Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells

Aslan, Sema; TUTUM, Murat; ANIK, Ulku; TEPELİ, Yudum

Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells

Sema ASLAN, (Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Kimya, Bölümü Muğla Türkiye)

Murat TUTUM, (Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Kimya, Bölümü Muğla Türkiye)

Yudum TEPELİ, (Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Kimya, Bölümü Muğla Türkiye)

Ülkü ANIK (Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Kimya, Bölümü Muğla Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Chemistry

0 0

Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 40 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 698 - 705 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells

Öz:

This paper presents a comparative study of nanomaterial modi ed glassy carbon paste electrodes (GCPEs)used as bioanodes in enzymatic biofuel cells. The developed bioanode electrodes were obtained by modi cation ofcomposite GCPEs with glucose oxidase (GOx) and different nanomaterials like manganese(IV) oxide nanoparticle (MnO2np) and aluminum titanate (Al2O3{TiO2) bimetallic nanostructure. These nanostructures were utilized in a GCPE-based enzymatic bioanode construction for the rst time. P-benzoquinone mediator was used for the electron transferbetween enzyme redox center and bioanode electrode where glucose analyte was used as substrate. A laccase-modi edplain GCPE was used as biocathode electrode. Then these electrodes were combined in a membraneless biofuel cell(BFC). The power densities of single cell BFCs were 0.619 W cm2(at 34 mV) for the plain GCPE, 4.57 W cm2(at 76 mV) for the GOx/MnO2np/GCPE, and 1.41 W cm2(at 36 mV) for the GOx/Al2O3{TiO2/GCPE. As aresult, it has been observed that the MnO2np/GOx/GCPE exhibits the best power density. The current density valueof this bioanode has also been examined and found to be 99.21 A cm2in phosphate buffer solution (pH 7) withmaximum open circuit potential of 294 mV.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Mühendislik, Kimya

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1.Kim, H. H.; Mano, N.; Zhang, Y.; Heller, A.J:Electrochem. Soc.2003,150, A209-A213.
2.Heller, A.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2004,6, 209-216.
3.Bunte, C.; Hussein, L.; Gerald, A.J. Power Sour.2014,247, 579-586.
4.Murthy, A. S. N.; Sharma, J.P Indian as-Chem Sci.1997,109, 295-301.
5.Ikeda, T.; Katasho, I.; Kamei, M.; Senda, M.Agr. Biol. Chem. Tokyo1984,48, 1969-1976.
6.Ikeda, T.; Hamada, H.; Miki, K.; Senda, M.Agr. Biol. Chem. Tokyo1985,49, 541-543.
7.Li, J.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Qian, J.; Zhi, J.Electrochim. Acta2013,97, 52-57.
8.Anik, U.; Tutum, M.; Aslan, S.Curr. Anal. Chem.2016,12, 54-59.
9.Liu, C.; Alwarappan, S.; Chen, Z.; Kong, X.; Li, C. Z.Biosens. Bioelectron.2010,25, 1829-1833.
10.Li, Y.; Tang, L.; Li, J.Electrochem. Commun.2009,11, 846-849.
11.Najafabadi, A. T.; Ng, N.; Gyenge, E.Biosens. Bioelectron.2016,81, 103-110.
12.Chen, Y.; Gai, P.; Xue, J. J; Zhang, J. R.; Zhu, J. J.Biosens. Bioelectron.2015,74, 142-149.
13.Kilic, M. S.; Korkut, S.; Hazer, B.; Erhan, E.Biosens. Bioelectron.2014,61, 500-505.
14.Arrocha, A. A.; Castillo, U. C. Aguila, S. A.; Duhalt, R. V.Biosens. Bioelectron.2014,61, 569-574.
15.Cevik, S.; Akpolat, O.; Anik,U.Food Anal. Method.2016,9, 500-504.
16.Yao, S.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Xu, Y.; Hu, S.Anal. Chim. Acta2006,557, 78-84.
17.Hocevar, S. B.; Ogorevc, B.; Schachl, K.; Kalcher, K.Electroanal.2004,16, 1711-1716.
18.Lin, Y.; Cui, X.; Li, L.Electrochem. Commun.2005,7, 166-172.
19.Luo, X. L.; Xu, J. J.; Zhao, W.; Chen, H. Y.Biosens. Bioelectron.2004,19, 1295-1300.
20.Yao, S.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Xu, Y.; Hu, S. Anal.Chim. Acta2006,557, 78-84.
21.Hocevar, S. B.; Ogorevc, B.; Schachl, K.; Kalcher, K.Electroanal.2004,16, 1711-1716.
22.Lin, Y.; Cui, X.; Liyu, L. Electrochem. Commun.2005,7, 166-172.
23.Xu, J. J.; Zhao, W.; Luo, X. L.; Chen, H. Y.Chem. Commun.2005,3, 792-794.
24.Williams, D. L.; Doig, A. R.; Korosi, A.Anal. Chem.1970,42, 118-121.
25.Cubukcu, M.; Ertas, F. N.; Ank,U.Curr. Anal. Chem.2012,8, 351-357.
26.Aslan, S.; Yavuz, Y.; Anik,U.Curr. Anal. Chem.2014,10, 435-442.
27.Yu, J.; Zhao, T.; Zeng, B.Electrochem. Commun.2008,10, 1318-1321.
28.Billik, P.;Caplovicova, M.; Janata, J.; Fajnor, V.S.Mater. Lett.2008,62, 1052-1054.
29.Zebda, A.; Gondran, C.; Le Goff, A.; Holzinger, M.; Cinquin, P.; Cosnier, S.Nat. Commun.2011,2:370 doi:10.1038/ncomms1365.
30.Kilic, M. S.; Korkut, S.; Hazer, B. InEnvironmental Impact II; Passerini G.; Brebbia, C. A., Eds. WIT Transactionson Ecology and the Environment: Ashurst Lodge, Ashurst, Southampton, UK, 2014, pp. 213-224.
31.du Toit, H.; Di Lorenzo, M.Biosens. Bioelectron.2015,69, 199-205.
32.Kim, D. S.; Kim, S. B.; Yang, X.; Lee, J. H.; Yoo, H. Y.; Chun, Y.; Cho, J.; Park, C.; Lee, J.; Kim S. W.J.Electrochem. Soc.2015,162, G113-G118.
33.Wang, S. C.; Yang, F.; Silva, M.; Zarow, A.; Wang, Y.; Iqbal Z.Electrochem. Commun.2009,11, 34-37.

APA	Aslan S, TUTUM M, TEPELİ Y, ANIK U (2016). Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells. , 698 - 705.
Chicago	Aslan Sema,TUTUM Murat,TEPELİ Yudum,ANIK Ulku Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells. (2016): 698 - 705.
MLA	Aslan Sema,TUTUM Murat,TEPELİ Yudum,ANIK Ulku Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells. , 2016, ss.698 - 705.
AMA	Aslan S,TUTUM M,TEPELİ Y,ANIK U Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells. . 2016; 698 - 705.
Vancouver	Aslan S,TUTUM M,TEPELİ Y,ANIK U Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells. . 2016; 698 - 705.
IEEE	Aslan S,TUTUM M,TEPELİ Y,ANIK U "Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells." , ss.698 - 705, 2016.
ISNAD	Aslan, Sema vd. "Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells". (2016), 698-705.

APA	Aslan S, TUTUM M, TEPELİ Y, ANIK U (2016). Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, 40(5), 698 - 705.
Chicago	Aslan Sema,TUTUM Murat,TEPELİ Yudum,ANIK Ulku Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells. Turkish Journal of Chemistry 40, no.5 (2016): 698 - 705.
MLA	Aslan Sema,TUTUM Murat,TEPELİ Yudum,ANIK Ulku Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, vol.40, no.5, 2016, ss.698 - 705.
AMA	Aslan S,TUTUM M,TEPELİ Y,ANIK U Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells. Turkish Journal of Chemistry. 2016; 40(5): 698 - 705.
Vancouver	Aslan S,TUTUM M,TEPELİ Y,ANIK U Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells. Turkish Journal of Chemistry. 2016; 40(5): 698 - 705.
IEEE	Aslan S,TUTUM M,TEPELİ Y,ANIK U "Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells." Turkish Journal of Chemistry, 40, ss.698 - 705, 2016.
ISNAD	Aslan, Sema vd. "Comparison of in uence of nanomaterials on a glassy carbon pasteelectrode-based bioanode in biofuel cells". Turkish Journal of Chemistry 40/5 (2016), 698-705.