The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates

Ayoob DAMAVAND (Islamic Azad University Department of Humanities, Bandar Abbas Branch, Bandar Abbas, Iran)
Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
1 0
Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 15 Sayfa Aralığı: 109 - 123 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates

Öz:
Bu çalışma, bütünüyle motive olmuş IELTS adayları ile onlarin araçsal olarakmotive olmuş emsaller arasinde yazma başarısı açisindan bir karşılaştırma yapmayıamaçladi. Bununla birlikte, yukarıda bahsi geçen gruplar IELTSten aldıkları yeterlilikpuanına göre karşılaştırılmışlardır. Bu çalışmayı yürütmek için, çalışmanın katılımcıları ilkbaşta asıl IELTS sınavına Iranda girmiş olan 245 Iranlı IELTS adayı olarak seçildi. Bunaek olarak, Lainein (1987) her bir aday üzerinde ne çeşit bir motivasyona sahip olduklarınıbelirlemek için uyguladığı anket kullanildı. Elde edilen bilgi 86sı bütünüyle motive olmuş,110u araçsal şekilde motive olmuş iki grup ortaya çıkardı. Yeterlilik sınavından elde edilensonuçlarla tek yönlü bir ANOVA (analysis of variance = farklılık analizi) uygulandı. Sonuçbu iki grubun yeterlilikleri göz önüne alındığında istatiksel olarak bu iki grubun arasındaçok önemli bir farkın bulunmadığını gösterdi ve bu yüzden iki grubun da yeterliliklerinin eşitseviyede olduğu sonucu çıkarıldı. Bununla birlikte, tek yönlü ANOVA yı kullanan istatikselanaliz, yazma konusunda bütünüyle kendini bu yöne yöneltmiş ve araçsal şekilde motiveolmuşlar arasında büyük bir farklılık olmadığını göstedi.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat

İranlı ıelts adaylarının yazma yeterliliği üzerine motıvasyon (araçsal ve bütünleyici) çeşitlerinin etkileri

Öz:
candidates and their instrumentally motivated peers in terms of their writingachievement. Moreover, the above-mentioned groups were compared based on theirproficiency score on IELTS Test. In order to carry out the study, the participants of the studywere chosen as 245 Iranian IELTS candidates who had initially taken the actual IELTS testin Iran. In addition to that, the questionnaire which was utilized by Laine (1987), todetermine the type of motivation each participant possessed, was used. The obtained dataformed two groups of 86 integrative and 110 instrumental candidates. Using the resultsobtained from the proficiency test, a one-way ANOVA was run. The result indicated thatthere was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in so far as theirproficiency was concerned and it therefore was concluded that the two groups were at thesame level of proficiency. Moreover, the statistical analyses, using one-way ANOVA,revealed that there was no significant difference between the integratively orientedparticipants and instrumentally oriented ones as far as their writing was concerned.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abu-Rabia, S. (1995), “Attitudes and cultural background and their relationship to English in multicultural social context: The case of male and female Arab immigrants in Canada”, Educational Psychology, 15(3), 323.
  • Au, S.Y. (1988), “A critical appraisal of Gardner‟s socio-psychology theory of second language learniung”, Language Learning Journal, 38, 75-100.
  • Bizzell, P. (1992), Academic discourse and critical consciousness, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Bronson, M. (2005), “Writing passage: Academic literacy socialization among ESL graduate students, a multiple case study”, Dissertation Abstracts International, 66(1), 103.
  • Candlin, C.N., & Hyland, K.(Eds.). (1999), Writing: texts, processes & practices, Longman, London.
  • Chastain, K. (1988), Developing second language skills: theory and practice (3rd ed), Harcourt Brace and Jovanovich, New York.
  • Chomsky, N. (1988), Language and Problems of Knowledge, MLT Press, Cambridge Mass.
  • Dornyei, Z. (1990), “Conceptualizing motivation in foreign language learning”, Language Learning, 40, 45-78
  • Ehrman, M. (1996), Understanding second language learning difficulties, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Falk, J. (1978), Linguistics and language: A survey of basic concepts and implications (2nd ed.), John Wiley and sons, New York.
  • Fazel, I. (2002), Effects of Motivation on Oral Proficiency Among Iranian Female Students Of English At Shiraz University Language Center, Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981), “A cognitive process theory of writing”, College composition communication, 32(?), 365-387.
  • Gardner, R.C. (1960), Motivational variables in second language acquisition, Published Doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.
  • Gardner, R.C. (1968), “Attitudes and motivation: Their role in second language acquisition”, TESOL, Vol. 2, 141-149.
  • Gardner, R.C. (1979), “Social-psychological aspects of second language acquisition”, Language and social psychology, (Eds. In H. Giles and R.S. Clair), Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 193-220.
  • Gardner, R. C. (1985), Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitude and motivation, Edward Arnold, London.
  • Gardner, R.C., & Lambert, W.E. (1959), “Motivational variables in second language acquisition”, Canadian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 13, 266-272.
  • Gardner, R.C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972), Attitudes and motivations in second language learning, Rowley: Newbury House Publishers.
  • Gardner, R.C. & Smythe, P.C. (1975), “Motivation and second language acquisition”, Canadian Modern Language Review, 3, 218-233.
  • Gardner, R.C., Smythe, P.C., Clèment, R., & Gilksman, L. (1976), “Second language learning: A social psychological perspective”, Canadian Modern Language Review, Vol. 32, 198-213.
  • Hassani, H. (2005), The relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and Iranian EFL Students' gender, Level of University Instruction, and the EFL proficiency, Unpublished M.A. thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Kaylani, C. (1996), The influence of gender and motivation on EFL learning strategy use in Jordan, Language learning strategies around the world: cross-cultural perspectives, (Ed. In: Oxford, R.), University of Hawaii Press, Hawaii, 75-88.
  • Kolb, D.A. (1984), Experiential learning, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Laine, J. E. (1987), Affective Factors in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching Cross-Language Studies, (No 13), Jyvaskyla University, Department of English, Jyvaskyla.
  • Lewin, K. (1964), Field theory and learning, Field theory social science, (Ed. In D. Cartwright), Harper & Row, New York, 60-86.
  • Lukmani, Y. M. (1972), “Motivation to learn and language proficiency”, Language Learning, 22(2), 261-273.
  • Pallant, J. (2005), SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows, Open University Press, Buckingham.
  • Ramazanian, M. (1998), The motivation for language learning among Shiraz University undergraduate students of English as a foreign language, Unpublished M.A. thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Rogers, C. (1969), Freedom to learn, Columbus, OH: Merril.
  • Roohani, A. (2001), An Investigation Into EFL Students’ Motivation in Shiraz State and Islamic Azad University, Unpublished M.A. thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Rubin, B., Katznelson, E., Perpignan, H. (2005), “Learning for life: the potential of academic writing courses for individual EFL learners”,System, 33, 17-27.
  • Salimi, M. R. (2000), Affective Factors in Learning English: A Study of the Filter, Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Sedaghat, M. (2001), The Effects of Attitude, Motivation and Proficiency Level On the Use of Listening Comprehension Strategies by Iranian Female Learners, Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Silva, T., & Mastud, P.K. (Eds.). (2001), On second language writing, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Spolsky, B. (1969), “Attitudinal aspects of second language learning”, Language Learning, Vol. 19, 271-285.
  • Strong, M. (1984), “Integrative motivation: Cause or result of second language acquisition?”, Language Learning, 34, 1-14.
  • Tamada, y. (1996), “The relationship between Japanese Learners, personal factors and their choices of language learning strategies” , Modern Language Journal, 80(12) , 120-131.
  • Tremblay, P. F., & Gardner, R. C. (1995), “Expanding the motivation construct inlanguage learning”, Modern Language Journal, 79, 505–520.
  • UCLES. (2005), IELTS handbook 2005, Retrieved from the IELTS Web site: http://www.ielts.org/pdf/IELTS_Handbook_2005.pdf
  • Zhu, W. (2004), “Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in disciplines”, Journal of second language writing, 13(11), 29-48.
APA DAMAVAND A (2012). The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates. , 109 - 123.
Chicago DAMAVAND Ayoob The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates. (2012): 109 - 123.
MLA DAMAVAND Ayoob The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates. , 2012, ss.109 - 123.
AMA DAMAVAND A The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates. . 2012; 109 - 123.
Vancouver DAMAVAND A The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates. . 2012; 109 - 123.
IEEE DAMAVAND A "The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates." , ss.109 - 123, 2012.
ISNAD DAMAVAND, Ayoob. "The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates". (2012), 109-123.
APA DAMAVAND A (2012). The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(15), 109 - 123.
Chicago DAMAVAND Ayoob The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 8, no.15 (2012): 109 - 123.
MLA DAMAVAND Ayoob The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.8, no.15, 2012, ss.109 - 123.
AMA DAMAVAND A The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2012; 8(15): 109 - 123.
Vancouver DAMAVAND A The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2012; 8(15): 109 - 123.
IEEE DAMAVAND A "The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates." Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8, ss.109 - 123, 2012.
ISNAD DAMAVAND, Ayoob. "The effects of motivation types (instrumental and integrative) on writing proficiency among iranian ielts candidates". Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 8/15 (2012), 109-123.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 20:13

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları