The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective

Şule ŞAHİN, (Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Aktüerya Bilimleri Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Helga TLINÇ RITTERSBERGER, (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Sosyoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Adem Yavuz ELVEREN (Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İktisat Bölümü, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye)
Ekonomik Yaklaşım
8 0
Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 77 Sayfa Aralığı: 115 - 142 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective

Öz:
Kadınların hem aile içinde hem de emek piyasasında değişen rolleri buyüzyılda yeni bir sosyal politika oluşturmanın en önemli konulardan biridir. Neo- liberal gelişmelerle birlikte özel emeklilik planları tüm dünyada sosyal güvenliksistemleri içinde daha yüksek bir paya ulaştı. Ancak, kadınların dezavantajları(daha düşük ücret düzeyi, kesikli iş yaşamı ve daha uzun yaşam beklentisi vb.)geleneksel dağıtım sistemleri ile karşılaştırıldığında emeklilik geliri anlamında özelemeklilik sistemlerinde olumsuz sonuçlar doğurur. Türkiye bu mevcut trendlebirlikte 2003 yılında özel sektör tarafından yönetilen emeklilik planı BireyselEmeklilik Sistemini oluşturdu. Emeklilik Gözetim Merkezi’nin sağladığı toplam1,457,704 kişiden örneklem olarak alınan 102,896 katılımcıya ait verileri kullananve 2008 - 2009 döneminde gerçekleştirilen bu çalışma genelleştirilmiş lineer modelkullanarak sosyal değişkenlerin (örneğin yaş, meslek, şehir, medeni durum, gelir,sosyal güvenlik kurumu ve eğitim gibi) bireylerin sisteme yaptıkları düzenli katkıpayları üzerindeki etkilerini ve toplumsal cinsiyet eşitsizliğini incelemektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat

Türkiye’de bireysel emeklilik sistemi: Toplumsal cinsiyetçi bir yaklaşım

Öz:
The changing role of women both within family and in the labour market isone of the most crucial issues of constructing a new social policy in our century. Inline with neo-liberal developments, private pension schemes have reached higherproportions in social security systems all over the world. However, it is a fact thatdisadvantages of women (i.e. lower level of wage, intermittent work life, and higherlife expectancy) have negative consequences on private pension schemes in terms ofretirement income compared with traditional pay-as-you-go systems. Turkey, in linewith the current trend, introduced a privately managed individual pension scheme,the Individual Pension System in 2003. This study (conducted in 2008 - 2009), usingthe actual data of 102,724 participants (sampled from a total of 1,457,704) providedby the Pension Monitoring Center, examines the effects of social variables (i.e. age,occupation, province, marital status, income, social security and education) onregular contributions of individuals to the system and analyzes the gender gap byusing the generalized linear model.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • ANDREWS, Emily S. (2006), “Pension Reforms and the Development of Pension Systems, An Evaluation of World Bank Assistance”, available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org EXTPENREFDEVPENSYS/Resources/pensions_evaluation.pdf, The World Bank, last accessed on May 31, 2008.
  • ARIN, Tülay. (2002), The Poverty of Social Security: The Welfare Regime in Turkey. In The Ravages of Neo-Liberalism: Economy, Society and Gender in Turkey, edited by N. Balkan and S. Savran, 73-91. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. New York.
  • ARTS, Wil, GELISSEN, John (2002), “Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report” Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 12, No. 2, 137-158.
  • BOJE, Thomas, LEIRA, Arnlaug (2000), Gender, Welfare State and the Market Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group: London.
  • BOZKUS, S. Cihan, ELVEREN, Adem Yavuz. (2008) “An Analysis of Gender Gaps in the Private Pension Scheme in Turkey” Ekonomik Yaklaşım, Vol. 19, No. 69, 89-106.
  • BUGRA, Ayse, KEYDER, Çaglar (2003), “New Poverty and the Changing Welfare Regime of Turkey”, Report Prepared for the United Nations Development Programme.
  • BUGRA, Ayşe, KEYDER, Çaglar (2006), “The Turkish Welfare Regime in Transformation”, Journal of European Social Policy, Vol.16, No. 3, 211- 228.
  • DALY, Mary (1994)”Comparing Welfare States: Toward a Gender-Friendly Approach” pp. 101-117 in Gendering Welfare States ed. Diane Sainsbury Sage Publications: London.
  • DION, Michelle (2008) “Retrenchment, Expansion and the Transformation of Mexican Social Protection Policies”, Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 42, No. 4, 434-450.
  • ELVEREN, Ali Haydar (2003a) “Bireysel Emeklilik Sisteminin Makro Ekonomik Etkileri [Macroeconomic Effects of the Individual Pension System]” İşveren Dergisi, Vol. 41, No. 8, 23.
  • ELVEREN, Ali Haydar (2003b) “Individual Pension System”, Interview at NTV, http://ntv-msnbc.com.tr/news/241266.asp, last accessed on January 16, 2009.
  • ELVEREN, Ali Haydar (2005), “Bireysel Emeklilik Sistemi: İşleyişi ve Gelişmeler”, Avrasya Sigortacılık Toplantısı, TSRSB Yayın 1, İstanbul.
  • ELVEREN, Adem Yavuz (2008a), ‘Social Security Reform in Turkey: A Critical Perspective’, Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 40, No. 2, 212- 232.
  • ELVEREN, Adem Yavuz (2008b), “Assessing Gender Inequality in the Turkish Pension System’, International Social Security Review, Vol. 61, No. 2, 39- 58.
  • ERGÖKMEN, N. Gülden (2006) “Kamu Emeklilik Sisteminden Bireysel Hesaplara Dayalı Fonlu Emeklilik Sistemine Geçişin Modellenmesi: Türkiye Uygulaması” Unpublished Speciality Thesis, Başbakanlık Hazine Müsteşarlığı Kamu İktisadi Teşebbüsleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
  • ESPING-ANDERSEN, Gosta (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton University Press.
  • ESPING-ANDERSEN, Gosta (ed.) (1996), Welfare Sates in Transition. National Adaptations in Global Economies London: Sage.
  • ESPING-ANDERSEN, Gosta (2002), Why we need a New Welfare State Oxford University Press.
  • ESTES, Carroll L. (2004), “Social Security Privatization and Older Women: A Feminist Political Economy Perspective” Journal of Aging Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1, 9-26.
  • FERRERA, Maurizio (1996), “The ’Southern Model’ of Welfare in Social Europe”, Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, 17-37.
  • FRASER, Nancy (1994), “After the Family Wage: Gender Equity and the Welfare State”, Political Theory, Vol. 22, No. 4, 591-618.
  • GILBERT, Neil. (2006), Gender and Social Security Reform what’s Fair for Women? Transactions Publisher: London.
  • GILL, Indermit S., PACKARD, Truman, YERMO, Juan (2005), “Keeping the Promise of Social Security in Latin America”, Washington, DC: World Bank, 340 pages.
  • GORNICK, Janet C., JACOBS, Jerry A. (1998), “Gender, the Welfare State, and Public Employemt: A comparative Study of Seven Industrialized Countries”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 63, No. 5, 688 – 710.
  • GOUGH, Ian, BRADSHAW, Jonathan, DITCH, John, EARDLEY, Tony, WHITEFORD, Peter (1997) “Social Assistance in OECD Countries”, Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 7, No. 1, 17-43.
  • GOUGH, Ian (1996) “Social Assistance in Southern Europe”, Southern European Society & Politics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1-23.
  • GUILLEN, A. M., MATSAGANIS, M. (2000), “Testing the ‘Social Dumping’ Hypothesis in Southern Europe: Welfare Policies in Greece and Spain during the Last 20 Years”, Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 10, No. 2, 120-145.
  • HEMERIJCK, Anton (2002), “The Self-Transformation of the European Social Model(s)”, in Why we need a New Welfare State, Oxford University Press.
  • HOLZMANN, Robert (2002), “The World Bank Approach to Pension Reform”, International Social Security Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, 11-34. http://www.r-project.org, last accessed on February 8, 2009.
  • HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT TURKEY (2004), http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/national/europethecis/turkey/name,3296,en.html, last accessed on January 10, 2009.
  • IWPR (Institute for Women’s Policy Research) (2000) Why Privatizing Social Security Would Hurt Women, IWPR Publication # D437RB.
  • JAMES, Estelle, EDWARDS, Alejandra Cox and WONG, Rebeca (2003), “The Gender Impact of Pension Reform: A Cross Country Analysis” Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Vol. 2, No. 2, 181-219.
  • JESSOP, Bob (1994), “The Transition to Post-Fordism and the Schumpetarian Workfare State”, in R. Burrows and B. Loader (eds.), Towards a Post- Fordist Welfare State? London: Routledge.
  • KALAYCIOĞLU, Sibel, RITTERSBERGER-TILIÇ, Helga (2000), “Intergenerational Solidarity Networks of Instrumental and Cultural Transfers Within Migrant Families in Turkey”, Ageing and Society, Vol. 20, No. 5, 523 -542.
  • KALAYCIOĞLU, Sibel (2006) “Dynamics of Poverty in Turkey: Gender, Rural/Urban Poverty, Social Networks and Reciprocal Survival Strategies”, Poverty and Social Deprivation in the Mediterranean Area: Trends, Policies and Welfare Prospects, pp.218-247.
  • KAR, Muhsin, ELVEREN, Adem Yavuz (2008), “Özel Emeklilik Sistemlerinde Cinsiyete Dayalı Gelir Farkı: Türkiye Örneği”, TİSK Akademi, Vol. 3, No. 5, 68-99.
  • LEIBFRIED, Stephan (1992), “Towards a European Welfare State? On Integrating Poverty Regimes in the European Community”, in Z. Ferge and J. E. Kolberg (eds), Social Policy in a Changing Europe, Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
  • LEITNER, Sigrid (2001), “Sex and Gender Discrimination within EU Pension Systems”, Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 11, No. 2, 99-115.
  • LEWIS, Jane (1992), “Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes”, Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 2, No. 3, 159-173.
  • LEWIS, Jane (1997), “Gender and welfare regimes: further thoughts”, Social Politics, Vol. 4, No. 2, 160-177.
  • MACDONALD, Martha (1998) “Gender and Social Security Policy: Pitfalls and Possibilities” Feminist Economics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-25.
  • MCCULLAGH, P., NELDER, John A (1989), Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman and Hall.
  • MINGIONE, E., (2001), “The Southern European Welfare Model and the Fight against Poverty and Social Exclusion” in Mostafa Tolba (eds.), Our Fragile World: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Development Oxford: EOLSS Publications.
  • ORLOFF, Ann Shola (1996) “Gender and the Welfare State”, Institute for Research on Poverty, Discussion Paper no. 1082-96.
  • ORSZAG, Peter R., STIGLITZ, Joseph E. (1999), “Rethinking Pension Reform: Ten Myths about Social Security Systems”, World Bank Conference.
  • PMC (Pension Monitoring Center) (Emeklilik Gözetim Merkezi) (2009), http://www.egm.org.tr, last accessed on March 24, 2009.
  • QUADAGNO, Jill, Fobes, Catherine (1995), “The Welfare State and the Cultural Reproduction of Gender: Making Good Girls and Boys in the Job Corps”, Social Problems, Vol. 42, No. 2, 171-190.
  • RA (REVENUE ADMINISTRATION) (Gelir İdaresi Başlanlığı) (2008), http:// http://www.gib.gov.tr, last accessed on February 8, 2008.
  • SAINSBURY, Diane (1994) Gendering Welfare States London: Sage Publications.
  • ŞAHİN, Şule (2006), Modeling the Convergence Process from Defined Benefit Pension Plans to Defined Contribution Pension Plans: Turkey Application (Belirlenmis Fayda Emeklilik Planlarindan Belirlenmis Katki Emeklilik Planlarina Gecisin Modellenmesi: Turkiye Uygulamasi) Unpublished MSc. Thesis, Department of Actuarial Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • ŞAHİN, Şule (2008), Transformation of the Turkish Welfare Regime: The Role of the Individual Pension System and its Effects on Women’s Welfare Unpublished MSc. Thesis, Department of Sociology, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • ŞAHİN, Şule, ELVEREN, Adem Yavuz (2009), “Gender Gaps in the Private Pension Systems: A Minimum Pension Guarantee Application for Turkey”, International Multidisciplinary Women Congress, October, 13-16, 2009, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • SARACENO, Chiara (2002), (ed.) Social Assistance Dynamics in Europe: National and Local Poverty Regimes. Bristol, The Policy Press.
  • SINGH, Ajit (1996) “Pension Reform, the Stock Market, Capital Formation and Economics Growth: A Critical Commentary on the World Bank’s Proposal”, Working Paper No. 2, Center for Economics Policy Analysis, New School for Social Research, New York.
  • STEINHILBER, Silke (2004), The Gender Implications of Pension Reforms. Gender Remarks and Evidence from Selected Countries, UNRISD http://www.unrisd.org/UNRISD/website/ document.nsf/d2a23ad2d50cb2a280256eb300385855/52dbb0b27c54635cc 12570350048ed4e/$FILE/steinhil.pdf, last accessed on January 03, 2009.
  • SCHWARZ, Anita M., DEMIRGUC-KUNT, Asli (1999), “Taking Stock of Pension Reforms Around the World”, SP Discussion Paper No. 9917, The World Bank.
  • TAN, Mine, ECEVİT, Yıldız, ÜŞÜR, Serpil Sancar, ACUNER, Selma (2008), “Türkiye’de Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitsizliği: Sorunlar, Öncelikler ve Çözüm Önerileri, ‘Kadın-Erkek Eşitliğine Doğru Yürüyüş: Eğitim, Çalışma Yaşamı ve Siyaset’ Raporunun Güncellenmesi”, Yayın No: TÜSİAD- T/2008-07/468.
  • TUOMINEN, Eila, LAITINEN-KUIKKA, Sini (2006), “Pension Policy in the European Union: Responses to the Changing Division of Labor in Family Life”, in N. Gilbert (ed.) Gender and Social Security Reform What’s Fair for Women?, pp. 45-80, Transaction Publishers: London.
  • WILLIAMSON, John B., RIX, Sara E. (1999) Social Security Reform: Implications for Women, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, MA.
APA ŞAHİN Ş, TLINÇ RITTERSBERGER H, Elveren A (2010). The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective. , 115 - 142.
Chicago ŞAHİN ŞULE,TLINÇ RITTERSBERGER Helga,Elveren Adem The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective. (2010): 115 - 142.
MLA ŞAHİN ŞULE,TLINÇ RITTERSBERGER Helga,Elveren Adem The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective. , 2010, ss.115 - 142.
AMA ŞAHİN Ş,TLINÇ RITTERSBERGER H,Elveren A The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective. . 2010; 115 - 142.
Vancouver ŞAHİN Ş,TLINÇ RITTERSBERGER H,Elveren A The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective. . 2010; 115 - 142.
IEEE ŞAHİN Ş,TLINÇ RITTERSBERGER H,Elveren A "The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective." , ss.115 - 142, 2010.
ISNAD ŞAHİN, ŞULE vd. "The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective". (2010), 115-142.
APA ŞAHİN Ş, TLINÇ RITTERSBERGER H, Elveren A (2010). The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 21(77), 115 - 142.
Chicago ŞAHİN ŞULE,TLINÇ RITTERSBERGER Helga,Elveren Adem The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective. Ekonomik Yaklaşım 21, no.77 (2010): 115 - 142.
MLA ŞAHİN ŞULE,TLINÇ RITTERSBERGER Helga,Elveren Adem The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, vol.21, no.77, 2010, ss.115 - 142.
AMA ŞAHİN Ş,TLINÇ RITTERSBERGER H,Elveren A The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective. Ekonomik Yaklaşım. 2010; 21(77): 115 - 142.
Vancouver ŞAHİN Ş,TLINÇ RITTERSBERGER H,Elveren A The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective. Ekonomik Yaklaşım. 2010; 21(77): 115 - 142.
IEEE ŞAHİN Ş,TLINÇ RITTERSBERGER H,Elveren A "The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective." Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 21, ss.115 - 142, 2010.
ISNAD ŞAHİN, ŞULE vd. "The individual pension system in Turkey: A gendered perspective". Ekonomik Yaklaşım 21/77 (2010), 115-142.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
16-04-2024 22:54

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları