Yıl: 2013 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 39 Sayfa Aralığı: 61 - 76 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma

Öz:
Bilimciler, örgütsel davranış kavramlarından biri olan örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışını verimlilik ve etkinliği artırıcı en önemli değişkenlerden biri olarak kabul etmişlerdir. Yapılan araştırmalarda örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarıyla sonuçlandığı düşünülen birçok bağımsız değişken ileri sürülmüştür. Bu bağımsız değişkenlerden en önemlilerinden biri örgütsel güven kavramıdır. Bu araştırmalarda, örgütsel güven ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişkiye aracılık yapabilecek faktörler aranmıştır. Bu çalışmada diğerlerinden farklı olarak, örgütsel özdeşleşmenin, örgütsel güven ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişkiye aracılık etkisi yapacağı ileri sürülmüştür. Bu nedenle araştırmanın örneklemi, Balıkesir Devlet Hastanesi ve Balıkesir Ağız ve Diş Sağlığı Merkezi’ndeki 220 işgörenden anket aracılığıyla elde edilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre, örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasında anlamlı ve pozitif bir ilişki vardır. Ayrıca, örgütsel özdeşleşme, örgütsel güven ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişkide aracılık rolü oynamıştır.RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST, ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR: A STUDY AT A STATE HOSPITAL Abstract: Organizational citizenship behavior, which increases productivity and efficiency, has been recognized as one of the most important concepts of organizational behavior by scientists. Organizational citizenship behaviors are thought to result in many of the studies suggested that the independent variable. The concept of organizational trust is one of the most important independent variables. The relationships which can act as mediator factors sought between organizational trust and organizational citizenship behavior. In this study, unlike the others, It is asserted that organizational identification plays moderator role in the relation of organizational trust and organizational citizenship behavior. For this reason, Sample of the study was collected via questionnaire through 220 employees at Balıkesir State Hospital and Balıkesir Oral And Dental Health Center. According to research findings, there are positive and significant relationships between organizational trust, organizational identification and organizational citizenship behavior. In addition, organizational identification plays moderator role in the relation of organizational trust and organizational citizenship behavior.
Anahtar Kelime:

Relationship between organizational trust, organizational identification and organizational citizenship behavior: A study at a state hospital

Öz:
Organizational citizenship behavior, which increases productivity and efficiency, has been recognized as one of the most important concepts of organizational behavior by scientists. Organizational citizenship behaviors are thought to result in many of the studies suggested that the independent variable. The concept of organizational trust is one of the most important independent variables. The relationships which can act as mediator factors sought between organizational trust and organizational citizenship behavior. In this study, unlike the others, It is asserted that organizational identification plays moderator role in the relation of organizational trust and organizational citizenship behavior. For this reason, Sample of the study was collected via questionnaire through 220 employees at Balıkesir State Hospital and Balıkesir Oral And Dental Health Center. According to research findings, there are positive and significant relationships between organizational trust, organizational identification and organizational citizenship behavior. In addition, organizational identification plays moderator role in the relation of organizational trust and organizational citizenship behavior.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] Organ, DennisW. (1997). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It’s Construct Clean Up Time. Human Performance, 10, 2, 85-97.
  • [2] Posdakoff, Philip M. ve MacKenzie, Scott B. (1994). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors And Sales Unit Effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 3, 351.
  • [3] Podsakoff, Philip M. ve MacKenzie, Scott B. (1997). Impact Of Organizational Citizenship Behavior On Organizational Performance: A Review And Suggestions For Future Research. Human Performance, 10,2, 133-151.
  • [4] Podsakoff, Philip M., MacKenzie, Scott B., Paine, Julie Beth ve Bachrach, Daniel G. (2000). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. Journail of Management, 26, 3, 513-563.
  • [5] Bolino, Mark C. (1999). Citizenship And Impression Management: Good Soldiers Or Good Actors? Academy of Management Heview, 24, 1, 82-98.
  • [6] Acar, A. Zafer. (2006). Örgütsel Yurttaşlık Davranışı:Kavramsal Gelişimi ile Kişisel ve Örgütsel Etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7, 1, 1-14.
  • [7] Aryee, Samuel, Budhwar, Pawan S. ve Chen, Zhen Xiong. (2002). Trust As A Mediator Of The Relationship Between Organizational Justice And Work Outcomes: Test Of A Social Exchange Model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 3, 267.
  • [8] Arslantaş, Cem Cüneyt. (2008). Yöneticiye Duyulan Güvenin ve Psikolojik Güçlendirmenin Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkilerini Belirlemeye Yönelik Görgül Bir Çalışma. Tisk Akademi, 1.
  • [9] Brower, Holly H., Lester, Scott W., Korsgaard, M. Audrey ve Dineen, Brian R. (2009). A Closer Look at Trust Between Managers and Subordinates: Understanding the Effects of Both Trusting and Being Trusted on Subordinate Outcomes, Journal of Management, 35, 327.
  • [10] Chen, Chun-Hsi Vivian, Wang, Shih-Jon, Chang, Wei-Chieh ve Hu, Chin-Shin. (2008). The Effect of Leader-Member Exchange, Trust, Supervisor Support on Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Nurses. Journal of Nursing Research, 16, 4, 321-328.
  • [11] Deluga, Ronald J. (1995). The Relation Between Trust In The Supervisor And Subordinate Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Military Psychology, 7, 1, 1-16.
  • [12] Dirks, Kurt T. ve Ferrin, Donald L. (2002). Trust In Leadership Meta-Analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611-628.
  • [13] Konovsky, Mary A. ve Pugh, S Douglas. (1994). Citizenship Behavior And Social Exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 3, 656.
  • [14] Lau, Dora C. ve Lam, Long W. (2008). Effects Of Trusting And Being Trusted On Team Citizenship Behaviours İn Chain Stores. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 141–149.
  • [15] MacKenzie, Scott B., Podsakoff, Philip M. ve Rich, Gregory A. (2001). Transformational And Transactional Leadership And Salesperson Performance. Academy of Marketing Science, 29, 2, 115.
  • [16] Pillai, Rajnandini, Schriesheim A. ve Williams, Eric S. (1999). Fairness Perceptions and Trust As Mediators for Transformational And Transactional Leadership: ATwo Sample Study. Journal Of Management, 25, 6, 897-933.
  • [17] Wong, Yui-Tim, Ngo, Hang-Yue ve Wong, Chi-Sum. (2003). Antecedents and Outcomes of Employees’ Trust in Chinese Joint Ventures. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20, 481–499.
  • [18] Wong, Yui-Tim, Ngo, Hang-Yue ve Wong, Chi-Sum. (2006). Perceived Organizational Justice, Trust, And OCB: A Study Of Chinese Workers In Joint Ventures And State-Owned Enterprises. Journal of World Business, 41, 344–355.
  • [19] Van Dick, Rolf, Grojean, Michael W., Christ, Oliver ve Wieseke, Jan. (2006). Identity And The Extra Mile: Relationships Between Organizational Identification And Organizational Citizenship Behaviour. British Journal of Management, 17, 283–301.
  • [20] Bell, Simon J. ve Menguc, Bülent. (2002). The Employee-Organization Relationship, Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, And Superior Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 78, 131–146.
  • [21] Riketta, Michael. (2005). Organizational Identification: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358–384.
  • [22] Christ, Oliver, Dick, Rolf Van, Wagner, Ulrich ve Stellmacher, Jost. (2003). When Teachers Go The Extra Mile: Foci Of Organisational Identification As Determinants Of Different Forms Of Organizational Citizenship Behaviour Among School Teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 329-341.
  • [23] Wegge, Jürgen, Dick, Rolf Van, Gary K. Fisher, Wecking, Christiane ve Moltzen, Kai. (2006). Work Motivation, Organizational Identification, And Well-Being İn Call Centre Work. Work & Stress, 20, 1, 60-83.
  • [24] Mollering, Guido, Backmann, Reinhard ve Lee, Soo Hee. (2004). Understanding Organizational Trust-Foundations, Constellations and Issues of Operationalisation (eds). The Micro – Foundations of Organizational Trust, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 6.
  • [25] Hosmer, Larue Tone. (1995). Trust: The Connecting Link Between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 2, 379-403.
  • [26] Lewis, J. David ve Weigert, Andrew. (1985). Trust as a Social Reality. Social Forces, 63, 4, 967-985.
  • [27] Colquitt, Jason A., Scott, Brent A. ve LePine, Jeffery A. (2007). Trust, Trustworthiness, and Trust Propensity: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Unique Relationships With Risk Taking and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 4, 909–927.
  • [28] Cook, John ve Wall, Toby. (1980). New Work Attitude Measures of Trust, Organizational Commitment and Personal Need Non-Fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, (53), 39-52.
  • [29] Dani, S. S., Burns N. D., Backhouse C. J. ve Kochhar A. K. (2006). The implications of Organizational Culture and Trust in The Working of Virtual Teams. J. Engineering Manufacture, Proc. IMechE Vol. 220 Part B.
  • [30] Kramer, M.R. (1999). Trust and Distrust İn Organizations:Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions. Annual Review Of Psychology, 50, 569-598.
  • [31] Paine, Scott Christopher. (2007). The Relationship Among Interpersonal And Organizational Trust And Organizational Commitment. Doctoral dissertation. San Diego Alliant International University.
  • [32] Jones, Gareth R. ve George, Jennifer M. (1998). The Experience And Evolution Of Trust: Implications For Cooperation And Teamwork. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 3, 531.
  • [33] Farris, George F., Senner, Eldon E. ve Butterfield, D. Anthony. (1973). Trust, Culture, and Organizational Behavior. Industrial Relations, 12, 144-157.
  • [34] Goto, Sharon G. (1996). To Trust Or Not ToTrust: Situational And Dispositional Determinants. Social Behavior And Personality, 24, 2, 119-132.
  • [35] McAllister, Daniel J. (1995). Affect- And Cognition-Based Trust As Foundations For Interpersonal Cooperation In Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1, 24-59.
  • [36] Merritt, Stephanie M. (2008). Not All Trust Is Created Equal: Dispositional and History-Based Trust in Human-Automation Interactions. Human Factors, 50, 2, 194-210.
  • [37] Brown, Elizabeth Z., Erwin, Craig R. ve Petkov, Doncho. (2006). On the Impact of Demographic Variables on Interpersonal and Organizational Trust. Competition Forum, 4, 1, 135.
  • [38] Rodgers, Waymond. (2009). Three Primary Trust Pathways Underlying Ethical Considerations. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 83–93.
  • [39] Arslan, Mehmet Metin. (2009). Perceptions Of Technical And Industrial Vocational High School Teachers About Organizational Trust. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 5, (2), 274-288.
  • [40] Zalabak, Pamela Shockley, Ellis, Kathleen ve Winograd, Gaynelle. (2000). Organizational trust: What It Means, Why It Matters. Organization Development Journal, (18), 4, 35.
  • [41] Chathoth, Prakash K., Mak, Brenda, Jauhari, Vinnie ve Manaktola, Kamal. (2007). Employees’ Perceptions of Organizational Trust and Service Climate: A Structural Model Combining Their Effects On Employee Satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 31, 338.
  • [42] Zalabak, Pamela Shockley, Morreale, Sherwyn ve Hackman, Michael Z. (2010). Build High Trust. Leadership Excellence, (27), 7, 23.
  • [43] Mishra, Jitendra ve Morrissey, Molly A. (1990). Trust in Employee/Employer Relationships: A Survey of West Michigan Managers. Public Personnel Managment, (19), 4, 443–485.
  • [44] Gilbert, Jacqueline A. ve Tang, Thomas Li-Ping. (1998). An Examination Of Organizational Trust Antecedents. Public Personnel Management, (27), 3, 321.
  • [45] Tan, Hwee Hoon ve Tan, Christy S. F. (2000). Toward The Differentiation Of Trust In Supervisor And Trust In Organization. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126, 2, 241-260.
  • [46] Demircan, N. ve Ceylan, A. (2003). Örgütsel Güven Kavramı: Nedenleri ve Sonuçları. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 10, 2, 139–150.
  • [47] Huff, Lenard ve Kelley, Lane. (2003). Levels Of Organizational Trust İn İndividualist Versus Collectivist Societies: A Seven-Nation Study. Organization Science, 14, 1, 81.
  • [48] Joseph, Errol E. ve Winston, Bruce E. (2005). A Correlation Of Servant Leadership, Leader Trust, And Organizational Trust. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26, 6.
  • [49] Deluga, Ronald J. (1994). Supervisor Trust Building, Leader-Member Exchange And Organizational Citizenship Behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 315-326.
  • [50] Whitener, Ellen M., Brodt, Susan E., Korsgaard, M. Audrey ve Werner, Jon M. (1998). Managers As İnitiators Of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework For Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior. Academy of Management, The Academy of Management Review, 23, 3, 513.
  • [51] Butler, John K Jr. (1991). Toward Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust: Evolution of a Conditions of Trust Inventory. Journal of Management, 17, 3, 643.
  • [52] Cadenhead, Alton Christian ve Richman, Charles. (1996). The Effects Of Interpersonal Trust And Group Status On Prosocial And Aggressive Behaviors. Social Behavior And Personality, 24, 2, 169-184.
  • [53] Silva, Deborah K. (2007). Structurational Identification In Grups Within Organizations: I, We & Us. Yayınlanmış Doktora Tezi. Washington University.
  • [54] Ashforth, Blake E. ve Mael, Fred. (1989). Social Identity Theory And The Organization, Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 1, 20.
  • [55] Dutton, Jane E., Dukerich, Janet M. ve Harquail, Celia V. (1994). Organizational Images and Member Identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 2, 239.
  • [56] Köse, Ceren Gözde. (2009). Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Çalışanların Sürekli İyileştirme Çabalarına Katkısı: Bir Araştırma. Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • [57] Foote, Nelson N. (1951). Identification As The Basis For a Theory of Motivation. American Sociological Review, 16, 1, 14-21.
  • [58] Kelman, Herbert C. (1958). Compliance, Identification, and Internalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 1, 51-60.
  • [59] Lee, Sang M. (1969). Organizational Identification Of Scientists. Academy of Management Journal, 12, 3, 327.
  • [60] Lee, Sang M. (1971). An Empirical Analysis Of Organizational Identification. Academy of Management Journal, 14, 213.
  • [61] Brown, Michael E. (1969). Identification And Some Conditions Of Organizational Involvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 3, 346-355.
  • [62] Hall, Douglas T., Schneider, Benjamin ve Nygren, Harold T. (1970). Personal Factors in Organizational Identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 2, 176-190.
  • [63] Hall, Douglas T. ve Schneider, Benjamin. (1972). Correlates of Organizational Identification as a Function of Career Pattern and Organizational Type. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 340–350.
  • [64] Rotondi, Thomas. (1975). Organizational Indentification And Group Involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 4, 892.
  • [65] Reade, Carol. (2001). Antecedents of Organizational Identification in Multinational Corporations: Fostering Psychological Attachment to The Local Subsidiary and The Global Organization. Int. J. of Human Resoune Management, 12, 8, 1269-1291.
  • [66] Tak, Bilçin ve Çiftçioğlu, Aydem. (2009). Algılanan Örgütsel Prestij İle Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Arasındakí İlişkilerin İncelenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 18, 100-116.
  • [67] Mael, Fred ve Ashforth, Blake E. (1992). Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of The Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 2, 103.
  • [68] Mael, Fred A. ve Ashforth, Blake E. (1995). Loyal From Day One: Biodata, Organizational Identification And Turnover Among Newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48, 2, 309.
  • [69] Bergami, Massimo ve Bagozzi, Richard P. (2000). Self-Categorization, Affective Commitment And Group Self-Esteem As Distinct Aspects Of Social İdentity In The Organization. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 555.
  • [70] Dukerich, Janet M., Golden, Brian R. ve Shortell, Stephen M. (2002). Beauty Is In The Eye Of The Beholder: The Impact Of Organizational Identification, Identity, And Image In The Cooperative Behaviors Of Physicians. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 507-533.
  • [71] Kreiner, Glen E. ve Ashforth, Blake E. (2004). Evidence Toward An Expanded Model Of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1, 1.
  • [72] Chreim, Samia. (2002). Influencing Organizational Identification During Major Change: A Communication- Based Perspective. Human Relations, 55, 9, 1117.
  • [73] Van Dick, Rolf, Wagner, Ulrich, Stellmacher, Jost ve Christ, Oliver. (2004a). The Utility Of A Broader Conceptualization Of Organizational Identification: Which Aspects Really Matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171–191.
  • [74] Van Dick, Rolf, Wagner, Ulrich, Stellmacher, Jost ve Christ, Oliver. (2005a). Category Salience And Organizational Identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 273-285.
  • [75] Knippenberg, Daan Van ve Van Schie, Els C. M. (2000). Foci and Correlates of Organizational Identification, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137-147.
  • [76] Bartels, Jos, Pruyn, Ad, Jong, Menno De ve Joustra, Inge. (2007). Multiple Organizational Identification Levels And The Impact Of Perceived External Prestige And Communication Climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 173–190.
  • [77] Tsamitis, Dena Haritos. (2009). An Exploration Of The Influence Of Institutional Factors And Practices On Organizational Identification In Students Enrolled In Transnational University Partnership Programs. Yayınlanmış Doktora Tezi. University of Pennsylvania.
  • [78] Boroş, Smaranda. (2008). Organizational Identification: Theoretical And Empirical Analyses Of Competing Conceptualizations. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 12, 1-27.
  • [79] Cooper, Danielle ve Thatcher, Sherry M. B. (2010). Identification In Organizations: The Role of Self-Concept Orientations And Identification Motives. Academy of Management Review, 35, 4, 516–538.
  • [80] Lipponen, Jukka, Helkama, Klaus, Olkkonen, Maria-Elena ve Juslin Milla. (2005). Predicting The Different Profiles Of Organizational İdentification: A Case Of Shipyard Subcontractors. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 97.
  • [81] Fuller, J Bryan, Marler, Laura, Hester, Kim, Frey, Len ve Relyea, Clint. (2006a). Construed External Image and Organizational Identification: A Test of the Moderating Influence Of Need For Self-Esteem. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 6, 701.
  • [82] Bolat, Oya İnci, Bolat, Tamer ve Seymen, Oya Aytemiz. (2009). Güçlendirici Lider Davranışları Ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Arasındaki İlişkinin Sosyal Mübadele Kuramından Hareketle İncelenmesi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12, 21, 215-239.
  • [83] VanYperen, Nico W., Van Den Berg, Agnes E. ve Willering, Martijn C. (1999). Towards A Better Understanding Of The Link Between Participation In Decision Making and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: A Multilevel Analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 377.
  • [84] Organ, Dennis W. (1990). The Motivational Basis Of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Research In Organizational Behavior, 12, 43-72.
  • [85] Gouldner, Alvin W. (1960). The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 2, 161-178.
  • [86] Somech, Anit ve Zahavy, Anat Drach. (2004). Exploring Organizational Citizenship Behaviour From An Organizational Perspective: The Relationship Between Organizational Learning And Organizational Citizenship Behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 281.
  • [87] Chahal, Hardeep ve Mehta, Shivani. (2010). Antecedents and Consequences of Organisational Citizenship Behaviour (ocb): A Conceptual Framework In Reference To Health Care Sector. Journal of Services Research, 10, 2, 25-44.
  • [88] DiPaola, Michael F. ve Hoy, Wayne K. (2005). Organizational Citizenship of Faculty and Achievement of High School Students. The High School Journal, 88, 3, 35-44.
  • [89] Williams, Larry J. ve Anderson, Stella E. (1991). Job Satisfaction And Organizational Commitment As Predictors Of Organizational Citizenship And In Role Behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 3, 601-617.
  • [90] Jahangir, Nadim, Akbar, Mohammad Muzahid ve Haq, Mahmudul. (2004). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature And Antecedents. BRAC University Journal, 1, 2, 75-85.
  • [91] Zinko, Robert, Furner, Christopher P., Royle, Todd ve Hall, Angela. (2010). Self-Perceptions Of Our Personal Reputations: The Mediating Role Of Image In The Development Of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. The Journal of International Management Studies, 5, 1, 1-9.
  • [92] Taşcı, Deniz ve Koç, Umut. (2007). Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Örgütsel Öğrenme Değerleri ilişkisi: Akademisyenler Üzerinde Görgül Bir Araştırma. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7, 2, 373-382.
  • [93] Bolat, Tamer. (2008a). Dönüşümcü Liderlik, Personeli Güçlendirme ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İlişkisi. Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • [94] Bolat, Oya İnci ve Bolat, Tamer. (2008b). Otel İşletmelerinde Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İlişkisi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11, 19, 75-94.
  • [95] Castro, Carmen Barroso, Armario, Enrique Martin ve Ruiz, David Martin. (2004). The Influence Of Employee Organizational Citizenship Behavior On Customer Loyalty. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15, 1, 27.
  • [96] Aquino, Karl ve Bommer, William H. (2003). Preferential Mistreatment: How Victim Status Moderates The Relationship Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior And Workplace Victimization. Organization Science, 14, 4, 374-385.
  • [97] Karadağ, Engin ve Mutafçılar, Işıl. (2009). Prososyal Davranış Ekseninde Özgecilik Üzerine Teorik Bir Çözümleme. Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8, 41-70.
  • [98] Sezgin, Ferudun. (2005). Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışları: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme ve Okul Açısından Bazı Çıkarımlar. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25, 1, 317-339.
  • [99] Konovsky, Mary A. ve Organ, Dennis W. (1996). Dispositional And Contextual Determinants of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 17, 253-266.
  • [100] Polat, Soner. (2009). Organizational Citizenship Behavior (ocb) Display Levels of The Teachers At Secondary Schools According To The Perceptions Of The School Administrators. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1591–1596.
  • [101] Dipaola, Michael F. ve Da Costa Neves, Paula Maria Mendes. (2009). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors In American And Portuguese Public Schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 47, 4, 490-507.
  • [102] Appelbaum, Steven, Bartolomucci, Nicolas, Beaumier, Erika ve Boulanger, Jonathan. (2004). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Case Study Of Culture, Leadership And Trust. Management Decision, 42, 1/2, 13-40.
  • [103] Özdevecioğlu, Mahmut. (2003). Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İle Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Bazı Demografik Özellikleri ve Akademik Başarıları Arasındaki İlişkilerin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, 117-135.
  • [104] Motowidlo, Stephan J. (2000). Some Basic Issues Related To Contextual Performance And Organizational Citizenship Behavior In Human Resource Management. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 1, 115-126.
  • [105] MacKenzie, Scott B., Podsakoff, Philip M. ve Fetter, Richard. (1993). The Impact Of Organizational Citizenship Behavior On Evaluations Of Salesperson Performance. Journal of Marketing, 57, 1, 70.
  • [106] Bolino, Mark C., Turnley, William H. ve Niehoff, Brian P. (2004). The Other Side of The Story: Reexamining Prevailing Assumptions About Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 229–246.
  • [107] Oplatka, Izhar. (2009). Organizational Citizenship Behavior In Teaching. International Journal of Educational Management, 23, 5, 375-389.
  • [108] Chughtai, Aamir Ali ve Buckley, Finian. (2009). Linking Trust In The Principal To School Outcomes The Mediating Role Of Organizational Identification And Work Engagement. International Journal of Educational Management, 23, 7, 574-589.
  • [109] Mayer, Roger C. ve Gavin, Mark B. (2005). Trust In Management And Performance: Who Minds The Shop While The Employees Watch The Boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 5, 874–888.
  • [110] Shapiro, Debra L. ve Sheppard, Blair H. (1992). In Theory. Business On A Handshake. Negotiation Journal, 365-377.
  • [111] Bouquillon, Edward A., Sosik, John J. ve Lee, Doris. (2005). ‘It’s Only A Phase’: Examining Trust, İdentification And Mentoring Functions Received Across The Mentoring Phases. Mentoring and Tutoring, 13, 2, 239–258.
  • [112] Pastoriza, David, Arino, Miguel A. ve Ricart, Joan E. (2008). Ethical Managerial Behaviour As An Antecedent Of Organizational Social Capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 329–341.
  • [113] Sindhav, Lusch G. ve Lusch, Robert F. (2008). An Identification-Based Model of Supplier-Retailer Communication. Journal of Marketing Channels, 15, 4, 281-314.
  • [114] Bellou, Victoria ve Thanopoulos, John. (2006). Enhancing Service Quality in a Hospital Setting. Review of Business, 27, 1, 26-32.
  • [115] Edwards, Martin R. (2005). Organizational Identification: A Conceptual And Operational Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7, 4, 207–230.
  • [116] Ge, Jianhua, Su, Xuemei ve Zhou, Yan. (2010). Organizational Socialization, Organizational Identification And Organizational Citizenship Behavior An Empirical Research Of Chinese High-Tech Manufacturing Enterprises. Nankai Business Review International, 1, 2, 166-179.
  • [117] Lee, Hyun-Jung. (2004). The Role Of Competence-Based Trust And Organizational Identification In Continuous Improvement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 6, 623-639.
  • [118] Mayer, Roger C., Davis James H. ve Schoorman F. David. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational trust. Academy ol Management Review, (20), 3, 709-734.
APA TOKGÖZ E, SEYMEN AYTEMİZ O (2013). Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma. , 61 - 76.
Chicago TOKGÖZ EMRAH,SEYMEN AYTEMİZ Oya Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma. (2013): 61 - 76.
MLA TOKGÖZ EMRAH,SEYMEN AYTEMİZ Oya Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma. , 2013, ss.61 - 76.
AMA TOKGÖZ E,SEYMEN AYTEMİZ O Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma. . 2013; 61 - 76.
Vancouver TOKGÖZ E,SEYMEN AYTEMİZ O Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma. . 2013; 61 - 76.
IEEE TOKGÖZ E,SEYMEN AYTEMİZ O "Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma." , ss.61 - 76, 2013.
ISNAD TOKGÖZ, EMRAH - SEYMEN AYTEMİZ, Oya. "Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma". (2013), 61-76.
APA TOKGÖZ E, SEYMEN AYTEMİZ O (2013). Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma. ÖNERİ, 10(39), 61 - 76.
Chicago TOKGÖZ EMRAH,SEYMEN AYTEMİZ Oya Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma. ÖNERİ 10, no.39 (2013): 61 - 76.
MLA TOKGÖZ EMRAH,SEYMEN AYTEMİZ Oya Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma. ÖNERİ, vol.10, no.39, 2013, ss.61 - 76.
AMA TOKGÖZ E,SEYMEN AYTEMİZ O Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma. ÖNERİ. 2013; 10(39): 61 - 76.
Vancouver TOKGÖZ E,SEYMEN AYTEMİZ O Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma. ÖNERİ. 2013; 10(39): 61 - 76.
IEEE TOKGÖZ E,SEYMEN AYTEMİZ O "Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma." ÖNERİ, 10, ss.61 - 76, 2013.
ISNAD TOKGÖZ, EMRAH - SEYMEN AYTEMİZ, Oya. "Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma". ÖNERİ 10/39 (2013), 61-76.