Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 56 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 16 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
Ele geçirme1, bir şirketin, diğer bir şirketin yönetiminin ya da hissedarlarının istekleridışında, şirket üzerinde denetim ve sahiplik elde etmek amacıyla hisse senetlerinin satınalınmasıdır. Şirketler arası birleşmeler her zaman tarafların karşılıklı anlaşması ve isteğiylegerçekleşmemektedir. Hedef şirketin yönetimi ele geçirilmeye karşı çıkabilir. Bu çalışmanınamacı; şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin ilgili literatür dikkate alınarak teorik olarak ortayakonulmasıdır. Kullanılan bu taktiklerin bir arada sunulduğu çalışmaların yeterli düzeydeolmayışı çalışmanın çıkış noktası olmuştur. Çalışmada, başlıca ele geçirme taktiklerine ve elegeçirmelerin hissedarlar üzeri ndeki etkisine yönelik ampirik çalışma sonuçlarına yerverilecektir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih İşletme İktisat

The evaluation of company takeover tactics

Öz:
Takeover is an acquiring of stocks in order to obtain controlling and possession atcompany, out of the desires of other company's administration and partners. Integration ofinter- company mergings doesn't always occur with desire and mutual agreement.Management of Target Company may challenge to this takeover. The aim of this study is topresent theoretically takeover tactics considering related literature. Deficiency of the studiesin which these tactics are used together has given light to this study. Basic takeover tacticsand the empirical study results of the effects of takeovers on the shareholder will be examinedin the study.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih İşletme İktisat
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aggarwal, Rajesh K. - Wu, Guojun (2002), “Stock Market Manipulation Theory and Evidence”,http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=474582 (03.03.2012).
  • Agrawal, Anup - Knoeber, Charles R. (1998), “Managerial Compensation and the Threat of Takeover”, Journal of Financial Economics, No. 47, pp. 219- 239.
  • Akgüç, Öztin (1998), Finansal Yönetim, 7. Baskı, Avcıol Basım, İstanbul. Amihud, Yakov - Lev, Baruch (1981), “Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate Mergers”, Bell Journal of Economics, No. 12, pp. 605 –617.
  • Angwin, Duncan - Philip, Stern - Bradley, Sarah (2004), “Agent or Steward: The Target CEO in a Hostile Takeover Can a Condemned Agent be Redeemed?”, Long Range Planning, No. 37, pp. 239–257.
  • Bagnoli, Mark - Lipman, Barton (1996), “Stock Price Manipulation Through Takeover Bids ”, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 124- 147.
  • Bebchuk, Lucian - Hart, Oliver (2001), “Takeover Bids vs. Proxy F ights in Contests for Corporate Control”, Working Paper 8633, http:// papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=290584 (05.03.2012).
  • Brealey, Richard A. - Myers, Stewart C. - Franklin Allen (2006), Corporate Finance, McGraw ve Hill, Eighth Edition, New York.
  • Brealey, Richard A. - Myers, Stewart C. – Marcus, Alan J. (2001 ), İşletme Finansının Temelleri (Çev. Bozkort Ünal, Türkü Arıkan ve Hatice Doğukanlı), McGraw ve Hill ve Literatür ortak yayını, İstanbul.
  • Brennan, Niamh M. - Caroline, A. Daly - Claire S., Harrington (2010), “Rhetoric, Argument and Impression Management in Hostile Takeover Defence Documents”, The British Accounting Review, No. 42, pp. 253 –268.
  • Brigham, Eugene F. - Houston, Joel F. (2001), Fundamentals of Financial Management, Ninth Edition, Horcourt College Publishers, Orlando.
  • Bugeja, Martin (2007), “Voluntary use of Independent Valuation Advice by Target Firm Boards in Takeovers”, Pacific- Basin Finance Journal, No. 15, pp. 368–387.
  • Chemla, Gilles (2005), “Hold- up, Stakeholders and Takeover Threats”, Journal of Financial Intermediation, No. 14, pp. 376–3 97.
  • Comerton, Forde Carole - Putniņs, Tālis J. (2007), “Measuring Closing Price Manipulation”,http://cbe.anu.edu.au/schools/fas/documents/Measuring_Closing_Price _Manipulation.pdf (03.03.2012).
  • Dağlı, Hüseyin (2001), Finansal Yönetim, İkinci Baskı,Derya Kitapevi, Trabzon. Dasgupta, Sudipto - Nanda, Vikram (1997),” Tender Offers, Proxy Contests, and Large- Shareholder Activism”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 787–820.
  • Demir, Yusuf (2001), “Hisse Senedi Fiyatını Etkileyen İşletme Düzeyindeki Faktörler ve Mali Sektör Üzerine İMKB’de Bir Uygulama”, Süleymen Demirel Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 6, S ayı 2, s s. 109- 130.
  • DePamphilis , Donald (2010), Mergers, Acquisitions, and Other Restructuring Activities: An Integrated Approach to Process, Tools, Cases, and Solutions, 5th edition, Elsevier Academic Press, Amerika.
  • DePamphilis, Donald (2005), Mergers, Acquisitions, and Other Restructuring Activities: An Integrated Approach to Process, Tolls, Cases, and Solutions, Second Edition, Academic Press, Amerika.
  • Dickerson, Andrew P. - Heather D. Gibson - Euclid, Tsakalotos (2002), “Takeover Risk and the Market for Corporate Control: the Experience of British Firms in the 1970s and 1980s”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, No. 20, pp. 1167–1195.
  • Emery, Dougles R. - John D., Finnery - John D., Stone (1998), Principles of Financial Management , Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  • Fama, Eugene - Jensen, Michael (1983), “Separation of Ownership and Control”, Journal of Law and Economics, No. 26, pp. 301 –325. Furfine, Craig H. - Rosen, Richard J. (2011), “Mergers Increase Default Risk”, Journal of Corporate Finance, No. 17, pp. 832–849.
  • Goldstein, Don (2000), “Hostile Takeovers as Corporate Governance? Evidence from the 1980s”, Review of Political Economy, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 381 – 402.
  • Gort, Michael (1969), “An Economic Disturbance Theory of Mergers”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, No. 83, pp. 624–642.
  • Greenwood, Robin - Schor, Michael (2009), “Investor Activism and Takeovers”, Journal of Financial Economics, No. 92, pp. 362–375.
  • Gürtler, Oliver - Kräkel, Matthias (2010), “Hostile Takeover and Costly Merger Control”, Public Choice, No. 141, pp. 371 –389..
  • Haan, Marco A. - Riyanto, Yohanes (2006), “The Effects of Takeover Threats on Shareholders and Firm Value”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, No. 59, pp. 45 –68.
  • Hanly, Ken (1992), “Hostile Takeovers and Methods of Defense: A Stakeholder Analysis”, Journal of Business Ethics, No. 11, pp. 895 – 913.
  • Harford, Jarrad (2003), “Takeover Bids and Target Directors’ Incentives: The Impact of a Bid on Directors’ Wealth and Board Seats”, Journal of Financial Economics, No. 69, pp. 51 –83.
  • Henry, Darren (2004), “Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure of Target Companies and the Outcome of Takeovers”, Pacific- Basin Finance Journal, No. 12, pp. 419– 444.
  • Hillion, Pierre - Suominen, Matti (2004), “The Manipulation of Closing Prices”, Journal of Financial Markets, No. 7, pp. 351 –375.
  • Huang, Wei Chiao - Yen, Gili (1996), “The Impact of Proxy Contests on Managerial Turnover: A Test of the Job Security Hypothesis”, Managerial and Decision Economics, No. 17, pp. 551 – 558.
  • Jensen, Michael C. (1988), “Takeovers: Their Causes and Consequences”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 2, No. 1, s. 21 – 48.
  • Khwaja, Asim Ijaz - Mian, Atif (2005), “Unchecked Intermediaries: Price Manipulation in an Emerging Stock Market”, Journal of Financial Economics, 78, s. 203 –241.
  • Kwoka, John - Pollitt, Michael (2010), “Do Mergers Improve Efficiency? Evidence from Restructuring the US Electric Power Sector”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, No. 28, pp. 645 –656.
  • Mikami, Kazuhiko (1999) , “Proxy Contests and Corporate Democracy”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, No. 40, pp. 353 –371.
  • Mukherjee, Tarun K. - Várela, Oscar (1993), “Corporate Operating Performance Around the Proxy Contest “, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 417- 425.
  • Mulherin, J. Harold - Poulsen, Annette B. (1998), “Proxy Contests and Corporate Change: Implications for Shareholder Wealth”, Journal of Financial Economics, No. 47, pp. 279- 313.
  • Oded, Jacob (2011), “Stock Repurchases: How Fir ms Choose between a Self Tender Offer and an Open- Market Program”, Journal of Banking & Finance, No. 35, pp. 3174– 3187.
  • Pearce II, John A. - Richard B., Robinson (2004), “Hostile Takeover Defenses That Maximize Shareholder Wealth”, Business Horizons , Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 15- 24.
  • Sarıkamış, Cevat (2003), Satın Almalar ve Yeniden Yapılanma, Şirket Birleşmeleri, 1. Baskı, Avcıol Basım Yayım, İstanbul.
  • Schnitzer, Monica (1996), “Hostile versus Friendly Takeovers”, Economica, No. 63, pp. 37– 55.
  • Schoenberg, Richard - Thornton, Daniel (2006), “The Impact of Bid Defences in Hostile Acquisitions”, European Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2- 3, pp. 142- 150.
  • Sinkovics, Rudolf R. - Zagelmeyer, Stefan- Verena, Kusstatscher (2011), “Between Merger and Syndrome: The Intermediary role of Emotions in four Cross - Border M&As”, International Business Review, No. 20, pp. 27–47.
  • Sridharan, Uma V. - Reinganum, Marc R. (1995), “Determinants of the Choice of the Hostile Takeover Mechanism: An Empirical Analysis of Tender Offers and Proxy Contests”, Financial management, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 57- 67.
  • Stotz, Olaf - Wanzenried, Gabrielle- Karsten, Döhnert (2010), “Open- Market Purchases of Public Equity by Private Equity I nvestors: Size and Home- Bias Effects”, Journal of Economics and Business, No. 62, pp. 562–576.
  • Wang, Hongxia- Sameh, Sakr- Yixi, Ning- Wallace, N. Davidson (2010), “Board Composition After Mergers, Does it M atter to Target S hareholders?”, Journal of Empirical Finance, No. 17, pp. 837–851.
  • Washington, Marvin - Patterson, Karen D.W. (2011), “Hostile Takeover or Joint Venture: Connections between Institutional Theory and Sport Management Research”, Sport Management Review, Vol. 14, pp. 1 –12.
  • Yılgör, Ayşe Gül (2004), Şirket Birleşme, Ele Geçirme ve Satın Alma İşlemlerinin Finansal Çerçevesi”, Editörler: Sumer Haluk, Pernsteiner Helmut, Şirket Birleşmeleri, 1.Baskı, Alfa Yayınevi, s. 381 - 409.
APA DAĞLI H, AYAYDIN H (2012). Şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin değerlendirilmesi. , 1 - 16.
Chicago DAĞLI Hüseyin,AYAYDIN HASAN Şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin değerlendirilmesi. (2012): 1 - 16.
MLA DAĞLI Hüseyin,AYAYDIN HASAN Şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin değerlendirilmesi. , 2012, ss.1 - 16.
AMA DAĞLI H,AYAYDIN H Şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin değerlendirilmesi. . 2012; 1 - 16.
Vancouver DAĞLI H,AYAYDIN H Şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin değerlendirilmesi. . 2012; 1 - 16.
IEEE DAĞLI H,AYAYDIN H "Şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin değerlendirilmesi." , ss.1 - 16, 2012.
ISNAD DAĞLI, Hüseyin - AYAYDIN, HASAN. "Şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin değerlendirilmesi". (2012), 1-16.
APA DAĞLI H, AYAYDIN H (2012). Şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 0(56), 1 - 16.
Chicago DAĞLI Hüseyin,AYAYDIN HASAN Şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi 0, no.56 (2012): 1 - 16.
MLA DAĞLI Hüseyin,AYAYDIN HASAN Şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, vol.0, no.56, 2012, ss.1 - 16.
AMA DAĞLI H,AYAYDIN H Şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi. 2012; 0(56): 1 - 16.
Vancouver DAĞLI H,AYAYDIN H Şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi. 2012; 0(56): 1 - 16.
IEEE DAĞLI H,AYAYDIN H "Şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin değerlendirilmesi." Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 0, ss.1 - 16, 2012.
ISNAD DAĞLI, Hüseyin - AYAYDIN, HASAN. "Şirket ele geçirme taktiklerinin değerlendirilmesi". Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi 56 (2012), 1-16.