Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure

Emre Şenol Durak, (Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, Bolu, Türkiye)
Mithat DURAK (Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, Bolu, Türkiye)
Eğitim ve Bilim
6 1
Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 37 Sayı: 165 Sayfa Aralığı: 48 - 63 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure

Öz:
Stres Değerlendirme Ölçeği, stresin bilişsel değerlendirmesini ölçmek amacıyla en sıkkullanılan psikometrik ölçme aracıdır. Bu ölçeğin bu alandaki diğer ölçeklere göre üstünlüğü,stresin hem birincil hem de ikincil bilişsel değerlendirmesini içermesidir. Bu çalışma, StresDeğerlendirme Ölçeği Süreklilik Formu’nun (SDÖ-S) psikometrik özelliklerini 470 üniversiteöğrencisinde ve 170 yetişkinde test etmeyi amaçlamıştır. Ölçeğin literatürdeki araştırmalartarafından desteklenen faktör yapısını değerlendirmek üzere Amos 7.0 (Arbuckle, 2006) yazılımıile doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonuçları, beş faktörlü yapınınher iki örneklemde de geçerli olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, cinsiyete bağlı çoklu grupkarşılaştırmaları, sınırlandırılmış ve sınırlandırılmamış modeller arasında fark olmadığınıgöstermiştir. Yüksek iç tutarlılığın yanı sıra, ölçeğin eştutarlılık geçerliliği, kavramsal açıdanbenzer ölçümlerle her iki örneklemde de yüksek korelasyon göstermesi ile kanıtlanmıştır. Ölçeğingelecekteki kuramsal ve uygulamalı etkileri tartışma bölümünde ele alınmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Stres değerlendirme ölçeği süreklilik formu’nun (sdö-s) Türkçe geçerliliği

Öz:
The Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM) is the most frequently used scale for the assessment ofcognitive appraisals and surpasses other types of measures by including primary and secondaryappraisal processes. This study aims to examine the psychometric properties of the dispositionalSAM (SAM-D) by utilizing the samples of Turkish university students (n= 470) and communitymembers (n= 170). In order to evaluate factor structure of the scale obtained by previous literature,confirmatory factor analysis is used by Amos 7.0 (Arbuckle, 2006) software program. The resultsdemonstrate that the five-factor model reveals significant results in both samples in terms ofgoodness of fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis. Moreover, multi-group comparisons onthe basis of gender groups demonstrate no significant differences between the constrained andunconstrained models. In addition to significant internal consistency, the concurrent validity ofthe scale is supported in both samples by revealing the association of the SAM-D with conceptuallyrelated measures. The theoretical and practical implications of this study are discussed.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Anshel, M. H., Robertson, M., & Caputi, P. (1997). Sources of acute stress and their appraisals and reappraisals among Australian police as a function of previous experience. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 337-356.
  • Arbuckle, J.L. (2006). Amos (Version 7.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: SPSS.
  • Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS: Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 78-117.
  • Benyamini, Y. (2009). Stress and coping with women’s health issues a review from a self-regulation perspective. European Psychologist, 14, 63-71. DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040.14.1.63.
  • Buyuksahin-Sunal, A., & Donmez, A. (2011). Self monitoring in romantic relationships: Stress and psychological symptoms, Education and Science, 36(162), 149-158.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(2), 272-300Ceyhan, E., Ceyhan, A.A. (2011). Loneliness and depression levels of students usıng a university counseling center. Education and Science, 36(160), 81-92.
  • Cordova, M. J., Ruzek, J. I., Benoit, M., & Brunet, A. (2003). Promotion of emotional disclosure following illness and injury: A brief intervention for medical patients and their families. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 10, 358-371.
  • Çuhadaroğlu, F. (1986). Self esteem among adolescents. Unpublished dissertation. Ankara: Hacettepe University.
  • Devonport, T. J., & Lane, A. M. (2006). Cognitive appraisal of dissertation stres among undergraduate students. The Psychological Record, 56, 259-266.
  • Dopke, C. A., & Milner, J. S. (2000). Impact of child noncompliance on stres appraisals, attributions, and disciplinary choices in mothers at high and low risk. Child Abuse, & Neglect, 24, 493-504.
  • Durak, M., & Senol-Durak, E. (in press). The development and psychometric properties of the turkish version of the stress appraisal measure. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000079
  • Ferguson, E., Matthews, G., & Cox, T. (1999). The appraisal of life events (ALE) scale: Reliability and validity. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 97-116.
  • Fleming, J. S. & Courtney, B. E. (1984). The dimensionality of self-esteem II: Hierarchical facet model for revised measurement scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 404-421.
  • Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219-239.
  • Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during 3 stages of a college-examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150-170.
  • Folkman, S. (2008). The case for positive emotions in the stress process. Anxiety Stress and Coping, 21, 3-14.
  • Gan, Q., & Anshel, M.H. (2006). Differences between elite and non-elite male and female Chinese athletes on cognitive appraisal of stressful events in competitive sport. Journal of Sport Behavior, 29(3), 213-227.
  • Gençöz, T. (2000). Positive and negative affect schedule: A study of validity and reliability. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 15(46), 27-28.
  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Gundogdu, M. (2010). Life orientations among university students. Education and Science, 35(157) 192-199.
  • Honey, K. L., Bennett, P., & Morgan, M. (2003). Predicting postnatal depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 76, 201-210. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00085-X
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparametrized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
  • Jerusalem, M. & Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 195-213). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
  • Kennedy, P., Evans, M., & Sandhu, N. (2009). Psychological adjustment to spinal cord injury: The contribution of coping, hope and cognitive appraisals. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 14, 17-33.
  • King, K. R. (2005). Why is discrimination stressful? The mediating role of cognitive appraisal. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 11(3), 202- 212.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Largo-Wight, E., Peterson, M., & Chen, W. (2005). Perceived problem solving, stress, and health among collage students. American Journal of Health Behavior, 29(4), 360-368.
  • Lazarus, R. S. (2006). Emotions and interpersonal relationships: Toward a person-centered conceptualization of emotions and coping. Journal of Personality, 74, 9-46.
  • Miles, L. M., Keitel, M., Jackson, M., Harris, A., & Licciardi, F. (2009). Predictors of distress in women being treated for infertility. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 27(3), 238-257.
  • Murad, S. D., Joung, I. M. A., van Lenthe, F. J., Bengi-Arslan, L., & Crijnen, A. A. M. (2003). Predictors of self-reported problem behaviours in Turkish immigrant and Dutch adolescents in the Netherlands. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 44, 412-423.
  • Öner, N. & LeCompte, A. (1985). Durumluk-Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri Elkitabı [Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory]. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi.
  • Orucu, M. C. & Demir, A. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of perceived stress scale for Turkish university students. Stress and Health, 25, 103-109. DOI: 10.1002/smi.1218.
  • Peacock, E. J., & Wong, P. T. (1990). The cognitive appraisal of stress measure (SAM): A multidimensional approach to cognitive appraisal. Stress Medicine, 6, 227-236.
  • Peacock, E. J., Wong, P. T. P., & Reker, G. T. (1993). Relations between appraisals and coping schemas - support for the congruence model. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science-Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 25, 64-80.
  • Peterson, C., Semmel, A., Vonbaeyer, C., Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1982). The attributional style questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 287-299.
  • Puente-Diaz, R. & Anshel, M. H. (2005). Sources of acute stress, cognitive appraisal, and coping strategies among highly skilled Mexican and U.S. competitive tennis players. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 429-446.
  • Rafferty, A. E. & Griffin, M. A. (2006). Perceptions of organizational change: A stress and coping perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1154-1162. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1154
  • Roesch, S. C., & Rowley, A. A. (2005). Evaluating and developing a multidimensional, dispositional measure of appraisal. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85 (2), 188-196.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Rowley, A. A., Roesch, S. C., Jurica, B., & Vaughn, A. A. (2005). Developing and validating a stress appraisal measure for minority adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 547-557.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74
  • Senol-Durak, E., Durak, M., & Elagöz, F.Ö. (2011). Testing the Psychometric Properties of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WCQ) in Turkish University Students and Community Samples. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy. DOI: 10.1002/cpp.677.
  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. (1983). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Test Manual for Form Y. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychological Press.
  • Subasi, G. (2007). Some variables for social anxiety prediction in college students. Education and Science, 32(144), 3-15.
  • Suzuki, S., & Sakano, Y. (1998). Development of a Cognitive Appraisal for Rating Scale (CARS) and its validation. Human Science Research, 7, 113-124.
  • Tuzgöl-Dost, M. (2010). An examination of subjective well-being and life satisfaction of students atending to university in South Africa and Turkey. Education and Science 35(158), 75-89.
  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect - the PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
APA Şenol Durak E, Durak M (2012). Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure. , 48 - 63.
Chicago Şenol Durak Emre,Durak Mithat Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure. (2012): 48 - 63.
MLA Şenol Durak Emre,Durak Mithat Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure. , 2012, ss.48 - 63.
AMA Şenol Durak E,Durak M Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure. . 2012; 48 - 63.
Vancouver Şenol Durak E,Durak M Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure. . 2012; 48 - 63.
IEEE Şenol Durak E,Durak M "Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure." , ss.48 - 63, 2012.
ISNAD Şenol Durak, Emre - Durak, Mithat. "Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure". (2012), 48-63.
APA Şenol Durak E, Durak M (2012). Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(165), 48 - 63.
Chicago Şenol Durak Emre,Durak Mithat Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure. Eğitim ve Bilim 37, no.165 (2012): 48 - 63.
MLA Şenol Durak Emre,Durak Mithat Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.37, no.165, 2012, ss.48 - 63.
AMA Şenol Durak E,Durak M Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2012; 37(165): 48 - 63.
Vancouver Şenol Durak E,Durak M Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2012; 37(165): 48 - 63.
IEEE Şenol Durak E,Durak M "Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure." Eğitim ve Bilim, 37, ss.48 - 63, 2012.
ISNAD Şenol Durak, Emre - Durak, Mithat. "Turkish validation of the dispositional form of stress appraisal measure". Eğitim ve Bilim 37/165 (2012), 48-63.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
17-04-2024 0:27

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları