Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar

Türk, Mevlüt; albayrak, sebahattin

Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar

Mevlüt TÜRK, (Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Isparta, Türkiye)

Sebahattin ALBAYRAK (Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Isparta, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Field Crops

4 2

Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 111 - 114 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar

Öz:

This study is aimed to determine the effects of three different harvesting stages (beginning of flowering, full flowering and seed filling) on forage yield and quality of different leaf type pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars. Two semi-leafless cultivars (Ulubatli and Kirazli), two leafed cultivars (Golyazi and Urunlu) were used in this research. Dry matter (DM) yield, crude protein (CP) ratio, CP yield, acid detergent fibre (ADF), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), total digestible nutrients (TDN) and relative feed value (RFV) were determined. According to two years averages, Golyazi had the highest DM (2415 kg ha-1) and CP yield (442 kg ha-1). Harvesting at the late stages caused a reduction in forage quality. Contents of CP, TDN and RFV decreased with advancing growth while DM yield, CP yield, ADF and NDF contents increased.

Anahtar Kelime: fodder crops peas crop quality cultivars harvesting date crop yield crude protein Pisum sativum

Konular: Ziraat Mühendisliği

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Acikgoz. E., V. Katkat, S. Omeroglu, B. Okan, 1985. Mineral elements and amino acid concentrations in field pea and common vetch herbages and seeds. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 55,179–185.
Albrecht K.A. and H.H. Marvin, 1995. Hay and silage management. In: Barnes RF, Miller DA, Nelson CJ ed. Forages, vol. I: an introduction to grassland agriculture. Ames, Iowa, Iowa State University Press. Pp. 155–174.
Armstrong, E. L., 1989. Seeding date and rate of conventional and semi-leafless field peas. Proceedings 5th Australian Agronomy Conference, p. 500. Perth,Western Australia.
Aydin, N., Z. Mut, H. Mut, I. Ayan - 2010. Effect of autumn and spring sowing dates on hay yield and quality of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 9(10):1539-1545.
Berry, G. J., 1985. Performance of new field pea types. Proceedings of the 3rd Australian Agronomy Conference, January/February 1985, p. 322. University of Tasmania, Hobart.
Biederbeck, V.O., O.T. Boudman, 1994. Water use by annual green manure legumes in dryland cropping system. Agron. J. 86, 543–549.
Blaser R.E., R.C. Hames, J.P. Fontenot, H.T. Bryant, C.E. Polan, D.D. Wolf, F.S. McClaugherty, R.G. Kline, J.S. Moore, 1986. Growth stages of plants, forage quality and animal production. In: Holliman MC ed. Forageanimal management systems. Virginia Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin: 86–87.
Cawood, R. J., 1987. Productivity of conventional and new pea phenotypes in Victoria. Proceedings of the 4th Australian Agronomy Conference, 24-27 August, p.224. La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria.
Cook C.W. and L.E. Harris, 1979. Nutritive value of seasonal ranges. Utah Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin: 72: 1–55.
Cote, R., J.M. Gerrath, U. Posluszny and B. Grodzinski, 1992. Comparative development of conventional and semi-leafless peas (Pisum sativum). Can. J.Bot. 70: 571-580.
Heath, M.C. and P.D. Hebblethwaite, 1985. Solar radiation interception by leafless and leafed peas (Pisum sativum) under contrasting field conditions. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107: 309-318.
Hintz RW, K.A. Albrecht, E.S. Oplinger, 1992. Yield and quality of soybean forage as affected by cultivar and management practices. Agronomy Journal 84: 795–798.
Kacar, B., 1972. Chemical analysis of plant and soil. II . Plant analysis. Ankara University Agriculture Faculty Publication. 453 p.
May, W.E., G.P. Lafond, E.N. Johnson, T. Hogg, A.M. Johnston, B. Nybo, N. Harker and G. Clayton, 2003. An assessment of the concept of early time of weed removal in field pea using natural weed populations. Can. J. Plant Sci. 83: 423-431.
McKenzie, D.B., D. Sponer, 1999. White lupin: an alternative to pea in oat-legume forage mixtures grown in New Foundland. Can. J. Plant Sci. 79, 43–47.
Munoz A.E., E.C. Holt, R.W. Weaver, 1983. Yield and quality of soybean hay as influenced by stage of growth and plant density. Agronomy Journal 75:147–148.
Oelberg, K., 1956. Factors affecting the nutritive value of range forage. Journal of Range Management 9:220–225.
Osborne S.L. and W.E. Riedell, 2006. Soybean growth response to low rates of nitrogen applied at plantings in the Northern Great Plains. Journal of Plant Nutrition 29: 985–1002.
Prates E.R., H.L. Chapman, H.M. Hodges, 1975. Animal performance by steers grazing Pensacola bahiagrass pasture in relation to forage production, forage composition and estimated intake. Soil & Crop Science Society of Florida. 34: 152–256.
Rama Rao M, H.H. Leniel arbers, E.F.S. Smith, 1973. Seasonal changes in nutritive value of bluestem pastures. Journal of Range Management 26: 419–422.
Rauber, R., K. Schmidtke and H. Kimpel-Freund, 2001. The performance of pea (Pisum sativum) and its role in determining yield advantages in mixed stands of pea and oat (Avena sativa). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 187: 137-144.
Rauzi F, L.I. Painter., A.K. Dobrenze, 1969. Mineral and protein content of blue grama and western wheatgrass. Journal of Range Management 22: 47–49.
Rebole A, C. Alzueta, L.T. Ortiz, C.Barro, M.L. Rodriguez, R. Caballero, 2004. Yields and chemical composition of different parts of the common vetch at flowering and at two seed filling stages. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2(4): 550–557.
Rowell, D.R. 1996. Soil science: methods and applications. Harlow, Longman.
SAS Institute, 1998. SAS user.s guide. Version 8. SAS Inst. Cary, NC.
Semere, T. and R.J. Froud-Williams, 2001. The effect of pea cultivar and water stress on root and shoot competition between vegetative plants of maize and peas. J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 137-145.
Snoad, B., 1985. The need for improved pea-crop plant ideotypes. In ’The Pea Crop. A Basis for Crop Improvement.’ (Eds P. D. Hebblethwaite, M. C. Heath and T. C. K. Dawkins.) pp. 31-41.
Stobbs T.H., 1975. Factors limiting the nutritional value of grazed tropical pastures for beef and milk production. Tropical Grassland 9: 141–150.
Stubbendieck J. and M.A. Foster, 1978. Herbage yield and quality of threadleaf sedge. Journal of Range Management 31: 290–292.
Tan M. and Y. Serin, 1996. The effects of mixture rates and cutting dates on the macro nutrient compositions in vetch + cereal mixtures. III. Grassland and Forage Congress in Turkey, Erzurum, Pp. 308–315.
Tan M, A. Bakoglu, A. Koc 1997. The changing of aboveground biomass and chemical composition of birdsfood trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) during growing period. II. Field Crops Congress in Turkey, Samsun. Pp. 693–695.
Tan M, S Temel, H. Yolcu, 2003. Effects of harvest management on the mineral composition of common vetch. Proceedings of the 12th Symposium of the European Grassland Federation, Pleven, Bulgaria. Pp. 423–425.
Turk M, S. Albayrak, O. Yuksel, 2007. Effects of phosphorus fertilization and harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of narbon vetch. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 50: 457–462.
Turk, M., S. Albayrak and O. Yuksel, 2009. Effects of
Fertilisation and Harvesting Stages on Forage Yield and Quality of Hairy Vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.). The New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 52: 269-275.
Turk M., S. Albayrak, and O.Yuksel, 2011. Effect Of Seeding Rate On The Forage Yields And Quality In Pea Cultivars Of Differing Leaf Types. Turkish Journal of Field Crops.16 (2):137-141.
Uzun F., 2010. Changes in hay yield and quality of bulbous barley at different phenological stages. Turk J Agric For 34:1-9.
Uzun, A. and E. Acikgoz, 1998. Effect of sowing season and seeding rate on the morphological traits and yield in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 181: 215-222.
Uzun, A., U. Bilgili, M. Sincik, I. Filya and E. Acikgoz, 2005.
Yield and quality of forage type pea lines of contrasting leaf type. Europ. J. Agronomy. 22: 85-94.
Van Soest P.J. 1982. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant: Ruminant metabolism, nutritional strategies, the cellulolytic fermentation and the chemistry of forages and plant fibers. O and B Books Publisher, Corvallis, OR., USA.
Zain, Z. M., J.N. Gallagher, J.G.H. White and J.B.Reid, 1983. The effect of irrigation on radiation absorption, water use and yield of conventional and semi-leafless peas. Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand 13, 95-102.
Zohary, D. and M. Hopf, 2002. Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia, Europe and the Nile Valley. Third Edition. Oxford University Press Inc. New York.

APA	Türk M, albayrak s (2012). Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar. , 111 - 114.
Chicago	Türk Mevlüt,albayrak sebahattin Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar. (2012): 111 - 114.
MLA	Türk Mevlüt,albayrak sebahattin Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar. , 2012, ss.111 - 114.
AMA	Türk M,albayrak s Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar. . 2012; 111 - 114.
Vancouver	Türk M,albayrak s Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar. . 2012; 111 - 114.
IEEE	Türk M,albayrak s "Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar." , ss.111 - 114, 2012.
ISNAD	Türk, Mevlüt - albayrak, sebahattin. "Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar". (2012), 111-114.

APA	Türk M, albayrak s (2012). Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 17(2), 111 - 114.
Chicago	Türk Mevlüt,albayrak sebahattin Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 17, no.2 (2012): 111 - 114.
MLA	Türk Mevlüt,albayrak sebahattin Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, vol.17, no.2, 2012, ss.111 - 114.
AMA	Türk M,albayrak s Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 2012; 17(2): 111 - 114.
Vancouver	Türk M,albayrak s Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 2012; 17(2): 111 - 114.
IEEE	Türk M,albayrak s "Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar." Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 17, ss.111 - 114, 2012.
ISNAD	Türk, Mevlüt - albayrak, sebahattin. "Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar". Turkish Journal of Field Crops 17/2 (2012), 111-114.