Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 35 - 43 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5336/jcog.2017-58388 İndeks Tarihi: 23-10-2019

Discussion on Provincial Evaluation Results of Maternal Mortality in Terms of Preventability: Commission Decision Differences in Konya

Öz:
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the risk factors of maternalmortality in Konya province, as well as the preventability of deaths in cases where the central andlocal commissions differed in their decisions. Material and Methods: Maternal mortality between2009 and 2014 in the Konya province was screened for the cases, where the central and local MaternalMortality Investigation Commissions gave different decisions. These differences pertain towhether the deaths were ‘preventable’ or ‘not-preventable’, differences in the first, second andthird delay models, and indirect, direct and incidental deaths. The data were evaluated electronicallyalong with a descriptive statistical analysis, differences in the decisions and compliance inthe mortality rates were evaluated. Results: The median age of the deceased mothers was 28 (21–44) years and 83.3% of the mothers had at least one mortality risk factor. While the overall maternalmortality rate was 36.7% within the first 48 h after birth, the rates were highest within thefirst 48 h after birth (26.7%) and between the 1st and 42nd day after birth (26.7%) in indifferentlyassessed cases. The cause in 30% of all deaths and 33.3% of deaths with differential assessmentswas postpartum hemorrhage, as per the results of central Maternal Mortality InvestigationCommissions. The decisions of the central and local commissions differed in terms of preventability,delay models or death classification in 50% of the deaths. Taken together, the compliancebetween central and local decisions was not precise in investigating maternal mortality. Conclusion:The first 48 h after birth and the postpartum period are particularly critical. The causes ofdeath, particularly postpartum hemorrhage, should be thoroughly investigated. We recommendperiodic re-evaluations of cases where different decisions were made, in order to lower the rate ofpreventable maternal mortality.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • World Health Organization (WHO). Measuring maternal mortality. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2010. p.4.
  • World Health Organization (WHO). World Health Statistics 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2014. p.180.
  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Merkezi. Ulusal Anne Ölümleri Çalışması. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Ana Çocuk Sağlığı ve Aile Planlaması Genel Müdürlüğü ve Avrupa Komisyonu Türkiye Delegasyonu. Ankara: Elma Teknik Basım Matbaacılık; 2005. p.267.
  • World Health Organization (WHO). Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2010 WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank estimates. Genava, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2012. p.59.
  • Stanton C, Hobcraft J, Hill K, Kodjogbé N, Mapeta WT, Munene F, et al. Every death counts: measurement of maternal mortality via a census. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79 (7):657-64.
  • Ronsmans C, Graham WJ. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet 2006;368(9542):1189-200.
  • Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, Shackelford KA, Steiner C, Heuton KR, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990- 2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014;384(9947):980-1004.
  • Saucedo M, Deneux-Tharaux C, BouvierColle MH; Le Comité national d’experts sur la mortalité maternelle. [Maternal mortality in France, 2007-2009]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2013;42(7):613-27.
  • T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Ana Çocuk Sağlığı ve Aile Planlaması Genel Müdürlüğü. Anne Ölümleri Veri Sistemi. 2007/27 Sayılı Genelge; 2007. p.4.
  • T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Ana Çocuk Sağlığı ve Aile Planlaması Genel Müdürlüğü. 2007/27 Sayılı Genelgeye Ek Genelge 2007/57; 2007. p.2.
  • T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu. Doğum Öncesi Bakım Yönetim Rehberi. Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayın No: 924. Ankara: Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu Kadın ve Üreme Sağlığı Daire Başkanlığı; 2014. p.32.
  • United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Maternal Mortality Update 2002: A focus On Emergency Obstetric Care. New York: UNFPA; 2003. p.35.
  • Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 1994;38 (8):1091-110.
  • Combs Thorsen V, Sundby J, Malata A. Piecing together the maternal death puzzle through narratives: the three delays model revisited. PLoS One 2012;7(12):e52090.
  • Barnes-Josiah D, Myntti C, Augustin A. The “three delays” as a framework for examining maternal mortality in Haiti. Soc Sci Med 1998;46(8):981-93.
  • World Health Organization (WHO). Maternal Mortality in 2005: Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2007. p.39.
  • Hayran M, Hayran H. Sağlık Araştırmaları İçin Temel İstatistik. Omega Araştırma. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Art Ofset Matbaacılık Yayıncılık; 2011.
  • Kılıç S. [Kappa test]. Journal of Mood Disorders 2015;5(3):142-4.
  • World Health Organization-1. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. 10th Revision. Volume 2. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2010. p.189.
  • Berg CJ, Callaghan WM, Syverson C, Henderson Z. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 1998 to 2005. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116(6):1302-9.
  • Biri A, Öztürk J, Maral I. [Maternal deaths occured in hospitals in Ankara between 1997 and 2]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2002;22(2): 142-7.
  • T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu. Riskli Gebelikler Yönerim Rehberi. Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayın No: 926. Ankara: Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu Kadın ve Üreme Sağlığı Daire Başkanlığı; 2014. p.65.
  • Şekeroğlu M, Baksu A, İnce Z, Gültekin H, Göker N, Özsoy S. [Obstetric outcomes in adolescents and older pregnancies]. Swollen Etfal Hospital Medical Bulletin 2009;43(1):1-7.
  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü. Türkiye Nüfus ve Saülık Araştırması 2013. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü, T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı, TÜBİTAK. Ankara: Elma Teknik Basım Matbaacılık Ltd Şti; 2014. p.343.
  • T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık Araştırmaları Genel Müdürlüğü. Başara BB, Güler C, Yentür GK, editörler. Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2013. Ankara: Sentez Matbaacılık ve Yayıncılık; 2014. p.163.
  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü. Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması 2008. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü, T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Ana Çocuk Sağlığı ve Aile Planlaması Genel Müdürlüğü, Başbakanlık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Müsteşarlığı ve TÜBİTAK. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hastaneleri Basımevi; 2009. p.345.
  • Declercq E, Young R, Cabral H, Ecker J. Is a rising cesarean delivery rate inevitable? Trends in industrialized countries, 1987 to 2007. Birth 2011;38(2):99-104.
  • Barber EL, Lundsber LS, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118(1):29- 38.
  • Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205(3):262.e1-8.
  • Patel DA, Burnett NM, Curtis KM. Maternal Health Epidemiology. Reproductive Health Epidemiology Series: Module 2. Atlanta, Georgia, USA: Department of Health and Human Services; 2003. p.71.
  • T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu. Doğum Sonu Bakım Yönetim Rehberi. Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayın No: 925. Ankara: Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu Kadın ve Üreme Sağlığı Daire Başkanlığı; 2014. p.44.
  • T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Ana Çocuk Sağlığı ve Aile Planlaması Genel Müdürlüğü. Doğum Öncesi Bakım Yönetim Rehberi. Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayın No: 924. Ankara: Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu Kadın ve Üreme Sağlığı Daire Başkanlığı; 2009. p.32.
  • Esen Melez İ, Şahin E, Gürler AS, Melez DO, Şahin MF, Avşar A, et al. [Maternal death cases for which autopsies were performed in Istanbul]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Foren Med 2012;9(1):28-36.
APA durduran y, SOYSAL S, BAŞARAN M, celik c, Acar A, DOĞAN C, KAYA H, İZGİ Ş, ÖZNAVRUZ H (2018). Discussion on Provincial Evaluation Results of Maternal Mortality in Terms of Preventability: Commission Decision Differences in Konya. , 35 - 43. 10.5336/jcog.2017-58388
Chicago durduran yasemin,SOYSAL Sema,BAŞARAN Mustafa,celik cetin,Acar Ali,DOĞAN Canan,KAYA Hüsnü Murat,İZGİ Şule,ÖZNAVRUZ Hasan Discussion on Provincial Evaluation Results of Maternal Mortality in Terms of Preventability: Commission Decision Differences in Konya. (2018): 35 - 43. 10.5336/jcog.2017-58388
MLA durduran yasemin,SOYSAL Sema,BAŞARAN Mustafa,celik cetin,Acar Ali,DOĞAN Canan,KAYA Hüsnü Murat,İZGİ Şule,ÖZNAVRUZ Hasan Discussion on Provincial Evaluation Results of Maternal Mortality in Terms of Preventability: Commission Decision Differences in Konya. , 2018, ss.35 - 43. 10.5336/jcog.2017-58388
AMA durduran y,SOYSAL S,BAŞARAN M,celik c,Acar A,DOĞAN C,KAYA H,İZGİ Ş,ÖZNAVRUZ H Discussion on Provincial Evaluation Results of Maternal Mortality in Terms of Preventability: Commission Decision Differences in Konya. . 2018; 35 - 43. 10.5336/jcog.2017-58388
Vancouver durduran y,SOYSAL S,BAŞARAN M,celik c,Acar A,DOĞAN C,KAYA H,İZGİ Ş,ÖZNAVRUZ H Discussion on Provincial Evaluation Results of Maternal Mortality in Terms of Preventability: Commission Decision Differences in Konya. . 2018; 35 - 43. 10.5336/jcog.2017-58388
IEEE durduran y,SOYSAL S,BAŞARAN M,celik c,Acar A,DOĞAN C,KAYA H,İZGİ Ş,ÖZNAVRUZ H "Discussion on Provincial Evaluation Results of Maternal Mortality in Terms of Preventability: Commission Decision Differences in Konya." , ss.35 - 43, 2018. 10.5336/jcog.2017-58388
ISNAD durduran, yasemin vd. "Discussion on Provincial Evaluation Results of Maternal Mortality in Terms of Preventability: Commission Decision Differences in Konya". (2018), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.5336/jcog.2017-58388
APA durduran y, SOYSAL S, BAŞARAN M, celik c, Acar A, DOĞAN C, KAYA H, İZGİ Ş, ÖZNAVRUZ H (2018). Discussion on Provincial Evaluation Results of Maternal Mortality in Terms of Preventability: Commission Decision Differences in Konya. Journal of Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, 28(2), 35 - 43. 10.5336/jcog.2017-58388
Chicago durduran yasemin,SOYSAL Sema,BAŞARAN Mustafa,celik cetin,Acar Ali,DOĞAN Canan,KAYA Hüsnü Murat,İZGİ Şule,ÖZNAVRUZ Hasan Discussion on Provincial Evaluation Results of Maternal Mortality in Terms of Preventability: Commission Decision Differences in Konya. Journal of Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology 28, no.2 (2018): 35 - 43. 10.5336/jcog.2017-58388
MLA durduran yasemin,SOYSAL Sema,BAŞARAN Mustafa,celik cetin,Acar Ali,DOĞAN Canan,KAYA Hüsnü Murat,İZGİ Şule,ÖZNAVRUZ Hasan Discussion on Provincial Evaluation Results of Maternal Mortality in Terms of Preventability: Commission Decision Differences in Konya. Journal of Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.28, no.2, 2018, ss.35 - 43. 10.5336/jcog.2017-58388
AMA durduran y,SOYSAL S,BAŞARAN M,celik c,Acar A,DOĞAN C,KAYA H,İZGİ Ş,ÖZNAVRUZ H Discussion on Provincial Evaluation Results of Maternal Mortality in Terms of Preventability: Commission Decision Differences in Konya. Journal of Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018; 28(2): 35 - 43. 10.5336/jcog.2017-58388
Vancouver durduran y,SOYSAL S,BAŞARAN M,celik c,Acar A,DOĞAN C,KAYA H,İZGİ Ş,ÖZNAVRUZ H Discussion on Provincial Evaluation Results of Maternal Mortality in Terms of Preventability: Commission Decision Differences in Konya. Journal of Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018; 28(2): 35 - 43. 10.5336/jcog.2017-58388
IEEE durduran y,SOYSAL S,BAŞARAN M,celik c,Acar A,DOĞAN C,KAYA H,İZGİ Ş,ÖZNAVRUZ H "Discussion on Provincial Evaluation Results of Maternal Mortality in Terms of Preventability: Commission Decision Differences in Konya." Journal of Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, 28, ss.35 - 43, 2018. 10.5336/jcog.2017-58388
ISNAD durduran, yasemin vd. "Discussion on Provincial Evaluation Results of Maternal Mortality in Terms of Preventability: Commission Decision Differences in Konya". Journal of Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology 28/2 (2018), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.5336/jcog.2017-58388