Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types

Türk, Mevlüt; YÜKSEL, OSMAN; albayrak, sebahattin

Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types

Mevlüt TÜRK, (Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Isparta, Türkiye)

Sebahattin ALBAYRAK, (Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Isparta, Türkiye)

Osman YÜKSEL (Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Isparta, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Field Crops

2 1

Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 137 - 141 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types

Öz:

This study aimed to determine the effects of four seeding rates (75, 100, 125 and 150 plant $m^{-2})$ on forage yield and quality of pea cultivars (Pisum sativum L.) of differing leaf types. Two semi-leafless cultivars (Ulubatli and Kirazli), two leafed cultivars (Golyazi and Urunlu) were used in this research. Plant height, plants number per $m^{2,}$ seeds number per pod, lodging scores, 1000 seed weight, forage yield, DM yield, seed yield, forage CP yield and seed CP yield were determined. According to two years averages, Golyazi had the highest 1000 seed weight, forage yield, DM yield, seed yield, forage CP yield and seed CP yield. Semi-leafless pea cultivars (Ulubatli and Kirazli) had significantly better standing ability than normal leaf cultivars (Urunlu and Golyazi). Increasing seed rates resulted in an increase in plants per$m^{2,}$ lodging scores, forage yield, DM yield and forage CP yield. However, increasing seed rates caused decrease in seeds per pod and seed CP yield in two years averages.

Anahtar Kelime: peas leaves forage seed yield dry matter plant disorders Pisum sativum

Konular: Ziraat Mühendisliği

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Acikgoz. E., V. Katkat, S. Omeroglu, B. Okan, 1985. Mineral elements and amino acid concentrations in field pea and common vetch herbages and seeds. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 55,179–185.
Armstrong, E. L., 1989. Seeding date and rate of conventional and semi-leafless field peas. Proceedings 5th Australian Agronomy Conference, p. 500. Perth,Western Australia.
Ayaz, S., B.A. McKenzie, G.D. Hill and D.L. McNeil, 2004. Variability in yield of four grain legume species in a subhumid temperate environment. II. Yield components. Journal of Agricultural Science. 142: 21-28.
Bakry, M.O., M.M. Abou El-Magd and A.M. Shaheen, 1984. Response of growth and yield of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to plant population and NPK fertilization. Egypt. J. Hort. 11: 151-161.
Banniza, S., P. Hashemi, T. Warkentin, A. Vandenberg and A. Davis, 2005. The relationship among lodging, stem anatomy, degree of lignification and resistance to mycosphaelrella blight in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Canadian Journal of Botany. 83: 954-967.
Berry, G. J., 1985. Performance of new field pea types. Proceedings of the 3rd Australian Agronomy Conference, January/February 1985, p. 322. University of Tasmania, Hobart.
Biederbeck, V.O., O.T. Boudman, 1994. Water use by annual green manure legumes in dryland cropping system. Agron. J. 86, 543–549.
Biarnes-Dumoulin, V., J.B. Denis, I. Lejeune-Henaut, G. Eteve, 1996. Interpreting yield instability in pea using genotypic and environmental covariates. Crop Sci.36, 115.120.
Cawood, R. J., 1987. Productivity of conventional and new pea phenotypes in Victoria. Proceedings of the 4th Australian Agronomy Conference, 24-27 August, p.224. La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria.
Cote, R., J.M. Gerrath, U. Posluszny and B. Grodzinski, 1992. Comparative development of conventional and semi-leafless peas (Pisum sativum). Can. J.Bot. 70: 571-580.
Cousin, R., 1997. Peas (Pisum sativum L.). Field Crops Research. 53: 111-130. Davies, D.R., G.J. Berry, M.C. Heath, and T.C. Dawkins, 1985. Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Grain Legume Crops. Ch 5. Collins, London.
Dominguez, C and D.J. Hume, 1978. Flowering, abortion and yield of early maturing soybeans at three densities. Agronomy Journal. 70: 801-805.
Heath M.C. and P.D. Hebblethwaite, 1984. A basis for improving the dried pea crop.Outlook on Agriculture 13: 195-202.
Heath, M.C. and P.D. Hebblethwaite, 1985a. Are semi-leafless peas the answer? Arable Farming 12: (2), 40-49.
Heath, M.C. and P.D. Hebblethwaite, 1985b. Solar radiation interception by leafless and leafed peas (Pisum sativum) under contrasting field conditions. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107: 309-318.
Heath M.C. and P.D. Hebblethwaite, 1985c. Agronomic problems associated with the pea crop. Ch 2. In the Pea Crop: A Basis for Improvement. 486 pp.
Johnston, A.M., G.W. Clayton, G.P. Lafond, K.N. Harker, T.J. Hogg, E.N. Johnson, W.E. May and J.T. McConnell, 2002. Field Pea Seeding Management. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82: 639-644.
Knott, C.M. and S.J. Belcher, 1998. Optimum sowing dates and plant populations for winter peas (Pisum sativum). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge. 131:499-454.
Kruger, N.S., 1977. The effect of plant density on leaf area index and yields of Pisum sativum. L. Queensland Journal of Agricultural and Animal Science. 34: 35-52.
Martin, I., J.L Tenoria and L. Ayerbe, 1994. Yield, growth and water use of conventional and semi-leafless peas in semi-arid environments. Crop Sci. 34:1576-1583.
May, W.E., G.P. Lafond, E.N. Johnson, T. Hogg, A.M. Johnston, B. Nybo, N. Harker and G. Clayton, 2003. An assessment of the concept of early time of weed removal in field pea using natural weed populations. Can. J. Plant Sci. 83: 423-431.
McEven, J.D.P.Yeoman and R.Moffit, 1988. Effect of seed rates, sowing dates and methods of sowing on autumn-sown field beans (Vicia faba L.). J.Agric.Sci.Camb.110, 345-352.
McKenzie, D.B., D. Sponer, 1999. White lupin: an alternative to pea in oat-legume forage mixtures grown in New Foundland. Can. J. Plant Sci. 79, 43–47.
Meadley, J.T. and G.M Milbourn, 1970. The growth of vining peas. II. The effect of density of planting. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge. 74: 273-278.
Murray, G.A. and D.L. Auld, 1987. Effects of seeding rate, row spacing and seed size on chickpea yield and seed size. J. Appl. Seed Produc. 5: 10.19.
Pandley, S and E.T. Gritton, 1975. Genotypic and Phenotypic Variances and Correlations in Peas. Can J. Plant Sci. 3: 353-356.
Rauber, R., K. Schmidtke and H. Kimpel-Freund, 2001. The performance of pea (Pisum sativum) and its role in determining yield advantages in mixed stands of pea and oat (Avena sativa). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 187: 137-144.
Rowell DR 1996. Soil science: methods and applications. Harlow, Longman. Salter, P.J. and J.B. Williams, 1967. The effect of irrigation on pea crops grown at different plant densities. Journal of Horticultural Science. 42: 59-66.
SAS Institute, 1999. SAS user.s guide. Version 8. SAS Inst. Cary, NC.
Semere, T. and R.J. Froud-Williams, 2001. The effect of pea cultivar and water stress on root and shoot competition between vegetative plants of maize and peas. J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 137-145.
Shaukat, A., B.A. McKenzie and G.D. Hill, 1999. The effect of plant population on dry matter accumulation, yield and yield components of four grain legumes. Agronomy N.Z. 29: 9-15.
Snoad, B., 1985. The need for improved pea-crop plant ideotypes. In ’The Pea Crop. A Basis for Crop Improvement.’ (Eds P. D. Hebblethwaite, M. C. Heath and T. C. K. Dawkins.) pp. 31-41.
Snoad, B., 1974. A preliminary assessment of .leafless. pea. Euphytica. 23: 257-263.
Stelling, D., 1989. Problems of breeding for improved standing ability of dried pea. Pisum sativum L. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 163: 21-32.
Stoker, R., 1975. Effect of plant population on yield of garden peas under different moisture regimes. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 3: 333-337.
Stützel, H. And W. Aufhammer, 1992. Grain yield in determinate and indeterminate cultivars of Vicia faba with different plant distribution patterns and population densities. J.Agric.Sci.Camb.118,343-352.
Townley-Smith, L. and A.T. Wright, 1994. Field pea cultivar and weed response to crop seed rate in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 74: 387-393.
Uzun, A. and E. Acikgoz, 1998. Effect of sowing season and seeding rate on the morphological traits and yield in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 181: 215-222.
Uzun, A., U. Bilgili, M. Sincik, I. Filya and E. Acikgoz, 2005. Yield and quality of forage type pea lines of contrasting leaf type. Europ. J. Agronomy. 22: 85-94.
Zain, Z. M., J.N. Gallagher, J.G.H. White and J.B.Reid, 1983. The effect of irrigation on radiation absorption, water use and yield of conventional and semi-leafless peas. Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand 13, 95-102.
Zohary, D. and M. Hopf, 2002. Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia, Europe and the Nile Valley. Third Edition. Oxford University Press Inc. New York.

APA	Türk M, albayrak s, YÜKSEL O (2011). Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. , 137 - 141.
Chicago	Türk Mevlüt,albayrak sebahattin,YÜKSEL OSMAN Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. (2011): 137 - 141.
MLA	Türk Mevlüt,albayrak sebahattin,YÜKSEL OSMAN Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. , 2011, ss.137 - 141.
AMA	Türk M,albayrak s,YÜKSEL O Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. . 2011; 137 - 141.
Vancouver	Türk M,albayrak s,YÜKSEL O Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. . 2011; 137 - 141.
IEEE	Türk M,albayrak s,YÜKSEL O "Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types." , ss.137 - 141, 2011.
ISNAD	Türk, Mevlüt vd. "Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types". (2011), 137-141.

APA	Türk M, albayrak s, YÜKSEL O (2011). Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 16(2), 137 - 141.
Chicago	Türk Mevlüt,albayrak sebahattin,YÜKSEL OSMAN Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 16, no.2 (2011): 137 - 141.
MLA	Türk Mevlüt,albayrak sebahattin,YÜKSEL OSMAN Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, vol.16, no.2, 2011, ss.137 - 141.
AMA	Türk M,albayrak s,YÜKSEL O Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 2011; 16(2): 137 - 141.
Vancouver	Türk M,albayrak s,YÜKSEL O Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 2011; 16(2): 137 - 141.
IEEE	Türk M,albayrak s,YÜKSEL O "Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types." Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 16, ss.137 - 141, 2011.
ISNAD	Türk, Mevlüt vd. "Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types". Turkish Journal of Field Crops 16/2 (2011), 137-141.