Short term results of cervical disc prostheses

GÖKÇE, Alper; BECERİR, Cengiz; TAŞCI, Rumeysa; YALÇIN, MEHMET BURAK; GÖKAY, Nevzat Selim

Short term results of cervical disc prostheses

Alper GÖKÇE, (Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Tekirdağ, Türkiye)

Cengiz BECERİR, (Tekirdağ Devlet Hastanesi, Tekirdağ, Türkiye)

Nevzat Selim GÖKAY, (Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Tekirdağ, Türkiye)

Mehmet Burak YALÇIN, (Nusaybin Devlet Hastanesi, Mardin, Türkiye)

Rumeysa TAŞCI (Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, Tekirdağ, Türkiye)

Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery

4 1

Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 147 - 154 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Short term results of cervical disc prostheses

Öz:

Servikal spondilozun ve semptomatik radikülopatinin klasik olarak uygulanan tedavisi anterior dekompresyon (AD) ve omurga cisimler arası füzyondur (İF). Anterior dekompresyon (AD) sonrası total disk proteziyle (TDP) servikal artroplasti, anterior servikal füzyona alternatif olarak öne sürülen bir tedavidir. Boyun ağrısı ve radikülopati nedeniyle AD sonrasında 52 TDP uyguladığımız birbirini izleyen 51 hastanın klinik ve radyolojik sonuçlarını geriye dönük olarak değerlendirdik. 34 hasta (28 kadın, 6 erkek) ortalama 25.76 ay izlendi (12-36 ay). Bizim çalışmamızda elde ettiğimiz klinik ve radyolojik başarı dinamik stabilizasyona yönelme kararımızı destekler niteliktedir. Serimizin uzun dönem randomize çalışmaların sonuçları ile desteklenmesi halen gerekliliğini sürdürmektedir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

Servikal disk protezi kısa dönem sonuçları

Öz:

The classical applied therapy for cervical spondylosis and symptomatic radiculopathy is anterior decompression (AD) and interbody fusion (IF). Cervical arthroplasty with total disc prosthesis (TDP) after AD is a treatment suggested as an alternative to anterior cervical fusion. We have retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of 51 consecutive patients whom we have treated with 52 TDP due to neck pains and radiculopathy. 34 patients (28 female, 6 male) were followed up for an average of 25.76 months (12 “ 36 months). The clinical and radiological success we have achieved in our study support our decision to head towards dynamic stabilization. The necessity of support for our series through the results of long term randomized studies is still valid.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Fras CI, Balderston JR, Rushton SA, Chin KR. The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement. Spine J 2008; 8(5): 711-716.
2. Chang UK, Kim DH, Lee MC, Willenberg R, Kim SH, Lim J. Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 7(1): 33-39.
3. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1999; 81-A (4): 519-528.
4. Kim SW, Shin JH, Arbatin JJ, Park MS, Chung YK, McAfee PC. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 2008; 17(1): 20-29.
5. McAfee PC. Degenerative Disc Disease Cervical Disc Replacement Benefits. Curr Opin Orthop 2006; 1(3): 155-164.
6. Nabhan A, Ahlhelm F, Pitzen T, Steudel WI, Jung J, Shariat K, Steimer O, Bachelier F, Pape D. Disc replacement using Pro-Disc C versus fusion: a prospective randomised and controlled radiographic and clinical study. Eur Spine J 2007; 16(3): 423-430.
7. Özer AF, Öktenoğlu T, Sasani M, Bozkuş H, Canbulat N, Sarıoğlu AÇ. Cervical disc prosthesis. Türk Nöroşir Derg 2005; 15(3): 285-290.
8. Peng CWB, Quirnoa M, Bendo JA, Spivak JM, Goldstein JA. Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes after Prodisc-C cervical disc replacement. Spine J 2009; 9: 551–555.
9. Peng-Fei S, Yu-Hua J. Cervical disc prosthesis replacement and interbody fusion: a comparative study. Int Orthop 2008; 32(1): 103-106.
10.Phillips FM, Tzermiadianos MN, Voronov LI, Havey RM, Carandang G, Dooris A, Patwardhan AG. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics. Spine 2009; 34(22): E794-E799.
11.Pickett GE, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, et al. Complications with cervical arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 4(2): 98–105.
12.Sasso RC, Best NM, Cervical Kinematics After Fusion and Bryan Disc Arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008; 21: 19–22.
13.Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial with 24-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007; 20(7): 481-491.
14.Shim CS, Lee SH, Park HJ, Kang HS, Hwang JH. Early clinical and radiologic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006; 19: 465- 470.

APA	GÖKÇE A, BECERİR C, GÖKAY N, YALÇIN M, TAŞCI R (2010). Short term results of cervical disc prostheses. , 147 - 154.
Chicago	GÖKÇE Alper,BECERİR Cengiz,GÖKAY Nevzat Selim,YALÇIN MEHMET BURAK,TAŞCI Rumeysa Short term results of cervical disc prostheses. (2010): 147 - 154.
MLA	GÖKÇE Alper,BECERİR Cengiz,GÖKAY Nevzat Selim,YALÇIN MEHMET BURAK,TAŞCI Rumeysa Short term results of cervical disc prostheses. , 2010, ss.147 - 154.
AMA	GÖKÇE A,BECERİR C,GÖKAY N,YALÇIN M,TAŞCI R Short term results of cervical disc prostheses. . 2010; 147 - 154.
Vancouver	GÖKÇE A,BECERİR C,GÖKAY N,YALÇIN M,TAŞCI R Short term results of cervical disc prostheses. . 2010; 147 - 154.
IEEE	GÖKÇE A,BECERİR C,GÖKAY N,YALÇIN M,TAŞCI R "Short term results of cervical disc prostheses." , ss.147 - 154, 2010.
ISNAD	GÖKÇE, Alper vd. "Short term results of cervical disc prostheses". (2010), 147-154.

APA	GÖKÇE A, BECERİR C, GÖKAY N, YALÇIN M, TAŞCI R (2010). Short term results of cervical disc prostheses. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, 21(2), 147 - 154.
Chicago	GÖKÇE Alper,BECERİR Cengiz,GÖKAY Nevzat Selim,YALÇIN MEHMET BURAK,TAŞCI Rumeysa Short term results of cervical disc prostheses. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery 21, no.2 (2010): 147 - 154.
MLA	GÖKÇE Alper,BECERİR Cengiz,GÖKAY Nevzat Selim,YALÇIN MEHMET BURAK,TAŞCI Rumeysa Short term results of cervical disc prostheses. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, vol.21, no.2, 2010, ss.147 - 154.
AMA	GÖKÇE A,BECERİR C,GÖKAY N,YALÇIN M,TAŞCI R Short term results of cervical disc prostheses. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery. 2010; 21(2): 147 - 154.
Vancouver	GÖKÇE A,BECERİR C,GÖKAY N,YALÇIN M,TAŞCI R Short term results of cervical disc prostheses. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery. 2010; 21(2): 147 - 154.
IEEE	GÖKÇE A,BECERİR C,GÖKAY N,YALÇIN M,TAŞCI R "Short term results of cervical disc prostheses." Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, 21, ss.147 - 154, 2010.
ISNAD	GÖKÇE, Alper vd. "Short term results of cervical disc prostheses". Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery 21/2 (2010), 147-154.