Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 44 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 27 - 56 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Ekonomik gelişmenin yaratıcı yıkımı: Schumpeteryan girişimci

Öz:
İktisat literatüründe girişimci konusu daha çok ekonomik gelişme açısından incelenmiştir. Neoklasik iktisadın statik bir temele sahip olması nedeniyle ekonomik değişimin güçlerini açıklayamayacağını belirten Schumpeter, dinamik bir teorinin gerekliliğini savunarak farklı bir pozisyon almıştır. Bu dinamik ekonomik değişim teorisinin temel unsuru olarak da girişimciyi yerleştirmiştir. Schumpeter'e göre girişimcinin temel rolü, ekonomik değişimi sağlayan yeni birleşimleri ya da yenilikleri gerçekleştirmektir. Bu yeni birleşimler yaratıcı yıkıma yol açarak, ekonomik sistemi dengesizliğe götürmektedir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, kapitalist sistem içinde yeni birleşimler aracılığıyla yaratıcı yıkıma neden olan Schumpeteryan girişimcinin, bireysel (psikolojik) ve liderlik (sosyolojik) özellikleri ele alınarak onun diğer iktisadi aktörlerden farkını ortaya koymak ve kapitalizmin geleceğinde (yıkılışında) oynayacağı rolü göstermektir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İletişim İşletme İktisat İşletme Finans

The creative destruction of economic development: The schumpeterian entrepreneuer

Öz:
The subject of the entrepreneur in economic theory has mostly been examined in terms of development. Schumpeter, who argued that the neoclassical economic theory could not explain the powers of the economic change due to its static base, took a different position by arguing the necessity of a dynamic theory. Schumpeter identified the entrepreneur as essential element of the dynamic theory of economic change. To Schumpeter, the major role of the entrepreneur is to realize new combinations or innovations that ensure economic change. The primary objective of this study is to explore the individual (psychological) and leadership (sociological) characteristics of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur, who leads to creative destruction via the new combinations in the capitalist system; to put forth his difference from other economic actors and to demonstrate his role in the future (the collapse) of capitalism.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İletişim İşletme İktisat İşletme Finans
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Diğer Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Arena, Richard - Dangel-Hagnauer, Cecile (2002), "Introduction", Arena, Richard -Dangel-Hagnauer, Cecile (Eds.), The Contribution of Joseph Schumpeter to Economics: Economic Development and Institutional Change, Roütledge, London and New York, s. 1-18.
  • Arena, Richard - Romani, Paul-Marie (2002), "Schumpeter on Entrepreneurship", Arena, Richard - Dangel-Hagnauer, Cecile (Eds.), The Contribution of Joseph Schumpeter to Economics: Economic Development and Institutional Change, Routledge, London and New York, s. 167-183.
  • Arena, Richard (2008), "On the Relation between Economics and Sociology: Marshall and Schumpeter", Shionoya, Yuichi - Nishizawa, Tamotsu (Eds.), Marshall and Schumpeter on Evolution Economic Sociology of Capitalist Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, s. 65-93.
  • Baumol, William J. (2003), "On Austrian Analysis of Entrepreneurship and My Own", Roger Koppl; Steven Horwitz (Eds.), Austrian Economics and Entrepreneurial Studies (Advances in Austrian Economics, Volume 6), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, s.57-66.
  • Becker, Markus C. - Knudsen, Thorbjorn (2003), "Austrian Economics and Entrepreneurial Studies", Koppl, Roger - Horwitz, Steven (Eds.), Austrian Economics and Entrepreneurial Studies (Advances in Austrian Economics, Volume 6), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, s. 199-233.
  • Bertocco, Giancarlo (2008), "Finance and Development: Is Schumpeter's Analysis Still Relevant?", Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol.32, No:6, s. 1161-1175.
  • Bianchi, Milo - Henrekson, Magnus (2005), "Is Neoclassical Economics still Entrepre-neurless?", Kyklos, Vol. 58, No: 3, s. 353-377.
  • Bloch, Harry - Finch, John (2008), "Schumpeter and Steindl on Growth and the Transformation to Maturity in Capitalism", History of Economics Review, Vol.47, s.l-19.
  • Boettke, Peter J. - Coyne, Christopher J. (2003), "Entrepreneurship and Development: Cause or Consequence?", Koppl, Roger - Horwitz, Steven (Eds.), Austrian Economics and Entrepreneurial Studies (Advances in Austrian Economics, Volume 6), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, s.67-87.
  • Braunerhjelm, Pontus-Svensson, Roger (2010), "The Inventor's Role: Was Schumpeter Right?", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol.20, No: 3, s.413-444.
  • Brouwer, Maria T. (2002), "Weber, Schumpeter and Knight on Entrepreneurship and Economic Development", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 12, No: 1, s. 83-105.
  • Busenitz, Lowell W. (2007), "Discussant Comments. Progress in Understanding Entrepreneurial Behavior", Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol.1, No: 1-2, s. 183-185.
  • Clemence, Richard V. - Swedberg, Richard (1989), Essays On Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles, and the Evolution of Capitalism/Joseph Allois Schumpeter, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick and Oxford .
  • Cole, Arthur H. (1959), Business Enterprise in its Social Setting, Harward University Press, Cambridge.
  • Dahms, Harry F. (1995), "From Creative Action to the Social Rationalization of the Economy: Joseph A. Schumpeter's Social Theory", Sociological Theory, Vol. 13, No: 1, March, s. 1-13.
  • Donzelli, F. (1986), II Concetto di Equilibrio nella Teoria Economica Neoclassica, La Nuova Italia Scientifica, Rome.
  • Douglas, Rimmer (1961), "Schumpeter and the Underdeveloped Countries", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 75, No: 3, s. 422-450.
  • Drucker, Peter F. (1986), Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles, Simon and Schuster, New York.
  • Ebner, Alexander (2003), " The Institutional Analysis of Entrepreneurship: Historist Aspects of Schumpeter's Development Theory", Backhaus, Jtirgen (Ed.), Joseph Alois Schumpeter Entrepreneurship, Style and Vision, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, s. 117-140.
  • Endres, Anthony - Woods, Christine R. (2010), "Schumpeter's Conduct Model of the Dynamic Entrepreneur: Nature, Scope and Distinctiveness", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 20, No: 4, s. 583-607.
  • Festré, Agnès - Garrouste, Pierre (2008), "Rationality, Behavior, Institutional, and Economic Change in Schumpeter", Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 15, No: 4, December 2008, 365-390.
  • Festré, Agnès - Lazaric, Nathalie (2008), "Routine, Creativity and Leadership in Schumpeter and Von. Mises' Analyses of Economic Change: A New Look at Recent. Debates on Routines", http://halshs.archive-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/27/13/38/PDF/AISPE.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 27.04.2010).
  • Foss, Nicolai J. - Klein, Peter G. (2005), "Entrepreneurship and the Economic Theory of the Firm: Any Gains from Trade ?", Alvarez , Sharon A. - Agarwal, Rajshree R. - Sorenson, Olav (Eds.) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: Disciplinary Perspectives, Springer, New York, s. 55-80.
  • Gloria-Palermo, Sandye (2002), "Schumpeter and the old Austrian School Interpretations and Influences", Arena, Richard - Dangel-Hagnauer, Cecile (Eds.), The Contribution of Joseph A. Schumpeter to Economics: Economic Development and Institutional Change, Routledge, London and New York, s.21-39.
  • Godin, Benoit (2008), "In the Shadow of Schumpeter: W. Rupert Maclaurin and the Study of Technological Innovation", Minerva, Vol.46, No:3, s.343-360.
  • Goss, David (2005), "Schumpeter's Legacy? Interaction and Emotions in the Sociology of Entrepreneurship", Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol.29, No:2, s. 205-218.
  • Granovetter, Mark (2000), "A Theoretical Agenda for Economic Sociology", http://econ2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/econsocperspective.granovetter.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.06.2010).
  • Hagemann, Harald (2008), "Schumpeter on Development", Shionoya, Yuichi - Nishizawa, Tamotsu (Eds.), Marshall and Schumpeter on Evolution: Economic Sociology of Capitalist Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, s. 225-242.
  • Hartmann, Heinz (1958), "Managers and Entrepreneurs: A Useful Distinction?", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.3, No:4, s. 429-451.
  • Hebert, Robert F.- Link, Albert N. (1989), "In Search of the Meaning of Entrepreneur-ship", Small Business Economics, Vol. 1, No:1, s.39-49.
  • Hebert, Robert F.- Link, Albert N. (2006), "The Entrepreneur as Innovator", Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol.31, No:5, s. 589-597.
  • Heertje, Arnold (1981), "Preface", Heertje, Arnold (ed.), Schumpeter's Vision: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy after 40 Years, Praeger, Eastbourne and New York, s.ix-xi.
  • Helge, Peukert, (2003), "The Missing Chapter in Schumpeter's The Theory of Economic Development", Batkhaus, Jürgen (Ed.), Joseph Alois Schumpeter Entrepre-neurship, Style and Vision, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, s. 221-231.
  • Henrekson, Magnus - Jakobsson, Ulf (2001), "Where Schumpeter Was nearly Right-The Swedish Model and Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 11, No:3, s. 331-358.
  • Higgins, Benjamin (1968), Economic Development: Principles, Problems, and Policies, Revised Edition, W. W. Norton & Company, New York.
  • Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (2007), "Marshall, Schumpeter and the Shifting Boundaries of Economics and Sociology", http://www.lib.hit-u.ac.jp/service/tenji/amjas/ Hodgson.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 08.07.2010).
  • Kalantaridis, Christos (2004), "Veblen and the Entrepreneur", International Review of Sociology/Revue Internationale de Sociologie, Vol. 14, No: 3, s. 487-501.
  • Kiessling, Timothy S. (2004), "Entrepreneurship and Innovation: Austrian School of Economics to Schumpeter to Drucker to Now", Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 9, No:l, s. 80-91.
  • Kirzner, Israel M. (1973), Competition and Entrepreneurship, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Lakomslci, Odile (2002), "The Long-Term Perspective Schumpeter's Prediction of the End of Capitalism", Arena, Richard - Dangel-Hagnauer, Cecile (Eds.), The Contribution of Joseph A. Schumpeter to Economics: Economic Development and Institutional Change, Routledge, London and New York, s. 146-164.
  • Lambooy, Jan (2005), "Innovation and Knowledge: Theory and Regional Policy", European Planning Studies, Vol. 13, No: 8, December, s.1137-1152.
  • Langloiş, Richard N. (2007), The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Schumpeter, Chandler, and the New Economy, Routledge, London and New York.
  • Legris, Andre (2002), "On the Boundaries between Economic Analysis and Economic Sociology", Arena, Richard - Dangel-Hagnauer, Cecile (Eds.), The Contribution of Joseph A. Schumpeter to Economics: Economic Development and Institutional Change,Routledge, London and New York, s. 89-105.
  • Livengood, R. Scott (2009), "An Austrian Economics View of the Market Process: The Impact of Entrepreneurial Actions on Sensemaking and Market Discourse", http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=l350644 (Erişim Tarihi: 16.05.2010).
  • Loasby, Brian J. (1982), "The Entrepreneur in Economic Theory", Scottish Journal of Polilical Economy, Vol. 29, No: 3, 235-245.
  • Loasby, Brian J. (2007), "A Cognitive Perspective on Entrepreneurship and the Firm", Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 44, No: 7, November, s. 1078-1106.
  • McDaniel, Bruce A. (2000), "A Survey on Entrepreneurship and Innovation", The Social Science Journal, Vol.37, No:2, s. 277-284.
  • McDaniel, Bruce A. (2005), "A Contemporary View of Joseph A. Schumpeter's Theory of the Entrepreneur", Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 39, No: 2, June, 485-489.
  • McFarling, Bruce (2000), "Schumpeter's Entrepreneurs and Commons's Sovereign Authority", Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 34, No: 3, September, s.707-721.
  • McKee, David L (1990), "On Schumpeter, Services and Economic Change: His Evolutionary Economics Could Not Have Foreseen the Burgeoning of Issue-specific Con-stdting", American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 49, No: 3, s. 297-306.
  • McMillan, John (2004), "Quantifying Creative Destruction: Entrepreneurship and Productivity in New Zealand", Vinig, G. T.- Van Der Voort, R. C. W. (Eds.), Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy (Volume-9: The Emergence of Entrepreneurial Economics), Amsterdam-Boston-Heidelber vd: Elsevier s. 189-210.
  • Metcalfe, J. S. (2004), "The Entrepreneur and the Style of Modern Economics", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol.4, s.157-175.
  • Michaelides, Panayotis G.-Milios, John G. (2005), "Did Hilferding Influence Schumpeter?", History of Economics Review, Vol.41, Winter, s. 98-125.
  • Michaelides, Panayotis G.-Milios, John G. (2009), "Joseph Schumpeter and the German Historical School", Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol.33, No: 3, s. 495-516.
  • Osterhammel, Jurgen (1987) "Varieties of Social Economics: Joseph A. Schumpeter and Max Weber", Mommsen, Wolfgang - Osterhammel, Jürgen (Eds.), Max Weber and His Contemporaries, Allen & Unwin, London, s. 106-120.
  • Prendergast, Renee (2006), "Schumpeter, Hegel and the Vision of Development", Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 30, No:2, s.253-275.
  • Reisman, David (2004), Schumpeter's Market Enterprise and Evolution, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK-Northampton, MA, USA.
  • Rima, Ingrid Hahne (2001), Development of Economic Analysis, Sixth Edition, Routledge, London and New York.
  • Ritzer, Gorge (2008), "Critiquing Creative Destruction", http://www.georgeritzer.com/docs/critiquing%20creative%20destruction.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 14.08.2010).
  • Rosenberg, Nathan (2003), Schumpeter and the Endogeneity of Technology, Routledge, London and New York.
  • Rothbard, Murray N.(1997), "Breaking Out of the Walrasian Box: The Cases of Schumpeter and Hansen", Review of Austrian Economics, Vol.1 No:l s. 97-108
  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. - Takata, Yasuma (1998), Power or Pure Economics ?, Morishima, Michio (Ed.), MacMillan Press, London.
  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1928), "The Instability of Capitalism", The Economic Journal, Vol. 38, No: 151, September, s.361-386.
  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1934), The Theory of Economics Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1939), Business Cycless: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, Vol: I, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York and London.
  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Harper and Brothers, New York.
  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1947), "The Creative Response in Economic History", The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 7, No: 2, November, s.149-159.
  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1954), History of Economic Analysis, George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London.
  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1966), Imperialism and Social Classes (Translated by Heinz Norden), 9th Ed, Meridian Books, Cleveland and New York.
  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (2005), "Development", Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.43, No: 1, March, s. 108-120.
  • Scott, Maurice F. (1998), A New View of Economic Growth, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.
  • Senn, Peter R.(2003), "Edward Bellamy and Joseph Schumpeter in the Year 2000", Backhaus, Jürgen (Ed.), Joseph Alois Schumpeter Entrepreneur ship, Style and Vision, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, s. 313-325.
  • Shionoya, Yuichi (2008), "Schumpeter and Evolution: An Ontological Exploration", Shionoya, Yuichi - Nishizawa, Tamotsu (Eds.), Marshall and Schumpeter on Evolution Economic Sociology of Capitalist Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, s. 15-35.
  • Stolper, Wolfgang F. (1994), Joseph Alois Schumpeter: The Public Life of a Private Man, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Swedberg, Richard (2000), Entrepreneurs hip: The Social Science View, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Swedberg, Richard (2008), "Rebuilding Schumpeter's Theory of Entrepreneurship, Shionoya", Yuichi - Nishizawa, Tamotsu (Eds.), Marshall and Schumpeter on Evolution Economic Sociology of Capitalist Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, s. 188-203.
  • Sweezy, Paul M. (1943), "Professor Schumpeter's Theory of Innovation", The Review of Economic Statistics, Vol. 25, No:1, Feb, s. 93-96.
  • Whelan, Garvan - O'Gorman, Colm (2007), "The Schumpeterian and Universal Hero Myth in Stories of Irish Entrepreneurs", Irish Journal of Management, Vol. 28, No: 2, 79-107.
  • Witt, Ulrich (2002), "How Evolutionary is Schumpeter's Theory of Economic Development?", Industry and Innovation, Vol. 9, No: 1-2, April-August, s. 7-22.
  • Yagi, Kiichiro (2008), "Schumpeter in the Harvard Yard: Inventions, Innovations and Growth", Shionoya, Yuichi- Nishizawa, Tamotsu (Eds.), Marshall and Schumpeter on Evolution Economic Sociology of Capitalist Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. s. 204-224.
APA BASILGAN M (2011). Ekonomik gelişmenin yaratıcı yıkımı: Schumpeteryan girişimci. , 27 - 56.
Chicago BASILGAN MÜSLÜM Ekonomik gelişmenin yaratıcı yıkımı: Schumpeteryan girişimci. (2011): 27 - 56.
MLA BASILGAN MÜSLÜM Ekonomik gelişmenin yaratıcı yıkımı: Schumpeteryan girişimci. , 2011, ss.27 - 56.
AMA BASILGAN M Ekonomik gelişmenin yaratıcı yıkımı: Schumpeteryan girişimci. . 2011; 27 - 56.
Vancouver BASILGAN M Ekonomik gelişmenin yaratıcı yıkımı: Schumpeteryan girişimci. . 2011; 27 - 56.
IEEE BASILGAN M "Ekonomik gelişmenin yaratıcı yıkımı: Schumpeteryan girişimci." , ss.27 - 56, 2011.
ISNAD BASILGAN, MÜSLÜM. "Ekonomik gelişmenin yaratıcı yıkımı: Schumpeteryan girişimci". (2011), 27-56.
APA BASILGAN M (2011). Ekonomik gelişmenin yaratıcı yıkımı: Schumpeteryan girişimci. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 44(3), 27 - 56.
Chicago BASILGAN MÜSLÜM Ekonomik gelişmenin yaratıcı yıkımı: Schumpeteryan girişimci. Amme İdaresi Dergisi 44, no.3 (2011): 27 - 56.
MLA BASILGAN MÜSLÜM Ekonomik gelişmenin yaratıcı yıkımı: Schumpeteryan girişimci. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, vol.44, no.3, 2011, ss.27 - 56.
AMA BASILGAN M Ekonomik gelişmenin yaratıcı yıkımı: Schumpeteryan girişimci. Amme İdaresi Dergisi. 2011; 44(3): 27 - 56.
Vancouver BASILGAN M Ekonomik gelişmenin yaratıcı yıkımı: Schumpeteryan girişimci. Amme İdaresi Dergisi. 2011; 44(3): 27 - 56.
IEEE BASILGAN M "Ekonomik gelişmenin yaratıcı yıkımı: Schumpeteryan girişimci." Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 44, ss.27 - 56, 2011.
ISNAD BASILGAN, MÜSLÜM. "Ekonomik gelişmenin yaratıcı yıkımı: Schumpeteryan girişimci". Amme İdaresi Dergisi 44/3 (2011), 27-56.