Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently

BEYDOĞAN, H. Ömer

Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently

H. Ömer BEYDOĞAN (Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü, Kırşehir, Türkiye)

Eğitim ve Bilim

3 1

Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 37 Sayı: 166 Sayfa Aralığı: 3 - 13 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently

Öz:

Akıcı okuma, bireyin okuma ile ilgili öğeleri kullanarak bilgi işleme hızını artırdığı bir beceridir. Bilgi işleme hızını artırırken okuma-anlama stratejilerini daha etkin kullanabileceği konuma gelmektedir. Bu çalışmada, öğrencilerin akıcı okuma yeterliklerine göre okuma-anlama stratejilerini kullanma düzeyleri incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla ilköğretim altıncı sınıfa devam eden 131 öğrenci çalışma evrenini oluşturmuştur. Çok boyutlu akıcı okuma ölçeği ile öğrencilerin akıcı okuma düzeyleri belirlenmiş, daha sonra okuma-anlama stratejileri kullanımıyla ilgili testler verilmiştir. Ölçme araçlarından elde edilen veriler, yüzdelik, aritmetik ortalama, berivate korelasyon tekniği, tek yönlü varyans analizi, t-test, LSD tekniğiyle analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucu, öğrencilerin cinsiyetlerine, akıcı okuma düzeylerine göre okuma-anlama stratejilerini kullanma düzeyleri belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular çerçevesinde, akıcı okuma sürecine yönelik bazı öneriler dile getirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Öğrencilerin akıcı okumalarına göre okuma-anlama stratejilerini kullanma düzeyleri

Öz:

Fluent reading is a skill in which an individual increases his/her information process speed through the use of elements related to reading. He/she also can use reading-comprehension strategies more effectively while increasing the speed of information process. In this study, the reading-comprehension levels of the students in terms of the fluent reading abilities of the students were analyzed. To do that, 131 primary school 6th grade students formed the study sample. The reading levels of the students were determined by a multi-dimensional fluent reading scale followed by tests on reading-comprehension strategies. Data were represented through percentages, averages, berivate correlations, one-way variant analysis, t-test and LSD techniques. Finally, the readingcomprehension strategies usage levels of the students were determined in relation to their sex and fluent reading levels. Within the frame of the findings, some suggestions were made on learners’ reading-comprehension processes.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Afflerbach, P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge and text genre on readers’ prediction strategies. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 22, 131-148.
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, D. (1984). A schema-thematic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthals (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 255 - 291). New York: Longman.
Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in L2 reading and testing. Modern Language Journal, 75, 460-472.
Ashby, J. & Clifton, C. (2005). The prosodic property of lexical stress effects eye 150 movements during silent reading. Cognition, 96(3), B89-B100.
Baydık B.(2011). Okuma Güçlüğü Olan Öğrencilerin Üstbilişsel Okuma Stratejilerini Kullanımı ve Öğretmenlerinin Okuduğunu Anlama Öğretim Uygulamalarının İncelenmesi, Eğitim ve Bilim, 162, 301-318.
Begeny, J.C., & Silber, J. M. (2006). An examination of group-based treatment packages for increasing elementary-aged students’ reading fluency. Psychology in the Schools, 43(2), 183- 195.
Berninger, V., Abbott, R., & Swanson, H. (2010). Relationship of word- and sentencelevel working memory to reading and writing in second, fourth, and sixth grade. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41(2), 179-193.
Brantmeier, C. A.(2000). The releationship between readers’ gender, passage content, comprehension and strategy use in reading Spanish as a second language. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Indiana University.
Carrell, P. L.(1989). Metacognitive Awareness and Second Language Reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134.
Courbron, C. (2012). The correlation between the three reading fluency subskills and reading comprehension in at-risk adolescent readers. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA.
Çetinkaya, P., & Erktin, E.(2002. Assesment of metacognition and it’s reletionship with reading comprehension , achievement and aptitude, Boğaziçi Üniversity Journal of Education, 19, (1), 1-11.
Gernschbacher, M.N.(1997). Coherence cues mapping during comprehension. In J. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds.), Processing interclausal relationships: Studies in the production and comprehension of text. (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Khun, M.R., & Stahle S. H.(2003). Fluency: A review of development and remedial practice, Jounal of Educational Psychology, 9, 3-21.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J.(1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
Lau, L., K.(2006). Reading strategy use beetween Chinese good and poor readers: A think-aloud study, Journal of Research in Reading, 29(4), 383-399.
Meneghetti, C., Carretti, B., & De Beni, R.(2006). Components of reading comprehension and scholastic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 291–301.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the national reading panel, Teaching children to read of subgroups (Niff PublicationNo:00-4754 c.h) Washington Dc: US Government printing Office.
O’Connor, R.E, Bell,K.M, harty,K.R, Larkin,L.K. Sackor, S.M & Zigmond M.(2002). Teaching reading to poor readers in the intermediate grades: A comprasion of text difficulty. Journal of Educational Pshychology, 94, 474-485.
Pang, J. (2008). Research on good and poor reader characteristics: Implicationsfor L2 reading research in China. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(1), 1-18.
Pressley, M., & Wharton-McDonald, R. (1997). Skilled comprehension and its development through instruction. School Psychology Review, 26(2), 129-143.
Radoyevic, N.(2006), Exploring the use of effective learning strategies to ıncrease students’reading comprehension and test taking skills, Unpublished Thesis Master of Education The Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario: http://www.proquestcompany.com.
Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. Honolulu, HI: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.
Rumelhart, D. E.(1994). Toward an interactive model of reading. In R. Rudell, M. R. Rudell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.) (pp. 864 - 894). Newark, DA: International Reading Association.
Shreiber, P. A.(1980). On the acquisition of reading fluency. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12(17), 186.
Shreiber, P. A.(1991). Understanding prosody’s role in reading acquisition. Theory into practice, 30, 158-164.
Shreiber, P. A., & Read, C. (1980) Children’s use of phonetıc cues in spelling, parsing, and-maybereading. Bulletin of Orton Society, 30, 209-224.
Slaimber, G. B.(1999). Scan and Run: A reading comprehension strategy that works. Journal of Adolesscent & Adult Literacy, 42(5), 386.
Stayter, F. & Allington, R. (1991). Fluency and the understanding of texts. Theory Into Practice, 33, 143-148.
Swanson, H. & O’Connor, R. (2009). The role of working memory and fluency practice on the reading comprehension of students who are dysfluent readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(6), 297-304.
Sweet, A. P. & Snow, C.(2002). Reconceptualizing reading comprehension. In C. C. Block, L. B. Gambrell, M. Pressley (Eds.), Improving comprehension instruction (pp. 17-53). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 548-575.
Vaughn, S.,Chard D.J.,Bryan D.P.,Coleman M., Tyler B.J., Thompson, L. & Kouzekanani K. (2000). Fluency and compherension interventions for third-grade students, Remedial and Special Education, 21, 224-335.
Zutell, J., & Rasinsky T.V. (1991). Training teachers to their students: Oral reading fluency. Theory into Practice, 30, 211-217.

APA	BEYDOĞAN H (2012). Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently. , 3 - 13.
Chicago	BEYDOĞAN H. Ömer Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently. (2012): 3 - 13.
MLA	BEYDOĞAN H. Ömer Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently. , 2012, ss.3 - 13.
AMA	BEYDOĞAN H Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently. . 2012; 3 - 13.
Vancouver	BEYDOĞAN H Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently. . 2012; 3 - 13.
IEEE	BEYDOĞAN H "Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently." , ss.3 - 13, 2012.
ISNAD	BEYDOĞAN, H. Ömer. "Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently". (2012), 3-13.

APA	BEYDOĞAN H (2012). Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(166), 3 - 13.
Chicago	BEYDOĞAN H. Ömer Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently. Eğitim ve Bilim 37, no.166 (2012): 3 - 13.
MLA	BEYDOĞAN H. Ömer Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.37, no.166, 2012, ss.3 - 13.
AMA	BEYDOĞAN H Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2012; 37(166): 3 - 13.
Vancouver	BEYDOĞAN H Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2012; 37(166): 3 - 13.
IEEE	BEYDOĞAN H "Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently." Eğitim ve Bilim, 37, ss.3 - 13, 2012.
ISNAD	BEYDOĞAN, H. Ömer. "Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently". Eğitim ve Bilim 37/166 (2012), 3-13.