Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 38 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 412 - 420 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Bufotes variabilis (syn. Pseudepidalea variabilis) (Pallas, 1769) in Turkey

Öz:
Although there have been several studies based on the molecular data of green toads, some ambiguities related to thesystematics of these toads in Turkey still remain. Tus, we used combined mitochondrial genes (D-loop and 12S ribosomal RNA) toresolve these taxonomic problems. We also applied demographic analysis to elucidate the evolutionary history using these genes. Wefound 3 haplotype groups: 1 for Bufo viridis and 2 lineages for Bufotes variabilis, with only the latter represented in Turkey. Tis studyshowed a genetic diversity within Anatolian B. variabilis. Population genetic analysis of mismatch distributions, Tajima s D-statistic, andFu s Fs test are consistent with a range expansion of the Bufotes variabilis group covering western Turkey. B. variabilis populations oflineage 1 and lineage 2, from western and eastern Anatolia respectively, are genetically identical. Mitochondrial DNA haplotype groupsmay refect historical separation within B. variabilis. Our study indicated that allopatric distribution of B. variabilis within Anatoliaoccurred due to climatic shifs during the Pliocene. Tis study shows that Anatolia likely has served as a factor in vicariant speciesformation.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Biyoloji
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akaike H (1974). A new look at the statistical model identifcation. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 19: 716–723.
  • Akın C, Bilgin CC, Beerli P, Westaway R, Ohst T, Litvinchuk SN, Uzzell T, Bilgin M, Hotz H, Guex GD et al. (2010). Phylogeographic patterns of genetic diversity in eastern Mediterranean water frogs were determined by geological processes and climate change in the Late Cenozoic. J Biogeogr 37: 2111–2124.
  • Arntzen JW, Recuero E, Canestrelli D, Martínez-Solano I (2013). How complex is the  Bufo bufo  species group? Mol Phylogenet Evol 69: 1203–1208.
  • Avise JC (2000). Phylogeography. Te History and Formation of Species. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
  • Balletto E, Cherchi MA, Gasperetti J (1985). Amphibians of the Arabian Peninsula. Fauna Saudi Arabia 7: 318–392.
  • Bell RC, MacKenzie JB, Hickerson MJ, Chavarría KL, Cunningham M, Williams S, Mortitz C (2011). Comparative multi-locus phylogeography confrms multiple vicariance events in co- distributed rainforest frogs. P R Soc 279: 991–999.
  • Borkin LJ, Eremchenko VK, Helfenberger N, Panflov AM, Rozanov JM (2001). On the distribution of diploid, triploid and tetraploid green toads in south-eastern Kazakhstan. Russ J Herpetol 8: 45–53.
  • Brunsfeld SJ, Sullivan J, Soltis DE, Soltis P (2001). Comparative phylogeography of northwestern North America: a synthesis. In: Silvertown J, Antonovics J, editors. Integrating Ecology and Evolution in a Spatial Context. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science, pp. 319–339.
  • Çıplak B (2003). Distribution of Tettigoniinae (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) bush-crickets in Turkey: the importance of the Anatolian Taurus Mountains in biodiversity and implications for conservation. Biodivers Conserv 12: 47–64.
  • Dubois A, Bour R (2010). Te nomenclatural status of the nomina of amphibians and reptiles created by Garsault (1764), with a parsimonious solution to an old nomenclatural problem regarding the genus Bufo (Amphibia, Anura), comments on the taxonomy of this genus, and comments on some nomina created by Laurenti (1768). Zootaxa 2447: 1–52.
  • Eiselt J, Schmidtler JF (1973). Froschlurche aus dem Iran unter Berücksichtigung außeriranischer Populationsgruppen. Ann Naturhist Mus 77: 181–243 (article in German).
  • Excofer L, Laval G, Schneider S (2006). Arlequin ver. 3.1: An Integrated Sofware Package for Population Genetics Data Analysis. Bern, Switzerland: Computational and Molecular Population Genetics Lab, Institute of Zoology, University of Bern.
  • Frost DR (2013). Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.6 (9 January 2013). New York, NY, USA: American Museum of Natural History. Available at http:// research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html.
  • Frost DR, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain RH, Haas A, Haddad CFB, De Sá RA, Channing A, Wilkinson M, Donnellan SC et al. (2006). Te amphibian tree of life. Bull Amer Mus Nat Hist 297: 1–370.
  • García-Porta J, Litvinchuk SN, Crochet PA, Romano A, Geniez PH, Lo-Valvo M, Lymberakis P, Carranza S (2012). Molecular phylogenetics and historical biogeography of the west- Palearctic common toads (Bufo bufo species complex). Mol Phylogenet Evol 63: 113–130.
  • Goebel AM, Donnelly JM, Atz ME (1999). PCR primers and amplifcation methods for 12S ribosomal DNA, the control region, cytochrome oxidase I, and cytochromebin bufonids and other frogs, and an overview of PCR primers which have amplifed DNA in amphibians successfully. Mol Phylogenet Evol 11: 163–199.
  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001). MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.
  • IUCN (2013). IUCN Red List of Treatened Species. Version 2012.2. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Available at www.iucnredlist.org. Kete R (1992). İzmir ve Adana bölgesi (Amphibia: Anura) populasyonlarinin taksonomik yönden incelenmesi. Turk J Zool 16: 60–70 (article in Turkish).
  • Kocher TD, Tomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Paabo S, Villablanca FX, Wilson AC (1989). Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplifcation and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci 86: 6196–6200.
  • Kornilios P, Ilgaz Ç, Kumlutaş Y, Giokas S, Tsolis SF, Chondropoulos B (2011). Te role of Anatolian refugia in herpetofaunal diversity: an mtDNA analysis of Typhlops vermicularis Merrem, 1820 (Squamata, Typhlopidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 32: 351–363.
  • Librado P, Rozas J (2009). DnaSP v5: sofware for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451– 1452.
  • Mahoney MJ (2004). Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the Plethodon elongates species group: combining phylogenetic and population genetic methods to investigate species history. Mol Ecol 13: 149–166.
  • Murphy MA, Evans JS, Storfer A (2010). Quantifying Bufo boreas connectivity in Yellowstone National Park with landscape genetics. Ecology 91: 252–261.
  • Nylander JAA (2004). MrModeltest 2.0. Uppsala, Sweden: Program Distributed by the Author, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University. Available at http://www.ebc.uu.se/systzoo/ staf/nylander.html.
  • Odierna G, Aprea G, Capriglione T, Castellano S, Balletto E (2004). Evidence for chromosome and pst I satellite DNA family evolutionary stasis in the Bufo viridis group (Amphibia, Anura). Chromosome Res 12: 671–681.
  • Özdemir N, Kutrup B (2007). Intraspecifc variation of Turkish green toads, Bufo (Pseudepidalea ) viridis Laurenti, 1768, based on 16S ribosomal RNA sequences. Herpetozoa 20: 3–10.
  • Rogell B, Eklund M, Torngren H, Laurila A, Hoglund J (2010). Te efect of selection, drif and genetic variation on life-history trait divergence among insular populations of natterjack toad, Bufo calamita . Mol Ecol 19: 2229–2240.
  • Rogers AR, Harpending H (1992). Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic distances. Mol Biol Evol 9: 552–569.
  • Sarıkaya MA, Zreda M, Çiner A, Zweck C, (2008). Cold and wet Last Glacial Maximum on Mount Sandıras, SW Turkey, inferred from cosmogenic dating and glacier modeling. Quaternary Sci Rev 27: 769–780.
  • Schmidtler JF (1998). Verbreitungsstrukturen der Herpetofauna im Taurus-Gebirge, Türkei (Amphibia; Reptilia). In: Fritz U, Obst, FJ, Andreas, B editors. Contributions to a “Herpetologica arabica”. Faun Abh Staatl Mus Tierkunde Dresden 21 (Suppl. 13): 133–148 (article in German).
  • Schneider S, Excofer L (1999). Estimation of past demographic parameters from the distribution of pairwise diferences when the mutation rates vary among sites: application to human mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 152: 1079–1089.
  • Slatkin M, Hudson RR (1991). Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. Genetics 129: 555–562.
  • Stamatakis A (2006). RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688–2690.
  • Stöck M, Frynta D, Grosse WR, Steinlein C, Schmid M (2001). A review of the distribution of diploid, triploid and tetraploid green toads (Bufo viridis complex) in Asia including new data from Iran and Pakistan. Asiatic Herp Res 9: 77–100.
  • Stöck M, Moritz C, Hickerson M, Frynta D, Dujsebayeva T, Eremchenko V, Macey JR, Papenfuss TJ, Wake DB (2006). Evolution of mitochondrial relationships and biogeography of Palearctic green toads (Bufo viridis subgroup) with insights in their genomic plasticity. Mol Phylogenet Evol 41: 663–689.
  • Tajima F (1989). Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585–595.
  • Tchernov E (1992). Te Afro-Arabian component in the Levantine mammalian fauna - a short biogeographical review. Israel J Zool 38: 155–192.
  • Tompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higguns DG (1997). Te CLUSTALX Windows Interface: fexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 24: 4876–4882.
  • Tosunoğlu M (1999). Türkiye Bufo viridis (Anura: Bufonidae) populasyonları üzerinde morfolojik, osteolojik ve serolojik araştırmalar. Turk J Zool 3: 849–871 (article in Turkish).
  • Wang IJ (2009). Fine-scale population structure in a desert amphibian: landscape genetics of the black toad (Bufo exsul). Mol Ecol 18: 3847–3856.
  • Yılmaz İ (1984) Trakya kuyruksuz kurbağaları üzerine morfolojik ve taksonomik bir araştırma (Anura: Discoglossidae, Pelobatidae, Bufonidae, Hylidae, Ranidae). Doğa Bilim Dergisi 8: 244–264 (article in Turkish).
  • Yılmaz L, Uğurtaş I (1990). Kuzey Anadolu ve Trakya bölgesi Bufo viridis (Bufonidae: Anura) populasyonlarının taksonomik bir araştırması. Turk J Zool 14: 1–13 (article in Turkish).
  • Zhan AB, Fu JZ (2011). Past and present: phylogeography of the  Bufo gargarizans species complex inferred from multi-loci allele sequence and frequency data. Mol Phylogenet Evol 61: 136– 148.
APA ÖZDEMİR N, gül s, POYARKOV JR A, KUTRUP B, TOSUNOĞLU M, DOGLIO S (2014). Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Bufotes variabilis (syn. Pseudepidalea variabilis) (Pallas, 1769) in Turkey. , 412 - 420.
Chicago ÖZDEMİR Nurhayat,gül serkan,POYARKOV JR A. Nikolay,KUTRUP Bilal,TOSUNOĞLU Murat,DOGLIO Stefano Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Bufotes variabilis (syn. Pseudepidalea variabilis) (Pallas, 1769) in Turkey. (2014): 412 - 420.
MLA ÖZDEMİR Nurhayat,gül serkan,POYARKOV JR A. Nikolay,KUTRUP Bilal,TOSUNOĞLU Murat,DOGLIO Stefano Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Bufotes variabilis (syn. Pseudepidalea variabilis) (Pallas, 1769) in Turkey. , 2014, ss.412 - 420.
AMA ÖZDEMİR N,gül s,POYARKOV JR A,KUTRUP B,TOSUNOĞLU M,DOGLIO S Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Bufotes variabilis (syn. Pseudepidalea variabilis) (Pallas, 1769) in Turkey. . 2014; 412 - 420.
Vancouver ÖZDEMİR N,gül s,POYARKOV JR A,KUTRUP B,TOSUNOĞLU M,DOGLIO S Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Bufotes variabilis (syn. Pseudepidalea variabilis) (Pallas, 1769) in Turkey. . 2014; 412 - 420.
IEEE ÖZDEMİR N,gül s,POYARKOV JR A,KUTRUP B,TOSUNOĞLU M,DOGLIO S "Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Bufotes variabilis (syn. Pseudepidalea variabilis) (Pallas, 1769) in Turkey." , ss.412 - 420, 2014.
ISNAD ÖZDEMİR, Nurhayat vd. "Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Bufotes variabilis (syn. Pseudepidalea variabilis) (Pallas, 1769) in Turkey". (2014), 412-420.
APA ÖZDEMİR N, gül s, POYARKOV JR A, KUTRUP B, TOSUNOĞLU M, DOGLIO S (2014). Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Bufotes variabilis (syn. Pseudepidalea variabilis) (Pallas, 1769) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 38(4), 412 - 420.
Chicago ÖZDEMİR Nurhayat,gül serkan,POYARKOV JR A. Nikolay,KUTRUP Bilal,TOSUNOĞLU Murat,DOGLIO Stefano Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Bufotes variabilis (syn. Pseudepidalea variabilis) (Pallas, 1769) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology 38, no.4 (2014): 412 - 420.
MLA ÖZDEMİR Nurhayat,gül serkan,POYARKOV JR A. Nikolay,KUTRUP Bilal,TOSUNOĞLU Murat,DOGLIO Stefano Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Bufotes variabilis (syn. Pseudepidalea variabilis) (Pallas, 1769) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, vol.38, no.4, 2014, ss.412 - 420.
AMA ÖZDEMİR N,gül s,POYARKOV JR A,KUTRUP B,TOSUNOĞLU M,DOGLIO S Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Bufotes variabilis (syn. Pseudepidalea variabilis) (Pallas, 1769) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology. 2014; 38(4): 412 - 420.
Vancouver ÖZDEMİR N,gül s,POYARKOV JR A,KUTRUP B,TOSUNOĞLU M,DOGLIO S Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Bufotes variabilis (syn. Pseudepidalea variabilis) (Pallas, 1769) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology. 2014; 38(4): 412 - 420.
IEEE ÖZDEMİR N,gül s,POYARKOV JR A,KUTRUP B,TOSUNOĞLU M,DOGLIO S "Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Bufotes variabilis (syn. Pseudepidalea variabilis) (Pallas, 1769) in Turkey." Turkish Journal of Zoology, 38, ss.412 - 420, 2014.
ISNAD ÖZDEMİR, Nurhayat vd. "Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Bufotes variabilis (syn. Pseudepidalea variabilis) (Pallas, 1769) in Turkey". Turkish Journal of Zoology 38/4 (2014), 412-420.