Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction

ÖZGÜNGÖR, Sevgi

Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction

Sevgi ÖZGÜNGÖR (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Denizli, Türkiye)

Eurasian Journal of Educational Research

7 0

Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 38 Sayfa Aralığı: 146 - 163 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction

Öz:

Problem Durumu: Öğrencilerin öğretmenin yeterliliğine ilişkin değerlendirmeleri özellikle Amerika ve Avrupa başta olmak üzere tüm dünyada gerek önemli bir araştırma konusu olarak, gerekse yüksek öğretimde kaliteyi artırma çabasında önemli bir araç olarak yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Ancak Türkiye’de yurt dışı çalışmalara ilişkin bulguların ötesinde yeni anlayışlar oluşturmayı sağlamada araç olarak kullanılabilecek geçerliliği ve güvenirliliği kanıtlanmış bir ölçek bulunmamaktadır. Bununla birlikte, her ne kadar yurt dışında yapılan çalışmalarda öğrenci değerlendirmelerinin öğrencinin başarısı ve doyumu ile ilişkisi yaygın bir şekilde çalışılmış olsa da (Cohen, 1981; Enwistle & Ramsden, 1983; Howard & Maxwell, 1980; Marsh, 1987; Ramsden & Entwistle, 1981) öğrenci değerlendirmelerinin öğrencilerin öz yeterlilikleriyle ilişkileri çalışılmamıştır. Yazım alanında öğrenci değerlendirmeleri çok boyutlu bir değişken olarak tanımlanır (Marsh, 1984; Marsh & Roche, 1993). Bu yüzden her ne kadar öğrenci değerlendirmeleri öz yeterlilik algıları ile ilişkili olsa da, bu ilişkinin öneminin farklı öğretmen davranışları için değişmesi beklenmektedir. Benzer şekilde, her ne kadar geçmiş çalışmalar öğretmen değerlendirmelerinin öğrencilerin derse verdiği değerle ilişkili olduğunu göstermiş olsa da (örn., Young & Shaw, 1999), öğretmen davranışlarının hangi alt boyutlarının öğrencinin derse verdiği değeri artırmada daha önemli olduğu bilinmemektedir. Araştırmanın Amacı: Bu çalışmanın 3 temel amacı bulunmaktadır: (a) Öğrenci değerlendirmelerini ölçmek amacıyla yurt dışında en sık kullanılan ölçme araçlarından biri olan Ders Deneyim Ölçeğinin (Course Experience Questionnaire) geçerlik ve güvenirlik düzeyinin belirlenmesi ve Türkçeye uyarlanması (b) Öğrenci değerlendirmelerinin öğrencinin öz yeterlilik algıları ile ilişkisinin belirlenmesi (c) Öğretmene ilişkin değerlendirmelerin farklı boyutlarının (iyi öğretebilme, açıklık, adil değerlendirme gibi) öz yeterlilik algıları, derse verilen değer ve derse ilişkin genel doyum düzeyini yordama gücünün karşılaştırılmalı olarak belirlenmesi

Anahtar Kelime: students evaluations satisfaction teaching quality self efficacy

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Ainley, J., & Long, M. (1994). The course experience survey, 1992 graduates. Canberra, AGPS: Graduate Careers Council of Australia.
Barth, M. M. (2008). Deciphering student evaluations of teaching: A factor analysis approach. Journal of Education for Business, 84 (1), 40-46.
Bong, M. (2001). Role of self-efficacy and task-value in predicting college students' course performance and future enrollment intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), 553-570.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö., Kahveci, Ö., & Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4 (2), 207-239.
Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Byrne, M., & Flood, B. (2003). Assessing the teaching quality of accounting programmes: An evaluation of the Course Expereince Questionnaire. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (2),135-145.
Centra, J. A. (2003). Will teachers receive higher student evaluations by giving higher grades and less course work? Research in Higher Education, 44(5), 495–518.
Chen, Y., & Hoshower, L. B. (2003). Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness: An assessment of student perception and motivation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(1), 71–88.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, Academic Press.
Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness of student rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings. Research in Higher Education, 13, 321–341.
Cohen, P. A. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A metaanalysis of multi-section validity studies. R e v i e w o f E d u c a t i o n a l R e s e a r c h , 51, 281-309.
Collins, A. B. (2002). Üniversite öğrencileri öğretim elemanlarının başarısını değerlendirebilir mi? İkilemler ve problemler. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, (1-2), 81-91.
d'Apollonia, S., & Abrami, P. C. (1988, April). The literature on student ratings of instruction: Yet another meta-analysis. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
d'Apollonia, S., & Abrami, P. C. (1997). Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist, 52, 1198-1208.
Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
Finaly-Neumann, E. (1994). Course work characteristics and students’ satisfaction with instructions. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 21(2), 14-19.
Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997a). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52, 1209-1217.
Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, J. M. (1997b). No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 743-751.
Howard, G., & Maxwell, S. (1980). Correlation between student satisfaction and grades: A case of mistaken causation. J o u r n a l o f E d u c a t i o n a l P s y c h o l o g y , 72, 810-820.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Pschometrika, 39, 31-6.
Karagiannopoulou, E., & Christodoulides, P. (2005). The impact of Greek University students' perceptions of their learning environment on approaches to studying and academic outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 43 (6), 329-350.
Kember, D., & Leung, D.Y.P. (1998). Influences upon students’ perceptions of workload. Educational Psychology, 18 (3), 293-307.
Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2008). Establishing the validity and reliability of course evaluation questionnaires. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33 (4), 341- 353.
Kreber, C. (2003). The relationship between students’ course perception and their approaches to studying in undergraduate science courses: A Canadian experience. Higher Education Research and Development, 22, 57–70.
Lawless, C.J., & Richardson, J.T.E. (2002). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in distance education. Higher Education, 44 (2), 257-82.
Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students' perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27 (1), 27-52.
Marsh, H. W. (1980). The influence of student, course and instructor characteristics on evaluations of university teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 219- 237.
Marsh, H. (1984). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 707–754.
Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' evaluation of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253-388.
Marsh, H. W. (1991). Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A test of alternative higher-order structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 285- 296.
Marsh, H. W. (2001). Distinguishing between good (useful) and bad workload on students' evaluations of teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (1), 183- 212.
Marsh, H. W., & Bailey, M. (1993). Multidimensional students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A profile analysis. The Journal of Higher Education, 64 (1), 1-18.
Marsh, H. W., & Dunkin, M. (1992). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In J. C. Smart (ed.), H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n : H a n d b o o k o f T h e o r y a n d R e s e a r c h : Volume 8, pp. 143-233. New York: Agathon.
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1993). The use of students’ evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 217–251.
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. American Psychologist, 52, 1187-1197.
Martin, E., & Ramsden, P. (2000). Introduction to scholarship in teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 19, 133–137.
Murat, M., Aslantaş, İ. H., & Özgan, H. (2006). Öğretim elemanlarının sınıf içi eğitimöğretim etkinlikleri acısından değerlendirilmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26 (3), 263-278.
Murray, H. G. (1983). Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 856-865.
Özgüngör, S. (2009). Eğitim Fakültesi öğrencilerinin fakülte yaşantısından alınan doyum düzeylerini belirleyen öğrenci ve okul özellikleri. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Peter, J.P. (1979). Reliability: A review of psychometric basics and recent marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (1), 6-17.
Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.R, Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire . Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129-50.
Ramsden, P. (1999). The 1999 CEQ Interim Report.
Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368-83.
Richardson, J., Long, G., & Woodley, A. (2003). Academic engagement and perceptions of quality in distance education. Open Learning, 18(3), 223-244.
Rindermann H., & Schofield N. (2001). Generalizability of multidimensional student ratings of university instruction across courses and teachers. Research in Higher Education, 42 (4), 377-399.
Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Thomas, E. H., & Galambos, N. (2004). What satisfies students? Mining students’ opinion data with regression and decision tree analysis. Research in Higher Education, 45 (3), 251-269.
Turanlı, A. S. (2009). Students’ perceptions of teachers’ behaviors of social emotional support and students’ satisfaction with the classroom atmosphere. Eğitim Araştırmaları- Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 35, 129-146.
Young, S., & Shaw, D. G. (1999). Profiles of effective college and university teachers. The Journal of Higher Education, 70 (6), 670-686.
Watchel, H.K. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23 (2), 191–211.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
Wilson, K. Lizzio, A., & Ramsden. P. (1997). The development, validation and application of the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22 (1), 33–53.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning. In Schunk, Dale H. and Meece, Judith L. (Eds.), Student Perceptions in the Classroom, (pp. 185-207). NJ: Hillsdale.

APA	ÖZGÜNGÖR S (2010). Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction. , 146 - 163.
Chicago	ÖZGÜNGÖR Sevgi Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction. (2010): 146 - 163.
MLA	ÖZGÜNGÖR Sevgi Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction. , 2010, ss.146 - 163.
AMA	ÖZGÜNGÖR S Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction. . 2010; 146 - 163.
Vancouver	ÖZGÜNGÖR S Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction. . 2010; 146 - 163.
IEEE	ÖZGÜNGÖR S "Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction." , ss.146 - 163, 2010.
ISNAD	ÖZGÜNGÖR, Sevgi. "Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction". (2010), 146-163.

APA	ÖZGÜNGÖR S (2010). Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 10(38), 146 - 163.
Chicago	ÖZGÜNGÖR Sevgi Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 10, no.38 (2010): 146 - 163.
MLA	ÖZGÜNGÖR Sevgi Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, vol.10, no.38, 2010, ss.146 - 163.
AMA	ÖZGÜNGÖR S Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2010; 10(38): 146 - 163.
Vancouver	ÖZGÜNGÖR S Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2010; 10(38): 146 - 163.
IEEE	ÖZGÜNGÖR S "Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction." Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 10, ss.146 - 163, 2010.
ISNAD	ÖZGÜNGÖR, Sevgi. "Identifying dimensions of students' ratings that best predict students' self efficacy, course value and satisfaction". Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 10/38 (2010), 146-163.