Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 72 Sayfa Aralığı: 167 - 183 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Awareness of Technological Terms

Öz:
Purpose: To accomplish the goals of science education, it is essential that science teachers have technological literacy. Thus, we need to determine the awareness of pre-service science teachers expected to possess a basic working knowledge of technological terms. The aim of this study was to examine the candidates’ awareness level of technological terms and to examine the effect of gender, grade level and family income on this awareness. Research Methods: The sample of the current study comprises 212 students. The collected quantitative data were analyzed by using frequencies, percentages and Chisquare test. In the study, the second part of the Questionnaire of Technological Terms Awareness and Knowledge Level was used to collect data. Findings Results of the study revealed that pre-service science teachers having a medium level awareness of technological terms are generally familiar with popular technological terms. Both gender and grade level were found to have a significant influence on the students’ technological terms awareness. On the other hand, the family income level was found to have no significant effect on the students’ awareness levels of technological terms. Implications for Research and Practice: It was found in this study that the pre-service science teachers’ technological terms awareness level is medium. It can be suggested that more space should be allocated for technology-related concepts, applications and terms in the curriculums of science teacher training programs.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akcay, A. (2013). Turkce ogretmeni adaylarının yabanci kokenli bilisim terimlerinin Turkce karsiliklarini bilme yeterliklerinin cesitli degiskenlerden acisindan incelenmesi. [Investigation of the extent to which pre-service Turkish language teachers know the Turkish meanings of the terms of informatics in relation to different variables]. Adıyaman Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi Turkce’nin Egitimi Ogretimi, (Ozel Sayısı), 11, 1-19.
  • Akkoyunlu, B., & Kurbanoglu, S. (2003). Ogretmen adaylarının bilgi okuryazarligi ve bilgisayar oz-yeterlilik algıları uzerine bir calısma [A study on preservice teachers’ information literacy and perceptions of their computer selfefficacy]. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 24, 1-10.
  • Aksoy, H. H. (2003). Egitim kurumlarında teknoloji kullanımı ve etkilerine iliskin bir cozumleme [An analysis of the technology use and its effects in educational institutions]. Egitim Bilim Toplum Dergisi, 1(4), 4-23.
  • Altun, T., Yigit, N., & Adanur, Z. (2011). Ilkogretim ogrencilerinin bilgisayara yonelik tutumlarının incelenmesi: Trabzon ili ornegi [Investigation of elementary school students’ attitudes towards the computer: The case of Trabzon]. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 69-86.
  • Archer, B., & Roberts, P. H. (1979). Design and technological awareness in education. Studies in Design Education Craft and Technology, 12(1), 55-56.
  • Arslan, A. (2006). Bilgisayar destekli egitim yapmaya iliskin tutum olcegi [An attitude scale for conducting computer-assisted teaching]. Yuzuncu Yıl Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 3(2), 24-33.
  • Bacanak, A., Karamustafaoglu, O., & Kose, S. (2003). Yeni bir bakıs: Egitimde teknoloji okuryazarligi [A new viewpoint: Technology literacy in education]. Pamukkale Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 2(14), 191-196.
  • Becker, K. H., & Maunsaiyat, S. (2002). Thai students’ attitudes and concepts of technology. Journal of Technology Education, 13(2), 6-19.
  • Bilecik, A., Caglayan, N., & Guven, E. (2012). Fen ve teknoloji ogretmen adaylarinin teknoloji ve teknolojik urun konusuna yonelik bilgi duzeylerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of pre-service science and technology teachers’ information level about technology and technological product]. X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Egitimi Kongresi, 27-30 Haziran, Nigde.
  • Birgin, O., Coker, B., & Catlioglu, H. (2010). Investigation of first year pre-service teachers’ computer and internet uses in terms of gender. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1588-1592.
  • Burkhardt, G., Monsour, M., Valdez, G., Gunn, C., Dawson, M., Lemke, C., Coughlin, E., Thadani, V., & Martin, C. (2003). Literacy in the digital age. Retrieved February 26, 2016 from http://pict.sdsu.edu/engauge21st.pdf.
  • Canbaz, N. (2010). Yetiskin egitimi kurslarina devam eden kadin kursiyerlerin teknoloji okuryazarligi egitim ihtiyacini belirleme. [Determination of the female course attendees’ need for technological literacy training who are attending adult education courses. (An unpublished master’s thesis)]. Canakkale 18 Mart Universitesi/ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, Canakkale.
  • De Vries, M. J. (1994). Technology education in western europe. Innovations in science and technology education: Paris. UNESCO. Retrieved May 20, 2016 from http://www.iteawww.org/PATT10/Barak.pdf.
  • Dogan, M., Irioglu, Z., Serin, F. G., & Yuzerler, S. (2010). İlkogretim matematik ogretmenlerinin materyal ve teknoloji kullanimina iliskin tutumlari [Elementary school math teachers’ attitudes towards materials and technology use]. IX. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Egitimi Kongresi, 23-25 Eylul, Izmir.
  • European Commission (2013). ICT in schools survey. Retrieved August 10, 2016 from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP- 13-341_en.html
  • Eurydice (2007). The education system in France 2006/07. The Information Database on Education Systems in Europe. Retrieved February 25, 2007 from http://www.eurydice.org.
  • Ginestie, J. (2005). Analysing technology education through the curricular evoluation and the ınvestigation themes, Internetional Conference PATT 15th, 18-22 Nisan, Haarlem, Hollanda. Retrieved February 25, 2016 from http://www.iteaconnect.org/Conference/PATT/PATT15/Ginestie.pdf
  • Hur, J. W., Cullen, T., ve Brush, T. (2010). Teaching for application: A model for assisting preservice teachers with technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(1), 161-182.
  • ITEA (2000). International Technology Education Association (ITEA), Technology for all American project; standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology, Reston, Virginia.
  • Isman, A., Isbulan, O., Demir, Z., & Canan, O. (2008). Egitim fakultesinde ogrenim goren ogretmen adaylarinin internet kullanma bariyerleri [Internet use barriers of preservice teachers attending education faculties]. 8th International Educational Technology Conference (IETC-2008), Eskisehir, 6-9 May 2008.
  • Karal, H., & Berigel, M. (2006). Egitim fakultelerinin ogretmenlerin teknolojiyi egitimde etkin olarak kullanabilme yeterlilikleri uzerine etkileri ve cozum onerileri [The effect of education faculties on teachers' competency of using technology effectively and solution suggestions]. Cukurova Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 2(32), 60-66.
  • Kose, S., Gencer, A., & Gezer, K. (2007). Meslek yuksekokulu ogrencilerinin bilgisayar ve internete yonelik tutumlari [The attitudes of students from vocational schools of higher education towards the computer and internet]. Pamukkale Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 1(21), 44-54.
  • McMillan, H., & J., Schumacher, S. (2006). Researching in education evidence-based ınquiry. (6th Edition) Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
  • MEB. (2006). İlkogretim fen ve teknoloji dersi ogretim programi ve kilavuzu (6., 7. ve 8. siniflar)[ Curriculum and guideline of elementary school science and technology course (6th, 7th and 8th graders)]. Ankara: Milli Egitim Bakanligi Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Baskanlıgı.
  • Menzi, N., Calıskan, E., & Cetin, O. (2012). Ogretmen adaylarinin teknoloji yeterliliklerinin cesitli degiskenler acisindan incelenmesi [Investigation of pre-service teachers’ technology competencies in relation to different variables]. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 2(1), 1-18.
  • Ozsevgec, T., & Yazar, E. (2012). Ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik terim farkindaliklarinin belirlenmesi [Determination of pre-service teachers’ awareness of technological terms]. X. Ulusal Matematik ve Fen Egitimi Kongresi, 27-30 Haziran, Nigde Universitesi: Nigde.
  • Ozsevgec, T., Batman, D., Yazar, E., & Yigit, N. (2014). Ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik terim farkindaliklarinin belirlenmesi [Determination of preservice teachers’ awareness of technological terms]. Egitim ve Bilim, 39(173), 235-248.
  • Pamuk, S. (2007). Pre-Service science and mathematics teachers’ computer related selfefficacy, attitudes and relationship among these variables. (The Degree of Master). Middle East Technical Universty/The Enstitute of The Education, Ankara.
  • Rasinen, A. (2003). An analysis of the technology education curriculum of six countries. Journal of Technology Education, 15(1), 31-47.
  • Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310.
  • Sade, D., & Coll, R. (2003). Technology and technology education: views of some Solomon island primary teachers and curriculum development officers. International Journal of Science And Mathematics Education, 1, 87–114.
  • Seferoglu, S. (2008). İlkogretim okullarinda teknoloji kullanimi: Yasanan sorunlar, gozlemler ve cozum onerileri [Technology use in elementary schools: Problem experienced, observations and solution suggestions]. Tahsilde Qloballasma ve IKT, Beynelxalq Elmi-Praktik Konfrans, 17-19 Mayıs, Baku-Azerbaycan.
  • TDK. (2016). Teknoloji [Technology]. Retrived July 08, 2016 from http://www.tdk.gov.tr.
  • UNESCO, (2008). ICT competency standards for teachers, competency standards modules UK: UNESCO, Retrived July 25, 2017 from http://cst.unescoci.org/sites/projects/cst/The%20Standards/ICTCSTCompetency%20Stand ards%20Modules.pdf.
  • Web, (2003). Technological questions and issues; What is technology?, Retrived July 18, 2017 from http://atschool.eduweb.co.uk/trinity/watistec.html.
  • Yazar, E. (2013). Ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik terim farkindaliklarinin ve bilgi duzeylerinin belirlenmesi. (Yayimlanmamis Yuksek Lisans Tezi) [Determination of pre-service teachers’ technological term awareness and information level. (An unpublished master’s thesis)]. Karadeniz Teknik Universitesi/ Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu, Trabzon.
  • Yilmaz, M. (2007). Sinif ogretmeni yetistirmede teknoloji egitimi [Technology training in educating classroom teachers]. Gazi Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 27(1), 155-167.
APA CAN Ş, KAYMAKCI G (2017). Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Awareness of Technological Terms. , 167 - 183.
Chicago CAN Şendil,KAYMAKCI Guliz Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Awareness of Technological Terms. (2017): 167 - 183.
MLA CAN Şendil,KAYMAKCI Guliz Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Awareness of Technological Terms. , 2017, ss.167 - 183.
AMA CAN Ş,KAYMAKCI G Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Awareness of Technological Terms. . 2017; 167 - 183.
Vancouver CAN Ş,KAYMAKCI G Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Awareness of Technological Terms. . 2017; 167 - 183.
IEEE CAN Ş,KAYMAKCI G "Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Awareness of Technological Terms." , ss.167 - 183, 2017.
ISNAD CAN, Şendil - KAYMAKCI, Guliz. "Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Awareness of Technological Terms". (2017), 167-183.
APA CAN Ş, KAYMAKCI G (2017). Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Awareness of Technological Terms. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17(72), 167 - 183.
Chicago CAN Şendil,KAYMAKCI Guliz Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Awareness of Technological Terms. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 17, no.72 (2017): 167 - 183.
MLA CAN Şendil,KAYMAKCI Guliz Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Awareness of Technological Terms. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, vol.17, no.72, 2017, ss.167 - 183.
AMA CAN Ş,KAYMAKCI G Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Awareness of Technological Terms. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2017; 17(72): 167 - 183.
Vancouver CAN Ş,KAYMAKCI G Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Awareness of Technological Terms. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2017; 17(72): 167 - 183.
IEEE CAN Ş,KAYMAKCI G "Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Awareness of Technological Terms." Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17, ss.167 - 183, 2017.
ISNAD CAN, Şendil - KAYMAKCI, Guliz. "Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Awareness of Technological Terms". Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 17/72 (2017), 167-183.