Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 191 - 199 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.3153/AR19018 İndeks Tarihi: 19-10-2020

REMARKS ON SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN THE LOWER SAKARYA RIVER (TURKEY): EXPLOITED SPECIES AND CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT (CPUE)

Öz:
The aim of this study was to determine the exploitation of 7 freshwater species, Freshwater bream(Abramis brama Linnaeus, 1758), Vimba bream (Vimba vimba Linnaeus, 1758), Wels catfish (Silurus glanis Linnaeus, 1758), Roach (Rutilus rutilus Linnaeus, 1758), European perch (Perca fluviatilis Linnaeus, 1758), Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio Bloch, 1782) and White bream (Bliccabjoerkna Linnaeus, 1758), from Lower Sakarya River, Turkey. Samplings were conducted fromJune 2017 to May 2018. Length-based estimations were evaluated in FiSAT II software. Total (Z),natural (M), fishing (Fcurr) mortality, exploitation rate (Ecurr) and CPUEs of all 7 species were determined. Results showed that almost all reference points stayed below the natural and fisheriesmortality values. Besides overfishing, pollutants (chemical, physical and biological) and changesin the river morphology may affect the fish populations. Study results could be used for furtherfisheries management applications.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Acarlı, D., Kara, A., Bayhan, B., Çoker, T. (2009). Homa lagünü' nden (İzmir Körfezi, Ege Denizi) Yakalanan Türlerin Av Kompozisyonu ve Av Verimi. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 26(1), 39-47.
  • Allan, J.D., Abell, R., Hogan, Z., Revenga, C., Taylor, B.W., Welcomme, R.L., Winemiller, K. (2005). Overfishing of inland waters. BioScience, 55, 1041-1051. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006- 3568(2005)055[1041:OOIW]2.0.CO;2
  • Alp, A, Balık, S. (2000). Growth conditions and stock analysis of the carp (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758) population in Gölhisar Lake. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 24, 291-304.
  • Anonymous (2019). Hidroelektrik-Sakarya Nehri. https://www.enerjiatlasi.com/akarsular/sakarya-nehri.html (accessed 04.02.2019)
  • Arthington A.H., Lorenzen K., Pusey B.J., Abell R., Halls, A., Winemiller K.O., Arrington D.A., Baran E. (2004). River fisheries: ecological basis for management and conservation. In Welcomme R. & T. Petr (Eds.). Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Management of Large Rivers for Fisheries Volume I (p. 31-60), FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand. RAP Publication 2004/16.
  • Balcıoğlu, E.B., Öztürk, B. (2009). Oil pollution in the surface water of Sakarya River. Journal of the Black Sea / Mediterranean Environment, 15, 99-108.
  • Balık, İ., Çubuk, H., Özkök, R., Uysal, R. (2006). Some characteristics and size of carp (Cyprinus carpio L., 1758) population in the Lake Karamık (Afyonkarahisar/Turkey). Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 6, 117-122.
  • Cooke, S.J., Arthington, A.H., Bonar, S.A., Bower, S.D., Bunnel, D.B., Entsua-Mensah, R., Funge-Smith, S., Koehn, J., Lester, N., Lorenzen, K., Nam, S., Randall, R., Venturelli, P.A., Cowx, I.G. (2016). Assessment of inland fisheries: a vision for the future. In W.W. Taylor, D.M. Bartley, C.I. Goddard, N.J. Leonard & R. Welcomme (Eds.). Freshwater, fish, and the future: proceedings of the global cross-sectoral conference (p. 45-62), American Fisheries Society Press, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Datta, S. (2015). Effect of Aquatic Pollution on fish & fisheries. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259263619_Effect_of_Aquatic_Pollution_on_fish_fisheries (accessed 18.09.2019)
  • Dündar, M.S., Altundağ, H. (2018). Determination of some major and trace elements in the lower Sakarya River water by ICP-MS. Journal of Chemical Metrology, 12(2), 128-139. https://doi.org/10.25135/jcm.22.18.11.1073
  • FAO (2013). The Youth Guide to Biodiversity. http://www.fao.org/3/i3157e/i3157e.pdf (accessed 20.09.2019)
  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), MSU (Michigan State University) (2016). The Rome declaration: 10 steps to responsible inland fisheries. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome and Michigan State University, East Lansing. p. 11.
  • FAO (2018). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018 - Meeting the sustainable development goals. Rome. p. 227.
  • Gayanilo, F.C. Jr., Sparre, P., Pauly, D. (2002). The FAOICLARM Stock Assessment Tools II (FiSAT II Ver. 1.0). http://www.fao.org/fi/statist/fisoft/fisat/index.htm (accessed 15.01.2019)
  • Gulland, J.A. (1971). The Fish Resources of the Ocean. Fishing News (Books), West Byfleet. p. 255.
  • Hamilton, P.B., Cowx, I.G., Oleksiak, M.F., Griffiths, A.M., Grahn, M., Stevens, J.R., Carvalho, G.R., Nicol, E., Tyler, C.R. (2016). Population‐level consequences for wild fish exposed to sublethal concentrations of chemicals - a critical review. Fish and Fisheries. 17, 545-566. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12125
  • IPBES (2019). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. S. Díaz, J. Settele, E. S. Brondizio E.S., H.T. Ngo, M. Guèze, J. Agard, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, K.A. Brauman, S.H.M. Butchart, K.M.A. Chan, L.A. Garibaldi, K. Ichii, J. Liu, S.M. Subramanian, G.F. Midgley, P. Miloslavich, Z. Molnár, D. Obura, A. Pfaff, S. Polasky, A. Purvis, J. Razzaque, B. Reyers, R. Roy Chowdhury, Y.J. Shin, I.J. Visseren-Hamakers, K.J. Willis, and C.N. Zayas (Eds.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. p. 25.
  • Işık, S., Doğan, E., Kalın, L., Sasal, M., Ağıralioğlu, N. (2008). Effects of anthropogenic activities on the lower Sakarya River. Catena, 75, 172-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.06.001
  • Jakubaviciute, E,. Putys, Z., Dainys, J., Lozys, L. (2011). Perch (Perca fluviatilis) growth, mortality and stock exploitation by 40-45 mm mesh-sized gillnet fishery in the Curonian Lagoon. Acta Zoologica Lithuania, 21(3), 215-220. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10043-011-0026-y
  • Karataş, E., Karataş, A. (2017). The importance of fishery production as an income source in Turkey. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences, 4(1), 38-53.
  • KIMO, (2010). Incident Highlights the Real Cost of Marine Litter. http://www.kimointernational.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/KIMO_Economic-Impacts-of-Marine-Litter.pdf (accessed 15.09.2018)
  • Köse, E., Tokatlı, C., Çiçek, A. (2014). Monitoring stream water quality: A statistical evaluation. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 23(5), 1637-1647.
  • Lymer, D., Marttin, F., Marmulla, G., Bartley, D.M. (2016). A global estimate of theoretical annual inland capture fisheries harvest. In W.W. Taylor, D.M. Bartley, C.I. Goddard, N.J. Leonard & R. Welcomme (Eds.). Freshwater, fish, and the future: proceedings of the global cross-sectoral conference (p. 63-75). American Fisheries Society Press, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Parker, H., Oates, N. (2016). How do healthy rivers benefit society? A review of the evidence. Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London, United Kingdom. Report to WWFUK, Woking, United Kingdom. p. 73.
  • Patterson, K. (1992). Fisheries for small pelagic species: an empirical approach to management targets. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2, 321-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043521
  • Pauly, D. (1980). On the interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks. Journal du Conseil / Conseil Permanent International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, 39(20), 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/39.2.175
  • Ricker W.E. (1975). Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 191, 1-382.
  • Taylor, W.W., Bartley, D.M., Goddard, C.I., Leonard, N.J., Welcomme, R. (2016). Freshwater, fish and the future: proceedings of the global cross-sectoral conference. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome; Michigan State University, East Lansing; American Fisheries Society Press, Bethesda, Maryland. p. 351.
  • TUİK, (2017). Su ürünleri istatistikleri. http://tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1005 (accessed 15.09.2018)
  • Von Bertalanffy, L. (1957). Quantitative laws in metabolism and growth. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 32(3), 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1086/401873
APA CERİM H, REİS İ, ATEŞ C (2019). REMARKS ON SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN THE LOWER SAKARYA RIVER (TURKEY): EXPLOITED SPECIES AND CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT (CPUE). , 191 - 199. 10.3153/AR19018
Chicago CERİM Hasan,REİS İsmail,ATEŞ Celal REMARKS ON SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN THE LOWER SAKARYA RIVER (TURKEY): EXPLOITED SPECIES AND CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT (CPUE). (2019): 191 - 199. 10.3153/AR19018
MLA CERİM Hasan,REİS İsmail,ATEŞ Celal REMARKS ON SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN THE LOWER SAKARYA RIVER (TURKEY): EXPLOITED SPECIES AND CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT (CPUE). , 2019, ss.191 - 199. 10.3153/AR19018
AMA CERİM H,REİS İ,ATEŞ C REMARKS ON SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN THE LOWER SAKARYA RIVER (TURKEY): EXPLOITED SPECIES AND CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT (CPUE). . 2019; 191 - 199. 10.3153/AR19018
Vancouver CERİM H,REİS İ,ATEŞ C REMARKS ON SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN THE LOWER SAKARYA RIVER (TURKEY): EXPLOITED SPECIES AND CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT (CPUE). . 2019; 191 - 199. 10.3153/AR19018
IEEE CERİM H,REİS İ,ATEŞ C "REMARKS ON SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN THE LOWER SAKARYA RIVER (TURKEY): EXPLOITED SPECIES AND CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT (CPUE)." , ss.191 - 199, 2019. 10.3153/AR19018
ISNAD CERİM, Hasan vd. "REMARKS ON SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN THE LOWER SAKARYA RIVER (TURKEY): EXPLOITED SPECIES AND CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT (CPUE)". (2019), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.3153/AR19018
APA CERİM H, REİS İ, ATEŞ C (2019). REMARKS ON SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN THE LOWER SAKARYA RIVER (TURKEY): EXPLOITED SPECIES AND CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT (CPUE). Aquatic Research, 2(4), 191 - 199. 10.3153/AR19018
Chicago CERİM Hasan,REİS İsmail,ATEŞ Celal REMARKS ON SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN THE LOWER SAKARYA RIVER (TURKEY): EXPLOITED SPECIES AND CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT (CPUE). Aquatic Research 2, no.4 (2019): 191 - 199. 10.3153/AR19018
MLA CERİM Hasan,REİS İsmail,ATEŞ Celal REMARKS ON SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN THE LOWER SAKARYA RIVER (TURKEY): EXPLOITED SPECIES AND CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT (CPUE). Aquatic Research, vol.2, no.4, 2019, ss.191 - 199. 10.3153/AR19018
AMA CERİM H,REİS İ,ATEŞ C REMARKS ON SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN THE LOWER SAKARYA RIVER (TURKEY): EXPLOITED SPECIES AND CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT (CPUE). Aquatic Research. 2019; 2(4): 191 - 199. 10.3153/AR19018
Vancouver CERİM H,REİS İ,ATEŞ C REMARKS ON SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN THE LOWER SAKARYA RIVER (TURKEY): EXPLOITED SPECIES AND CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT (CPUE). Aquatic Research. 2019; 2(4): 191 - 199. 10.3153/AR19018
IEEE CERİM H,REİS İ,ATEŞ C "REMARKS ON SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN THE LOWER SAKARYA RIVER (TURKEY): EXPLOITED SPECIES AND CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT (CPUE)." Aquatic Research, 2, ss.191 - 199, 2019. 10.3153/AR19018
ISNAD CERİM, Hasan vd. "REMARKS ON SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN THE LOWER SAKARYA RIVER (TURKEY): EXPLOITED SPECIES AND CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT (CPUE)". Aquatic Research 2/4 (2019), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.3153/AR19018