Yıl: 2006 Cilt: 52 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 42 - 47 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Servikal spondilotik myelopati

Öz:
Servikal spondilotik myelopati servikal spondilozun en ağır komplikasyonlarındandır. Servikal myelopatinin başlangıcı sinsidir, 50-60 yaşlarında görülür. Derin sızlama ve yanma hissi ile ince el becerilerinin azalması, üst ekstremitelerde güç azalması, dizestezi, yazı yazmada zorluk, yürüme zorluğu, denge bozukluğu ilk şikayetler arasındadır. Erken evrelerde radiküler/sinir kök tutulumlarıyla karışarak tanısı atlanır. Fizik muayenede lezyon seviyesinde alt motor nöron bulguları saptanırken, lezyon seviyesi altında üst motor nöron bulguları saptanır. L'Hermitte ve Spurling bulguları yanı sıra patolojik refleksler ortaya çıkabilir. SSM tanısında görüntüleme yöntemleri çok önemlidir ve bunlar lateral grafiler, intratekal kontrastlı bilgisayarlı tomografi, Myelografik bilgisayarlı tomografi ile manyetik rezonans görüntülemedir. Lateral grafide Torg veya Pavlov oranı ölçülür ve bu oranın 0,8-0,7'ye inmesi halinde premyelopatiden söz edilebilir. Tanıda diğer yöntemler arasında elektromiyografi, somatosensoriyel uyandırılmış potansiyeller, motor uyandırılmış potansiyeller ve ürodinamik incelemeler vardır. Yapılan çoğu çalışmada konservatif tedavinin etkinliğinin düşük olduğunu savunulurken, iyi bir muayene ardından yapılan yoğun konservatif tedavinin de başarılı sonuçlar vereceği söylenmektedir. Konservatif tedavide servikal traksiyon, servikal immobilizasyon ve diğer fizik tedavi ajanları kullanılabilir, ancak bunlara yönelik yapılan çalışmalar yetersizdir. Araştırıcılar cerrahinin semptomların başlangıcından itibaren ilk 18 ay içinde yapılmasının daha başarılı sonuçlar verdiğini bildirmişlerdir.
Anahtar Kelime: Spinal osteopitoz Omurilik hastalıkları

Konular: Radyoloji, Nükleer Tıp, Tıbbi Görüntüleme

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Öz:
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is the most serious complication of cervical spondylosis and has an insidious onset at the fifth to sixth decades of life. The initial symptoms are deep aching and burning sensation, loss of fine motor control and muscular strength of the upper extremities, dysesthesias, difficulty in writing and walking as well as balance impairments. Early symptoms may mimic radicular/nerve root involvement leading to misdiagnosis. Physical examination demonstrates lower motor neuron symptoms at the lesion level and upper motor neuron symptoms below the level of the lesion. Pathological reflexes as well as L'Hermitte and Spurling signs may also be present. Lateral cervical roentgenograms and imaging studies, intrathecal contrast computerized tomography, myelo-computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are the main tools for diagnosis. Lateral X-rays are helpful in measuring Torg and Pavlov ratio where the decrease to 0.8-0.7 may point out premyelopathy. Electromyography, somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials as well as urodynamic investigations are also used in the diagnosis. In most studies it was concluded that conservative treatment had lower efficacy, however, intensive treatment following a comprehensive physical examination lead to better results. Cervical traction, cervical immobilization and other physical therapy agents may be used in conservative therapy, but there is limited evidence for this hypothesis. The researchers declared that during the first 18 months after diagnosis of surgical treatment may demonstrate positive outcome.
Anahtar Kelime: Spinal Cord Diseases Spinal Osteophytosis

Konular: Radyoloji, Nükleer Tıp, Tıbbi Görüntüleme
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Fehlings MG, Skaf G. A review of the pathophysiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with insights for potential novel mechanisms drawn from spinal cord injury. Spine 1998;23(24):2730-7.
  • 2. Clark CR. Differental diagnosis and non-operative management. In: Frymoyer JW, editor. The Adult Spine: Principles and Practice. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; l997. p. 1323-47.
  • 3. O'Duffy JD. Spinal stenosis, development of the lesion, clinical classification and presentation. In: Frymoyer JW, editor. The Adult Spine: Principles and Practice 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; l997. p. 719-69.
  • 4. Kim DH, Vaccaro AR, Henderson FC, Benzel EC. Molecular biology of cervical myelopathy and spinal cord injury: role of oligodendrocyte apoptosis. Spine 2003;3(6):510-9.
  • 5. Young WF. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in older persons. Am Fam Physician 2000;62(5):1064-73.
  • 6. Denno JJ, Meadows GR. Early diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, a useful clinical sign. Spine 1991;16:353-5.
  • 7. Fregni F, Conceicao Souza GE, Taricco MA, Mutarelli EG. Phrenic paresis and respiratory insufficiency associated with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Neurochir 2004;146(3):309-12.
  • 8. Henderson FC, Geddes JF, Vaccaro AR, Woodard E, Berry KJ, Benzel EC. Stretch-associated injury in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: new concept and review. Neurosurgery 2005;56(5):1101-3.
  • 9. Vo AN, Kamen LB, Shih VC, Bitar AA, Stitik TP, Kaplan RJ. Rehabilitation of orthopedic and rheumatologic disorders. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:69-76.
  • 10. Crandall PH, Batzdorf U. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 1966;25:57-66.
  • 11. Ebara S, Yonnenobu K, Fujiwara K, Yamashita K, Ono K. Myelopathic hand characterized by muscle wasting. A different type of myelopathy hand in patients with cervical spondylosis. Spine 1988;13:785-91.
  • 12. Dvorak J. Epidemiology, physical examination and neurodiagnostics. Spine 1998;23:2663-73.
  • 13. King JT Jr, McGinnis KA, Roberts MS. Quality of life assessment with the medical outcomes study short form-36 among patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery 2003;52(1):113-20.
  • 14. King JT Jr, Tsevat J, Moossy JJ, Roberts MS. Preference-based quality of life measurement in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2004;29(11):1271-80.
  • 15. Nurick S. The pathogenesis of spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 1972;95:87-100.
  • 16. Torq JS. Pavlov's ratio: Determining cervical spinal stenosis on routine lateral roentgenograms. Contemp Orthop l989;18:153-60.
  • 17. Edwards WC, laRocca H. The developmental segmenter sagittal diameter of the cervical spine canal in patients with cervical spondylosis. Spine 1983;8:20-7.
  • 18. Penning L, Wilmink JJ. CT myelographic findings in degenerative disorders of the cervical spine: clinical significance. AJR 1986;146:793-801.
  • 19. Fukui K, Kataoka O, Sho T, Sumi M. Pathomechanism, pathogenesis and results of treatment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy caused by dynamic canal stenosis. Spine 1990;11:148-52.
  • 20. Maksumo M, Toyama Y. Increased signal intensity of the spinal cord on magnetic resonance images in cervical compressive myelopathy. Does it predict out come of conservative treatment. Spine 2000;25:677-82.
  • 21. Carr RG. The physiatrist and cervical spondylosis. In: Saunders RL, Bernini PM, editors. Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1992. p. 96-109.
  • 22. Yoshimatsu H, Nagata K, Goto H, Sonoda K, Ando N, Imoto H, Mashima T, Takamiya Y. Conservative treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy:prediction of treatment effects by multivariate analysis. Spine 2001;1(4):269-73.
  • 23. Oostveen J C, J van de Laar M, Geelen J. Successful conservative treatment of rheumatoid subaxial subluxation resulting in improvement of myelopathy, reduction of subluxation and stabilisation of the servical spine. A report of two cases. Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58:126-9.
  • 24. Kaminsky SB, Clark CR, Traynelis VC. Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. A comparison of laminectomy and laminoplasty at five year average follow-up. Iowa Orthop J 2004;24:95-105.
  • 25. Kadanka Z, Mares M, Bednarik J, Smrcka V, Krbec M, Chaloupka R, Dusek L. Predictive factors for mild forms of spondylotic cervical myelopathy treated conservatively or surgically. Eur J Neurol 2005;12(1):16-24.
  • 26. Amasson O, Carlsson JA, Peilettieri L:Surgical and conservative treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. Acta Neurochir 1987:84(1-2):48-53.
  • 27. Wang YL, Tsau JC, Huang MH. The prognosis of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 1997;13(7):425-31.
  • 28. BenEliyahu D. Cervical myelopathy and spinal stenosis. Dynamic Chriopractic 1998;18:1-4.
  • 29. Sekhon LH. Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16(4):307-13.
  • 30. Singh A, Crockard NA. Quantitative assesment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by a simple walking test. Lancet 1999;354(9176):370-3.
  • 31. Latimer M, Haden N, Seeley HM, Laing RJ. Measurement of outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically. Br J Neurosurg 2002;16(6):545-9.
  • 32. Boehm H, Greiner-Perth R, El-Saghir H, Allam Y. A new minimally invasive posterior approach for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy: surgical technique and preliminary results. Eur Spine J 2003;12(3):268-73.
APA Sahin N, BERKER E (2006). Servikal spondilotik myelopati. , 42 - 47.
Chicago Sahin Nilay,BERKER Ender Servikal spondilotik myelopati. (2006): 42 - 47.
MLA Sahin Nilay,BERKER Ender Servikal spondilotik myelopati. , 2006, ss.42 - 47.
AMA Sahin N,BERKER E Servikal spondilotik myelopati. . 2006; 42 - 47.
Vancouver Sahin N,BERKER E Servikal spondilotik myelopati. . 2006; 42 - 47.
IEEE Sahin N,BERKER E "Servikal spondilotik myelopati." , ss.42 - 47, 2006.
ISNAD Sahin, Nilay - BERKER, Ender. "Servikal spondilotik myelopati". (2006), 42-47.
APA Sahin N, BERKER E (2006). Servikal spondilotik myelopati. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 52(1), 42 - 47.
Chicago Sahin Nilay,BERKER Ender Servikal spondilotik myelopati. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 52, no.1 (2006): 42 - 47.
MLA Sahin Nilay,BERKER Ender Servikal spondilotik myelopati. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, vol.52, no.1, 2006, ss.42 - 47.
AMA Sahin N,BERKER E Servikal spondilotik myelopati. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2006; 52(1): 42 - 47.
Vancouver Sahin N,BERKER E Servikal spondilotik myelopati. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2006; 52(1): 42 - 47.
IEEE Sahin N,BERKER E "Servikal spondilotik myelopati." Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 52, ss.42 - 47, 2006.
ISNAD Sahin, Nilay - BERKER, Ender. "Servikal spondilotik myelopati". Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 52/1 (2006), 42-47.