Yıl: 2013 Cilt: 46 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 249 - 261 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı ilköğretim öğrencilerinin geometri özyeterlikleri ve geometri başarıları, cinsiyet ve anne-baba eğitim durumu arasındaki ilişkileri incelemektir. Çalışmada, Günhan ve Başer (2007) tarafından geliştirilen geometriye yönelik öz-yeterlik ölçeği ve literatürde yer alan geometri başarısını ölçen maddeler seçilerek oluşturulan geometri başarı testi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma Bolu il merkezinde rasgele seçilmiş 14 okulda okuyan 334 (176 kız- 158 erkek) ilköğretim 8.sınıf öğrencisi ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Regresyon analizleri sonucunda, araştırmada elde edilen bulgular, babanın öğretim durumunun ve geometri öz-yeterliğinin geometri başarısının istatistiksel olarak anlamlı pozitif bir yordayıcısı olduğunu göstermektedir. Anne veya babanın eğitim durumunun öz-yeterlik üzerinde istatistiksel olarak etkisi olsa da pratikte anlamlı olmayabileceği bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, sonuçlar cinsiyetin geometri özyeterliği ve geometri başarısı ile ilişkili olmadığını göstermiştir. Sonuçlar, öğrencilerin öz-yeterliğinin ve ebeveynlerinin eğitim durumunun akademik başarıları üzerindeki etkisinin önemini desteklemektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Geometri başarısı, geometri öz-yeterliği, ebeveyn eğitim durumu ve cinsiyet arasındaki ilişkiler

Öz:
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender. In this study, geometry self- efficacy scale which was developed by Günhan and Başer (2007) and geometry achievement test were used. The geometry achievement test was developed by the authors using the test items in the literature. Sample of the research consisted of 334 (176 girls-158 boys) 8th grade students. Results of regression analyses indicated that father’s education level and geometry self-efficacy were statistically significant predictors of geometry achievement. Effects of mother’s or father’s education level on geometry self-efficacy beliefs may not be significant in practice. In addition, the results indicated that gender was not related to geometry self-efficacy and geometry achievement. Findings support the importance of students’ self-efficacy and parents’ education level on their academic achievement.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akyol, G., Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). The contribution of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to students’ science achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16, 1–21.
  • Assessment Systems Corporation (2000). Iteman [Computer software]. (http://www.assess.com/iteman.html, 16.04.2010 tarihinde erişildi).
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New york: Freeman.
  • Bong, M. (2001). Role of self-efficacy and task value in predicting college students’ course performance and future enrollment intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 553-570.
  • Chen, P. P. ( 2003). Exploring the accuracy and predictability of the self-efficacy beliefs of seventh grade mathematics students. Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 79-92.
  • Erdoğan, A. Baloğlu, M. ve Kesici, Ş. (2009). Geometri ve matematik ders başarı düzeyleri ile geometri öz-yeterlik inançlarında cinsiyet farklılıkları. XVIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayında sunulan bildiri (1-3 Ekim, İzmir).
  • Günhan, B. C. ve Başer, N. (2007). Geometriye yönelik öz-yeterlik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 68-76.
  • Howie S. J. ve Pietersen, J. J. (2001). Mathematics literacy of final year students: South African realities. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 7-25.
  • Jöreskog, K. ve Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.7: user’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific software international Inc, USA.
  • Jöreskog, K. ve Sörbom, D. (2002). PRELIS 2: user’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific software international Inc, USA.
  • Koutsoulis, M. K., & Campbell, J. R. (2001). Family processes affect students’ motivation, and science and math achievement in Cypriot high schools. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 108–127.
  • Lloyd, J.E.V., Walsh, J., ve Yailagh, M.S. (2005). Sex differences in performance attributions, self-efficacy, and achievement in mathematics: If I’m so smart, why don’t I know it? Canadian Journal of Education, 28(3), 384-408.
  • MEB (2009). İlköğretim matematik dersi öğretim programı (6-8. Sınıflar). Ankara.
  • Osterlind, S. J. (2002). Constructing test items. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.
  • Pajares, F. ve Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124–139.
  • Pajares, F. ve Kranzler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 426-443.
  • Pajares, F. ve Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86 (2), 193– 203.
  • Pajares, F. ve Miller, M. D. (1995). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics outcomes: The need for specificity of assessment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 190–198.
  • Pietsch, J., Walker, R. ve Chapman, E. (2003). The relationship among self-concept, self-efficacy, and performance in mathematics during secondary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 589-603.
  • Randhawa, B. S., Beamer, J. E. ve Lundberg, I. (1993). Role of mathematics self- efficacy in the structural model of mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85 (1), 41- 48.
  • Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta- analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417-453.
  • Usiskin, Z.(1982). Van hiele levels and achievement in secondary school geometry. (Final report of the cognitive development and achievement in secondary school geometry project). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, Department of Education.
  • Üredi, I. ve Üredi, L. (2005). İlkögretim 8. sınıf ögrencilerinin öz-düzenleme stratejileri ve motivasyonel inançlarının matematik basarısını yordama gücü. Mersin Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 250-260.
  • Wang, D. B. (2004). Family background factors and mathematics success: A comparison of Chinese and US students. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 40-54.
  • Wolters, C. A. ve Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contexual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26, 27-47.
  • Yenilmez, K. ve Uygan, C. (2010). Yaratıcı drama yönteminin ilköğretim 7.sınıf öğrencilerinin geometriye yönelik öz-yeterlik inançlarına etkisi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 18(3), 931-942.
  • Yıldırım, S. ve Yıldırım, H. H. (2008). PISA 2006 matematik başarısı ile ilişkili olan değişkenler. VIII. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresinde sunulan bildiri (27-29 Ağustos, Bolu).
  • Zajacova, A., Lynch,S. M. ve Espenshade, T.J.( 2005). Self-efficacy, stress, and academic success in college. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 677-706.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self–Efficacy: An essential to motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
APA ÖZKAN E, YILDIRIM S (2013). The relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender. , 249 - 261.
Chicago ÖZKAN Eda,YILDIRIM Selda The relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender. (2013): 249 - 261.
MLA ÖZKAN Eda,YILDIRIM Selda The relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender. , 2013, ss.249 - 261.
AMA ÖZKAN E,YILDIRIM S The relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender. . 2013; 249 - 261.
Vancouver ÖZKAN E,YILDIRIM S The relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender. . 2013; 249 - 261.
IEEE ÖZKAN E,YILDIRIM S "The relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender." , ss.249 - 261, 2013.
ISNAD ÖZKAN, Eda - YILDIRIM, Selda. "The relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender". (2013), 249-261.
APA ÖZKAN E, YILDIRIM S (2013). The relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(2), 249 - 261.
Chicago ÖZKAN Eda,YILDIRIM Selda The relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 46, no.2 (2013): 249 - 261.
MLA ÖZKAN Eda,YILDIRIM Selda The relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.46, no.2, 2013, ss.249 - 261.
AMA ÖZKAN E,YILDIRIM S The relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2013; 46(2): 249 - 261.
Vancouver ÖZKAN E,YILDIRIM S The relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2013; 46(2): 249 - 261.
IEEE ÖZKAN E,YILDIRIM S "The relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender." Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, ss.249 - 261, 2013.
ISNAD ÖZKAN, Eda - YILDIRIM, Selda. "The relationships between geometry achievement, geometry self-efficacy, parents’ education level and gender". Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 46/2 (2013), 249-261.