Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 115 - 125 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces

Öz:
Türkiye’nin 7 bölgesine ait 35 ilden toplanan 340 adet yerel ekmeklik buğday çeşidinden seçilen 42 saf hat, 7modern ekmeklik buğday çeşidi ile birlikte Konya doğal koşullarında 2005-2006 ve 2006-2007 yetiştirme sezonlarındadeğerlendirilmiştir. Denemeler 3 tekerrürlü 7 × 7 latis deneme desenine göre kurulmuştur. Tane verimi ile 12 karakterarasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek amacıyla elde edilen verilere genotip-karakter (GK)-biplot analizi ve path analiziuygulanmıştır. İncelenen karakterlerle oluşturulan GK biplot grafiği, karakterler arası ilişkileri göstermiş (ıslahamaçları bakımından), pozitif veya negatif ilişkili karakterleri belirlemiş, hat ve ebeveyn seleksiyonu için oldukçaönemli olan genotiplerin (saf hat - çeşit) karakter profilini (güçlü-zayıf) görsel olarak değerlendirmeyi sağlamıştır.İncelenen karakterlerden, metrekarede tane sayısı, biyolojik verim, hasat indeksi, metrekarede başak sayısı, başaktatane sayısı ve başakta tane ağırlığında geniş varyasyonlar tespit edilmiştir. En yüksek tane verimine sahip olan saf hatveya çeşitlerin aynı zamanda en yüksek metrekarede tane sayısı, hasat indeksi ve biyolojik verim değerlerine de sahipoldukları belirlenmiştir. Tane verimi ile birlikte birkaç karakter bakımından iyi olan, G43 (Kars-TR15796–7), G33(Kars-TR15796–4), G20 (Kütahya-TR55167–3) ve G11 (Kütahya-TR55212–4) yerel buğday saf hatları çeşit adayı olarakekmeklik buğday bölge verim denemelerine alınabilir. Yüksek kalite değerlerine sahip olan G26 (Samsun-TR37926–3),G45 (Erzurum-TR32881–6) ve G49 (Erzurum-TR32668–1) saf hatlar ise, kalite ıslahında ebeveyn olarak kullanılabilir.Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, Türkiye kışlık yerel ekmeklik buğdayları kısa dönemde metrekaredeki tane sayısı ve biyolojikverim üzerinden yapılacak dolaylı ya da tane verimine göre yapılacak doğrudan seleksiyonla, uzun dönemde ise yüksekendüstriyel kalite karakterleri için yabancı genetik materyalle melezleme programlarına alınarak geliştirilebilir.
Anahtar Kelime: tohum ürün verimi başaklar verim ögeleri Triticum aestivum genotip çevre etkileşimi yerel çeşitler Türkiye hasat indeksi kışlık buğday ürün kalitesi kültür çeşitleri buğday path analizi

Konular: Orman Mühendisliği

Türkiye kışlık yerel ekmeklik buğdaylarında bazı karakterler arasındaki ilişkiler

Öz:
In this study, 42 bread wheat pure lines obtained from 340 landraces, collected from 35 provinces of 7 regions inTurkey, and 7 modern bread wheat cultivars were evaluated under rainfed conditions in Konya, in 2005-2006 and 2006- 2007 growing seasons. Experiments were conducted in a 7 × 7 lattice design in 3 replicates. Both genotype-traits (GT)biplot analysis and path analysis were used to investigate the relationships between grain yield and 12 traits. Applyingboth types of analyses to the multiple traits data revealed that GT biplot graphically displayed the interrelationships amongtraits (breeding objectives), identii ed traits that are positively or negatively associated, and facilitated visual comparisontrait proi les (strength and weakness) of genotypes, which is important for parent as well as variety selection. Vastvariations existed in traits (number of grains $m^ {-2}$ , harvest index, number of spikes $m^ {-2}$ , number of grains spik$e^ {-2}$ , andweight of grains spike-1and biological yield) and grain yield. It was found that either pure lines or cultivars with thehighest grain yield had the highest biological yield, number of grain $m^ {-2}$ , and harvest index. The results showed that purelines combined with favorable traits G43 (Kars-TR15796-7), G33 (Kars-TR15796-4), G20 (Kütahya-TR55167-3), andG11 (Kütahya-TR55212-4) can be evaluated in multi-environment trials for a candidate winter bread wheat registrationtrial. Some pure lines that had high quality traits G26 (Samsun-TR37926-3), G45 (Erzurum-TR32881-6) and G49(Erzurum-TR32668-1) might be good parents for enhancing quality in bread wheat. In conclusion, for the short-termimprovement of Turkish bread wheat landraces may be possible through an indirect selection of the number of grain m-2 and biological yield, or direct selection for grain yield per se. In the long-run, crossing programs between indigenousand introduced exotic germplasm may be necessary for high industrial quality characters of bread wheat.
Anahtar Kelime: landraces Turkey harvest index winter wheat crop quality cultivars wheat path analysis seeds crop yield spikes yield components Triticum aestivum genotype environment interaction

Konular: Orman Mühendisliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akçu ra M (2006) Türkiye Kışlık Ekmeklik Buğday Genetik Kaynaklarının Karakterizasyonu. Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, p 226.
  • Akçura M (2009) Genetic variability and interrelationship among grain yield and some quality traits in Turkish winter durum wheat landraces. Turk J Agric For 33: 547-556.
  • Akçura M, Topal A (2008) İç Anadolu Bölgesi Yerel Ekmeklik Buğday Populasyonlarından Seçilen Saf Hatların Tane Verimi ve Kalite Özellikleri Yönünden Bazı Tescilli Çeşitlerlerle Karşılaştırılması, Ülkesel Tahıl Sempozyumu 59-69, 2-5 Haziran Konya.
  • Belay G, Tesemma T, Becker HC, Merker A (1993) Variation and interrelationships of agronomic traits in Ethiopian tetraploid wheat landraces. Euphytica 71: 181-188.
  • Bilgin O, Başer I, Korkut KZ, Gençtan T, Balkan A, Sağlam N (2009) Variations for grain yield and milling value of durum wheat landraces and obsolete cul tivars. Philipp Agric Scientist 92: 25-32.
  • DMI (2007) Devlet Meteoroloji İşleri Konya Rasat İstasyonu Çok Yıllık İklim Verileri, Konya.
  • Dokuyucu T, Akkaya A, Akçura M (2002) The effects of intraplot competition on yield-related traits in wheat plots. Turk J Field Crops 7: 40-47.
  • Flores F, Moreno MT, Cubero JI (1998) A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G × E interaction. Field Crops Res 56: 271-286.
  • Gökgöl M (1939) Turkish Wheats, Vol. II. Yesilköy Seed Breeding Institute Publications. No. 14, Tan Press, Istanbul, Turkey (In Turkish), 955 pp.
  • Harlan JR (1971) Agricultural Origins: Centers and Noncenters. Science 174: 468–473.
  • Jaradat AA (1991). Phenotypic divergence for morphological and yield-related traits among landrace genotypes of durum wheat from Jordan. Euphytica 52: 155-164.
  • Karagöz A, Zencirci N (2005) Variation in wheat (Triticum spp.) landraces from dif erent altitudes of three regions of Turkey . Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 775-785.
  • Kroonenberg PM (1995) Introduction to Biplots for G×E Tables. Department of Mathematics, Research Report 51, University of Queensland.
  • Li CC (1955) The Theory of Path Coei cients. In: Population Genetics, pp. 144-171. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Pena RJ, Amaya A, Rajaram S, Mujeeb A (1990) Variation in quality characteristics with some spring 1B/1R translocation wheats. J Cereal Sci 12: 105-112.
  • Rubio J, Cubero JI, Martín LM, Suso MJ, Flores F (2004) Biplot analysis of trait relations of white lupin in Spain. Euphytica 135: 217-224.
  • SAS Institute (1999) SAS/STAT Sot ware: Release 9.00. SAS Inst. Cary, NC, USA.
  • Vavilov NI (1950) The phytogeographic basis of plant breeding. In: The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Transl. by K. Starr Chester. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, MA.
  • Williams PC, Norris KH, Zarowski WS (1982) Inl uence of temperature on estimation of protein and moisture in wheat by near-infrared rel ectance. Cereal Chem 59: 473-477.
  • Yan W, Kang MS (2003) GGE-Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders. Geneticists and Agronomists. CRD Press, Boca Raton.
  • Yan W, Reid JF (2008) Breeding Line Selection Based on Multiple Traits. Crop Sci 48: 417-423.
  • Yan W, Rajcan I (2002) Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci 42: 11-20.
  • Yan W (2001) GGE biplot- A windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types two-way data. Agron J 93: 1111-1118.
  • Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z (2000) Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci 40: 597-605.
  • Zencirci N (2008) Effect of upper plant parts on yield and quality in Turkish durum wheat landraces from dif erent regions, altitudes, and provinces. Turk J Agric For 32: 29-39.
APA AKÇURA M (2011). The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. , 115 - 125.
Chicago AKÇURA MEVLÜT The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. (2011): 115 - 125.
MLA AKÇURA MEVLÜT The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. , 2011, ss.115 - 125.
AMA AKÇURA M The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. . 2011; 115 - 125.
Vancouver AKÇURA M The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. . 2011; 115 - 125.
IEEE AKÇURA M "The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces." , ss.115 - 125, 2011.
ISNAD AKÇURA, MEVLÜT. "The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces". (2011), 115-125.
APA AKÇURA M (2011). The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 35(2), 115 - 125.
Chicago AKÇURA MEVLÜT The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 35, no.2 (2011): 115 - 125.
MLA AKÇURA MEVLÜT The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, vol.35, no.2, 2011, ss.115 - 125.
AMA AKÇURA M The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2011; 35(2): 115 - 125.
Vancouver AKÇURA M The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2011; 35(2): 115 - 125.
IEEE AKÇURA M "The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces." Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 35, ss.115 - 125, 2011.
ISNAD AKÇURA, MEVLÜT. "The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces". Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 35/2 (2011), 115-125.