In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents

TÜZÜNER, Evrim; POLAT, Sibel; SİPAHİ, Ayşe Bilge; ATABEK, Didem; ALAÇAM, ALEV

In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents

Didem ATABEK, (Gazi Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Pediatri Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

Alev ALAÇAM, (Gazi Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Pediatri Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

Evrim TÜZÜNER, (Gazi Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Pediatri Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

Sibel POLAT, (Gazi Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Pediatri Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

Ayşe Bilge SİPAHİ (Gazi Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research)

0 0

Yıl: 2009 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 52 - 59 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents

Öz:

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, ölçü malzemeleri üzerinde dezenfeksiyon ajanlarının zamana bağlı etkilerini değerlendirmektir. Gereçler ve Yöntemler: Protetik tedavi ihtiyacı olan 20 çocuk araştırmaya dâhil edilmiştir. Her hastadan 30 dak. aralıklarla irreversible bir hidrokolloid ölçü materyali ile 3 adet diş ölçüsü alınmıştır. Dezenfeksiyon ajanları (%7,5 Povidon İyot (PI), %1 Sodyum Hipoklorid (SH)) 3 ya da 10 dakikalık zaman çizelgelerinde uygulanmıştır. İlk ölçüler (kontrol) 250 cc, distile su ile yıkanmıştır. İkinci ölçüler (1. grup, n=20) 3 dak. uygulama zamanında, dezenfektan maddelerin kullanımına göre rastgele iki gruba (n = 10) ayrılmıştır. Üçüncü ölçüler (2. grup n=20) aynı protokolle10 dak dezenfekte edilmiştir. Mikrobiyolojik örnekler alınarak koloni oluşturan birimler sayısal olarak hesaplanmıştır. Bulgular: Kontrol grubunda Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci, Corynebacterium Diphteriae, Neisseria, α-Hemolytic Streptococci, Non-Hemolytic Streptococci ve Bacillus türleri saptandı. Öte yandan 3 ve 10 dakikalık zaman çizelgelerinde uygulanan % 7.5 PI ve % 1 SH gruplarında negatif kültürler elde edildi. Sonuçlar: Üç dakıkalık % 7,5 PI ve %1 SH uygulamalarının ölçü maddelerinin dezenfeksiyonunda başarılı olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Ölçü maddelerinin farklı dezenfektan ajanlarla dezenfeksiyonunun In-Vivo olarak değerlendirilmesi

Öz:

Aim: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the time dependent effects of disinfection agents on impression materials. Materials and Methods: 20 children having prosthetic treatment needs participated in the study. 3 dental impressions with 30 min. intervals were taken from each patient with an irreversible hydrocolloid impression. Disinfection agents (7,5% Povidone Iodine (PI), 1% Sodium Hypochloride (SH)) were applied for 3 or 10 min. time schedules. The first impressions (control) were rinsed with 250 cc distilled water. The second impressions (1st group, n=20) were evaluated for 3 min. application time, randomly divided into two groups (n=10) according to disinfectant agents used. The third impressions (2nd group, n=20) disinfected for 10 min. with the same protocol. The microbiological samples were taken and colony forming units were counted. Results: In the control group Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci, Corynebacterium Diphteriae, Neisseria, α-Hemolytic Streptococci, Non-Hemolytic Streptococci and Bacillus spieces were detected. However negative cultures were taken from both 7.5% PI and 1% SH groups in 3 and 10 minutes time schedules. Conclusions: It is concluded that 3 min. application of either with 7.5% PI or 1% SH was found sufficient for disinfecting impressions.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. BDA Advisory Service. The control of cross-infection in dentistry. Br Dent Assoc Advice Sheet 1991; A12.
2. Palenik CJ, Burke FJ, Miller CH. Strategies for dental clinic infection control. Dent Update 2000; 27: 7-15.
3. Silva SMLM, Salvador MCG. Effect of Disinfection Technique on the Linear Dimensional Stability of Dental Impression Materials. J Appl Oral Sci 2004; 12: 244-249.
4. Russell JN, Michael GN 1988 Oral Microbiology and Immunology. Saunders company. USA, pp.120-127.
5. Yumul Ç, Bilgin Z, GÜRSOY GÇ. The prevalence of Candida Albicans, Staphylococcus Aereus, Eschrichia Coli and Coliform Bacteroides in the Oropharynx of 4-15 aged children. Ankara University Press 1993;19: 297-299.
6. Centres for Disease Control and prevention: Recommended infection-control practices for dentistry. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rpt 1993:42:1-2.
7. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs and ADA council on Dental Practice: Infection control recommendations for the dental office and dental laboratory. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 672-680.
8. Leung RL, Schonfeld SE. Gypsum casts as a potential source of microbial cross-contamination. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 210-211.
9. Kugel G, Perry RD, Ferrari M, Lalıcata P. Disinfection And Communication Practices: A survey of U.S. Dental Laboratories. JADA 2000; 131: 786-792.
10. Yılmaz H, Aydın C, Gull B, Yılmaz C, Semiz M. Effect of disinfection on the Dimensional Stability of Polyether Impression Materials. J Prosthodont 2007; 16: 473-479.
11. Lu JX, Zhang FM, Chen YM, Qian M. The effect of disinfection on dimension stability of impressions. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2004; 13: 290-292.
12. Mathyas J, Dao N, Caputo AA, Lucatorto FM. Effects of disinfectants on dimensional accuracy of impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 25-31.
13. Dellinger EL, Williams KJ, Seteao JC. Influence of immersion and spray disinfectants on alginate impressions. J Dent Res 1990; 69(special issue):364.
14. Abdelaziz KM, Hassan AM, Hodges JS. Reproducibility of Sterilized Rubber Impressions. Braz Dent J 2004; 15: 209-213.
15. Boden J, Likeman M, Clark R. Some effects of disinfecting solutions on the properties of alginate impression material and dental Stone. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2001; 9: 131-5.
16. Porta SRS, Gomes VL, Pavanin LA, Soza CCB. Analysis of Three Disinfectants after Immersion of Irreversible Hydrocolloid and ZOE paste impressions. Br J Oral Sci 2006; 5: 1094-1100.
17. Blair FM, Wassell W. A Survey of The Methods Of Disinfection Of Dental İmpressions Used in Dental Hospitals in the United Kingdom. Br Dent J 1996; 180: 369-374.
18. Merchant VA, McNeight MK, Ciborowski CJ, Molinari JA. Preliminary investigation of a method for disinfection of dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 877-879.
19. Al-Omari MA, Al-Dwairi MA. Compliance with Infection Control Programs in Private Dental Clinics in Jordan. Journal of Dental Education 2005; 69: 693-698.
20. Walker MP, Rondeau M, Petrie C, Tasca A, Williams K. Surface Quality and Long-term Dimensional Stability of Current Elastomeric Impression Materials after Disinfection. J Prosthodontics 2007; 16: 343-351.
21. Mansour A, P.Colm S, Gerald NG, Arthur DE. Control of microbial contamination with commercially available cleaning solutions. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 275-277.
22. Donald LM, Nadjameh MH, Manville G, Duncanson Jr, Nancy LJ, Roderick EM. Quantitative study of bacterial colonization okf dental casts. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 518-521.
23. Memarian M, Fazeli MR, Jamalifar H, Azimnejad A. Disinfection Efficiency of Irreversible Hydrocolloid Impressions Using Different Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite: A Pilot Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8: 1-8.
24. Meiller TF, Silva A, Ferreira SM, Jabra-Rizk MA, Kelley JI, DePaola LG. Efficacy of Listerine® Antiseptic in reducing viral contamination. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 341-346.
25. Sofou A, Larsen T, Fiehn NE, Owall B. Contamination level of alginate impressions arriving at a dental laboratory. Clin Oral Investig 2002; 6: 161-5.
26. Herrera SP, Merchant VA. Dimensional stability of dental impressions after immersion disinfection. J Am Dent Assoc 1986; 113:419-22.
27. Schwartz RS, Hensley DH, Bradley DV Jr. 1996 Immersion disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impression in pH-adjusted sodium hypochlorite. Part 1: Microbiology. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9: 217-222.
28. Best M, Sattar SA, Springthorpe VS, Kennedy ME. Efficacies of selected disinfectants against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28: 2234-9.
29. Jennings KJ, Samaranayake LP. The persistence of microorganisms on impression materials following disinfection. Int J Prosthodont 1991; 4: 382-387.

APA	ATABEK D, ALAÇAM A, TÜZÜNER E, POLAT S, SİPAHİ A (2009). In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents. , 52 - 59.
Chicago	ATABEK Didem,ALAÇAM ALEV,TÜZÜNER Evrim,POLAT Sibel,SİPAHİ Ayşe Bilge In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents. (2009): 52 - 59.
MLA	ATABEK Didem,ALAÇAM ALEV,TÜZÜNER Evrim,POLAT Sibel,SİPAHİ Ayşe Bilge In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents. , 2009, ss.52 - 59.
AMA	ATABEK D,ALAÇAM A,TÜZÜNER E,POLAT S,SİPAHİ A In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents. . 2009; 52 - 59.
Vancouver	ATABEK D,ALAÇAM A,TÜZÜNER E,POLAT S,SİPAHİ A In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents. . 2009; 52 - 59.
IEEE	ATABEK D,ALAÇAM A,TÜZÜNER E,POLAT S,SİPAHİ A "In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents." , ss.52 - 59, 2009.
ISNAD	ATABEK, Didem vd. "In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents". (2009), 52-59.

APA	ATABEK D, ALAÇAM A, TÜZÜNER E, POLAT S, SİPAHİ A (2009). In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research), 33(2), 52 - 59.
Chicago	ATABEK Didem,ALAÇAM ALEV,TÜZÜNER Evrim,POLAT Sibel,SİPAHİ Ayşe Bilge In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research) 33, no.2 (2009): 52 - 59.
MLA	ATABEK Didem,ALAÇAM ALEV,TÜZÜNER Evrim,POLAT Sibel,SİPAHİ Ayşe Bilge In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research), vol.33, no.2, 2009, ss.52 - 59.
AMA	ATABEK D,ALAÇAM A,TÜZÜNER E,POLAT S,SİPAHİ A In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research). 2009; 33(2): 52 - 59.
Vancouver	ATABEK D,ALAÇAM A,TÜZÜNER E,POLAT S,SİPAHİ A In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research). 2009; 33(2): 52 - 59.
IEEE	ATABEK D,ALAÇAM A,TÜZÜNER E,POLAT S,SİPAHİ A "In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents." Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research), 33, ss.52 - 59, 2009.
ISNAD	ATABEK, Didem vd. "In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents". Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research) 33/2 (2009), 52-59.