Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 109 - 132 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Soğuk savaş sonrası Orta Asya ve Kafkasya ekseninde Türkiye-Nato-Rusya ilişkileri ve Türk dış politikası’na yansımaları

Öz:
Soğuk Savaş’ın sona ermesinden ve Sovyetler Birliği’nin dağılmasından sonra Orta Asya ve Kafkasya’da beş Türk Cumhuriyeti dahil birçok ülke bağımsızlıklarını kazanmış, bölgede bulunan zengin hidrokarbon rezervleri bölgeyi küresel ve bölgesel aktörlerin ilgi odağı haline getirmiştir. 11 Eylül sonrasında NATO’nun Afganistan’da güvenlik ve istikrarı sağlamadaki başarısının terörizmle mücadele ve İttifak’ın geleceği açısından kritik önem kazanması bölgenin jeostratejik önemini daha da arttırmıştır. Bu makalede, Türkiye’nin bölgede izlediği dış politika, NATO ve Rusya ile ilişkileri bağlamında değerlendirilmiştir. NATO’nun Soğuk Savaş sonrası geleneksel bir ortak savunma örgütünden işbirliğine dayalı bir güvenlik örgütüne dönüşümü, bölgeye bakış açısı ve bölge ülkeleriyle yaptığı işbirlikleri irdelenmiştir. Türkiye’nin Soğuk Savaş sonrası NATO ile ilişkileri incelenmiş, bölgede başta terörizmle mücadele ve enerji güvenliği alanlarında olmak üzere İttifak’la yaptığı işbirlikleri ele alınmış, Rusya ve Çin’in bölgesel politikaları analiz edilmiştir. Türkiye’nin bölge ülkelerinin siyasi, askeri ve ekonomik gelişimlerine destek vermeye ve bölgede başta uluslararası terörizm ve enerji güvenliği boyutlarında olmak üzere NATO ile işbirliği yapmaya devam edeceği, Rusya ile ilişkilerini geliştirmeye çalışacağı öngörülmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Siyasi Bilimler Kamu Yönetimi Asya Çalışmaları Uluslararası İlişkiler

Post-Cold war Turkey-Nato-Russia relations on the Central Asia-Caucasia axis and their reflections on the Turkish foreign policy

Öz:
After the end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the international system transformed from a bipolar system into an unipolar system. Relationship patterns at the regional and global level changed. Many countries including five Turkish Republics gained independence in the Central Asia and Caucasus. The region became the focus of interest of regional and global actors after rich hydrocarbon reserves were discovered in the region. Regional and global actors competed to consolidate their control on the critical energy infrastructure in the region. Since the success of NATO at providing security and stability in Afghanistan after September 11 gained critical importance with regards to the fight with terrorism and the future of the Alliance, the region’s geostrategic importance increased further. In this article, Turkey’s foreign policy in the region was evaluated within context of her relations with the NATO and Russia.The end of the Cold War changed the role and the function of the NATO in the international system. Many prominent scholars argued that NATO lost its “raison d’etre”. Nonetheless, the Alliance transformed itself from a collective defence organization into a collective security organization according to new threats. NATO identified international terrorism, proliferation of nuclear weapons and drugs and human trafficking as the new threat elements and increased her collaboration with many countries in the Caucasus and the Central Asia via programs such as Partnership for Peace (PFP). In this article, the transformation of NATO, the Alliance’s perspective about the Central Asia and the Caucasus and the collaborations she made with the region countries were investigated. Turkey’s relations with the NATO after the Cold War and the cooperation she made with the Alliance in areas such as international terrorism and energy security were examined. Energy security became a priority for many countries and for international organizations such as NATO and EU especially in the 2000s. Energy security is also a strategic factor in the political and economic dynamics of the Central Asia and the Caucasus. Some of the region countries are energy producers while others are energy consumers and transit countries in a complimentary way. Azerbaijan,Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan are energy producers while Georgia and Turkey are transit countries. Russia is a major player in the region dynamics since she controls most of the critical energy infrastructure in the region. The energy rich Caucasus and the Central Asian countries depend at a great extent on Russia to export their oil and natural gas reserves. The US and the EU prefers the transportation of the hydrocarbon reserves of the region over the routes bypassing the Russian territories to lower the EU’s dependence on Russia. Baku-Tiflis-Ceyhan oil pipeline that connects the Caspian Region to the Europe via Georgia and Turkey has a historical significance since it is the first pipeline that bypassed Russia and broken down Russia’s monopoly at the transportation dimension. The Nabucco Pipeline, which is planned to carry natural gas of the Caucasus, the Central Asia and the Middle East to the EU via Turkey, is supported by the western countries since it would lower energy dependence on Russia. Russia, as a counter-step, developed the South Stream Project, which would carry the Russian, the Caspian Region and the Central Asian natural gas via Russia and the Black Sea to the EU bypassing Turkey and in this way would sustain Russia’s control on the energy infrastructure.The clashes between the Russian Federation and Georgia in the summer 2008 showed the fragility of stability in the Caucasus and changed the geopolitical landscape fundamentally. The clashes between the two countries had reflections and implications beyond the region at the global level. It is argued that the developments are indications of return to Realpolitik in the region and even at the global level after the end of the Cold War. Russia’s military operations stunned the western world and reminded Russia’s military and political weight particularly in the region. These developments and the regional policies of Turkey, NATO, the US, the EU, Russia and China were analyzed in the article. It was anticipated that Turkey will continue to support the political, military and economic development of the region countries, cooperate with the NATO in international terrorism and energy security dimensions, and will try to improve her relations with Russia.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Siyasi Bilimler Kamu Yönetimi Asya Çalışmaları Uluslararası İlişkiler
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • AMINEH, Parvizi and HOUWELING, Henk (2004), Central Eurasia in Global Politics: Conflict, Security and Development, Brill Academic Pub, Leiden.
  • BALCI, Ali and MIŞ, Nebi (2008), “Turkey's Role in the Alliance of Civilizations: A New Perspective in Turkish Foreign Policy”, Turkish Studies, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 387-406.
  • BEKCAN, Umut (2008), “NATO İttifak mı Ulusal Güvenlik Aracı mı?”, Akademik Araştırmalar, Cilt: 10, Sayı: 36, ss. 85-91.
  • BEZHANISHVILI, Zurab (2009), “Between Conflict and Partnership: Contemporary Developments in Russian-Georgian Relations”, Russian Politics & Law, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 19-35.
  • BLANK, Stephen (2008), “The Strategic Importance of Central Asia: An American View”, Parameters, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 73-87.
  • BRYZA, Matt (2008), “Invigorating the U.S.-Turkey Strategic Partnership”, DISAM Journal of International Security Assistance Management, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 69-74.
  • BRZEZINSKI, Zbigniew (1997), The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostratejic Imperatives, Basic Books, New York.
  • BRZEZINSKI, Zbigniew (2009), “An Agenda for NATO”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 88, No. 5, pp. 2-20.
  • CRAWFORD, Gordon (2008), “EU Human Rights and Democracy Promotion in Central Asia: From Lofty Principles to Lowly Self-interests”, Perspectives on European Politics & Society, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 172-191.
  • CUTLER, Robert M. (2007), “US–Russian Strategic Relations and the Structuration of Central Asia”, Perspectives on Global Development & Technology, Vol. 6, No. 1-3, pp. 109-125.
  • ÇAYHAN, Esra (2003), “Towards a European Security and Defense Policy: With or Without Turkey?", Turkish Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 35-54.
  • DHAKA, Ambrish (2009), “The Geopolitics of Energy Security and the Response to Its Challenges by India and Germany”, Geopolitics, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 278-299.
  • EFEGIL, Ertan and STONE, Leonard A. (2003), “Iran And Turkey In Central Asia: Opportunities For Rapprochement In The Post-Cold War Era”, Journal of Third World Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 55-77.
  • HAVEL, Vaclav (2008), “Five Points on the Issue of NATO New Presence”, The Prague Journal of Central European Affairs, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 24-27.
  • HILL, Fiona (2003), “Seismic Shifts in Eurasia: The Changing Relationship Between Turkey and Russia and its Implications for the South Caucasus”, Journal of Southeast European & Black Sea Studies, Vol. 3, No.3, pp. 55-75.
  • HUNTER, Shireen (2001), “Turkey, Central Asia, and the Caucasus: Ten Years After Independence”, Journal of Southeast European & Black Sea Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 1-16.
  • IBRAHIM, Azeem (2009), “Testing the NATO Alliance”, Harvard International Review, Vol. 31, No. 2, p. 80.
  • ISMAILOV, Eldar and PAPAVA, Vladimer (2008), “A New Concept for the Caucasus”, Journal of Southeast European & Black Sea Studies, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 283-298.
  • KANDIYOTI, Rafael (2008), “What Price Access to the Open Seas? The Geopolitics of Oil and Gas Transmission from the Trans-Caspian Republics”, Central Asian Survey, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 75-93.
  • KAVALSKI, Emilian (2007), “Partnership or Rivalry between the EU, China and India in Central Asia: The Normative Power of Regional Actors with Global Aspirations”, European Law Journal, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 839-856.
  • KAZANTSEV, Andrei (2008), “Russian Policy in Central Asia and the Caspian Sea Region”, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 60, No. 6, pp. 1073-1088.
  • KERR, David and SWINTON, Laura C. (2008), “China, Xinjiang, and The Transnational Security of Central Asia”, Critical Asian Studies, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 89-112.
  • KHIDIRBEKUGHLI, Doulatbek (2003), “U.S. Geostrategy in Central Asia: A Kazakh Perspective”, Comparative Strategy, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 159-168.
  • KURECIC, Petar (2008), “NATO Enlargement: A Geopolitical Victory of the United States in the Post-Cold War Era? Results and Perspectives”, Croatian Geographical Bulletin, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 25-42.
  • MAKARYCHEV, Andrey (2009), “Russia, NATO, and the ‘Color Revolutions’: Discursive Traps”, Russian Politics & Law, Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 40-51.
  • MCCGWIRE, Michael and CLARKE, Michael (2008), “NATO Expansion: A Policy Error of Historic Importance”, International Affairs, Vol. 84, No. 6, pp 1281-1301.
  • MONAGHAN, Andrew (2006), “Energy Security: What Role for NATO?”, NATO Defense College Research Paper, No. 29.
  • MONAGHAN, Andrew (2009), “Russia at the Resumption of NATO-Russia Relations”, NATO Defense College Research Division Report, January 26, 2009, pp. 1-4.
  • REDING, Andrew (2009), “Georgian and Ukrainian Conflicts: The Limitations of NATO”, Brown Journal of World Affairs, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 171-181.
  • RYNNING, Sten (2007), “NATO and the Broader Middle East, 1949-2007: The History and Lessons of Controversial Encounters”, Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 905-927.
  • SHEA, Jamie (2006), “Enerji Güvenliği: NATO’nun Potansiyel Rolü”, NATO Dergisi, Sonbahar 2006.
  • TAZHIN, Marat (2008), “The Geopolitical Role of the Main Global Players in Central Asia”, American Foreign Policy Interests, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 63-69.
  • TUNCER, Idil (2000), “The Security Policies of the Russian Federation: The "Near Abroad" and Turkey”, Turkish Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 95-113.
  • UDUM, Şebnem (2002), “Turkey and the Emerging European Security Framework”, Turkish Studies, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 69-104.
  • UZGEL, İlhan (2001), “ABD ve NATO’yla İlişkiler”, Türk Dış Politikası Cilt II, (Ed.) Oran, Baskın, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul, ss. 243-326.
  • VAMVAKAS, Petros (2009), “NATO and Turkey in Afghanistan and Central Asia: Possibilities and Blind Spots”, Turkish Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 57-74.
  • VINNIKOV, Alexander (2009), “NATO and Central Asia: Security, Interests and Values in a Strategic Region”, Security & Human Rights, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 68-82.
  • YANIK, Lerna K. (2007), “Allies or Partners? An Appraisal of Turkey's Ties to Russia, 1991-2007”, East European Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 349-370.
  • ZIEGLER, Charles (2007, February 28), “The U.S., NATO and Central Asia: Collective Security in an Energy-Rich Region”, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Chicago, IL, USA.
APA ÖZKAN G (2010). Soğuk savaş sonrası Orta Asya ve Kafkasya ekseninde Türkiye-Nato-Rusya ilişkileri ve Türk dış politikası’na yansımaları. , 109 - 132.
Chicago ÖZKAN GÖKHAN Soğuk savaş sonrası Orta Asya ve Kafkasya ekseninde Türkiye-Nato-Rusya ilişkileri ve Türk dış politikası’na yansımaları. (2010): 109 - 132.
MLA ÖZKAN GÖKHAN Soğuk savaş sonrası Orta Asya ve Kafkasya ekseninde Türkiye-Nato-Rusya ilişkileri ve Türk dış politikası’na yansımaları. , 2010, ss.109 - 132.
AMA ÖZKAN G Soğuk savaş sonrası Orta Asya ve Kafkasya ekseninde Türkiye-Nato-Rusya ilişkileri ve Türk dış politikası’na yansımaları. . 2010; 109 - 132.
Vancouver ÖZKAN G Soğuk savaş sonrası Orta Asya ve Kafkasya ekseninde Türkiye-Nato-Rusya ilişkileri ve Türk dış politikası’na yansımaları. . 2010; 109 - 132.
IEEE ÖZKAN G "Soğuk savaş sonrası Orta Asya ve Kafkasya ekseninde Türkiye-Nato-Rusya ilişkileri ve Türk dış politikası’na yansımaları." , ss.109 - 132, 2010.
ISNAD ÖZKAN, GÖKHAN. "Soğuk savaş sonrası Orta Asya ve Kafkasya ekseninde Türkiye-Nato-Rusya ilişkileri ve Türk dış politikası’na yansımaları". (2010), 109-132.
APA ÖZKAN G (2010). Soğuk savaş sonrası Orta Asya ve Kafkasya ekseninde Türkiye-Nato-Rusya ilişkileri ve Türk dış politikası’na yansımaları. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 109 - 132.
Chicago ÖZKAN GÖKHAN Soğuk savaş sonrası Orta Asya ve Kafkasya ekseninde Türkiye-Nato-Rusya ilişkileri ve Türk dış politikası’na yansımaları. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 12, no.1 (2010): 109 - 132.
MLA ÖZKAN GÖKHAN Soğuk savaş sonrası Orta Asya ve Kafkasya ekseninde Türkiye-Nato-Rusya ilişkileri ve Türk dış politikası’na yansımaları. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.12, no.1, 2010, ss.109 - 132.
AMA ÖZKAN G Soğuk savaş sonrası Orta Asya ve Kafkasya ekseninde Türkiye-Nato-Rusya ilişkileri ve Türk dış politikası’na yansımaları. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010; 12(1): 109 - 132.
Vancouver ÖZKAN G Soğuk savaş sonrası Orta Asya ve Kafkasya ekseninde Türkiye-Nato-Rusya ilişkileri ve Türk dış politikası’na yansımaları. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010; 12(1): 109 - 132.
IEEE ÖZKAN G "Soğuk savaş sonrası Orta Asya ve Kafkasya ekseninde Türkiye-Nato-Rusya ilişkileri ve Türk dış politikası’na yansımaları." Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, ss.109 - 132, 2010.
ISNAD ÖZKAN, GÖKHAN. "Soğuk savaş sonrası Orta Asya ve Kafkasya ekseninde Türkiye-Nato-Rusya ilişkileri ve Türk dış politikası’na yansımaları". Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 12/1 (2010), 109-132.