Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 58 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 307 - 311 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Does the provocation maneuvers increase the sensitivity of sensory nerve conduction studies in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı karpal tünel sendromu (KTS) tanısında duyusal sinir iletim çalışmaları parametrelerinin duyarlılığını ve provokasyon manevraları kullanıldığında bunların duyarlılığını nasıl artırdığını belirlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu prospektif çalışmaya KTS semptom ve bulguları olan 85 olgu (135 el) ve 100 kontrol el dahil edildi. Duyusal sinir iletim çalışmaları, nötral pozisyonda, el bileği fleksiyon ve 90 derece ekstansiyonda 1 dk pozisyonlandıktan sonra yapıldı. Başlangıç ve piklatansı ve hızları, negatif dalga süresi ve alanı ve pik amplitud ölçüldü.Bulgular: En sensitif parametreler nötral pozisyonda başlangıç latansı (%77),başlangıç (%72) ve pik hızlarıydı (%72). Fleksiyon manevrası bunların duyarlılığını artırmadı; bununla beraber negatif pik alanı (%10) ve amplitüdlerin (%24) duyarlılığı ekstansiyon pozisyonunda nötral pozisyona göre daha yüksekti.Sonuç: Nötral pozisyonda en duyarlı manevralar başlangıç latansı, başlangıç ve pik hızlarıydı. Ekstansiyon manevrası nötral pozisyondan dahaduyarlıydı.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Rehabilitasyon

Karpal tünel sendromu tanısında provokasyon manevraları duyusal sinir iletim çalışmalarının duyarlılığını arttırmakta mıdır?

Öz:
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of sensory nerveconduction study (NCS) parameters in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome(CTS) and to explore if the use of provocative maneuvers improves theirsensitivity.Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, we included 85consecutive cases (135 hands) that had signs and symptoms of CTS, and100 control hands. Sensory NCS was performed in the neutral position andthen the wrist was placed in flexion and 90° of extension for 1 min. Onsetand peak latencies and velocities, negative peak duration and area, andpeak amplitude were measured.Results: The most sensitive parameters were onset latency (77%), andonset (72%) and peak velocities (72%) in neutral position. The flexionmaneuver did not increase their sensitivity, however, negative peak area(10%) and amplitude (24%) sensitivities were higher in extendedposition than in neutral position.Conclusion: The most sensitive NCS parameters were onset latency, andonset and peak velocities in neutral position. The extension maneuverwas more sensitive than neutral position.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Rehabilitasyon
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Buchthal F Rosenfalck A. Sensory conduction from digit to palm and, from palm to wrist in the carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1971;34:243-52.
  • 2. Kimura J. The carpal tunnel syndrome: localization of conduction abnormalities within the distal segment of the median nerve. Brain 1979;102:619-35.
  • 3. Mills KR. Orthodromic sensory action potentials from palmar stimulation in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985;48:250-5.
  • 4. Jablecki CK, Andary MT, Floeter MK, Miller RG, Quartly CA, Vennix MJ, et al. Practice parameter: Electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Report of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology 2002;58:1589-92.
  • 5. SJ Oh. Nerve conduction in focal neuropathies. In: Oh SJ, editor. Clinical Electromyography: nerve conduction studies. 3th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams&Wilkins; 2003. p. 601-94.
  • 6. Prakash KM, Fook-Chong S, Leoh TH, Dan YF Nurjannah S, Tan YE, et , al. Sensitivities of sensory nerve conduction study parameters in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Clin Neurophysiol 2006;23:565-7.
  • 7. Werner R, Armstrong TJ, Bir C, Aylard MK. Intracarpal canal pressures: the role of finger, hand, wrist and forearm position. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1997;12:44-51.
  • 8. Sesek RF Khalighi M, Bloswick DS, Anderson M, Tuckett RP Effects of , . prolonged wrist flexion on transmission of sensory information in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Pain 2007;8:137-51.
  • 9. Aird J, Cady R, Nagi H, Kullar S, MacDermid JC. The impact of wrist extension provocation on current perception thresholds in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a pilot study. J Hand Ther 2006;19:299- 305; quiz 306.
  • 10. Walters C, Rice V. An evaluation of provocative testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Mil Med 2002;167:647-52.
  • 11. Tetro AM, Evanoff BA, Hollstien SB, Gelberman RH. A new provocative test for carpal tunnel syndrome. Assessment of wrist flexion and nerve compression. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:493-8.
  • 12. Mondelli M, Passero S, Giannini F Provocative tests in different stages . of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2001;103:178-83.
  • 13. Bruske J, Bednarski M, Grzelec H, Zyluk A. The usefulness of the Phalen test and the Hoffmann-Tinel sign in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Acta Orthop Belg 2002;68:141-5.
  • 14. Phalen GS. The carpal-tunnel syndrome. Seventeen years' experience in diagnosis and treatment of six hundred fifty-four hands. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1966;48:211-28.
  • 15. Dunnan JB, Waylonis GW. Wrist flexion as an adjunct to the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:211-3.
  • 16. Schwartz MS, Gordon JA, Swash M. Slowed nerve conduction with wrist flexion in carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Neurol 1980;8:69-71.
  • 17. Emad MR, Najafi SH, Sepehrian MH. The effect of provocative tests on electrodiagnosis criteria in clinical carpal tunnel syndrome. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2009;19:1061-3.
  • 18. Marin EL, Vernick S, Friedmann LW. Carpal tunnel syndrome: median nerve stress test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983;64:206-8.
  • 19. Werner RA, Bir C, Armstrong TJ. Reverse Phalen's maneuver as an aid in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:783-6.
APA Aktas I, SÜNTER G, Uluc K, İŞAK B, TANRIDAĞ T, AKYÜZ G, US Ö (2012). Does the provocation maneuvers increase the sensitivity of sensory nerve conduction studies in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?. , 307 - 311.
Chicago Aktas Ilknur,SÜNTER GÜLIN,Uluc Kayihan,İŞAK Barış,TANRIDAĞ Tülin,AKYÜZ GÜLSEREN DERYA,US Önder Does the provocation maneuvers increase the sensitivity of sensory nerve conduction studies in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?. (2012): 307 - 311.
MLA Aktas Ilknur,SÜNTER GÜLIN,Uluc Kayihan,İŞAK Barış,TANRIDAĞ Tülin,AKYÜZ GÜLSEREN DERYA,US Önder Does the provocation maneuvers increase the sensitivity of sensory nerve conduction studies in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?. , 2012, ss.307 - 311.
AMA Aktas I,SÜNTER G,Uluc K,İŞAK B,TANRIDAĞ T,AKYÜZ G,US Ö Does the provocation maneuvers increase the sensitivity of sensory nerve conduction studies in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?. . 2012; 307 - 311.
Vancouver Aktas I,SÜNTER G,Uluc K,İŞAK B,TANRIDAĞ T,AKYÜZ G,US Ö Does the provocation maneuvers increase the sensitivity of sensory nerve conduction studies in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?. . 2012; 307 - 311.
IEEE Aktas I,SÜNTER G,Uluc K,İŞAK B,TANRIDAĞ T,AKYÜZ G,US Ö "Does the provocation maneuvers increase the sensitivity of sensory nerve conduction studies in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?." , ss.307 - 311, 2012.
ISNAD Aktas, Ilknur vd. "Does the provocation maneuvers increase the sensitivity of sensory nerve conduction studies in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?". (2012), 307-311.
APA Aktas I, SÜNTER G, Uluc K, İŞAK B, TANRIDAĞ T, AKYÜZ G, US Ö (2012). Does the provocation maneuvers increase the sensitivity of sensory nerve conduction studies in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 58(4), 307 - 311.
Chicago Aktas Ilknur,SÜNTER GÜLIN,Uluc Kayihan,İŞAK Barış,TANRIDAĞ Tülin,AKYÜZ GÜLSEREN DERYA,US Önder Does the provocation maneuvers increase the sensitivity of sensory nerve conduction studies in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 58, no.4 (2012): 307 - 311.
MLA Aktas Ilknur,SÜNTER GÜLIN,Uluc Kayihan,İŞAK Barış,TANRIDAĞ Tülin,AKYÜZ GÜLSEREN DERYA,US Önder Does the provocation maneuvers increase the sensitivity of sensory nerve conduction studies in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, vol.58, no.4, 2012, ss.307 - 311.
AMA Aktas I,SÜNTER G,Uluc K,İŞAK B,TANRIDAĞ T,AKYÜZ G,US Ö Does the provocation maneuvers increase the sensitivity of sensory nerve conduction studies in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2012; 58(4): 307 - 311.
Vancouver Aktas I,SÜNTER G,Uluc K,İŞAK B,TANRIDAĞ T,AKYÜZ G,US Ö Does the provocation maneuvers increase the sensitivity of sensory nerve conduction studies in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2012; 58(4): 307 - 311.
IEEE Aktas I,SÜNTER G,Uluc K,İŞAK B,TANRIDAĞ T,AKYÜZ G,US Ö "Does the provocation maneuvers increase the sensitivity of sensory nerve conduction studies in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?." Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 58, ss.307 - 311, 2012.
ISNAD Aktas, Ilknur vd. "Does the provocation maneuvers increase the sensitivity of sensory nerve conduction studies in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?". Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 58/4 (2012), 307-311.