Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 43 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 263 - 268 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?

Öz:
Amaç: Sağkalım üzerine olumsuz etkileri nedeniyle göğüs kompresyonlarınaara verilmesi minimalize edilmelidir. Bu randomize,kontrollü, cross-over çalışmada simüle edilmiş kardiyopulmonerresusitasyon senaryosunda Macintosh, Miller, McCoy ve McGrathlaringoskopların etkinliğinin göğüs kompresyonları sırasında veyokluğunda analizi amaçlanmıştır.Yöntemler: Başarılı entübasyon için gereken süre, girişim sayısı,dental travma şiddeti ve optimizasyon manevrası gereksinimi kardiyopulmonerresusitasyon sırasında göğüs kompresyonları varlı-ğında ve yokluğunda kaydedildi. Katılımcılara son 10 yıl içindebilgisayar oyunları konusundaki deneyimleri soruldu ve kaydedildi.Bulgular: McCoy laringoskop göğüs kompresyonları varlığındave yokluğunda en kısa başarılı trakeal entübasyon süresini sağladı.McCoy laringoskop kullanımı sırasında daha az trakeal entü-basyon girişimi, daha az dental travma insidansı ve entübasyonkolaylığı üzerine daha düşük Görsel Analog Skala skorları kaydedildi.Bilgisayar oyunlarında deneyimi olan katılımcılar Macintosh,McCoy ve McGrath kullanımıyla göğüs kompresyonu uygulanmayanresüsitasyon sırasında anlamlı olarak daha kısa süredebaşarılı trakeal entübasyon sağladılar. Dental travma insidansı vetrakeal entübasyon girişim sayısı dört laringoskop arasında bilgisayaroyunları oynama oranıyla ilişkili olarak anlamlı bir farklılıkgöstermedi.Sonuç: McGrath videolaringoskop ritmik göğüs kompresyonlarısırasında doğrudan laringoskoplardan yumuşak ve başarılı birtrakeal entübasyon bakımından avantajlı görünmemektedir. Dahakısa sürede ve daha az girişimle başarılı entübasyon sağladığındanMcCoy laringoskopun resüsitasyon başarı oranını artırabileceğineinanmaktayız.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Anestezi

Videolaringoskopi Kardiyopulmoner Resüsitasyon Sırasında Doğrudan Laringoskopiye Karşı Avantaj Sağlar mı?

Öz:
Objective: Interruption of chest compressions should be minimizedbecause of its negative effects on survival. This randomized,controlled, cross-over study aimed to analyze the effectiveness ofMacintosh, Miller, McCoy and McGrath laryngoscopes duringwith or without chest compressions in the scope of a simulatedcardiopulmonary resuscitation scenario.Methods: The time required for successful tracheal intubation,number of attempts, dental trauma severity and the need for optimizationmanoeuvres were recorded during cardiopulmonary resuscitationwith and without chest compressions. The experiencewith computer games during the last 10 years were asked to theparticipants and recorded.Results: McCoy laryngoscope yielded the shortest time for successfultracheal intubation both in the presence of and withoutchest compressions. During the use of McCoy laryngoscopes, fewertracheal intubation attempts, lower incidence of dental traumaand lower visual analogue scale scores on the ease of intubationwere recorded. Participants who are experienced computer gameplayers using Macintosh, McCoy and McGrath achieved successfultracheal intubation in a significantly shorter time during resuscitationwithout chest compressions. Dental trauma incidenceand number of tracheal intubation attempts did not show anysignificant difference between the four laryngoscopes being relatedto the rate of playing computer games.Conclusion: McGrath video laryngoscopes do not appear to haveadvantages over direct laryngoscopes for securing a smooth andsuccessful tracheal intubation during rhythmic chest compressions.We believe that as McCoy laryngoscope provided trachealintubation in a shorter time and with fewer attempts, this laryngoscopemay increase the success rate of resuscitation.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Anestezi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Nolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA, Biarent D, Bossaert LL, Deakin C, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 1219-76. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Hazinski MF, Nolan JP, Billi JE, Böttiger BW, Bossaert L, de Caen AR, et al. Part 1: Executive summary: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation 2010; 122: S250-75. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Xue FS, Yuan YJ, Liao X, Xiong J, Wang Q. Is Glidescope® videolaryngoscope more effective than Macintosh laryngoscope for emergent intubation during chest compression? Resuscitation 2011; 82: 957-8. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Xanthos T, Stroumpoulis K, Bassiakou E, Koudouna E, Pantazopoulos I, Mazarakis A, et al. Glidescope(®) videolaryngoscope improves intubation success rate in cardiac arrest scenarios without chest compressions interruption: a randomized cross-over manikin study. Resuscitation 2011; 82: 464-7. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Stroumpoulis K, Xanthos T, Bassiakou E, Iacovidou N, Koudouna E, Michaloliakou C, et al. Macintosh and Glidescope® performance by Advanced Cardiac Life Support providers: a manikin study. Minerva Anestesiol 2011; 77: 11-6.
  • 6. Yuan YJ, Xue FS, Wang Q, Liu JH, Xiong J, Liao X. Comparison of the tracheal intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope and GlideScope® videolaryngoscope by advanced cardiac life support providers in a manikin study. Minerva Anestesiol 2011; 77: 558-9.
  • 7. Shin DH, Han SK, Choi PC, Sim MS, Lee JH, Park SO. Tracheal intubation during chest compressions performed by qualified emergency physicians unfamiliar with the Pentax-Airwayscope. Eur J Emerg Med 2013; 20: 187-92. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Komasawa N, Atagi K, Ueki R, Nishi S, Kaminoh Y, Tashiro C. Comparison of optic laryngoscope Airtraq(®) and Miller laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2011; 82: 736-9. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Shippey B, Ray D, McKeown D. Case series: the McGrath videolaryngoscope--an initial clinical evaluation. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 307-13. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Noppens RR, Möbus S, Heid F, Schmidtmann I, Werner C, Piepho T. Evaluation of the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope after failed direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 716-20. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Taylor AM, Peck M, Launcelott S, Hung OR, Law JA, MacQuarrie K, et al. The McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 142-7. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Burdett E, Ross-Anderson DJ, Makepeace J, Bassett PA, Clarke SG, Mitchell V. Randomized controlled trial of the A.P. Advance, McGrath, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in normal and difficult intubation scenarios: a manikin study. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 983-8. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Ray DC, Billington C, Kearns PK, Kirkbride R, Mackintosh K, Reeve CS, et al. A comparison of McGrath and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice users: a manikin study. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 1207-10. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Ng I, Sim XL, Williams D, Segal R. A randomised controlled trial comparing the McGrath(®) videolaryngoscope with the straight blade laryngoscope when used in adult patients with potential difficult airways. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 709-14. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Niforopoulou P, Pantazopoulos I, Demestiha T, Koudouna E, Xanthos T. Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54: 1050-61. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Lee YK, Chen CC, Wang TL, Lin KJ, Su YC. Comparison of video and direct laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in emergency settings: A meta-analysis. J Acute Med 2012; 2: 43-9. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Healy DW, Maties O, Hovord D, Kheterpal S. A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation. BMC Anesthesiol 2012; 12: 32. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Rothfield KP, Russo SG. Videolaryngoscopy: should it replace direct laryngoscopy? a pro-con debate. J Clin Anesth 2012; 24: 593-7. [CrossRef]
  • 19. Kim YM, Kim JH, Kang HG, Chung HS, Yim HW, Jeong SH. Tracheal intubation using Macintosh and 2 video laryngoscopes with and without chest compressions. Am J Emerg Med 2011; 29: 682-6. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Koyama J, Iwashita T, Okamoto K. Comparison of three types of laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during rhythmic chest compressions: a manikin study. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 1172-4. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Cook TM, Howes B, Wharton N. Evaluation of airway equipment: man or manikin? Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 529. [CrossRef]
APA Saracoglu A, BEZEN O, ŞENGÜL T, UĞUR E, ŞENER S, YÜZER F (2015). Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?. , 263 - 268.
Chicago Saracoglu Ayten,BEZEN Olgaç,ŞENGÜL Türker,UĞUR Egin Hüsnü,ŞENER Sibel,YÜZER Fisun Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?. (2015): 263 - 268.
MLA Saracoglu Ayten,BEZEN Olgaç,ŞENGÜL Türker,UĞUR Egin Hüsnü,ŞENER Sibel,YÜZER Fisun Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?. , 2015, ss.263 - 268.
AMA Saracoglu A,BEZEN O,ŞENGÜL T,UĞUR E,ŞENER S,YÜZER F Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?. . 2015; 263 - 268.
Vancouver Saracoglu A,BEZEN O,ŞENGÜL T,UĞUR E,ŞENER S,YÜZER F Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?. . 2015; 263 - 268.
IEEE Saracoglu A,BEZEN O,ŞENGÜL T,UĞUR E,ŞENER S,YÜZER F "Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?." , ss.263 - 268, 2015.
ISNAD Saracoglu, Ayten vd. "Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?". (2015), 263-268.
APA Saracoglu A, BEZEN O, ŞENGÜL T, UĞUR E, ŞENER S, YÜZER F (2015). Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, 43(4), 263 - 268.
Chicago Saracoglu Ayten,BEZEN Olgaç,ŞENGÜL Türker,UĞUR Egin Hüsnü,ŞENER Sibel,YÜZER Fisun Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation 43, no.4 (2015): 263 - 268.
MLA Saracoglu Ayten,BEZEN Olgaç,ŞENGÜL Türker,UĞUR Egin Hüsnü,ŞENER Sibel,YÜZER Fisun Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, vol.43, no.4, 2015, ss.263 - 268.
AMA Saracoglu A,BEZEN O,ŞENGÜL T,UĞUR E,ŞENER S,YÜZER F Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation. 2015; 43(4): 263 - 268.
Vancouver Saracoglu A,BEZEN O,ŞENGÜL T,UĞUR E,ŞENER S,YÜZER F Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation. 2015; 43(4): 263 - 268.
IEEE Saracoglu A,BEZEN O,ŞENGÜL T,UĞUR E,ŞENER S,YÜZER F "Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?." Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, 43, ss.263 - 268, 2015.
ISNAD Saracoglu, Ayten vd. "Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?". Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation 43/4 (2015), 263-268.