Teacher education: Science or art?

Mira KARNIELI (Head, Department of Education, Faculty of Education Oranim,College of Education, Israel)
İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi
2 0
Yıl: 2009 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 25 - 48 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Teacher education: Science or art?

Öz:
While being a teacher-educator is a complex task, the mode to train teacher-educators is yet unclear.This question is even more relevant because education colleges thriving for academic accreditationrecruit PhDs with no field experience. The present study examines students and faculty perceptionson the strengths and weaknesses of the learning process of student-teachers. Using qualitativeresearch tools we found that developing a professional identity is not seen by most of the discipline- oriented lecturers as part of their role, and they also do not know how to perform it. The resultsemphasize the importance of an appropriate balance between the theoretical foundation andpractical learning in order to provide novice teachers with the mental flexibility enabling them to actcorrectly and productively in complex situations that arise in the act of teaching. Further, the studyoffers guidelines for teacher-educators' professional training.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ackerman, D. J. (2005). Getting teachers from here to there: examining issues related to an early care and education teacher policy. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 7 (1), Accessed at http://www.ecrp.uiuc.edu/v7n1/ackerman.html
  • Barnett, R. (1994). The limits of competence: knowledge, higher education and society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: an overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175-189.
  • Becker, B. J., Kennedy, M. M., & Hundersmarck, S. (2003). Hypothesis about 'quality': A decade of debates. Paper presented at the Paper Presented at the annual meeting of the American educational Research Association (AERA).
  • Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers' perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 749-764.
  • Belgrave, L. L., Allen-Kelsey, G. J., Smith, K. J., & Flores, M. C. (2004). Living with dementia: Lay definitions of Alzheimer’s disease among African American caregivers and sufferers. Symbolic Interaction, 27, 199-222.
  • Boss, P., Dahl, C., & Kaplan, L. (1996). The use of phenomenology for family therapy research. In D. H. Sprenkle & S. M. Moon (Eds.), Research methods in family therapy (pp. 83-105). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Buchberger, F., Campos, B.P., Kallos, D., & Stephenson, J. (2000). High quality teacher education for high quality education and training. Umea: Thematic Network on Teacher Education in Europe.
  • Bullough, R. V. (2005). Being and becoming a mentor: School-based teacher educators and teacher educator identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(6), 143-155.
  • Carr, D. (2003). Making sense of education. London & New York: Routledge Falmer.
  • Charon, J. M. (1995). Symbolic Interactionism (5 ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  • Cibulka, J. (2009) A new approach to teacher preparation, American Teacher. 94(1), 7.
  • Clandinin, D. J. (1992). Narrative and story in teacher education. In T. Russel & H. Munby (Eds.), Teachers and teaching: from classroom to reflection (pp. 124-137). London: Falmer Press.
  • Cochran, K., DeRuiter, J., & King, R. (1993). Pedagogical Content Knowing: An Integrative Model for Teacher Preparation Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263-272.
  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Taking Stock in 2004: Teacher Education in Dangerous Times. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 3-7.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2004). Practitioner Inquiry, Knowledge and University Culture. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. L. LaBoskey & T. L. Russell (Eds.), International Handbook of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices (Vol. 12, pp. 601-649). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Costa, A.L. & Garmston R.J. (1994). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools. Norwood: Christopher-Cordon Publishers, Inc.
  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design - choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Darling-Hammond L. (2006). Constructing 21st-Century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314.
  • Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (4 ed.). New York: MacMillan Publishing.
  • Duchram, E. R. (1993). The lives of teacher educators. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity - youth and crisis, London: Faber & Faber.
  • Floresa, M. A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study Teaching and Teacher Education, 22( 2), 219-232
  • Gee, J. P. (2000-2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. In W. G. Secada (Ed.), Review of research in education, (Vol. 25, pp. 99-126). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Grimsæth, G., Nordvik, G., & Bergsvik, E. (2008). The newly qualified teacher: a leader and a professional? A Norwegian study, Journal of In-service Education, Routledge, 34(2), 219-236.
  • Hargreaves, A. (2001). Teaching in a box: Emotional geographic of teaching, In Ariav, T. Keinan, A. Zuzovsky, R. (eds.). Ongoing development of teacher education: Exchange of ideas, Tel Aviv: Mofet Institute.
  • Harpaz Y. (2005) Teaching and learning in a community of thinking, Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 20(2), 136-157.
  • Hyland, T. (1994). Competence, education and NVQs': Dissenting perspectives. London: Cassell.
  • Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Kelchtermans, G., & Vandenberghe, R. (1994). Teachers' professional development: A biographical perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26, 45-62.
  • Knowles, J. G. (1992). Models for understanding pre-service and beginning teachers biographies. In I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers' lives (pp. 99-152). London: Routledge.
  • Korthagen, F. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher education Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 77-97.
  • Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 5(2), 187-199.
  • Kozminsky, L. (2008). Professional identity in teaching, Shviley Mechkar, 15, 13-17
  • Lunenberg, M., & Korthagen, F.A.J. (2003). Teacher educators and student- directed learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(1), 29-44.
  • Malm, B. (2009). Towards a new professionalism: enhancing personal and professional development in teacher education, Journal of Education for Teaching; 35(1), 77-91.
  • Mayes, C. (2001). A transpersonal model for teacher reflectivity. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(4), 477-493.
  • McLean, S. V. (1999). Becoming a teacher: the person in the process. In R.P. Lipka & T.M. Brinthaupt (Eds.), The role of self in teacher development. (pp. 55-91). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
  • Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Ofman, D. (2000). Core qualities: A gateway to human resources. Schiedam: Scriptum.
  • Ormrod, J. A. & Cole, D. B. (1996). Teaching content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: a model from geographic education, Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 37-42.
  • Pajares. M. F. (1992). Teachers beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct, Review of Educational Research, 62,(3), 307-332.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly- Hills: Sage Publications.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189- 1208.
  • Pope, M., & Denicolo, P. M. (2001). Transformative education: Personal construct approaches to practice and research. London: Whurr.
  • Rodgers, C. R., & Scott, K. H. (2008). The development of the personal self and professional identity in learning to teach. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman- Nemser, D. J. McIntyre & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 732-746). New York: Routledge.
  • Rogers, C.R. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. Columbus: Charles Merrill.
  • Rosenblatt, P. C., & Fischer, L. R. (1993). Qualitative family research. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 167-177). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R., (1986). Teaching functions In: M. Wittrock (Ed.). Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed) (pp. 376-391). New York: Macmillan.
  • Scheeler, M., Bruno, K., Grubb, E., & Seavey, T. (2009). Generalizing teaching techniques from university to K-12 classrooms: Teaching pre-service teachers to use what they learn. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 189– 210.
  • Seidman, E. (1983). Unexamined premises of social problem solving. In E. Seidman (Ed.), Handbook of social intervention (pp. 48-67). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Seligman, M.E.P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.
  • Shuell, T. (1996), The role of educational psychology in the preparation of teachers, Educational Psychologist, 31(1), 5-14.
  • Shulman, L. S.(1988). The danger of dichotomous thinking in education. In P.P. Grimmett & G. L. Erickson (Eds.), Reflection in Teacher Education Teacher (pp. 31-38), Missouri: College Press.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching, Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-21.
  • Spiro, R.J., Coulson, R.L., Feltovich, P.J., & Anderson, D.K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains (Tech. Rep. No. 441). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
  • Stone, E. (1994). Reform in teacher education: The power and pedagogy, Journal of Teacher Education, 45, 310-318.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basic of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  • Strauss A., & Glaser, B. (1977). Anguish: A case study of dying trajectory. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
  • Strauss, S., & Shilony, T. (1994). Teachers' models of children's minds and learning. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind (pp. 455-473), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tatto, M.T. (1998). The influence of teacher education on teacher’s beliefs about the purpose of education, roles and practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 49, 66-67.
  • Tickle, L. (1999). Teacher self-appraisal and appraisal of self. In R. P. LipkaT. & M. Brinthaupt (Eds.), The role of self in teacher development (pp. 121-141). New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Turner, J. H. (1982). The structure of sociological theory (3 ed.). Homewood: The Dorsey Press.
  • Vitstum, A. & Margolin, J. (2002). Case studies and keeping the privacy and secrecy of patients, Tel Aviv: Am Oved (Hebrew).
  • Wang, J., Spalding, E., Odell, S. J., Klecka, C. L., & Lin, E. (2010). Bold Ideas for Improving Teacher Education and Teaching: What We See, Hear, and Think. Journal of Teacher Education, 61 (1-2), 3-15
  • Wideen, M. Mayer-Smith, J. & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68 (2), 130-178.
  • Yost, D. S. Sentner, S. M. Forlenza-Bailey, (2000). An examination of the construct of critical reflection: Implications for teacher education programming in the 21st century”, Journal of Teacher Education, 51(1), 39- 49.
  • Zeichner, K. M. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: A personal perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 117-124.
APA KARNIELI M (2009). Teacher education: Science or art?. , 25 - 48.
Chicago KARNIELI Mira Teacher education: Science or art?. (2009): 25 - 48.
MLA KARNIELI Mira Teacher education: Science or art?. , 2009, ss.25 - 48.
AMA KARNIELI M Teacher education: Science or art?. . 2009; 25 - 48.
Vancouver KARNIELI M Teacher education: Science or art?. . 2009; 25 - 48.
IEEE KARNIELI M "Teacher education: Science or art?." , ss.25 - 48, 2009.
ISNAD KARNIELI, Mira. "Teacher education: Science or art?". (2009), 25-48.
APA KARNIELI M (2009). Teacher education: Science or art?. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(3), 25 - 48.
Chicago KARNIELI Mira Teacher education: Science or art?. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 10, no.3 (2009): 25 - 48.
MLA KARNIELI Mira Teacher education: Science or art?. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.10, no.3, 2009, ss.25 - 48.
AMA KARNIELI M Teacher education: Science or art?. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009; 10(3): 25 - 48.
Vancouver KARNIELI M Teacher education: Science or art?. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009; 10(3): 25 - 48.
IEEE KARNIELI M "Teacher education: Science or art?." İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10, ss.25 - 48, 2009.
ISNAD KARNIELI, Mira. "Teacher education: Science or art?". İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 10/3 (2009), 25-48.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 18:13

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları