps-splitting posterior approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 22(5), 483 - 488.
Chicago TÜRKMEN Faik,TOKER Serdar,KESİK Kayhan,korucu ismail hakkı,ACAR Mehmet Ali Comparison of lateral versus triceps-splitting posterior approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 22, no.5 (2016): 483 - 488.
MLA TÜRKMEN Faik,TOKER Serdar,KESİK Kayhan,korucu ismail hakkı,ACAR Mehmet Ali Comparison of lateral versus triceps-splitting posterior approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.22, no.5, 2016, ss.483 - 488.
AMA TÜRKMEN F,TOKER S,KESİK K,korucu i,ACAR M Comparison of lateral versus triceps-splitting posterior approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2016; 22(5): 483 - 488.
Vancouver TÜRKMEN F,TOKER S,KESİK K,korucu i,ACAR M Comparison of lateral versus triceps-splitting posterior approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2016; 22(5): 483 - 488.
IEEE TÜRKMEN F,TOKER S,KESİK K,korucu i,ACAR M "Comparison of lateral versus triceps-splitting posterior approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures." Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 22, ss.483 - 488, 2016.
ISNAD TÜRKMEN, Faik vd. "Comparison of lateral versus triceps-splitting posterior approach in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures". Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 22/5 (2016), 483-488.