Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 345 - 353 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

AN ANALYTIC LOOK AT A LANGUAGE COURSE DESIGN MODEL

Öz:
This study aims to qualitatively examine and elaborate on the characteristics of the course design model devised by Graves (2000). Drawing upon the traditional components and principals of instructional design, Graves' course design model is innovative or different in that it has been more specially developed for language course design purposes and thus is believed to be more suited to the nature of language courses with its consideration of the main elements or characteristics of language teaching and learning processes. This descriptive study centers upon the seven main examination criteria, which are in fact the main procedures as suggested by Graves (2000). These are a) defining context, b) conceptualizing content, c) organizing the course, d) formulating goals and objectives, e) assessing needs, f) developing materials and finally g) designing an assessment plan. In this essence, each criterion was first introduced and explained in detail before the researchers extend their critical outlook into the functionality and practical use of the relevant steps and strategies recommended by Graves (2000). This critical analysis and review on the Graves' course design model revealed that the model employs the traditional components of the ADDIE generic and lends itself well also to be used in the other disciplines other than foreign languages. The final part of this report will provide suggestions as regards the potential application of the model specifically in English language curriculum development and more broadly in the curriculum and course development procedures pertaining to other discipline areas.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York: Springer.
  • Brown, J. D. (1995). Elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Campos, M. G. (2005). Passive bystanders or active participants? The dilemmas and social responsibilities of teachers. Prelac Journal, 1, 6-24.
  • Chapman S., & Cantrell, P. (2006). What is an instructional designer? Retrieved from http://teaching.colostate.edu/tips/tip.cfm?tipid=70. on 25th April 2017.
  • Dick, W., & Cary, L. (1990). The systematic design of instruction (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
  • Collins, G. R. (1985). The conditions of learning and the theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehartn & Winston.
  • Genesee, F., & Upshur, J. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108.
  • Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Kemp, J. (1977). Instructional design: A plan for unit and course development. Belmont: Fearon-Pitman Pub.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity: Science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141-165.
  • Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2004). Designing effective instruction (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Olivia, P. F., & Gordon, W. R. (2012). Developing the curriculum, student value edition (8th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
  • Posner, G., & Rudnisky, A. N. (1997). Course design: A guide to curriculum development for teachers. New York: Longman.
  • Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (Eds.) (2002). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Saphier, J., & Gower, R. (1987). The skillful teacher: Building your teaching skills. Carlisle: Research for Better Teaching Inc.
  • Smith, P. L., & Ragan T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wile & Sons Inc.
  • Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
APA MUTLU G, SARİGUL E (2017). AN ANALYTIC LOOK AT A LANGUAGE COURSE DESIGN MODEL. , 345 - 353.
Chicago MUTLU Gulcin,SARİGUL Ece AN ANALYTIC LOOK AT A LANGUAGE COURSE DESIGN MODEL. (2017): 345 - 353.
MLA MUTLU Gulcin,SARİGUL Ece AN ANALYTIC LOOK AT A LANGUAGE COURSE DESIGN MODEL. , 2017, ss.345 - 353.
AMA MUTLU G,SARİGUL E AN ANALYTIC LOOK AT A LANGUAGE COURSE DESIGN MODEL. . 2017; 345 - 353.
Vancouver MUTLU G,SARİGUL E AN ANALYTIC LOOK AT A LANGUAGE COURSE DESIGN MODEL. . 2017; 345 - 353.
IEEE MUTLU G,SARİGUL E "AN ANALYTIC LOOK AT A LANGUAGE COURSE DESIGN MODEL." , ss.345 - 353, 2017.
ISNAD MUTLU, Gulcin - SARİGUL, Ece. "AN ANALYTIC LOOK AT A LANGUAGE COURSE DESIGN MODEL". (2017), 345-353.
APA MUTLU G, SARİGUL E (2017). AN ANALYTIC LOOK AT A LANGUAGE COURSE DESIGN MODEL. IOJET, 4(4), 345 - 353.
Chicago MUTLU Gulcin,SARİGUL Ece AN ANALYTIC LOOK AT A LANGUAGE COURSE DESIGN MODEL. IOJET 4, no.4 (2017): 345 - 353.
MLA MUTLU Gulcin,SARİGUL Ece AN ANALYTIC LOOK AT A LANGUAGE COURSE DESIGN MODEL. IOJET, vol.4, no.4, 2017, ss.345 - 353.
AMA MUTLU G,SARİGUL E AN ANALYTIC LOOK AT A LANGUAGE COURSE DESIGN MODEL. IOJET. 2017; 4(4): 345 - 353.
Vancouver MUTLU G,SARİGUL E AN ANALYTIC LOOK AT A LANGUAGE COURSE DESIGN MODEL. IOJET. 2017; 4(4): 345 - 353.
IEEE MUTLU G,SARİGUL E "AN ANALYTIC LOOK AT A LANGUAGE COURSE DESIGN MODEL." IOJET, 4, ss.345 - 353, 2017.
ISNAD MUTLU, Gulcin - SARİGUL, Ece. "AN ANALYTIC LOOK AT A LANGUAGE COURSE DESIGN MODEL". IOJET 4/4 (2017), 345-353.