Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 367 - 375 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a peripheral nerve defect: an experimental study

Öz:
AMAÇ Sinir defektlerinin rekonstrüksiyonunda ven greftlerinin kullanılması ile ilgili çalışmaların artması ve bu uygulamanın klinikte kullanıma girmesiyle birlikte, ven greftinin kollabe olma sorununun ortaya çıktığı görülmüştür. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM Çalışmada 40 adet Spraque-Dawley sıçan kullanıldı. Beş gruptan, 1. gruba herhangi bir cerrahi girişim yapılmadı; 2. grubun siyatik sinirinde oluşturulan defekt onarılmadan bırakıldı, 3. grupta defekt sinir grefti ile onarıldı, 4. grupta defekt ven grefti ile 5. grupta ise ven grefti ve katater birlikte kullanılarak onarım yapıldı. Birinci ve ikinci grup kontrol grubu olarak kullanıldı. Fonksiyonel iyileşmeyi, sinir rejenerasyonunu değerlendirmek amacıyla, 12. haftanın sonunda, yürüme analizi, elektrofizyolojik ve histomorfometrik analizler yapıldı. BULGULAR Defektin ven grefti ve katater ile onarıldığı grup (grup 5) ile grup 3 ve 4 arasında fonksiyonel açıdan fark bulunmazken, sinir iletim hızı açısından bakıldığında, 5. gruptaki sonuçlar, ven grefti ile onarım yapılan gruptan (grup 4) daha iyi bulundu. Onarım distalinden ve onarım alanının ortasından alınan siyatik sinir kesitlerindeki akson sayısına bakıldığında 3. ve 5. grup arasında fark bulunamazken; 4. ve 5. grup arasındaki fark anlamlıydı. SONUÇ Bu çalışma sonucunda, ven grefti ile onarılan periferik sinir yaralanmalarında görülebilen ven grefti kollapsının ven grefti içine kateter yerleştirilmesi ile aşılabileceği ve bu sayede onarımda sinir grefti kullanma ihtiyacının ortadan kalkabileceği deneysel olarak gösterilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

Ven grefti ile periferik sinir defektlerinin onarımında kateter kullanımının sinir rejenerasyonuna etkisi: Deneysel çalışma

Öz:
BACKGROUND Since vein grafts have been used in the repair of nerve defects, studies regarding this procedure have accumulated, and after coming into clinical use, it was noticed that there is a problem of collapse in the vein graft. METHODS Forty Sprague-Dawley rats were used, divided into five groups. No surgical intervention was performed in the first group. The defect was created in the sciatic nerve in Group 2 and left unrepaired. In Group 3, the defect was repaired with a nerve graft. In Group 4, the defect was repaired with a vein graft, while in Group 5, the repair was performed using a vein graft with an inserted catheter. In order to evaluate functional recovery and nerve regeneration, walking track analysis, electrophysiologic and histomorphometric analyses were done at the end of the 12th week. RESULTS Although there were no functional differences between Groups 5 and 4, comparisons regarding nerve conduction velocity demonstrated that the results obtained in Group 5 were better than those in Group 4. When the number of axons on the distal part of the sciatic nerve and mid-segment of the repaired area was taken into account, no significant difference was found between Groups 3 and 5, whereas there was a significant difference between Groups 4 and 5. CONCLUSION In our study, it was experimentally shown that the problem of collapse of a vein graft occurring after its use in the reconstruction of a nerve defect can be overcome by placing a catheter into the vein graft. Consequently, this method may eliminate the need for the use of a nerve graft in selected cases.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Payne SH Jr. Nerve repair and grafting in the upper extrem- ity. J South Orthop Assoc 2001;10:173-89.
  • 2. Thomas MB. Nerve repair and grafting, In Green DP, Hotch- kiss RN, Pederson WC, editors. Green’s operative hand sur- gery. Vol 2., Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 1999. p. 1381-404.
  • 3. Sunderland S. The anatomy and physiology of nerve injury. Muscle Nerve 1990;13:771-84.
  • 4. IJkema-Paassen J, Jansen K, Gramsbergen A, Meek MF. Transection of peripheral nerves, bridging strategies and ef- fect evaluation. Biomaterials 2004;25:1583-92.
  • 5. Lundborg G, Dahlin JB. Structure and function of peripheral nerve. In: Gelberman RH, editor. Operative nerve repair and reconstruction. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1991. p. 3-18.
  • 6. Lundborg G. Nerve regeneration and repair. A review. Acta Orthop Scand 1987;58:145-69.
  • 7. Brandt KE, Mackinnon SE. Microsurgical repair of periph- eral nerves and nerve grafts. In: Aston SJ, Beasley RW, Tho CHM, editors. Grabb and Smith’s plastic surgery. Philadel- phia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. p. 79-90.
  • 8. Liu K, Chen LE, Seaber AV, Goldner RV, Urbaniak JR. Motor functional and morphological findings following end-to-side neurorrhaphy in the rat model. J Orthop Res 1999;17:293- 300.
  • 9. Ozbek S, Ozcan M, Noyan B, Kurt MA, Tirelioğlu S, Boz- kurt C, et al. End-to-side nerve coaptation: is an additional proximal coaptation useful when available? Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:281-8.
  • 10. Chiu DT, Janecka I, Krizek TJ, Wolff M, Lovelace RE. Au- togenous vein graft as a conduit for nerve regeneration. Sur- gery 1982;91:226-33.
  • 11. Walton RL, Brown RE, Matory WE Jr, Borah GL, Dolph JL. Autogenous vein graft repair of digital nerve defects in the finger: a retrospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;84:944-9; discussion 950-2.
  • 12. Chiu DT, Strauch B. A prospective clinical evaluation of autogenous vein grafts used as a nerve conduit for distal sensory nerve defects of 3 cm or less. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;86:928-34.
  • 13. Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL. Clinical nerve reconstruction with a bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid tube. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;85:419-24.
  • 14. Hudson TW, Evans GR, Schmidt CE. Engineering strategies for peripheral nerve repair. Clin Plast Surg 1999;26:617-28.
  • 15. Foidart-Dessalle M, Dubuisson A, Lejeune A, Severyns A, Manassis Y, Delree P, et al. Sciatic nerve regeneration through venous or nervous grafts in the rat. Exp Neurol 1997;148:236-46.
  • 16. Thanos PK, Okajima S, Terzis JK. Ultrastructure and cel- lular biology of nerve regeneration. J Reconstr Microsurg 1998;14:423-36.
  • 17. Chiu DT. Autogenous venous nerve conduits. A review. Hand Clin 1999;15:667-71.
  • 18. Tang JB. Group fascicular vein grafts with interposition of nerve slices for long ulnar nerve defects: report of three cas- es. Microsurgery 1993;14:404-8.
  • 19. Tang JB. Vein conduits with interposition of nerve tissue for peripheral nerve defects. J Reconstr Microsurg 1995;11:21- 6.
  • 20. Keskin M, Akbaş H, Uysal OA, Canan S, Ayyldz M, Ağar E, et al. Enhancement of nerve regeneration and orientation across a gap with a nerve graft within a vein conduit graft: a functional, stereological, and electrophysiological study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:1372-9.
  • 21. Battiston B, Tos P, Cushway TR, Geuna S. Nerve repair by means of vein filled with muscle grafts I. Clinical results. Microsurgery 2000;20:32-6.The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a
  • 22. Battiston B, Tos P, Geuna S, Giacobini- Robechi MG, Gug- lielmone R. Nerve repair by means of vein filled with muscle grafts. II. Morphological analysis of regeneration. Microsur- gery 20: 37–41, 2000.
  • 23. Danielsen N, Lundborg G, Frizell M. Nerve repair and axo- nal transport: outgrowth delay and regeneration rate after transection and repair of rabbit hypoglossal nerve. Brain Res 1986;376:125-32.
  • 24. Varejão AS, Meek MF, Ferreira AJ, Patrício JA, Cabrita AM. Functional evaluation of peripheral nerve regenera- tion in the rat: walking track analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2001;108:1-9.
  • 25. Brown CJ, Mackinnon SE, Evans PJ, Bain JR, Makino AP, Hunter DA, et al. Self-evaluation of walking-track mea- surement using a Sciatic Function Index. Microsurgery 1989;10:226-35.
  • 26. Hare GM, Evans PJ, Mackinnon SE, Best TJ, Bain JR, Szalai JP, et al. Walking track analysis: a long-term assessment of peripheral nerve recovery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89:251- 8.
  • 27. Mayhew TM. A review of recent advances in stereology for quantifying neural structure. J Neurocytol 1992;21:313-28.
  • 28. Lundborg G. A 25-year perspective of peripheral nerve sur- gery: evolving neuroscientific concepts and clinical signifi- cance. J Hand Surg Am 2000;25:391-414.
  • 29. Amara B, de Medinaceli L, Lane GB, Merle M. Functional assessment of misdirected axon growth after nerve repair in the rat. J Reconstr Microsurg 2000;16:563-7.
  • 30. Al-Qattan MM. Terminolateral neurorrhaphy: review of experimental and clinical studies. J Reconstr Microsurg 2001;17:99-108.
  • 31. Bain JR, Mackinnon SE, Hunter DA. Functional evaluation of complete sciatic, peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve le- sions in the rat. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;83:129-38.
  • 32. Weber RA, Warner MR, Verheyden CN, Proctor WH. Func- tional evaluation of gap vs. abutment repair of peripheral nerves in the rat. J Reconstr Microsurg 1996;12:159-63.
  • 33. Giovanoli P, Koller R, Meuli-Simmen C, Rab M, Haslik W, Mittlböck M, et al. Functional and morphometric evaluation of end-to-side neurorrhaphy for muscle reinnervation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:383-92.
  • 34. Kanaya F, Firrell JC, Breidenbach WC. Sciatic function in- dex, nerve conduction tests, muscle contraction, and axon morphometry as indicators of regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:1264-74.
APA BAYRAKTAR A, Özbek S, ÖZCAN M, NOYAN B, ÇAVUŞOĞLU İ (2012). The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a peripheral nerve defect: an experimental study. , 367 - 375.
Chicago BAYRAKTAR Alper Mehmet,Özbek Serhat,ÖZCAN Mesut,NOYAN Behzat,ÇAVUŞOĞLU İlkin The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a peripheral nerve defect: an experimental study. (2012): 367 - 375.
MLA BAYRAKTAR Alper Mehmet,Özbek Serhat,ÖZCAN Mesut,NOYAN Behzat,ÇAVUŞOĞLU İlkin The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a peripheral nerve defect: an experimental study. , 2012, ss.367 - 375.
AMA BAYRAKTAR A,Özbek S,ÖZCAN M,NOYAN B,ÇAVUŞOĞLU İ The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a peripheral nerve defect: an experimental study. . 2012; 367 - 375.
Vancouver BAYRAKTAR A,Özbek S,ÖZCAN M,NOYAN B,ÇAVUŞOĞLU İ The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a peripheral nerve defect: an experimental study. . 2012; 367 - 375.
IEEE BAYRAKTAR A,Özbek S,ÖZCAN M,NOYAN B,ÇAVUŞOĞLU İ "The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a peripheral nerve defect: an experimental study." , ss.367 - 375, 2012.
ISNAD BAYRAKTAR, Alper Mehmet vd. "The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a peripheral nerve defect: an experimental study". (2012), 367-375.
APA BAYRAKTAR A, Özbek S, ÖZCAN M, NOYAN B, ÇAVUŞOĞLU İ (2012). The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a peripheral nerve defect: an experimental study. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 18(5), 367 - 375.
Chicago BAYRAKTAR Alper Mehmet,Özbek Serhat,ÖZCAN Mesut,NOYAN Behzat,ÇAVUŞOĞLU İlkin The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a peripheral nerve defect: an experimental study. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 18, no.5 (2012): 367 - 375.
MLA BAYRAKTAR Alper Mehmet,Özbek Serhat,ÖZCAN Mesut,NOYAN Behzat,ÇAVUŞOĞLU İlkin The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a peripheral nerve defect: an experimental study. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.18, no.5, 2012, ss.367 - 375.
AMA BAYRAKTAR A,Özbek S,ÖZCAN M,NOYAN B,ÇAVUŞOĞLU İ The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a peripheral nerve defect: an experimental study. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2012; 18(5): 367 - 375.
Vancouver BAYRAKTAR A,Özbek S,ÖZCAN M,NOYAN B,ÇAVUŞOĞLU İ The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a peripheral nerve defect: an experimental study. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2012; 18(5): 367 - 375.
IEEE BAYRAKTAR A,Özbek S,ÖZCAN M,NOYAN B,ÇAVUŞOĞLU İ "The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a peripheral nerve defect: an experimental study." Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 18, ss.367 - 375, 2012.
ISNAD BAYRAKTAR, Alper Mehmet vd. "The effect of catheter use on vein grafting of a peripheral nerve defect: an experimental study". Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 18/5 (2012), 367-375.