Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 89 - 108 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Communication Satisfaction

Öz:
Bu araştırmada, ilköğretim okullarında görevli öğretmenlerin okullarındaki iletişimden sağladıkları doyumdüzeylerinin belirlenmesi ve iletişim doyumunun boyutlarına ilişkin p uanlarının kamu ya da özel okulda görevyap maları ve cinsiyetlerine göre anlamlı bir f arklılık gösterip göstermediğinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.Araştırmanın örneklemi, Mersin ili merkez ilçelerindeki 33 ilköğretim okulunda görevli 741 öğretmendenoluşmaktadır. Çalışmanın verileri Downs and Hazen (1977) tarafından geliştirilen ve araştırmacılartarafından bu çalışma kapsamında Türkçeye uyarlanan İletişim Doyumu Anketi aracılığıyla elde edilmiştir.Elde edilen veri betimleyici istatistikler ve t-testi ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, öğretmenleriniletişim doyumunun bazı boyutlarından doyum sağladıklarını, bazılarında ise doyum sağlama açısındankararsız kaldıkları bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Öğretmenlerin okul türüne göre iletişim doyumunun bütünboyutlarından elde edilen p uanlar arasında özel okullar lehine anlamlı f arklılıklar olduğu belirlenmiştir.Öğretmenlerin iletişim doyumu cinsiyet değişkenine göre incelendiğinde ise, kişisel geribildirim boyutu hariç,diğer iletişim doyumu boyutlarından elde edilen p uanlar arasında anlamlı bir f arklılık olmadığı bulgusunaulaşılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

İlköğretim Okulu Öğretmenlerinin İletişim Doyumlarının İncelenmesi

Öz:
The purpose of this study was to examine primary school teacherssatisf action with communication withintheir schools and also determine whether there is a signif icant diff erence among scores obtained f romcommunication satisf action dimensions with regard to teachersgender and type of the school that teachersare employed. The sample consisted of 741 teachers employed in 33 primary schools in the province ofMersin. The data were gathered by Communication Satisf action Questionnaire developed by Downs andHazen (1977) af ter adapting into Turkish by the researchers and then analyzed using descriptive statistics andt-test. Analysis revealed that the teachers satisf ied with some communication satisf action dimensions whilethey were undecided about some dimensions. Moreover, there were signif icant diff erences between the scoreson each communication satisf action dimension regarding type of school although there were no signif icantdiff erences among the scores on each communication satisf action dimension, except personal f eedback,regarding gender.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akkirman, A. D. & Harris, D. L (2005). Organizational communication satisfaction in the virtual workplace. The Journal of Management Develop ment, 24, 397-409.
  • Aydın, M. (2007). Eğitim yönetimi (8. Baskı). Ankara: Hatipoğlu Yayınları.
  • Biggs, B. L. (1981). Bueraucratic variables and teacher communication satisf action. Unpublished Master Thesis. Oklahoma: Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University.
  • Book, C. L., Albrecht, T. L., Atkin, C., Bettinghaus, E. P., & Donohue, W.A. (1980). Human communication: Princip les, contexts, and skills. NewYork: St. Martin's Press.
  • Bolat, S. (1996). Eğitim örgütlerinde iletişim: H. Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi uygulaması. Hacettep e Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, 75-80.
  • Buchholz, W. (2001). Op en communication climate. 20.06.2012 tarihinde http://atc.bentley.edu/faculty/wb/printables/opencomm.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Carriére, J. & Bourque, C. (2009). The effects of organizational communication on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in a land ambulance service and the mediating role of cominication satisfaction. Career Develop ment International, 14, 29- 49.
  • Clampitt, P. G. (1983). Communication and p roductivity. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Kansas: The Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Kansas.
  • Clampitt, P. G. ve Downs, C. W. (1993). Employee perceptions of the relationship between communication and productivity. The Journal of Business Communication, 30, 5-28.
  • Çulha, S. (2008). Genel orta eğitim kurumlarında görev yap an yöneticilerin bakış açısından örgüt içi iletişim sürecinde yaşadıkları sorunların ve bu sorunlarla başa çıkma yollarının değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Mersin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • De Lange, J. (1995). Gender and communication in social work education: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Social Work Education, 31, 75- 81.
  • Downs, C. W. & Hazen, M, D. (1977). A factor analytic study of communication satisfaction. The Journal of Business Communication, 14, 63-74.
  • Ehlers, N. L. (2003). The reletionship of communication satisf action j ob satisf action and self rep orted absenteeism. Unpublished Master Thesis. Miami: Faculty of Miami University.
  • Eren, E. (2007). Örgütsel davranış ve yönetim psikoloj isi (10. Baskı). İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  • Eroğlu, E. & Özkan, G. (2009). Örgüt kültürü ve iletişim doyumu ile bireysel özellikler arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi: Bir uygulama örneği. Selçuk İletişim, 5, 50-61.
  • Fournier, W. H. (2008). Communication satisf action interractional j ustice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Staff p ercep tion in a university environment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ohio: The faculty of the Scripps College of Communication of Ohio University.
  • Goldhaber, G. M., Yates, M. P., Porter, D. T. & Lesniak, R. (1978). Organizational communication. Human Communications Research, 5, 76-96.
  • Goris, J. R. (2007). Effects of satisfaction with communication on the relationship between individual-job congruence and job performance/satisfaction. Journal of Management Devolop ment, 26, 737-752.
  • Gray, J. & Laidlaw, H. (2004). Improving the measurement of communication satisfaction. Management Communication Quarterly, 17, 425-448.
  • Gregson, T. (1990). Communication satisfaction: A path analytic study of accountants affiliated with CPA firms. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 2, 32-49.
  • Greenbaum, H. H., Clampitt, P. & Willihnganz, S. (1988). Organizational communication: An examination of four instrument. Management Communication, Quarterly, 2, 245- 282.
  • Gülnar, B. (2007). Araştırma görevlilerinin iş tatmini sağlama aracı olarak örgütsel iletişim ve iş doyumu: Kamu ve özel sektör üniversite karşılaştırması. Konya: Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi.
  • Gülnar, B. (2009). İletişim doyumu boyutları ile örgütlenme yapısı ilişkisi: Selçuk Üniversitesi akademisyenleri örneği. Selçuk İletişim, 5, 62-82.
  • Hecht, M. L. (1978). Measures of communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 4, 350-368.
  • Helweg-Larsen, M., Cunnigham, S. J., Carrico, A. & Pergram, A. M. (2004). The communication experiences of education managers: Identifying strengths, weaknesses and critical incidents. The Internetional Journal of Educational Management, 14, 120- 129.
  • Hopper, M. (2009). Communication satisf action, j ob satisf action, organizational commitment and intent to leave. Unpublished Master Thesis. New Zealand: The University of Waikato.
  • Jöreskog, K. & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8. 30. Chicago: Scientific Software International Inc.
  • Keyton, J. (2005). Communication and organizational culture. United States of America: Sage Publications.
  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Princip les and p ractices of structural equation modelling. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Koning, K. Z. & Jang, M. (2007). Evaulating the communication satisfaction questionnaire as a communication audit tool. Management Communication Quarterly, 20, (3), 261– 282.
  • Kongchan, A. (1985). Communication satisf action, j ob satisf action, and organizational commitment of business college f aculty. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Arizona: Arizona State University.
  • Lee, K. B. (1983). Communication satisf action in p rivate, church-related schools. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Oklahoma: The University of Tulsa.
  • Meintjes, C & Steyn, B. (2006). A critical evaluation of the Downs-Hazen instrument by measuring employee communication satisfaction at a private higher education institution in South Africa. Communication, 32, 1, 152-188.
  • Mount, D. J. & Back, K. J. (1999). A factor-analytic study of communication satisfaction in the lodging industry. Journal of Hosp itality and Tourism Research, 23, 401-418.
  • Mueller, H. B. & Lee, J. (2002). Leader-member exchange and organizational communication satisfaction in multiple contexts. The Journal of Business Communication, 39, 220-224.
  • Nakra, R. (2006). Relationship between communication satisfaction and organizational identification: An empiricial study. The Journal of Business Persp ective, 10, 41-51.
  • Polansky, J. B. (1994). An examination of cominication satisf action and communication comp etence in three p rof essional technical organizations. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Kansas: The Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Kansas.
  • Pincus. J. D. (1986). Communication satisfaction, job satisfaction and job performance. Human Communication Research, 4, 395-419.
  • Pişiren, L. (2010). Uluslararası bir grup tarafından satın alınan bir üretim şirketinde yaşanan kültür değişimi sürecinde yöneticilerin iletişimci biçimlerindeki değişmenin çalışanların iletişim doyumuna olan etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
  • Raile, A.N. W. (2005) . An initial exp loration of the eff ects of exp ectations about work values and work value attaintment on organizational communication satisf action. Michigan State University.
  • Ramos, D. (2003). Relationship amongs leader-member exchance quality, satisf action with organizational communication, and creativity in entertaintment organizations. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Los Angeles: Alliant International University.
  • Ritchie, L. E. (1999). Supp orting organizational learning through communication behaivors: The eff ects of sup erior/subordinate communication satisf action and organizational def ensive routines on p erceived supp ort f or double loop learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Maryland: The University of Maryland.
  • Robertson, E. (2003). How to use a communication climate model. Stratej ic Communication Management, 7, 24-27.
  • Schumacker, R. E. ve Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner ’s guide to structural equation modelling. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
  • Simpson, E. M. (1988). Communication satisf action and j ob satisf action among retail sp ecialty store sales p eop le. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Oklahoma: The University of Oklahoma Graduate College.
  • Sypher, B. D. (1981). A multimethod investigation of emp loyee communication abilities, communication satisf action and j ob satisf action. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation: Michigan: The University of Michigan.
  • Thayer, L. (1968). Communication and communications systems. Kansas: Homewood Illinois.
  • Thompson, T. D. (1998). The imp act of p articip ation in emergent communication Networks on communication satisf action and p ercep tions of organizational climate. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Pennsylvania: Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Science of Harvard University.
  • Tsai, M. T. ve Chuang, S. S. (2009). An integrated process model of communication satisfaction and organizational outcomes. Social Behaviour and Personality, 36, 825-834.
  • Varona, F. (1996). Relationship between communication satisfaction and organizational commitment in three Guatemalan organizations. The Journal of Business Communication, 33, 111-140.
APA GIZIR S, KÖKSAL E (2014). An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Communication Satisfaction. , 89 - 108.
Chicago GIZIR SIDDIKA,KÖKSAL Esin Kevser An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Communication Satisfaction. (2014): 89 - 108.
MLA GIZIR SIDDIKA,KÖKSAL Esin Kevser An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Communication Satisfaction. , 2014, ss.89 - 108.
AMA GIZIR S,KÖKSAL E An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Communication Satisfaction. . 2014; 89 - 108.
Vancouver GIZIR S,KÖKSAL E An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Communication Satisfaction. . 2014; 89 - 108.
IEEE GIZIR S,KÖKSAL E "An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Communication Satisfaction." , ss.89 - 108, 2014.
ISNAD GIZIR, SIDDIKA - KÖKSAL, Esin Kevser. "An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Communication Satisfaction". (2014), 89-108.
APA GIZIR S, KÖKSAL E (2014). An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Communication Satisfaction. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2), 89 - 108.
Chicago GIZIR SIDDIKA,KÖKSAL Esin Kevser An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Communication Satisfaction. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 15, no.2 (2014): 89 - 108.
MLA GIZIR SIDDIKA,KÖKSAL Esin Kevser An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Communication Satisfaction. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.15, no.2, 2014, ss.89 - 108.
AMA GIZIR S,KÖKSAL E An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Communication Satisfaction. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2014; 15(2): 89 - 108.
Vancouver GIZIR S,KÖKSAL E An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Communication Satisfaction. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2014; 15(2): 89 - 108.
IEEE GIZIR S,KÖKSAL E "An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Communication Satisfaction." İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, ss.89 - 108, 2014.
ISNAD GIZIR, SIDDIKA - KÖKSAL, Esin Kevser. "An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Communication Satisfaction". İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 15/2 (2014), 89-108.