Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 36 - 50 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Çerçeveleme teorisi ve toplumsal hareketler

Öz:
Toplumsal gerçekliğin inşasında yapı taşları olarak kullanılan iletişim çerçeveleri,bu süreç içinde kendilerine etkin roller biçen toplumsal gruplar ve toplumsal hareketler içinanlaşılması ve denetlenmesi şart olan dinamiklerin odağında yer almaktadır. Toplu eylemçerçevelerinin, kendilerini ortaya çıkaran kültürel faktörlerle birlikte ve özellikleriyle tanınması,bunların üretilip yayılıma sokulmasında etkin olan süreçlerin tanınması ve bu süreçlerintoplumsal hareketin diğer süreçleriyle etkileşimleri, toplumbilim ve siyaset bilim açısındanönemli süreçleri oluşturmaktadır. Bu nedenle çerçeveleme analizi, sosyoloji, sosyal psikoloji,siyaset bilim ve medya araştırmalarında toplumsal hareketleri ve sivil toplum kuruluşlarını daiçeren organizasyonların etkinliklerini inceleyen araştırmalar için de stratejik bir ittifak temelioluşturmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, çerçeveleme araştırmalarının toplumsal hareketleralanında hem uygulayıcılara (yani kanaat önderlerine) medya aracılığıyla iletişim sürecindesağlayabileceği denetleme imkânlarına, hem de toplumsal hareketleri odağına alan araştırmalarasunduğu analiz imkânlarına dikkati çekmektir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İletişim Film, Radyo, Televizyon Siyasi Bilimler Sosyoloji Hukuk

Framing theory and social movements

Öz:
Framing research focuses on the process and the dynamics that function in the constructionof social reality through communication, a process crucial to understand and to control forsocial movements and groups that contend for leading roles in this process. Understandingthe characteristics and functions of collective action frames and the social-cultural factors thatassociate the setting of collective action frames and understanding the interaction of frameswith the other factors related to social movements can produce insightful clues for sociologyand political science. Thus, framing analysis can form the basis for strategic alliances betweenresearch disciplines as sociology, social psychology, political science and media studies whichare dealing with the subject of social movements and social organizations that aim changes in thestructure or in the policies of the social-political system. The objective of this paper is on the onehand to point to this functional means for analysis for researchers and on the other hand to thecrucial capabilities it promises for activists that compete to control the communication processthrough the media.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İletişim Film, Radyo, Televizyon Siyasi Bilimler Sosyoloji Hukuk
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Jason Aronson Inc, Notvale, New Jersey. Benford, R. D. (1994). Review of Talking Politics, by William A. Gamson, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 99(4), pp. 1103 – 1104.
  • Benford, R.D.(1997). An insider’s critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry, vol. 67, pp. 409–430.
  • Benford, R.D. - Snow, A.D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 26, pp. 611–39.
  • Berger, P. L. - Luckmann, T. (1966/1991). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin
  • Boczkowski, P.J. - de Santos, M. (2007) When More Media Equals Less News: Patterns of Content Homogenisation in Argentina’s Leading Print and Online Newspapers. Political Communication, vol. 24 (2), pp. 167-180.
  • Carragee, K.M. (1997). Framing, the news media, and collective action. Paper presented at The Conference for the Center for Mass Communication Research, Columbia. S.C., United States, October.
  • Carroll, W. - Ratner, R.S. (1996). Master framing and cross-movement networking in contemporary social movements, The Sociological Quarterly, vol. 37(4), pp. 601- 625.
  • Cereb, E.D.(2014). Taksim Dayanışma Platformu’nun Gezi Parkı protestosunun çerçevelemesi: Hareket içinde çevre konusunun keşf, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İTÜ
  • Creed, W.E.D. - Langstraat, J.A. - Scully, M.A. (2002). A Picture of the frame. Frame analysis as technique and as politics, Organizational Research Methods, vol. 5, pp. 34-55
  • Çoban, M. (2009). Egemen söylemin yeniden üretilmesinde haber çerçeveleme: KANAL D ve STV örneği, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi.
  • Danacı, Ö. (2005) Siyasi kampanyalarda medya: Yazılı basın haberlerinde “çerçeveleme” ve “öne çıkarma”nın politikacı temsilindeki rolü, doktora tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi SBE İletişim Bilimleri İstanbul.
  • Doğan, M.G.(2014). Bir toplumsal hareket olarak Gezi direnişi: Sürekli olanı aramak, Eğitim Bilim Toplum Dergisi, Sayı: 48, s: 89-109.
  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarifcation of a fractured paradigm, Journal of Communication , vol. 43 (4), pp. 51-58.
  • Evans, J.H. (1997). Multi-organizational felds and social movement organization frame content: The religious pro-choice movement, Sociological Inquiry, vol. 67, pp. 451-69.
  • Eyerman, R. (1984). Social Movements and Social Theory, Sociology, vol. 18(1), pp. 71-82.
  • Fendrich, J. M. (1977). Keeping the faith or pursuing the good life: A study in the consequences of participation in the Civil Rights Movement, American Sociological Review , vol. 42, pp. 144–157. Fisher, K. (1997) Locating frames in the discursive universe, Sociological Research Online, vol. 2 (3), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/3/4.html.
  • Gamson, W.A. (1989). News as framing: Comment of Graber. American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 33, pp. 157-161.
  • Gamson, W.A. (1992). Talking Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gamson, W. A. (1995). Constructing social protest, ( İçinde): Social Movements and Culture, H. Johnson, - B. Klandermans (eds), pp: 85-106, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Gamson, W. A.- Fireman, B. - Rytina, S. (1982). Encounters with Unjust Authorities, Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
  • Gamson, W. A.- Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affrmative action. (İçinde) Research in Political Sociology, R.G. Braungart, M.M. Braungart (eds), vol. 3, pp. 137-177, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Gamson, W.A. - Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constuctionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 95 (1), pp: 1-37.
  • Gamson, W. A. - Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems,Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol.526, pp. 114-27.
  • Gerhards, J. -Rucht, D. (1992). Mesomobilization: Organizing and framing in two protest campaigns in West Germany, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 98(3), pp. 555 –596
  • Gitlin, T. (1980). The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left, University of California Press, Los Angeles.
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Gökalp, O. (2011) Medyanın gündem kurma ve çerçeveleme yoluyla Türkiye’nin Avrupa Birliğine üyeliğine dair kamuoyu oluşturmaya etkisi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi,
  • Haines, H.H. (2006). Dangerous ıssues and public ıdentities:the negotiation of controversy in two movement organizations, Sociological Inquiry, vol. 76(2), pp. 231–263.
  • Hunt, S.A.- Benford, R.D.- Snow, D.A. (1994). Identity felds: Framing processes and the social construction of movement identities,(içinde): New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity, Enrique Larana, Hank Johnston ve Joseph Gusfeld (eds.),Philadelphia, PA: Temple University, pp. 185–208.
  • Johnston, H. (1995). A Methodology for Frame Analysis: From Discourse to Cognitive Shemata, (içinde): Social Movements and Culture, H. Johnston and B. Klandermans (eds), pp. 217-246, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Johnston, H. -Klandermans, B. (1995). Social Movements and Culture, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Kasapoğlu, A. (2014). Her yer Taksim her yer direniş: 13 Haziran 2013 ve artçı sarsıntıları. Yurt ve Dünya Dergisi, 7.
  • Klandermans, B. (1992). The social construction of protest and multiorganizational felds, (içinde): Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, Aldon Morris ve Carol McClurg Mueller (eds), pp. 77-103, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • McAdam, D.- McCarthy, J.D. - Zald, M.N. (1996). Comparative perspectives on socialmovements: political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • McCaffrey, D. - Keys, J. (2000).Competitive framing processes in the abortion debate: polarization-vilifcation, frame saving, and frame debunking, The Sociological Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 41-61.
  • Nelson, T. E.- Oxley, Z. M.- Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior , vol: 19, pp: 221–246.
  • Oliver, P. E. -Johnston, H. (2000). What A Good Idea! ideology and frames in social movement research, Mobilization, vol. 5, pp. 37-54.
  • Özarslan, H. (2007). Çerçeveleme yaklaşımı açısından haber çerçevelerinin izler kitle düşünceleri üzerindeki etkisi. Doktora tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi
  • Paletz, D.L- Entman, R.M. (1981). Media, Power, Politics, The Free Press, New York
  • Pan, Z.-Kosicki, G.M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication , Vol. 10, pp. 55-76.
  • Rao, H.- Morrill, C. - Zald, M. (2000). Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms, Research in Organizational Behaviour, vol. 22, pp. 239–282.
  • Reese, S. D. (2001). Prologue-Framing Public Life: A Bridging Model for Media Research, (içinde): Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and our Understanding of the Social World. Stephen Reese, Oscar Gandy ve August Grant (eds.), pp. 7-31. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Rohlinger, D. A. - Quadagno, J. (2009). Framing faith: Explaining cooperation and confict in the US conservative christian political movement, Social Movement Studies, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 341-358, Routledge.
  • Roshco, B. (1975). Newsmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ryan, C. (1991). Prime Time Activism: Media Strategies for Grassroots Organizing, Boston: South end Press.
  • Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication , vol. 49 (1), pp. 103-122.
  • Schön, D. - Rein, M. (1994). Frame Refection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies, New York: Basic Books
  • Shupe, A. (1998). Frame alignment and strategic evolution insocial movements: The Case of Sun Myung Moon’s Unifcation Church, (İçinde): Religious Mobilization and
  • Social Action , Anson Shupe ve Bronislaw Misztal (eds.), pp. 197–215, Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Snow, D.A. (2004). Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields, (içinde): The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, D.A. Snow, S.A. Soule ve H. Kriesi (eds),pp. 380- 413, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Snow, D. A. - Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization; International Social Movement Research, vol.1, pp. 197-217.
  • Snow, D. A.- Rochford E. B. Jr. - Worden S. K. - Benford R.D. (1986). Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization and Movement Participation, American Sociological Review, vol. 51(4), pp. 464 – 81.
  • Spector, M. - John I.K. (1987). Constructing Social Problems, Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Stammers, N. (1999). Social Movements and the Social Construction of Human Rights, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 21(4), pp. 980-1008, The Johns Hopkins University Press. Steinberg, M.W. (1998). Tilting the frame: Considerations on collective action framing from a discursive turn, Theory and Society, vol. 27, pp. 845-872.
  • Swart, W. (1995). The League of Nations and the Irish Question: Master frames, cycles of protest, and master frame alignment, The Sociological Quarterly, vol. 36(3), pp. 465-481.
  • Şeref, E. (2011). Bağlam içinde mesaj çerçevelemesi: 2010 anayasal değişiklikleri hakkındaki siyasal tartışmalar. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Tannen, D. (1993). What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations,(İçinde): Framing in Discourse, D. Tannen (Eds), pp. 14-56, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Triandafyllidou, A. - Anastasios, F. (1998). Sustainability and Modernity in the European Union: A Frame Theory Approach to Policy-Making, Sociological Research Online, vol. 3 (1).
  • Turner, R. H. (1969). The theme of contemporary social movements, British Journal of Sociology, vol: 20, pp. 390-405.
  • Turner, R. H.(1983). Figure and Ground in the Analysis of Social Movements, Symbolic Interaction, vol. 6, pp. 175–81.
  • Türkeş Kılıç, M. S. (2012). Siyasi parti yasaklamalarındaki farklılığı açıklamak: DTP ve BATASUNA kararlarında AB çerçevelemesi. Doktora Tezi.
  • Tversky, A. - Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice, Science, vol. 211, pp. 453-458.
  • Uysal, A. (2003). The Framing of Political Inclusion and Exclusion: Media, State, and Islamic Party Interactions in Turkey, 1995 to 1998, doktora tezi, Department of Sociology in the Graduate School Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longman.
  • Williams, R.H. - Benford, R.D. (2000). Two faces of collective action frames: A theoretical consideration. Current Perspectives in Social Theory, vol. 20, pp. 127-151.
  • Zald, M.N. (1996). Culture, ideology and strategic framing, (içinde): Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framings, D. McAdam, J.D. McCarthy ve M.N. Zald (eds), pp. 261-274, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zald, M. - McCarthy, J. (1987). Social movement industries: Competition and confict among SMOs, (içinde): Social Movements in an Organizational Society: Collected Essays, M. Zald ve J. McCarthy (Eds), pp. 161–180, Transaction Publishers.
  • Zuo, J. - Benford, R. D. (1995). Mobilization processes and the 1989 Chinese Democracy Movement, Sociological Quarterly, vol.36, pp.131–56.
APA GÜRAN M (2015). Çerçeveleme teorisi ve toplumsal hareketler. , 36 - 50.
Chicago GÜRAN MEHMET SALİH Çerçeveleme teorisi ve toplumsal hareketler. (2015): 36 - 50.
MLA GÜRAN MEHMET SALİH Çerçeveleme teorisi ve toplumsal hareketler. , 2015, ss.36 - 50.
AMA GÜRAN M Çerçeveleme teorisi ve toplumsal hareketler. . 2015; 36 - 50.
Vancouver GÜRAN M Çerçeveleme teorisi ve toplumsal hareketler. . 2015; 36 - 50.
IEEE GÜRAN M "Çerçeveleme teorisi ve toplumsal hareketler." , ss.36 - 50, 2015.
ISNAD GÜRAN, MEHMET SALİH. "Çerçeveleme teorisi ve toplumsal hareketler". (2015), 36-50.
APA GÜRAN M (2015). Çerçeveleme teorisi ve toplumsal hareketler. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 4(1), 36 - 50.
Chicago GÜRAN MEHMET SALİH Çerçeveleme teorisi ve toplumsal hareketler. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi 4, no.1 (2015): 36 - 50.
MLA GÜRAN MEHMET SALİH Çerçeveleme teorisi ve toplumsal hareketler. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, vol.4, no.1, 2015, ss.36 - 50.
AMA GÜRAN M Çerçeveleme teorisi ve toplumsal hareketler. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi. 2015; 4(1): 36 - 50.
Vancouver GÜRAN M Çerçeveleme teorisi ve toplumsal hareketler. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi. 2015; 4(1): 36 - 50.
IEEE GÜRAN M "Çerçeveleme teorisi ve toplumsal hareketler." Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 4, ss.36 - 50, 2015.
ISNAD GÜRAN, MEHMET SALİH. "Çerçeveleme teorisi ve toplumsal hareketler". Erciyes İletişim Dergisi 4/1 (2015), 36-50.