The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level

Yıl: 2009 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 210 - 222 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level

Öz:
This study aims to explain how bachelor of communications students who are enrolled to various courses at Anadolu University value word-of-mouth messages in making a course decision. Use of WOM as a marketing tool in tertiary teaching is not a common practice. As elective course numbers increase, students look for alternative avenues and types of information to be sure of making the best possible course selection. The findings of this study indicate that instructors‘ previous experiences are not as important as their in-class performances. Another interesting finding of the study is although participants are prone to use internet resources as sources of information; they value the use of computer-mediated and enhanced technologies in teaching. Perhaps the most peculiar finding of the study is senior students are perceived as the most common source of information, and their experiences often seen as a point of reference in choosing a course.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aaker, D., Kumar, V., and Day, G.S. (2004). Marketing Research (8th Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Addis, M. (2005). New Technologies and Cultural Consumption - Edutainment is Born!. European Journal of Marketing, 39 (7/8), 729-736.
  • Anderson, N. H. (1965). Averaging versus Adding as a Stimulus Combination Rule in Impression Formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 1−9.
  • Arndt, J. (1968). Selective Process in Word-of-Mouth. Journal of Advertising Research, 4, 291-295.
  • Bansal, H. S., and Voyer, P. A. (2000). Word-of-Mouth Processes within a Service Purchase Decision Context. Journal of Service Research, 5 (3), 77-166.
  • Bone, P.F. (1995). Word-of-Mouth Effects on Short-Term and Long-Term Product Judgments. Journal of Busisness Research, 32, 213–23.
  • Borgida, E., and Nisbett, R. E. (1977). The differential impact of abstract vs. concrete information on decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 258-271.
  • Brown, T. J., Barry, T. E., Dacin, P. A., and Gunst, R. F. (2005). Spreading the Word: Investigating Antedecents of Consumers‘ Positive Word-of-Mouth Intentions and Behaviors in a Retailing Context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 123-138.
  • Brown, J. J. and Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 350-362.
  • Burzyunski, M. H., and Bayer, D., D. J. (1977). The Effect of Positive and Negative Prior Information on Motion Picture Appreciation. Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 215-218.
  • Bytwerk, R. L. (2005). The Argument for Genocide in Nazi propaganda. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 91, 37-62.
  • Calder, B. (1977). Focus Groups and the Nature of Qualitative Marketing Research. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 353–364.
  • Carl, W. J. (2006). What‘s All the Buss About? Everyday Communication and the Relational Basis of Word-of-Mouth and Buzz Marketing Practices. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 601-634.
  • Cadotte, Ernest R., Robert B. Woodruff, and Roger L. Jenkins. 1987. Expectations and norms in models of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (August): 353–64.
  • Chevalier, J. A., and Mayzlin, D. (2003). The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, (3), 345−354.
  • Clapper, D. L., and Massey, A. P. (1996). Electronic Focus Groups: A Framework for Exploration. Information & Management, 30, 43–50.
  • Clark, T., and Holmes, S. (2007). Fit for Practice? An Exploration of the Development of Newly Quali.ed Nurses Using Focus Groups. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 1210–1220.
  • Compton, J. A., and Pfau, M. (2004). Use of Inoculation to Foster Resistance to Credit Card Marketing Targeting College Students. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 343- 364.
  • Curran, J.M. and Rosen, D.E. (2006). Student Attitudes Toward College Courses: An Examination of Influences and Intentions. Journal of Marketing Education, 28 (2), 135-148.
  • Day, G. S. (1971). Attitude Change, Media, and Word of Mouth. Journal of Advertising Research, 11, 31-40.
  • Daymon, C. (2002). Qualitative Research Metdohs in Public Relations and Marketing Communications, Florence: Routledge.
  • Davis, Duane L., Joseph P. Guiltinan, and Wesley H. Jones. (1979). Service Characteristics, Consumer Research and the Classification of Retail Services. Journal of Retailing, 55, 3–21.
  • Engel, J. E., Blackwell, R. D., and Kegerreis, R. J. (1969). How Information is Used to Adopt an Innovation. Journal of Advertising Research, 9, 3-8.
  • Fitzgerald Bone, P. (1995). Word-of-Mouth Effects on Short-Term and Long-Term Product Judgements. Journal Business Research, 32, 213-223.
  • Frymier, A. B., and Thompson, C. A. (1992). Perceived Teacher Affinity-Seeking in Relation to Perceived Teacher Credibility. Communication Education, 41, 388-399.
  • Harrison-Walker, J. L. (2001). The Measurement of Word-of Mouth Communication and an Investigation of Service Quality and Customer Commitment as Potential Antedecents. Journal of service Research, 4, 60-75.
  • Howard, D. J., and Gengler, C. (2001). Emotional Contagion Effects on Product Attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 189-201.
  • Katz, E., and Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence; the Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Free Press, Glencoe, IL.
  • Klein, E.E., Tellefsen, T., and Herskovitz, P.J. (2007). The Use of Group Support Systems in Focus Groups: Information Technology Meets Qualitative Research. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2113–2132.
  • Krueger, R. A. (1988). Focus Groups: A practical guide for applied research, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Krueger, R. A., and Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.,
  • Krueger, R.A. (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, (2nd Ed.), London: Sage Publishing.
  • Mittal, V., Ross, W. T., and Baldasare, P. M. (1998). The Asymmetric Impact of Negative and Positive Attribute-Level Performance on Overall Satisfaction and Repurchase Intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62, 33−47.
  • Morgan, D.L. (1990). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
  • Newton, J.M., and McKenna, L. (2007). The Transitional Journey through the Graduate Year: A Focus Group Study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 1231–1237.
  • Reed, J., and Payton, V.R., (1997). Focus Groups: Issues of Analysis and Interpretation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26 (4), 765–771.
  • Richins, M. L. (1983). Negative Word-of Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers: A Pilot Study. Journal of Marketing, 47, 68-78.
  • Shrum, L. J., and Bischak, V. D. (2001). Mainstreaming, Resonance, and Impersonal Impact: Testing Moderators of the Cultivation Effect for Estimates of Crime Risk. Human Communication Research, 27, 187-215.
  • Singhal, A., Rogers, E., and Mahajan, M. (1999) ―The Gods are Drinkink Milk!‖ Asian Journal of Communication, 9, 86-107.
  • Spangenberg, E. R., and Giese, J. L., (1997). An Exploratory Study of Word-of-Mouth Communication in a Hierarchy of Effects Contest. Communication Research Reports, 14, 89- 96.
  • Sultan, F., Farley, J. U., and Lehmann, D. R. (1990). A Meta-Analysis of Applications of Diffusion Models. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 70-77.
  • Sun, T., Youn, S., Wu, G., and Kuntaraporn, M. (2006). Online Word-of-Mouth (or Mouse): An Exploration of Its Antedecents and Consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 114-1127.
  • Threlfall, K.D. (1999). Using Focus Groups as A Consumer Research Tool. Journal of Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science, 5 (4), 102-105.
  • von Wangenheim, F., and Bayon, T., (2004). The Effect of Word-of Mouth on Service Switching. European Journal of Marketing, 38, (9/10), 1173-1185.
APA Sever N (2009). The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level. , 210 - 222.
Chicago Sever Necip Serdar The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level. (2009): 210 - 222.
MLA Sever Necip Serdar The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level. , 2009, ss.210 - 222.
AMA Sever N The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level. . 2009; 210 - 222.
Vancouver Sever N The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level. . 2009; 210 - 222.
IEEE Sever N "The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level." , ss.210 - 222, 2009.
ISNAD Sever, Necip Serdar. "The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level". (2009), 210-222.
APA Sever N (2009). The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(1), 210 - 222.
Chicago Sever Necip Serdar The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 10, no.1 (2009): 210 - 222.
MLA Sever Necip Serdar The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol.10, no.1, 2009, ss.210 - 222.
AMA Sever N The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 2009; 10(1): 210 - 222.
Vancouver Sever N The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 2009; 10(1): 210 - 222.
IEEE Sever N "The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level." The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10, ss.210 - 222, 2009.
ISNAD Sever, Necip Serdar. "The effectivenes of online and off line word of mouth messages on traditional course choice at tertiary level". The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 10/1 (2009), 210-222.