Yıl: 2007 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 158 - 166 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: An experimental study

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmada sirküler trakeal rekonstrüksiyon için farklı prefabrike modellerin karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Otuz adet erişkin dişi Yeni Zelanda tavşanı, farklı doku kombinasyonuyla sirküler trakeal rekonstrüksiyon için altı gruba ayrıldı. Prefabrike edilmiş trakealarda anastomoz yapılmadı. Vasküler kaynak olarak lateral torasik fasya veya pektoralis majör kası; iskeletsel çatı olarak polipropilen mesh, politetrafloroetilen (Gore-Tex) veya yüzük kartilajlar kullanıldı. İç yüzey tüysüz epitelyal deri greftinden sağlandı. Gruplar tüysüz epitel greftinin canlılığı, longitüdinal esneklik, dayanıklılık, flep duvar kalınlığı, iç çap ve flep canlılığı açısından karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Polipropilen mesh gruplarında tama yakın epitelyal deri grefti canlılığı görülürken (%95-%99), Gore-Tex gruplarında tama yakın nekroz gözlendi (%74-%71). Longitüdinal esneklik ve dayanıklılık Gore-Tex ve polipropilen mesh gruplarında normal trakeaya yakın ölçülerde bulundu. Kartilaj greftleri ile prefabrikasyon yapılan gruplar normalden fazla longitüdinal esneklik ve kolayca kollaps gösterdi. Sonuç: İskeletsel çatı olarak polipropilen mesh, vasküler kaynak olarak lateral torasik fasyanın kullanıldığı prefabrike model, sirküler trakea defektlerinin rekonstrüksiyonunda en iyi seçenek olarak görünmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

Sirküler trakeal rekonstrüksiyonda farklı yöntemlerin karşılaştırılması: Deneysel çalışma

Öz:
Objectives: This study was designed to compare different préfabrication models for circumferential tracheal reconstruction. Materials and Methods: Thirty adult female New Zealand rabbits were divided into six groups for circumferential tracheal reconstruction with a different tissue combination. Préfabrication of neotrachea was performed without anastomosis. Lateral thoracic fascia or pectoralis major muscle were used for vascular supply. Polypropylene mesh, polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex), or cartilage rings were used for skeletal framework. Hairless epithelial skin graft was used for inner lining. The groups were compared in terms of viability of hairless epithelial graft, longitudinal flexibility, rigidity, flap wall thickness, internal diameter, and flap viability. Results: Epithelial skin graft was almost totally viable (95%-99%) in the polypropylene mesh groups.. Gore-Tex groups exhibited almost total necrosis (74%-71%). Longitudinal flexibility and rigidity were similar to the native trachea in Gore-Tex and polypropylene mesh groups. Neotrachea prefabricated with cartilage grafts showed more than normal longitudinal flexibility and collapsed easily, Conclusion: The prefabricated model with the use of polypropylene mesh for skeletal framework and lateral thoracic fascia for vascular supply seems to be the best alternative in the reconstruction of circumferential tracheal defects.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Grillo HC. Circumferential resection and reconstruction of the mediastinal and cervical trachea. Ann Surg 1965;162:374-88.
  • 2. Lykoudis EG, Tsoutsos DA, Papalois AE, Frangia KB, Stamatopoulos CN, Ioannovich JD. Préfabrication of an axial bio-synthetic flap for circumferential tracheal defect reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53:508-15.
  • 3. Cavadas PC. Tracheal reconstruction using a free jejunal flap with cartilage skeleton: experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:937-42.
  • 4. Delaere PR, Hardillo J, Hermans R, Van Den Hof B. Préfabrication of composite tissue for improved tracheal reconstruction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001; 110:849-60.
  • 5. Belsey R. Resection and reconstruction of the intrathoracic trachea. Br J Surg 1950;38:200-5.
  • 6. Narodick BG, Worman LW, Pemberton AH. Relaxation technique for tracheal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 1965;24:190-6.
  • 7. Fonkalsrud EW, Plested WG. Tracheobronchial reconstruction with autologous periosteum. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1966;52:666-74.
  • 8. Neifeld JP, Theogaraj SD, Mehrhof AI. Reconstruction after mediastinal tracheostomy. Am J Surg 1984;148: 505-8.
  • 9. Yamada A, Harii K, Itoh Y, Kikawada T, Miyashita H. Reconstruction of the cervical trachea with a free forearm flap. Br J Plast Surg 1993;46:32-5.
  • 10. Biller HF, Munier MA. Combined infrahyoid and inferior constrictor muscle release for tension-free anastomosis during primary tracheal repair. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;107:430-3.
  • 11. Shaha A, DiMaio T, Money S, Krespi Y, Jaffe BM. Prosthetic reconstruction of the trachea. Am J Surg 1988;156:306-9.
  • 12. Krizek TJ, Kirchner J A. Tracheal reconstruction with an autogenous mucochondrial graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972;50:123-30.
  • 13. Ohlsen L, Nordin U. Tracheal reconstruction with perichondrial grafts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1976;10: 135-45.
  • 14. Friedman M, Mayer AD. Laryngotracheal reconstruction in adults with the sternocleidomastoid myoperiosteal flap. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:897-908.
  • 15. Fleischer A, Khafif R. Reconstruction of the mediastinal trachea with a tubed pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;84:342-6.
  • 16. Papp C, McCraw JB, Arnold PG. Experimental reconstruction of the trachea with autogenous materials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;90:13-20.
  • 17. Costantino PD, Nuss DW, Snyderman CH, Johnson JT, Friedman CD, Narayanan K, et al. Experimental tracheal replacement using a revascularized jejunal autograft with an implantable Dacron mesh tube. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:807-14.
  • 18. Ruuskanen MM, Kallioinen MJ, Kaarela Ol, Laiho JA, Tormala PO, Waris TJ. The role of polyglycolic acid rods in the regeneration of cartilage from perichondrium in rabbits. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1991;25:15-8.
  • 19. Fayad J, Kuriloff DB. Prefabricated microvascular autograft in tracheal reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;111:396-406.
  • 20. Okumus A, Cizmeci O, Kabakas F, Kuvat SV, Bilir A, Aydin A. Circumferential trachea reconstruction with a prefabricated axial bio-synthetic flap: experimental study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005;69:335-44.
APA OKUMUŞ A, ÇİZMECİ O, KUVAT S, KABAKAŞ F, ASLANOV A, YAPRAK B, GÜVEN E, HAFIZ G (2007). Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: An experimental study. , 158 - 166.
Chicago OKUMUŞ Aydın,ÇİZMECİ Orhan,KUVAT Samet V.,KABAKAŞ Fatih,ASLANOV Ayaz,YAPRAK BÜLENT,GÜVEN Erdem,HAFIZ Günter Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: An experimental study. (2007): 158 - 166.
MLA OKUMUŞ Aydın,ÇİZMECİ Orhan,KUVAT Samet V.,KABAKAŞ Fatih,ASLANOV Ayaz,YAPRAK BÜLENT,GÜVEN Erdem,HAFIZ Günter Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: An experimental study. , 2007, ss.158 - 166.
AMA OKUMUŞ A,ÇİZMECİ O,KUVAT S,KABAKAŞ F,ASLANOV A,YAPRAK B,GÜVEN E,HAFIZ G Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: An experimental study. . 2007; 158 - 166.
Vancouver OKUMUŞ A,ÇİZMECİ O,KUVAT S,KABAKAŞ F,ASLANOV A,YAPRAK B,GÜVEN E,HAFIZ G Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: An experimental study. . 2007; 158 - 166.
IEEE OKUMUŞ A,ÇİZMECİ O,KUVAT S,KABAKAŞ F,ASLANOV A,YAPRAK B,GÜVEN E,HAFIZ G "Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: An experimental study." , ss.158 - 166, 2007.
ISNAD OKUMUŞ, Aydın vd. "Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: An experimental study". (2007), 158-166.
APA OKUMUŞ A, ÇİZMECİ O, KUVAT S, KABAKAŞ F, ASLANOV A, YAPRAK B, GÜVEN E, HAFIZ G (2007). Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: An experimental study. Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi, 17(3), 158 - 166.
Chicago OKUMUŞ Aydın,ÇİZMECİ Orhan,KUVAT Samet V.,KABAKAŞ Fatih,ASLANOV Ayaz,YAPRAK BÜLENT,GÜVEN Erdem,HAFIZ Günter Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: An experimental study. Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi 17, no.3 (2007): 158 - 166.
MLA OKUMUŞ Aydın,ÇİZMECİ Orhan,KUVAT Samet V.,KABAKAŞ Fatih,ASLANOV Ayaz,YAPRAK BÜLENT,GÜVEN Erdem,HAFIZ Günter Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: An experimental study. Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi, vol.17, no.3, 2007, ss.158 - 166.
AMA OKUMUŞ A,ÇİZMECİ O,KUVAT S,KABAKAŞ F,ASLANOV A,YAPRAK B,GÜVEN E,HAFIZ G Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: An experimental study. Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi. 2007; 17(3): 158 - 166.
Vancouver OKUMUŞ A,ÇİZMECİ O,KUVAT S,KABAKAŞ F,ASLANOV A,YAPRAK B,GÜVEN E,HAFIZ G Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: An experimental study. Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi. 2007; 17(3): 158 - 166.
IEEE OKUMUŞ A,ÇİZMECİ O,KUVAT S,KABAKAŞ F,ASLANOV A,YAPRAK B,GÜVEN E,HAFIZ G "Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: An experimental study." Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi, 17, ss.158 - 166, 2007.
ISNAD OKUMUŞ, Aydın vd. "Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: An experimental study". Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi 17/3 (2007), 158-166.