Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 99 - 103 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5222/terh.2018.099 İndeks Tarihi: 24-01-2020

Could the cytological evaluation of pericardial effusions illuminate our path?

Öz:
Objective: Pericardial effusion (PE) is a common clinical condition that can develop as aresult of systemic or heart disease. In our study, we synthesized the cytopathological andclinical results of patients who underwent pericardiocentesis due to pericardial effusion.Method: A total of 213 patients who underwent percutaneous pericardiocentesis between2007-2017 were included in the study: their cytologic and histopathologic diagnoses werenoted and their relations were examined.Results: Hundred and thirty-two cases were male (61.9%), 81 were female (38.1%) and themean of the study population age was 59.9 (min 13-max 97) years. Hundred and sixty-eightpatients had benign (78.9%), 10 suspicious (4.6%), 3 non-diagnostic (1.4%) and 32 malignant cytologies (15.1%). Benign pericardial effusion was the most common diagnosis.Malignant cytology findings were interpreted as lung carcinoma (n=20: 62.5%), rhabdomyosarcoma (n=1: 3.1%), poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (n=2: 6.2%), a gastrointestinal system carcinoma (n=4: 12.5%), undifferentiated epithelial tumor (n=1: 3.1%),breast carcinoma (n=1: 3.1%), and unspecified malignant tumor (n=3: 9%). Four (2.4%)of the 168 patients having diagnosis of benign cytology had previously received diagnosis ofa malignant disease, however examination of cytological specimen. Did not reveal anymalignancy. Three (30%) of the 10 patients with suspicious cytology, had received diagnosis of a malignant disease previously.Conclusion: In developed countries, it is reported that more than 50% of the PE’s areidiopathic. The percentage of cancer-associated PE’s is 10-25%. In our study, 78.9% ofour cases had a benign diagnosis, and 15.1% had malignant PE consistent with the literature findings. Cytological sampling in pericardial fluid is a method that can shed light onthe diagnosis of many diseases.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Genel ve Dahili Tıp

Perikardiyal efüzyonlarda sitolojik değerlendirme yolumuzu aydınlatabilir mi?

Öz:
Amaç: Perikardiyal efüzyon (PE) sistemik veya kalp hastalıklarının bir sonucu olarak gelişebilen yaygın bir klinik tablodur. Çalışmamızda, perikardiyal efüzyon nedeniyle perikardiyosentez uygulanan hastaların sitopatolojik ve klinik sonuçlarını sentezledik. Yöntem: Çalışmaya 2007-2017 yılları arasında perkütan perikardiyosentez yapılan 213 hasta alınmış, sitolojik ve histopatolojik tanıları not edilmiş ve ilişkileri irdelenmiştir. Bulgular: Olguların 132’si erkek (%61,9), 81’i kadın (%38,1) olup, yaş ortalaması 59,9 (min. 13 - maks. 97)’dur. Sitolojik bulgulara göre; 168’i benign sitoloji (%78,9), 10’u kuşkulu sitoloji (%4,6), 3’ü tanısal olmayan (%1,4) ve 32’si malign sitoloji (%15,1) tanısı almıştır. En sık benign perikardiyal efüzyon tanısı mevcuttur.Malign sitoloji tanılı olguların 20’si akciğer karsinomu (%62,5), 1’i rabdomyosarkom (%3,1), 2’si az diferansiye adenokarsinom (%6,2), 4’ü gastrointestinal sistem ilişkili karsinom (%12,5), 1’i indifferansiye epitelyal tümör (%3,1), 1’i meme karsinomu (%3,1), 3’ü tiplendirme yapılamayan malign tümör (%9) olarak yorumlanmıştır. Benign sitoloji tanılı 168 hastanın 4 (%2,4)’ünün malignite tanısı var olmakla birlikte, sitolojik örneğe yansıyan malignite bulgusu yoktur. Kuşkulu sitoloji olarak tanı almış 10 olgunun 3’ünün (%30) malignite tanısı mevcuttur. Sonuç: Gelişmiş ülkelerde PE’lerin %50’sinden fazlasının idiyopatik olduğu bildirilmektedir. Kanser ilişkili PE’lerin oranı %10-25’tir. Çalışmamızda, literatürle uyumlu olarak %78,9 olgu benign, %15,1 olgu malign PE’dir. Perikardiyal sıvılarda sitolojik örnekleme birçok hastalığın tanısına ışık tutabilen bir inceleme yöntemidir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Genel ve Dahili Tıp
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Bonow RO, Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P. Braunwald’s Heart Disease, 9th ed., Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, 2012. p.1651-2.
  • Jöbsis PD, Ashikaga H, Wen H, Rothstein EC, Horvath KA, McVeigh ER et al. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00967.2007
  • Spodick DH. The Pericardium: A Comprehensive Textbook, Informa Healthcare, London, UK, 1997.
  • Akhter SA. The heart and pericardium. Thoracic Surgery Clinics. 2011;21:205-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2011.01.007
  • Mayosi BM. Contemporary trends in the epidemiology and management of cardiomyopathy and pericarditis in subSaharan Africa. Heart. 2007;93:1176-83. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.127746
  • Mayosi BM, Burgess LJ, Doubell AF. Tuberculous pericarditis. Circulation. 2005;112:3608-16. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.543066
  • Jeong TD, Jang S, Park CJ, Chi HS. Prognostic relevance of pericardial effusion in patients with malignant diseases. Korean J Hematol. 2012;47:237-8. https://doi.org/10.5045/kjh.2012.47.3.237
  • Karatolios K, Alter P, Maisch B. Differentiation of malignant from nonmalignant, inflammatory pericardial effusions with biomarkers. Herz. 2009;34:624-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-009-3304-8
  • Ristic´ AD, Imazio M, Adler Y, Anastasakis A, Badano LP, Brucato A et al. Triage strategy for urgent management of cardiac tamponade: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2279-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu217
  • Halfdanarson TR, Hogan WJ, Moynihan TJ. Oncologic emergencies: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:835-48. https://doi.org/10.4065/81.6.835
  • Gornik HL, Gerhard-Herman M, Beckman JA. Abnormal cytology predicts poor prognosis in cancer patients with pericardial effusion. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5211-6. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.00.745.
  • Mukai K, Shinkai T, Tominaga K, Shimosato Y. The incidence of secondary tumours of the heart and pericardium: a 10 year study. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1988;18:195-201.
  • He B, Yang Z, Zhao P, Li YJ, Wang JG. Cytopathologic analysis of pericardial effusions in 116 cases: Implications for poor prognosis in lung cancer patients with positive interpretations. Diagn Cytopathol. 2017;45(4):287-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.23671
  • Laham RJ, Cohen DJ, Kuntz RE, Baim DS, Lorell BH, Simons M. Pericardial effusion in patients with cancer: outcome with contemporary management strategies. Heart. 1996;75:67-71. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.75.1.67
  • Holdener EE, Ryser DH, Schaermeli K, Spieler P, Angehrn W, Reutter FW et al. Malignant pericardial effusion-a sign of unfavorable prognosis. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1986;116:366-70.
  • Refaat M, Katz W. Neoplastic pericardial effusion. Clin Cardiol. 2011;34:593-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20936
  • Wilkes JD, Fidias P, Vaickus L, Perez RP. Malignancy-related pericardial effusion. 127 Cases from the Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Cancer. 1995;76:1377-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19951015)76:8<1377:: AID-CNCR2820760813>3.0.CO;2-M
  • El Haddad D, Iliescu C, Yusuf SW, William NW, Khair TH, Song J et al. Outcomes of cancer patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1119-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1332
  • Imazio M, Adler Y. Management of pericardial effusion. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1186-97. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs372
  • Dragoescu EA, Liu L. Pericardial fluid cytology: An analysis of 128 specimens over a 6-year period. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121:242-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21246
APA EKMEKÇİ C, Ekmekci S, DERE Y, Adali Y, EKİNCİ S, Cabuk A, ÖKSÜZ P, solmaz h, ÖZDOĞAN Ö (2018). Could the cytological evaluation of pericardial effusions illuminate our path?. , 99 - 103. 10.5222/terh.2018.099
Chicago EKMEKÇİ Cenk,Ekmekci Sumeyye,DERE YELDA,Adali Yasemen,EKİNCİ Selim,Cabuk Ali Kemal,ÖKSÜZ Pınar,solmaz hatice,ÖZDOĞAN Ömer Could the cytological evaluation of pericardial effusions illuminate our path?. (2018): 99 - 103. 10.5222/terh.2018.099
MLA EKMEKÇİ Cenk,Ekmekci Sumeyye,DERE YELDA,Adali Yasemen,EKİNCİ Selim,Cabuk Ali Kemal,ÖKSÜZ Pınar,solmaz hatice,ÖZDOĞAN Ömer Could the cytological evaluation of pericardial effusions illuminate our path?. , 2018, ss.99 - 103. 10.5222/terh.2018.099
AMA EKMEKÇİ C,Ekmekci S,DERE Y,Adali Y,EKİNCİ S,Cabuk A,ÖKSÜZ P,solmaz h,ÖZDOĞAN Ö Could the cytological evaluation of pericardial effusions illuminate our path?. . 2018; 99 - 103. 10.5222/terh.2018.099
Vancouver EKMEKÇİ C,Ekmekci S,DERE Y,Adali Y,EKİNCİ S,Cabuk A,ÖKSÜZ P,solmaz h,ÖZDOĞAN Ö Could the cytological evaluation of pericardial effusions illuminate our path?. . 2018; 99 - 103. 10.5222/terh.2018.099
IEEE EKMEKÇİ C,Ekmekci S,DERE Y,Adali Y,EKİNCİ S,Cabuk A,ÖKSÜZ P,solmaz h,ÖZDOĞAN Ö "Could the cytological evaluation of pericardial effusions illuminate our path?." , ss.99 - 103, 2018. 10.5222/terh.2018.099
ISNAD EKMEKÇİ, Cenk vd. "Could the cytological evaluation of pericardial effusions illuminate our path?". (2018), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.5222/terh.2018.099
APA EKMEKÇİ C, Ekmekci S, DERE Y, Adali Y, EKİNCİ S, Cabuk A, ÖKSÜZ P, solmaz h, ÖZDOĞAN Ö (2018). Could the cytological evaluation of pericardial effusions illuminate our path?. İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi, 28(2), 99 - 103. 10.5222/terh.2018.099
Chicago EKMEKÇİ Cenk,Ekmekci Sumeyye,DERE YELDA,Adali Yasemen,EKİNCİ Selim,Cabuk Ali Kemal,ÖKSÜZ Pınar,solmaz hatice,ÖZDOĞAN Ömer Could the cytological evaluation of pericardial effusions illuminate our path?. İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi 28, no.2 (2018): 99 - 103. 10.5222/terh.2018.099
MLA EKMEKÇİ Cenk,Ekmekci Sumeyye,DERE YELDA,Adali Yasemen,EKİNCİ Selim,Cabuk Ali Kemal,ÖKSÜZ Pınar,solmaz hatice,ÖZDOĞAN Ömer Could the cytological evaluation of pericardial effusions illuminate our path?. İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi, vol.28, no.2, 2018, ss.99 - 103. 10.5222/terh.2018.099
AMA EKMEKÇİ C,Ekmekci S,DERE Y,Adali Y,EKİNCİ S,Cabuk A,ÖKSÜZ P,solmaz h,ÖZDOĞAN Ö Could the cytological evaluation of pericardial effusions illuminate our path?. İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi. 2018; 28(2): 99 - 103. 10.5222/terh.2018.099
Vancouver EKMEKÇİ C,Ekmekci S,DERE Y,Adali Y,EKİNCİ S,Cabuk A,ÖKSÜZ P,solmaz h,ÖZDOĞAN Ö Could the cytological evaluation of pericardial effusions illuminate our path?. İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi. 2018; 28(2): 99 - 103. 10.5222/terh.2018.099
IEEE EKMEKÇİ C,Ekmekci S,DERE Y,Adali Y,EKİNCİ S,Cabuk A,ÖKSÜZ P,solmaz h,ÖZDOĞAN Ö "Could the cytological evaluation of pericardial effusions illuminate our path?." İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi, 28, ss.99 - 103, 2018. 10.5222/terh.2018.099
ISNAD EKMEKÇİ, Cenk vd. "Could the cytological evaluation of pericardial effusions illuminate our path?". İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi 28/2 (2018), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.5222/terh.2018.099