Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System

Fatih ÖZDEN, (Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Muğla, Turkey)
Nazan TUĞAY, (Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Muğla, Turkey)
Baki Umut TUĞAY, (Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Muğla, Turkey)
Cem Yalın KILINÇ (Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Muğla, Turkey)
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
32 0
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 53 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 184 - 188 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.003 İndeks Tarihi: 31-10-2019

Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System

Öz:
Objective: To translate the New Knee Society Scoring System (KSS) into Turkish and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the translated questionnaire. Methods: This study was conductedon 66 knees of 43 pre-op patients whowere scheduled for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 50 knees of 26 knee arthroplasty patients at least 6 months postoperatively. KSS was translated and culturally adapted according to the guidelines of Guillemin and Beaton. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded. Patients completed WOMAC, KOOS and SF-36 surveys along with the Turkishversion of the newKSS. Afterthe initial evaluation, patients were asked to refill the new KSS 1 week later. Internal consistency and reliability were tested using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Validity was assessed by calculating the Spearman's correlation coefficient between the new KSS and WOMAC, KOOS and SF-36 scores. Results: The mean ages of the pre and post-operative groups were 67.16 ± 7.85 years and 71.65 ± 6.95 years respectively. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the new KSS calculated for symptoms (0.814), patient satisfaction (0.947), patient expectations (pre-op ¼ 1.000, post-op ¼ 0.997) and functional activities (0.864) were high. The ICC scores ranged between 0.790 and 0.951. The pain subscore of the new KSS and the pain subscores of the WOMAC (r¼0.720; p < 0.01), KOOS (r ¼ 0.550; p < 0.01) and SF-36 (r ¼0.434; p < 0.01) were highly correlated. Emotional role functioning (RH), mental health (MH) and social role functioning (SF) subscores of SF-36 showed no correlation with the all subscores of the new KSS (p > 0.05). No floor or ceiling effects in the new KSS scores were detected. Conclusion: It is concluded that the new KSS is a valid and reliable questionnaire which can be used in evaluating the pre and post-operative Turkish speaking TKA patients.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Ortopedi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Heidari B. Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: Part I. Casp J Intern Med. 2011;2(2):205e212.
  • Felson DT, Naimark A, Anderson J, Kazis L, Castelli W, Meenan RF. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum. 1987 Aug;30(8):914e918.
  • Ornetti P, Parratte S, Gossec L, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in knee osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Apr;16(4): 423e428.
  • Fibel KH, Hillstrom HJ, Halpern BC. State of the Art management of knee osteoarthritis. World J Clin Cases. 2015 Feb;3(2):89e101.
  • Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, et al. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):45e51.
  • Mota REM, Tarricone R, Ciani O, Bridges JF, Drummond M. Determinants of demand for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul;12(1):225e242.
  • Gray CF, Bozic KJ. Epidemiology, cost, and health policy related to total knee arthroplasty. Curr Orthopaedic Pract. 2015;26(3):212e216.
  • Ceyhan E, Gursoy S, Akkaya M, Ugurlu M, Koksal I, Bozkurt M. Toward the Turkish national registry system: a prevalence study of total knee arthroplasty in Turkey. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9):1878e1884.
  • Franklin PD, Li W, Ayers DC. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: functional outcomeafter total kneereplacement varieswith patientattributes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(11):2597e2604.
  • Mannion AF, K€ampfen S, Munzinger U, Kramers-de Quervain I. The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009 Sep;11(5):139e151.
  • Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Clements KE, Zeni JA, Irrgang JJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Measuring functional improvement after total knee arthroplasty requires both performance-based and patient-report assessments: a longitudinal analysis of outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Aug;26(5):728e737.
  • Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;248(248):13e14.
  • Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN. The new knee society knee scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):3e19.
  • Noble PC, Scuderi GR, Brekke AC, et al. Development of a new Knee Society scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):20e32.
  • Debette C, Parratte S, Maucort-Boulch D, et al. French adaptation of the new Knee Society Scoring System for total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Sep;100(5):531e534.
  • Van Der Straeten C, Witvrouw E, Willems T, Bellemans J, Victor J. Translation andvalidation of the Dutch new knee society scoring system©. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3565e3571.
  • Hamamoto Y, Ito H, Furu M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Japanese version of the new Knee Society Scoring System for osteoarthritic knee with total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2015 Sep;20(5):849e853.
  • Liu D, He X, Zheng W, et al. Translation and validation of the simplified Chinese new knee society scoring system. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Dec;16: 291e396.
  • Kim SJ, Basur MS, Park CK, et al. Crosscultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the new Knee Society knee scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(6):1629e1639.
  • e Silva ALP, Croci AT, Gobbi RG, Hinckel BB, Pecora JR, Demange MK. Translation and validation of the new version of the knee society score e the 2011 KS score e into Brazilian Portuguese. Rev Bras Ortop. 2017;52(4):506e510.
  • Kacar C, Gilgil E, Urhan S, et al. The prevalence of symptomatic knee and distal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis in the urban population of Antalya, Turkey. Rheumatol Int. 2005 Apr;25(3):201e204.
  • Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of healthrelated quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417e1432.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000 Dec;25(24): 3186e3191.
  • Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. CRC press; 1990.
  • The 2011 Knee Society Knee Scoring System© Licenced User Manual. The Knee Society; 2012 [cited 2017 08/August]. Available from: http://kneesociety.org/ wp-content/uploads/2017/08/2011-KSS-User-Manual_FINAL_12-2012.pdf.
  • Tüzün E, Eker L, Aytar A, Das¸kapan A, Bayramoğlu M. Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005 Jan;13(1):28e33.
  • Evcik D, Ay S, Ege A, Turel A, Kavuncu V. Adaptation and validation of Turkish version of the knee outcome survey-activities for daily living scale. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Aug;467(8):2077e2082.
  • Koçyigit H, Aydemir O, Olmez N, Memis A. (KF-36)'nın Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliği ve geçerliği Romatizmal Hastalığı olan bir grup hasta ile çalışma. ilaç ve Tedavi Dergisi. 1999;12(2):102e106.
  • Tuğay U, Tuğay N, Gelecek N, özkan M. Oxford Shoulder Score: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 May;131(5):687e694.
  • Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, Jones EC, Warren RF. A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Aug;56(8):730e735.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34e42.
APA Özden F, TUĞAY N, TUĞAY B, kilinc c (2019). Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System. , 184 - 188. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.003
Chicago Özden Fatih,TUĞAY Nazan,TUĞAY BAKİ UMUT,kilinc cem yalin Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System. (2019): 184 - 188. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.003
MLA Özden Fatih,TUĞAY Nazan,TUĞAY BAKİ UMUT,kilinc cem yalin Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System. , 2019, ss.184 - 188. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.003
AMA Özden F,TUĞAY N,TUĞAY B,kilinc c Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System. . 2019; 184 - 188. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.003
Vancouver Özden F,TUĞAY N,TUĞAY B,kilinc c Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System. . 2019; 184 - 188. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.003
IEEE Özden F,TUĞAY N,TUĞAY B,kilinc c "Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System." , ss.184 - 188, 2019. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.003
ISNAD Özden, Fatih vd. "Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System". (2019), 184-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.003
APA Özden F, TUĞAY N, TUĞAY B, kilinc c (2019). Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 53(3), 184 - 188. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.003
Chicago Özden Fatih,TUĞAY Nazan,TUĞAY BAKİ UMUT,kilinc cem yalin Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 53, no.3 (2019): 184 - 188. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.003
MLA Özden Fatih,TUĞAY Nazan,TUĞAY BAKİ UMUT,kilinc cem yalin Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol.53, no.3, 2019, ss.184 - 188. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.003
AMA Özden F,TUĞAY N,TUĞAY B,kilinc c Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2019; 53(3): 184 - 188. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.003
Vancouver Özden F,TUĞAY N,TUĞAY B,kilinc c Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2019; 53(3): 184 - 188. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.003
IEEE Özden F,TUĞAY N,TUĞAY B,kilinc c "Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System." Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 53, ss.184 - 188, 2019. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.003
ISNAD Özden, Fatih vd. "Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the New Knee Society Scoring System". Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 53/3 (2019), 184-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.003
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 9:10

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları