The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities

Sibel ERKAL, (Hacettepe Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Aile ve Tüketici Bilimleri Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Zeynep ÇOPUR (Hacettepe Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Aile ve Tüketici Bilimleri Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi
3 0
Yıl: 2013 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 31 Sayfa Aralığı: 49 - 64 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities

Öz:
Bu pilot çalışma Ankara da yaşayan kadınların evle ilgili faaliyetlerde sorumluluk dağılımı konusundaki davranış ve görüşlerini belirlemek amacıyla planlanmış ve yürütülmüştür. Araştırma farklı sosyoekonomik düzeydeki katılımcıları temsil edeceği düşünülen Ankara-Eryaman bölgesinde 2005 yılında yapılmıştır. Evreni temsil edebilecek örneklem sayısı istatistiksel yöntemlerle belirlenmiş ve toplam 600 kadın araştırma kapsamına alınmıştır. Araştırma tanımlayıcı nitelikte bir çalışmadır. Hazırlanan anket formuna bağlı olarak, veriler ailede kadın ile yapılan yüz yüze görüşme sonucu toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, evle ilgili fiziksel ve bazı sosyal aktiviteleri yürütmekten ailede kadınlar sorumludur. Kadınlar bazı sosyal ve ekonomik faaliyetlerin yürütülmesinde kadın ve erkeğin birlikte sorumluluk almaları gerektiğini düşünmektedirler. Bu sonuç kadınların evle ilgili faaliyetlerdeki geleneksel yapının değişmesi gerektiği düşüncesinde olduklarını göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih

Kadınların evle ilgili faaliyetlerde sorumluluk dağılımı konusundaki davranış ve görüşleri

Öz:
The pilot study was planned and carried out to determine views and behaviors of women living in Ankara-Turkey, on distribution of responsibility in household activities. This study was conducted in the region of Eryaman-Ankara, which is thought to represent families in different socio-economic levels in 2005. A total of 600 women were selected by a Systematic Sampling Method which was statistically determined. This research is a descriptive study. Depending on the prepared questionnaire form, the data was collected through face-to-face interviews with women in the families. According to the results, women in the family are responsible for carrying out physical and some social activities. The women think that women and men should take the responsibility together in some social and economic activities. This results show that women think the traditional structure in household activities should change.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adana, Filiz, Hülya Arslanbaş, Filiz Ergin, Necla Biçer, Nilüfer Kıranşal and Sultan Şahin (2011).
  • Views of Male University Students about Social Gender Roles: An Example from East of Turkey. J. Fam. Viol, 26, 519-526.
  • Atalay, Beşir, Mehmet Y Kontas, Sema Beyazıt and Kemal Madenoglu (1993). Türk Aile Yapısı Araştırmaları. DPT: 2313, Nisan, Ankara.
  • Başaran, Fatma (1984). Ailede Cinsiyet Rollerine İlişkin Tutum Değişmeleri. Sosyal Bilimler Derneği Yayınları, 145-160.
  • Benin Mary Holland and Debra A Edwards (1990). Adolescents’chores: The difference between dual-and single earner families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52, 361-373.
  • Blair, Sampson and Daniel Lichter (1991). Measuring the division of household labor: Gender segregation of housework among couples. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 91-113.
  • Brines, John (1994). Economic dependency, gender and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652-688.
  • Coltrane, Scott (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1208-1233.
  • Coverman, Shelley (1985). Explaining husbands’participation in domestic labor. The Sociological Quarterly, 26 (1), 81-97.
  • Cunnigham, Mick (2007). Influences of women’s employment on the gendered division of household labor over the life course. Journal of Family Issues, 28(3), 422-444.
  • Davis, Shannon N, Theodore, N. Greenstein, Jennifer P. Gerteisen (2004). Cross-national variations in the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1260- 1271.
  • Denmark, Florence, Jeffrey Shaw and Samuel Ciali (1985). The relationship among sex roles, living arrangements, and the division of household responsibilities. Sex Roles, 12(5/6)617-25.
  • Dokmen, Zehra (1997). Calısma, cinsiyet ve cinsiyet rolleri ile ev isleri ve depresyon iliskisi.Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 12(39), 39-53.
  • Ferber, Marianne (1982). Labor market participation of young married women: causes and effects. Journal of Marriage and Family, .44, 457-468.
  • Goldscheider, Frances and Linda Waite (1991). New families, no families. Berkeley: University of California Press. (In: Manke, B, Seery B L, Crouter A C and Michael, S. M. (1994). The three corners of domestic labor: Mothers’, fathers’, and children’s weekday and weekend housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 657-668.
  • Himsel, Amy and Wendy Goldberg (2003). Social comparison and satisfaction with the division of housework: implications for men’s and women’s role strain. Journal of Family Issues, 24(7), 843-866.
  • Imamoglu, Olcay E. (1991). Aile icinde kadın-erkek rolleri. Turk Aile Ansiklopedisi, T.C. Basbakanlık Aile Arastırma Kurumu, pp.832-35.
  • Kamo, Yoshinori (1994). Division of household work in the United States and Japan. Journal of Family Issues, 15, 348-378.
  • Kluwer, Esther, Jose Heesink, and Evert Van de Vliert (2002). The division of labor across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 930-943.
  • Kroska, Amy (2004). Divisions of domestic work. Journal of Family Issues, 25(7), 900-932.
  • Lee, Yun Su and Waite Linda (2005). Husbands’and wives’time spent on housework: a comparison of measures. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 328-336.
  • Lennon, Maryclare, Sarah, Rosenfield (1994). Relative fairness and the division of housework: the importance of options. American J Sociology, 100, 506-531.
  • Lobel, Thalma, Michelle Slone, Yael Ashuach and Iris Revach (2001). Division of household labor and social judgments in Israel: the influence of gender and education. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(3), 829-839.
  • Manke, Beth, Brenda L Seery, Ann C Crouter and Susan M Mchale (1994). The three corners of domestic labor: Mothers’, fathers’, and children’s weekday and weekend housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 657-668.
  • Miller, Joanne, Howard Garrison (1982). Sex roles: The division of labor at home and in the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology. pp.237-262.
  • Mederer, Helen J (1993). Division of labor in two-earner homes: task accomplishment versus household management as critical variables in perceptions about family work. Journal of Marriage and Family. 5, 133-145.
  • Murstein, Bernard (1970). Stimulus-value-role: A theory of marital choice. Journal of Marriage and Family, 3, 465-81.
  • Ross, Catherine (1987). The division of labor at home. Social Forces, 65(3), 816-833.
  • Safak, Sükran (1985). Ailede sorumluluk dagilimi ve bunu etkileyen faktörler. Hacettepe Universitesi Ev Idaresi ve Aile Ekonomisi Programı Doktora Tezi, Ankara.
  • Schooler, Carmi, Joanne Miller, Karen Miller and Canol Richtand (1984). Work for the household: its nature and consequences for husband and wives. American Journal of Sociology, 90(1), 97-124.
  • Shelton, Beth Anne and Daphne John (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299-322. (Accessible from: Erickson, R. J. (2005). Why emotion work matters: Sex, gender, and the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 337-351.
  • T.C. Basbakanlık Kadının Statüsü ve Sorunları Genel Müdürlügü (Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Directorate General on the Status and the Problems of Women) (1998). Cumhuriyet’in 75. Yılında Türkiye’de Kadının Durumu. Takav Matbaacılık Yayıncılık A.S. Ankara.
  • Uslu, İbrahim (2011). Türkiye’de Aile Yapısı Araştırması. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı Yayınları, Afşaroğlu Matbaası, ISBN: 978-605-4628-37-7, Ankara.
  • Vander-Lıppe Tanja, Kea Tijdens and Esther de Ruijter (2004). Outsourcing of domestic tasks and time- saving effects. Journal of Family Issues, 25 (2), 216-240.
  • Weingarten, Kathy (1978). The employment pattern of professional couples and their distribution of involvement in the family. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 3, 43-52.
  • Wilkie Jane, Ribbett, Myra Marx, Ferree and Kathryn Strother, Ractclift (1998). Gender end fairness: marital satisfaction in two earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 577-594.
APA Erkal S, Copur Z (2013). The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities. , 49 - 64.
Chicago Erkal Sibel,Copur Zeynep The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities. (2013): 49 - 64.
MLA Erkal Sibel,Copur Zeynep The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities. , 2013, ss.49 - 64.
AMA Erkal S,Copur Z The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities. . 2013; 49 - 64.
Vancouver Erkal S,Copur Z The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities. . 2013; 49 - 64.
IEEE Erkal S,Copur Z "The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities." , ss.49 - 64, 2013.
ISNAD Erkal, Sibel - Copur, Zeynep. "The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities". (2013), 49-64.
APA Erkal S, Copur Z (2013). The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 0(31), 49 - 64.
Chicago Erkal Sibel,Copur Zeynep The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi 0, no.31 (2013): 49 - 64.
MLA Erkal Sibel,Copur Zeynep The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, vol.0, no.31, 2013, ss.49 - 64.
AMA Erkal S,Copur Z The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi. 2013; 0(31): 49 - 64.
Vancouver Erkal S,Copur Z The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi. 2013; 0(31): 49 - 64.
IEEE Erkal S,Copur Z "The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities." Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 0, ss.49 - 64, 2013.
ISNAD Erkal, Sibel - Copur, Zeynep. "The views and behaviours of women on the distribution of responsibility in household activities". Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi 31 (2013), 49-64.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
17-04-2024 2:25

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları