Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference

ERZENGİN, ÖMER UTKU; KURTEL, HIZIR; KASIMAY ÇAKIR, ÖZGÜR; ÇAKIR, Barış

Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference

ÖZGÜR KASIMAY ÇAKIR, (Marmara Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Fizyoloji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Barış ÇAKIR, (Marmara Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Fizyoloji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Ömer Utku ERZENGİN, (Marmara Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Biyoistatistik Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Hızır KURTEL (Marmara Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Fizyoloji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences

0 0

Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 42 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 906 - 912 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference

Öz:

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate cardiopulmonary responses of individuals with different fitness levels according to predetermined rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scores and to investigate the correspondence between the heart rate reserve percentage (HRR%) and the RPE scale by using fit and unfit subjects. Materials and methods: RPE scores of sedentary volunteers were recorded at different HRR% levels during graded exercise tests on a cycle ergometer. Following the tests, subjects were divided into 2 groups, high metabolic equivalent [(MET) MET ≥ 10; n = 9] and low MET (MET < 10; n = 11), according to maximal O2 uptakes (VO2max). Participants performed the steady-state exercise test at the 13th-14th level of their perceived exertion 48 h after the first test. Variance and regression analyses were performed. Results: For all HRR% values, RPE levels were not different between groups. During the graded exercise test, perceived exertion was significantly higher in the low MET group than in the high MET group. Predetermined RPE score results were significantly greater in the low MET group with relative O2 consumption as compared to the high MET group (P < 0.05-0.001). Conclusion: In individuals with different VO2max levels, exercise intensity can be prescribed using HRR% or RPE scale methods while adjusting for individual differences in oxygen consumption.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Batte AL, Darling J, Evans J, Lance LM, Olson ET, Pincivero DM. Physiological response to a prescribed rating of perceived exertion on an elliptical fitness cross-trainer. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2003; 43: 300-5.
2. Al-Rahamneh HQ, Eston RG. Prediction of peak oxygen consumption from the ratings of perceived exertion during a graded exercise test and ramp exercise test in able-bodied participants and paraplegic persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 277-83.
3. Zanettini R, Centeleghe P, Ratti F, Benna S, Di Tullio L, Sorlini N. Training prescription in patients on beta-blockers: percentage peak exercise methods or self-regulation? Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2012; 19: 205-12.
4. Hills AP, Byrne NM, Wearing S, Armstrong T. Validation of the intensity of walking for pleasure in obese adults. Prev Med 2006; 42: 47-50.
5. Colberg SR, Swain DP, Vinik AI. Use of heart rate reserve and rating of perceived exertion to prescribe exercise intensity in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 2003; 26, 986- 90.
6. Hill DW, Cureton KJ, Grisham SC, Collins MA. Effect of training on the rating of perceived exertion at the ventilatory threshold. Eur J Appl Physiol 1987; 56: 206-11.
7. Seip RL, Snead D, Pierce EF, Stein P, Weltman A. Perceptual responses and blood lactate concentration: effect of training state. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 80-7.
8. Held T, Marti B. Substantial influence of level of endurance capacity on the association of perceived exertion with blood lactate accumulation. Int J Sports Med 1999; 20: 34-9.
9. Travlos AK, Marisi DQ. Perceived exertion during physical exercise among individuals high and low in fitness. Percept Mot Skills 1996; 82: 419-24.
10. Green JM, Crews TR, Bosak AM, Peveler WW. Overall and differentiated ratings of perceived exertion at the respiratory compensation threshold: effects of gender and mode. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 89: 445-50.
11. Jackson AS, Pollock ML. Practical assessment of body composition. Physician Sport Med 1985; 13: 76-90.
12. Okura T, Tanaka K. A unique method for predicting cardiorespiratory fitness using rating of perceived exertion. J Physiol Anthropol 2001; 20: 255-61.
13. Karvonen MJ, Kentala E, Mustala O. The effects of training on heart rate: a longitudinal study. Ann Med Exp Biol 1957; 35: 307-15.
14. Borg GAV. An introduction to Borgs RPE-scale. New York: Movement Publications; 1985.
15. Howley ET. Type of activity: resistance, aerobic and leisure versus occupational physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33, 364-9.
16. Parfitt G, Eston R, Connolly D. Psychological affect at different ratings of perceived exertion in high- and low-active women: a study using a production protocol. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1996; 82: 1035-52.
17. Eston RG, Connolly D. The use of rating of perceived exertion for exercise prescription in patients receiving b-blocker therapy. Sports Med 1996; 21: 176-90.
18. Demello JJ, Cureton KJ, Boineau RE, Singh MM. Rating of perceived exertion at the lactate threshold in trained and untrained men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1987; 19: 354-62.
19. Faulkner J, Parfitt G, Eston R. Prediction of maximal oxygen uptake from the ratings of perceived exertion and heart rate during a perceptually-regulated sub-maximal exercise test in active and sedentary participants. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007; 101: 397-407.
20. Moyna NM, Robertson RJ, Meckes CL, Peoples JA, Millich NB, Th ompson PD. Intermodal comparison of energy expenditure at exercise intensities corresponding to the perceptual preference range. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1404-10.

APA	KASIMAY ÇAKIR Ö, ÇAKIR B, ERZENGİN Ö, KURTEL H (2012). Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference. , 906 - 912.
Chicago	KASIMAY ÇAKIR ÖZGÜR,ÇAKIR Barış,ERZENGİN ÖMER UTKU,KURTEL HIZIR Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference. (2012): 906 - 912.
MLA	KASIMAY ÇAKIR ÖZGÜR,ÇAKIR Barış,ERZENGİN ÖMER UTKU,KURTEL HIZIR Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference. , 2012, ss.906 - 912.
AMA	KASIMAY ÇAKIR Ö,ÇAKIR B,ERZENGİN Ö,KURTEL H Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference. . 2012; 906 - 912.
Vancouver	KASIMAY ÇAKIR Ö,ÇAKIR B,ERZENGİN Ö,KURTEL H Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference. . 2012; 906 - 912.
IEEE	KASIMAY ÇAKIR Ö,ÇAKIR B,ERZENGİN Ö,KURTEL H "Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference." , ss.906 - 912, 2012.
ISNAD	KASIMAY ÇAKIR, ÖZGÜR vd. "Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference". (2012), 906-912.

APA	KASIMAY ÇAKIR Ö, ÇAKIR B, ERZENGİN Ö, KURTEL H (2012). Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 42(5), 906 - 912.
Chicago	KASIMAY ÇAKIR ÖZGÜR,ÇAKIR Barış,ERZENGİN ÖMER UTKU,KURTEL HIZIR Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 42, no.5 (2012): 906 - 912.
MLA	KASIMAY ÇAKIR ÖZGÜR,ÇAKIR Barış,ERZENGİN ÖMER UTKU,KURTEL HIZIR Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.42, no.5, 2012, ss.906 - 912.
AMA	KASIMAY ÇAKIR Ö,ÇAKIR B,ERZENGİN Ö,KURTEL H Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012; 42(5): 906 - 912.
Vancouver	KASIMAY ÇAKIR Ö,ÇAKIR B,ERZENGİN Ö,KURTEL H Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012; 42(5): 906 - 912.
IEEE	KASIMAY ÇAKIR Ö,ÇAKIR B,ERZENGİN Ö,KURTEL H "Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference." Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 42, ss.906 - 912, 2012.
ISNAD	KASIMAY ÇAKIR, ÖZGÜR vd. "Rating of perceived exertion in cycle ergometer: Effect of maximal capacity difference". Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 42/5 (2012), 906-912.