The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers

Zeki ARSAL (Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü, Bolu, Türkiye)
International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik)
2 0
Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 85 - 103 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers

Öz:
Bu çalışmada günlüklerin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının öz düzenleme stratejilerine etkisi incelenmiştir. Araştırma 30 deney, 30 kontrol grubunda olmak üzere 60 fen bilgisi öğretmen adayı ile yapılmıştır. Çalışmada Pintrich’in öz düzenleme modeli temel olarak alınmıştır. Pintrich’in öz düzenleme modeli 3 genel bölümden oluşmaktadır: (a) bilişsel öğrenme stratejileri (b) bilişi kontrol eden biliş bilgisi veya öz düzenleme stratejileri (c) kaynak yönetim stratejileri. Araştırmada deney grubunda yer alan fen bilgisi öğretmen adayları günlük öğrenme etkinlikleri için kullandıkları öz düzenleme stratejilerini 14 hafta boyunca günlük rapor formunu doldurarak rapor etmişlerdir. Araştırmanın verileri öğrenme için motivasyon stratejileri ölçeği ile toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonunda öz düzenleme stratejilerini rapor eden deney grubundaki içsel motivasyon, konunun önemi, biliş bilgisi, zaman yönetimi stratejilerini kullanma durumu kontrol grubundan anlamlı bir şekilde farklılık göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs. Ns. Prentice. Hall.
  • Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. International Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 161-166.
  • Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 450-453.
  • Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199-231.
  • Bong, M. (2004). Academic motivation in self-efficacy, task value, achievement goal orientations, and attribution beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(6), 287-297.
  • Borkowski, J. G. (1996). Metacognition: theory or chapter heading? Learning and Individual Differences, 8(4), 391-402.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Özkahveci, Ö., & Demirel, F. (2004). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Science Theory and Practice, 4(2), 231-239.
  • Camahalan, F. M. (2006). Effect of self-regulated learning on mathematics achievement of selected Southeast Asian Children. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(3), 199-200.
  • Chan, K. S. L., & Moore, P. J. (2006). Development of attribution beliefs and strategic knowledge in years 5-9: A longitudinal analysis. Educational Psychology, 26(2), 161-185.
  • Chang, M. (2005). Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a web-based instruction: An investigation of motivation perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 217-230.
  • Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J.T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp.75-146). San Francisco: Freeman.
  • Eggen, P.. & Kauchak, D. (1994). Educational Psychology. New York, Macmillan College Publish.
  • Esler, Y., & Kohavi, R. (2003). Perceived classroom control, self-regulated learning strategies, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(3), 254-255.
  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitivedevelopmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
  • George, D., Dixon, S., Stansal, E., Gelb, S. L., & Pheri, T. (2008). Time diary and questionnaire assessment of factors associated with academic and personal success among university undergraduates. Journal of American College Health, 56(6), 706-715.
  • Gutman, L. M. (2006). How student and parent goal orientations and classroom goal structures influence the math achievement of African Americans during the high school transition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1), 44-63.
  • Haşlaman, T., & Aşkar, P. (2007). Investigating the relationship between self-regulated learning strategies and achievement in a programming course. Hacettepe University Journal Education, 32, 110-122.
  • Hayon, L. K., & Tillema, H. (1999). Self-regulated learning in the context of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(5), 520-521.
  • Husman, J., Derryberry, P.W.,& Crowsen, M.H. (2004). Instrumentality, task value, and intrinsic motivation: Making sense of their independent interdependence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(1), 63-76.
  • Mousoulides, N., & Philippou, G. (2005). Students’ motivational beliefs, self-regulation strategies and mathematics achievement. In Chick, H. L. & Vincent, J. L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 321- 328). Melbourne: PME.
  • Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 59-74.
  • Nicol, D., & Macfarhane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
  • Niemi, H. (2002). Active Learning: A cultural change needed in teacher education and schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(7), 763-780.
  • Ommundsen, Y., Haugen, R., & Lund, T. (2005). Academic self-concept, implicit theories of ability, and self-regulation strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(5), 461-474.
  • Pintrich, P. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459-470.
  • Pintrich, P. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issue in motivation terminology, theory and research, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 92-104.
  • Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 167–199.
  • Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: theory, research, and applications, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs (NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc).
  • Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self regulation: the role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Plant, A.E., Ericsson, A.K., & Asberg, L.H.K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1) 96-116.
  • Schmitz, B., & Wiese, B. (2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of training session in selfregulated learning: Time-series analyses of diary data. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1)83-88.
  • Schmitz, B., & Skinner, E. A. (1993). Perceived control, effort, and academic performance: Individual, and multivariate time series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 1010–1028.
  • Schraw, G., & Dennison, R.S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475.
  • Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351 – 371.
  • Sperling, R.A., Howard, B.C., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 117-139.
  • Stoeger, H., & Zeigler, A. (2005). Evaluation of an elementary classroom self-regulated learning program for gifted mathematics under achievers. International Education Journal, 6(2), 267- 368.
  • Sundre, D., & Kitsantas, A. (2004). An exploration of psychology of the examinee: Can examine selfregulation and test taking motivation predict consequential and non consequential test performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(1), 17-19.
  • Taylor, N., & Corrigan, G. (2005). Empowerment and confidence: Pre-service teachers learning to teach science through a program of self-regulated learning. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 5(1), 41-60.
  • Webber, J., Scheuermann, B., McCall, C., & Coleman, M. (1993). Research on self-monitoring as a behavior management technique in special education classrooms: A descriptive review. Remedial and Special Education, 14(3), 38–56.
  • Weinstein, C., & Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In Wittrock, M. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching and Learning (pp. 315–327). Macmillan, New York.
  • Winne, P.H. (2005). Key issues in modeling and applying research on self-regulated learning. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 232-238.
  • Yumuşak, S., Sungur, S., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2007). Turkish high school students’ biology achievement in relation to academic self-regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(1), 53-69.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 217-221.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner S., & Kovach, R.(1996) Developing Self-regulated Learning: Beyond Achievement to Self-efficacy. American Psychological Association, Washington DC.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American, Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614-628.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 83-89.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64 – 70.
  • Zusho, A., & Pintrich, P. (2003). Skill and Will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1086-1088.
APA ARSAL Z (2010). The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers. , 85 - 103.
Chicago ARSAL Zeki The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers. (2010): 85 - 103.
MLA ARSAL Zeki The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers. , 2010, ss.85 - 103.
AMA ARSAL Z The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers. . 2010; 85 - 103.
Vancouver ARSAL Z The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers. . 2010; 85 - 103.
IEEE ARSAL Z "The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers." , ss.85 - 103, 2010.
ISNAD ARSAL, Zeki. "The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers". (2010), 85-103.
APA ARSAL Z (2010). The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), 5(1), 85 - 103.
Chicago ARSAL Zeki The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) 5, no.1 (2010): 85 - 103.
MLA ARSAL Zeki The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), vol.5, no.1, 2010, ss.85 - 103.
AMA ARSAL Z The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik). 2010; 5(1): 85 - 103.
Vancouver ARSAL Z The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik). 2010; 5(1): 85 - 103.
IEEE ARSAL Z "The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers." International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), 5, ss.85 - 103, 2010.
ISNAD ARSAL, Zeki. "The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) 5/1 (2010), 85-103.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 15:29

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları