Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing
Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 43 - 56 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing
Öz: The idea that noticing captures a key role in second language acquisition, made the practitioners in the field search for ways of promoting noticing. In order to focus the learners’ attention to the form in the input, different attention gathering techniques, procedures and activities have been used. This study is an investigation of the role of dictogloss; a reconstruction activity popularized recently, as a task in promoting noticing. Two groups of Intermediate Turkish learners of English language (n=42) were given a pre-test before they were presented the same linguistic form by traditional Present-Practice-Produce method. The difference in the educational intervention was that, the experimental group was presented dictogloss activities in the Production stage of PPP. After 4 weeks of educational intervention, the groups were given the post-test, the results of which indicated the positive effect of dictogloss activity on noticing.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Adams, R. (2003). L2 output, reformulation and noticing: implications for IL development. Language Teaching Research, 1 (3), 347-376.
- Candlin, C. (1987). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Candlin, C. (2001). Afterword: taking the curriculum to task. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 229-243). Harlow, England: Longman.
- Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. (2001). Council of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Doughty, C. J. (2003). Instructed SLA: constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-311). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
- Egi, T. (2010). Uptake, modified output, and learner perceptions of recasts: learner responses as language awareness. Modern Language Journal, 94 (1), 1-21.
- Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Foster, P. (1999). Key concepts in ELT. ELT Journal, 53(1), 69-70.
- George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Ibarrola, A. L. (2009). Reformulation and self correction: testing the validity of correction strategies in the classroom. Revista Espanaola de Linguistica Aplicada, 22, 189-215.
- Izumi, S. (2002).Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: an experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.
- Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 168-196.
- Jacobs, G. & Small, J. (2003). Combining dictogloss and cooperative learning to promote language learning. The Reading Matrix, 3(1), 1-15.
- Kim, Y. (2009). The effect of task complexity on learner-learner interaction. System, 37, 254-268.
- Kowal, M. & Swain, M. (1997). From semantic to syntactic processing: how can we promote it in the immersion classroom? In R. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds.), Immersion education: International perspectives (pp. 284-309). NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 319-326.
- Malmquvist, A. (2005). How does group discussion in reconstruction tasks affect written language output? Language Awareness, 14(2), 128-141.
- Mathews-Aydınlı, J. (2008). Overlooked and understudied? A survey of current trends in research on adult English language learners. Adult Education Quarterly, 58(3), 198-213.
- Murphy, J. (2003).Task-based learning: the interaction between tasks and learners. ELT Journal, 57(4), 352-360.
- Nassaji, H. (2007). Elicitation and reformulation and their relationship with learner repair in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 57(4), 511-548.
- Parrott, M. (1993). Tasks for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Qi, D. and Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277-303.
- Samuda, V. & Madden, C. (1985). Task-based test design: testing as a reflection of classroom methodology. Papers in Applied Linguistics Michigan, 1, 84-89.
- Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: a case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
- Seedhouse, P. (1999). Task-based interaction. ELT Journal, 53(3), 149-156.
- Song, M. & Suh, B. (2008). The effects of output task types on noticing and learning of the English past counterfactual conditional. System, 36, 295-312.
- Swales, J. (2009). The concept of task. In K. Branden, M. Bygate & J.M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching. Philadelphia. PA: John Benjamins.
- Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seildhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125- 144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: two French immersion learners‟ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285-304.
- Thornbury, S. (1997). Reformulation and reconstruction: tasks that promote “noticing”. ELT Journal, 51(4), 326-335.
- Tocalli-Beller, A. and Swain, M. (2005). Reformulation: the cognitive conflict and L2 learning it generates. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 5-28.
- Vasiljevic, Z. (2010). Dictogloss as an interactive method of teaching listening comprehension to L2 learners. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 41-52.
- Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Willis, J. (2004). A framework for task-based learning. Essex: Longman.
APA | Oruc Erturk N (2012). Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing. , 43 - 56. |
Chicago | Oruc Erturk Nesrin Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing. (2012): 43 - 56. |
MLA | Oruc Erturk Nesrin Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing. , 2012, ss.43 - 56. |
AMA | Oruc Erturk N Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing. . 2012; 43 - 56. |
Vancouver | Oruc Erturk N Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing. . 2012; 43 - 56. |
IEEE | Oruc Erturk N "Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing." , ss.43 - 56, 2012. |
ISNAD | Oruc Erturk, Nesrin. "Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing". (2012), 43-56. |
APA | Oruc Erturk N (2012). Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 43 - 56. |
Chicago | Oruc Erturk Nesrin Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 13, no.2 (2012): 43 - 56. |
MLA | Oruc Erturk Nesrin Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.13, no.2, 2012, ss.43 - 56. |
AMA | Oruc Erturk N Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012; 13(2): 43 - 56. |
Vancouver | Oruc Erturk N Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012; 13(2): 43 - 56. |
IEEE | Oruc Erturk N "Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing." İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, ss.43 - 56, 2012. |
ISNAD | Oruc Erturk, Nesrin. "Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing". İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 13/2 (2012), 43-56. |