Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 125 - 132 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Kafa yaralanmalarında sonucu belirleyen etkenler

Öz:
AMAÇ Bu çalışmada, yetişkin kafa yaralanmalı (KY) olgularda hasta kayıt sistemimizden elde edilebilen verilerin sonuç üzerine etkisi araştırıldı. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM Trakya Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Beyin ve Sinir Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı ve Yoğun Bakım Ünitelerine yatırılan 356 KY tanılı yetişkin olgunun (308 erkek, 48 kadın; ort. yaş 43,1±18,6 yıl; dağılım 17-87 yaş) kayıtları incelendi. Elde edilen veriler istatistiksel olarak incelendi. BULGULAR Yaş (p=0,012), havayolu tüplenmesi (p<0,001), olay yeri ve acil birimde saptanan Glasgow koma ölçeği değerleri (p<0,001), kümelenmiş sistolik ve diyastolik triküspid annulus değerleri (p<0,001, eşlik eden göğüs (p=0,001) ve karın (p=0,041) yaralanması, anizokori (p=0,001), gözbebeği ışık refleksi (p<0,001), kafatası içi radyolojik bulgulardan subdural kanama (p<0,001), beyin ezilmesi (p=0,006), travmatik subaraknoid kanama (p<0,001), beyin içi kanama (p=0,005) ve beyin ödemi (p<0,001), cerrahi girişim yapılması (p<0,001) ve hastane enfeksiyonu varlığı (p<0,001) verilerinin sonuç üzerinde anlamlı farklılık oluşturduğu saptandı. SONUÇ Kafa yaralanmalarına bağlı ölümlerin azaltılmasında temel amaç kaza oluşumunun azaltılması olmalı, ayrıca ilk girişim ve hastane bakım şartları yaralanmalı olgular için iyileştirilmelidir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tıbbi İnformatik Acil Tıp Yoğun Bakım, Tıp

Effective factors in the outcome of head injury

Öz:
BACKGROUND In this study, the data that could be obtained from our patient record system were investigated with respect to factors affecting the outcome in adult patients with head injury. METHODS The records of 356 adult head-injury patients (308 males, 48 females; mean age 43.1±18.6 years; range 17 to 87 years) hospitalized in Trakya University Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery and the Intensive Care Unit were examined. Results of the obtained data were analyzed statistically. RESULTS Age (p=0.012), use of airway tube (p<0.001), Glasgow Coma Scale values determined at the injury site and in the Emergency Unit (p<0.001), clustered systolic and diastolic tricuspid annulus values (p<0.001), accompanying chest (p=0.001) and abdominal (p=0.041) injury, anisocoria (p=0.001), pupillary light response (p<0.001), intracranial radiologic findings such as subdural hematoma (p<0.001), brain contusion (p=0.006), traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (p<0.001), traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (p=0.005), and brain edema (p<0.001), performance of a surgical procedure (p<0.001), and presence of nosocomial infection (p<0.001) were demonstrated to cause significant differences in the outcome. CONCLUSION The main aim must be to reduce accidents in an effort to reduce the number of deaths due to head injuries; additionally, emergency and hospital care facilities should be developed with respect to head injury cases.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tıbbi İnformatik Acil Tıp Yoğun Bakım, Tıp
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Mirzai H, Yağli N, Tekin I. Epidemiologic and clinical features of cases applying to Celal Bayar University emergency unit with head trauma. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2005;11:146-52.
  • 2. Ökten Aİ, Ergün R, Beşkonaklı E, Akdemir G, Bostancı U, Gezici Aİ ve ark. Kafa travmasında prognozu ve ölüm oranını etkileyen unsurlar. Türk Nöroşirürji Dergisi 1997;7:51-9.
  • 3. Gennarelli TA, Thibault LE. Biomechanics of head injury. In: Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS, editors. Neurosurgery. New York: McGraw-HillBook Co; 1985. p. 1531-6.
  • 4. Bruns J Jr, Hauser WA. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: a review. Epilepsia 2003;44:2-10. CrossRef
  • 5. Andrews BT. History classification and epidemiology of cranial Trauma. In: Butjer HH, Loftus CM, editors. Textbook of Neurological surgery. Philedelphia: Lipincott Williams Wilkins; 2002. p. 2795-98.
  • 6. Mushkudiani NA, Engel DC, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, Lu J, Marmarou A, et al. Prognostic value of demographic characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007;24:259-69. CrossRef
  • 7. Butcher I, McHugh GS, Lu J, Steyerberg EW, Hernández AV, Mushkudiani N, et al. Prognostic value of cause of injury in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007;24:281-6. CrossRef
  • 8. Butcher I, Maas AI, Lu J, Marmarou A, Murray GD, Mushkudiani NA, et al. Prognostic value of admission blood pressure in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007;24:294-302. CrossRef
  • 9. McHugh GS, Engel DC, Butcher I, Steyerberg EW, Lu J, Mushkudiani N, et al. Prognostic value of secondary insults in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007;24:287-93. CrossRef
  • 10. Marmarou A, Lu J, Butcher I, McHugh GS, Murray GD, Steyerberg EW, et al. Prognostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale and pupil reactivity in traumatic brain injury assessed pre-hospital and on enrollment: an IMPACT analysis. J Neurotrauma 2007;24:270-80. CrossRef
  • 11. Maas AI, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, Dammers R, Lu J, Marmarou A, et al. Prognostic value of computerized tomography scan characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007;24:303-14. CrossRef
  • 12. Van Beek JG, Mushkudiani NA, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, McHugh GS, Lu J, et al. Prognostic value of admission laboratory parameters in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007;24:315-28. CrossRef
  • 13. Hsiao KY, Hsiao CT, Weng HH, Chen KH, Lin LJ, Huang YM. Factors predicting mortality in victims of blunt trauma brain injury in emergency department settings. Emerg Med J 2008;25:670-3. CrossRef
  • 14. Wardlaw JM, Easton VJ, Statham P. Which CT features help predict outcome after head injury? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:188-92. CrossRef
  • 15. Hukkelhoven CW, Steyerberg EW, Habbema JD, Farace E, Marmarou A, Murray GD, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics. J Neurotrauma 2005;22:1025-39. CrossRef
  • 16. Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, Butcher I, Lu J, McHugh GS, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med 2008;5:165. CrossRef
  • 17. MRC CRASH Trial Collaborators, Perel P, Arango M, Clayton T, Edwards P, Komolafe E, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. BMJ 2008;336:425-9. CrossRef
  • 18. Demetriades D, Kuncir E, Brown CV, Martin M, Salim A, Rhee P, et al. Early prediction of mortality in isolated head injury patients: a new predictive model. J Trauma 2006;61:868-72. CrossRef
  • 19. Signorini DF, Andrews PJ, Jones PA, Wardlaw JM, Miller JD. Predicting survival using simple clinical variables: a case study in traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;66:20-5. CrossRef
  • 20. Murray GD, Butcher I, McHugh GS, Lu J, Mushkudiani NA, Maas AI, et al. Multivariable prognostic analysis in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007;24:329-37. CrossRef
  • 21. Schaan M, Jaksche H, Boszczyk B. Predictors of outcome in head injury: proposal of a new scaling system. J Trauma 2002;52:667-74. CrossRef
  • 22. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974;2:81-4. CrossRef
  • 23. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975;1:480-4. CrossRef
  • 24. Karasu A, Sabanci PA, Cansever T, Hepgül KT, Imer M, Dolaş I, et al. Epidemiological study in head injury patients. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2009;15:159-63.
  • 25. Şimşek O, Süt N, Kılınçer C, Hamamcıoğlu MK, Memiş D. Yalnız kafa yaralanması olan olguda sonuç tahmini. Türk Nöroşirürji Dergisi 2010;20:107-8.
  • 26. Arslan A. Kafa travmalı olgularda enfeksiyonun erken dönem tedavi maliyeti üzerindeki etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi [Tez]. Edirne: Trakya Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi; 2009.
  • 27. Tagliaferri F, Compagnone C, Korsic M, Servadei F, Kraus J. A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006;148:255-68. CrossRef
  • 28. Becker DP, Gade GF, Miller JD. Prognosis head injury. In: Youmans JR, editor. Neurological surgery. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1990; p. 2194-230.
  • 29. Lu J, Marmarou A, Choi S, Maas A, Murray G, Steyerberg EW; Impact and Abic Study Group. Mortality from traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2005;95:281-5. CrossRef
  • 30. Arbabi S, Jurkovich GJ, Wahl WL, Franklin GA, Hemmila MR, Taheri PA, et al. A comparison of prehospital and hospital data in trauma patients. J Trauma 2004;56:1029-32. CrossRef
  • 31. Perel P, Edwards P, Wentz R, Roberts I. Systematic review of prognostic models in traumatic brain injury. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006;6:38. CrossRef
  • 32. Udekwu P, Kromhout-Schiro S, Vaslef S, Baker C, Oller D. Glasgow Coma Scale score, mortality, and functional outcome in head-injured patients. J Trauma 2004;56:1084-9. CrossRef
  • 33. Jones N. Examination of the head-injured patient. ADF Health september 2000;1:107-12.
  • 34. Ghajar J. Traumatic brain injury. Lancet 2000;356:923-9. CrossRef
  • 35. Mathur P. Infections in traumatised patients: a growing medico-surgical concern. Indian J Med Microbiol 2008;26:212-6. CrossRef
APA AKYEL S, ŞİMŞEK O, Süt N (2012). Kafa yaralanmalarında sonucu belirleyen etkenler. , 125 - 132.
Chicago AKYEL Serkan,ŞİMŞEK OSMAN,Süt Necdet Kafa yaralanmalarında sonucu belirleyen etkenler. (2012): 125 - 132.
MLA AKYEL Serkan,ŞİMŞEK OSMAN,Süt Necdet Kafa yaralanmalarında sonucu belirleyen etkenler. , 2012, ss.125 - 132.
AMA AKYEL S,ŞİMŞEK O,Süt N Kafa yaralanmalarında sonucu belirleyen etkenler. . 2012; 125 - 132.
Vancouver AKYEL S,ŞİMŞEK O,Süt N Kafa yaralanmalarında sonucu belirleyen etkenler. . 2012; 125 - 132.
IEEE AKYEL S,ŞİMŞEK O,Süt N "Kafa yaralanmalarında sonucu belirleyen etkenler." , ss.125 - 132, 2012.
ISNAD AKYEL, Serkan vd. "Kafa yaralanmalarında sonucu belirleyen etkenler". (2012), 125-132.
APA AKYEL S, ŞİMŞEK O, Süt N (2012). Kafa yaralanmalarında sonucu belirleyen etkenler. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 18(2), 125 - 132.
Chicago AKYEL Serkan,ŞİMŞEK OSMAN,Süt Necdet Kafa yaralanmalarında sonucu belirleyen etkenler. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 18, no.2 (2012): 125 - 132.
MLA AKYEL Serkan,ŞİMŞEK OSMAN,Süt Necdet Kafa yaralanmalarında sonucu belirleyen etkenler. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.18, no.2, 2012, ss.125 - 132.
AMA AKYEL S,ŞİMŞEK O,Süt N Kafa yaralanmalarında sonucu belirleyen etkenler. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2012; 18(2): 125 - 132.
Vancouver AKYEL S,ŞİMŞEK O,Süt N Kafa yaralanmalarında sonucu belirleyen etkenler. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2012; 18(2): 125 - 132.
IEEE AKYEL S,ŞİMŞEK O,Süt N "Kafa yaralanmalarında sonucu belirleyen etkenler." Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 18, ss.125 - 132, 2012.
ISNAD AKYEL, Serkan vd. "Kafa yaralanmalarında sonucu belirleyen etkenler". Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 18/2 (2012), 125-132.