The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development

Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 73 - 85 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development

Öz:
Fabl çocuklar için hem hayvanlar hem de insan dünyasına açılan mükemmel bir pencere görevindedir. Bunun dışında, fablların, öykü anlatımıyla okunması, tartışılması, imgelenmesi ve kişileştirilmesi çokzevklidir. Fabl nedir ne değildir konusunda yazan sayısız eleştirmen ve düşünür vardır. Bunlardan biriolan John Locke sosyal konularda sorunun olduğu zamanlarda özellikle eğitimde dil öğretiminde fabl kullanımını tavsiye eder. Aynı şekilde La Fontaine de fablın eğitimsel yanını öne çıkartır. Gerçekte fabl, ahlaki ders verme amacıyla yazılmış olan ve alegorik özellik taşıyan öğütlerdir. Ahlaki gelişim kuramlarındanbirini savunan Lawrence Kohlberg sanatın ahlaki gelişmeye yardımcı olabileceğini belirtir. Ahlaki gelişimde evrensel eğilimler olduğunu gösteren deneysel deliller mevcut olduğunu ve ahlaki gelişimin öğretmeveya büyümenin sonucu olduğunu savunan fikirlere şiddetle karşı çıkan L. Kohlberg (1971), deneysel çalışmaların psikoanalitik ekollerin bulgularını çürüttüğünü de savunmaktadır: ebeveynlerin çocuklarınındürtüleriyle başa çıkma yollarıyla kişilerin sonraki davranış ve tutumları arasında bir bağlantı yoktur. Dahaçok bireyin sosyal çevresiyle olan iletişiminin sonucu olduğunu ve bireyin üstlendiği rollerin bu ahlakigelişimde rol oynadığını belirtir. L. Kohlbergin sanatın kişilere ahlak eğitimi verebileceği tezinden hareketle, bu çalışma, Aesop masallarının eleştirel düşünmeyi ve ahlaki gelişimi ne kadar etkileyebileceği üzerinedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Beşeri Bilimler

Eleştirel Düşünme ve Ahlaki Gelişimin Örtüşümü

Öz:
Fables can be excellent windows into the worlds of animals and human beings for children.Moreover, they are fun to read, discuss, envisage and personalize via storytelling. There have been manyfable theorists who have reflected on the definition of fable and its different functions. John Lockerecommended fables to teach language at a time when social concern was growing, particularly ineducation. In the same way, the fabulist La Fontaine also alluded to the instructive aspect or value offables. Fables are kinds of instruction disguised under the allegory of an action with the purpose of moralteaching. One of the best known theories of moral development is associated with Lawrence Kohlberg(1971), and it suggests how art might lead to moral development. L. Kohlberg claims that there is empiricalevidence which shows that there are universal ontogenetic trends towards the development of morality.He explicitly rejects views that moral development is the result of either teaching or maturation. He alsoargues that empirical studies have failed to confirm the findings of psychoanalytic schools; there are nocorrelations between parental modes of handling infantile drives and later behavior and attitudes. Heholds, instead, that moral development is primarily the result of the interaction between the individual andtheir social environment, where role taking is of central importance. The aim of this paper is to show howAesop s fables are used to enhance critical thinking strategies and to promote moral development.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Beşeri Bilimler
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aesop : The complete f ables. (1998). Trans. R. Temple, & O. Temple. New York: Penguin.
  • Aesop ’s f ables. (1947). Kingsport, TN: Grosset & Dunlap.
  • Aesop ’s f ables. (1967). Trans. V. S. Vernon Jones. New York: Avenel Books.
  • Aesop ’s f ables. (2003). Trans. L. Gibbs. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Aesops’ f ables. Retrieved on January 2, 2009 from http://www.pagebypagebooks.com/Aesop/Aesops_ Fables.html
  • Afflerbach, P. P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers’ main idea construction strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 31-46.
  • Alexander, P., & Judy, J. (1988). The interaction of domain specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educuational Research, 58(4), 375-404.
  • Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Education Research Journal, 14(4), 367-381.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self -eff icacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: CUP.
  • Beach, R. (1993). A Teacher’s introduction to reader-response theories. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
  • Bennett, W. (1993). The book of virtues. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Bennett, W. (1995a). The children ’s book of virtues. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Bennett, W. (1995b). The moral compass. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Billow, R. (1975). A cognitive-developmental study of metaphor comprehension. Developmental Psychology, 11, 415-423.
  • Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11, 717-726.
  • van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. Ed.
  • Gernsbacher, M. A., Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 539-588. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • van den Broek, P., Lorch, E., & Thurlow, R. (1997). Children and adults’ memory for television stories: The role of causal factors, story-grammar categories and hierarchical level. Child Development, 67(6), 3010-3028.
  • Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn f rom texts. Educational Researcher, 10, 14-21.
  • Carnine, D., Stevens, C., Clements, J., & Kameenui, E. J. (1982). Effects of facilitative questions and practice on intermediate students’ understanding of character motives. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 14, 179-190.
  • Cervone, D., & Shoda, Y. (eds.). (1999). The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability and organization. New York: Guilford.
  • Derry, S. J. (1996). Cognitive schema theory in the constructivist debate. Educational Psychology, 31(3/4), 163-174.
  • van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. A. (1983). Strategies of discourse comp rehension. New York: Academic Press.
  • Dorfman, M. H., & Brewer, W. F. (1989). Understanding the points of f ables: A developmental study (Technical Report of the Reading Research and Education Center). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
  • Dorfman, M. H., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Understanding the points of fables. Discourse Processes, 17, 105-129.
  • Edgington, W. (2002). To promote character education, use literature for children and adolescents. Social Studies, 113-116.
  • Fein, D., & Stein, G. M. (1977). Immanent punishment and reward in six- and nine-year old children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 131, 91-96.
  • Gardner, H. (1974). Metaphors and modalities: How children project polar adjectives onto diverse domains. Child Development, 45, 84-91.
  • Goldman, S. R. (1985). Inferential reasoning in and about narrative texts. Ed. A. C. Graesser, & J. B. Black. The psychology of questions, 247-276. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Goldman, S. R., Reyes, M., & Varnhagen, D. (1984). Understanding fables in first and second languages. NABE J, 8(2), 35-66. Albany.
  • Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., & van den Broek, P. (Eds.). (1999). Narrative comp rehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Gorden, W. (2005). Learning from the best: From Aesop to empowerment. Vital Speeches of the Day, 71 (6), 178-184.
  • Harris, R. J., Lee, D. J., Hensley, D. L., & Schoen, L. M. (1988). The effect of cultural script knowledge on memory for stories over time. Discourse Process, 11, 413-431.
  • Honig, W. (1987). Last chance f or our children, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Jacobs, J. (1970). The f ables of Aesop . New York: Burt Franklin.
  • Johnson, N. S. (1984). What do you do if you can’t tell the whole story? The development of summarization skills. Ed. Nelson, K. E. Children ’s Language, 4. New York: Gardner.
  • Jose, P. E. (1990). Just-world reasoning in children’s immanent justice judgments. Child Development, 61, 1024-1033.
  • Jose, P. E., & Brewer, W. F. (1984). Development of story liking: Character identification, suspense, and outcome resolution. Developmental Psychology, 20, 911-924.
  • Jose, P., D’Anna, C., & Krieg, D. B. (2005) Development of the comprehension and appreciation of fables. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(1), 5-37. Washington.
  • Kilpatrick, W. (1992). Why Johnny can ’t tell right f rom wrong. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
  • Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
  • Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Towards a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. Ed. Goslin, D.. Handbook of socialization theory and research, 347-480. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Lapsley, D. K. (1996). Moral psychology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Lehr, S. (1991). The child ’s develop ing sense of theme. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Leming, J. (1997). Research and practice in character education: A historical perspective. Ed. Molnar, A., & Rehage, K. J. The construction of children ’s character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lerer, S. (2007). Aesop, authorship, and aesthetic imagination. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 37(3), 579-594. Durham.
  • Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a j ust world: A f undamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Lickona, T. (1991). Educating f or character. New York: Bantam.
  • Lukens, R. (1982). A critical handbook of children ’s literature. IL: Scott, Foresman.
  • Mandler, J., & Johnson, N. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111-151.
  • Martial, Epigrams. (1993). IV. 86.10-12, in D. R. Shackleton Bailey. Ed. and trans., Epigrams Cambridge, Mass.: HUP.
  • Narvaez, D. (2002) Does Reading Moral Stories Build Character? Educational Psychology Review, 14(2), 155-172.
  • Narvaez, D. (2001). Individual differences that influence reading comprehension. Ed. Pressley, M., & Block, C. Reading comprehension ınstruction, 158-175. New York: Guilford.
  • Narvaez, D. (1998). The effects of moral schemas on the reconstruction of moral narratives in 8th grade and college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 13-24.
  • Narvaez, D., Bentley, J., Gleason, T., & Samuels, J. (1998). Moral theme comprehension in third grade, fifth grade and college students. Reading Psychology, 19(2), 217-241.
  • Narvaez, D., Endicott, L., & Bock, T. (in press). Who should I become? Ed. Veugelers, W., & Oser, F. The positive and negative in moral education. New York: Routledge.
  • Narvaez, D., Gleason, T., Mitchell, C., & Bentley, J. (1999). Moral theme comprehension in children. Journal of Educational Psychology. 91(3), 477-487.
  • Narvaez, D., & Rest, J. (1995). The four components of acting morally. Ed. Kurtines, W., & Gewirtz, J., Moral behavior and moral development: An introduction, 385-400. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Nash, R. J. (1997). Answering the virtuecrats: A moral conversation on character education. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Psycholinguistics and reading ability. Ed. Gernsbacher, M. A. Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 849-894. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Perry, B. E. (1959). Fable. Studium Generale, 12, 2-37.
  • Percival, P., & Haviland, J. M. (1978). Consistency and retribution in children’s immanent justice decisions. Developmental Psychology, 14, 132-136.
  • Piaget, J. (1965, 1932). The moral j udgment of the child. New York: The Free Press.
  • Piaget, J. (1974, 1926). The language and thought of the child. New York: The New American Library.
  • Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal p rotocols of reading. NJ: Erlbaum, Hillsdale,
  • Raths, L. E., M. Harmin, & S. B. Simon. (1978). Values and teaching (2nd ed.). Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.
  • Reynolds, R., & Ortony, A. (1980). Some issues in the measurement of children’s comprehension of metaphorical language. Child Development, 51, 1110-1119.
  • Richards, I. A. (1936). The philosophy of rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Tomlinson, C., & C. Lynch-Brown. (1996), Essentials of children ’s literature. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Reder, L. M., & Anderson, J. R. (1980). Acomparison of texts and their summaries: Memorial consequences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 121-134. New York.
  • Rest, J. R. (1973). The hierarchical nature of moral judgment. Journal of Personality, 41, 86-109.
  • Rest, J. R. (1979). Develop ing in j udging moral issues. Minneapolis, MN: UMP.
  • Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (1999a). A neo-Kohlbergian approach to moral judgment: An overview of defining issues test research. Educational Psychology Review, 11(4), 291-324.
  • Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (1999b). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo- Kohlbergian app roach. NJ: Erlbaum, Mahwah.
  • Rest, J., Turiel, E., & Kohlberg, L. (1969). Level of moral development as a determinant of preference and comprehension of moral judgment made by others. Journal of Personality, 37, 225-252.
  • Reynolds, R., Taylor, M., Steffensen, M., Shirey, L., & Anderson, R. (1982). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension. Reading Research Questions, 17, 353-366.
  • Rosenblatt, L. M. (1938/1983). Literature as exploration. New York: MLA.
  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. Ed. Spiro, R. J., Bruce, B. C., & Brewer, W. F. Theoretical issues in reading comp rehension, NJ: Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
  • Singer, M. (1994). Discourse inference processes. Ed. Gernsbacher, M. A. Handbook of psycholinguistics, 479-516. New York: Academic Press.
  • Steffensen, M., Joag-Dev, C., & Anderson, R. (1979). Across-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Questions, 15, 10-29.
  • Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. Ed. Freedle, R. New directions in discourse p rocessing, 4, 53-119. NJ: Ablex, Norwood.
  • Taylor, K. (1986). Summary writing by young children. Reading Research Questions, 21, 193-207.
  • Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. Ed. Higgins, E. T., Herman, C. P., & Zanna, M. P. Social cognition: The Ontario symposium, vol. 1, 89-134. NJ: Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
  • Trabasso, T., & Nickels, M. (1992). The development of goal plans in the narration of a picture story. Discourse Processes, 15, 249-275.
  • Walker, L., de Vries, B., & Bichard, S. L. (1984). The hierarchical nature of stages of moral development. Developmental Psychology, 20, 960-966.
  • Williams, J. P., Brown, L.G., Silverstein, A. K., & de Cani, J. (1994). An instructional program in comprehension of narrative themes for adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 205-221. Kansas City.
  • Winner, E. (1988). The point of words: Children ’s understanding of metaphor and irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wynne, E. A., & K. Ryan. (1997). Reclaiming our schools: Teaching character, academics, and discipline (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • Wynne, E., & Ryan, K. (1993). Reclaiming our schools. New York: Merrill.
APA ÇUBUKÇU F (2011). The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development. , 73 - 85.
Chicago ÇUBUKÇU FATMA FERYAL The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development. (2011): 73 - 85.
MLA ÇUBUKÇU FATMA FERYAL The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development. , 2011, ss.73 - 85.
AMA ÇUBUKÇU F The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development. . 2011; 73 - 85.
Vancouver ÇUBUKÇU F The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development. . 2011; 73 - 85.
IEEE ÇUBUKÇU F "The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development." , ss.73 - 85, 2011.
ISNAD ÇUBUKÇU, FATMA FERYAL. "The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development". (2011), 73-85.
APA ÇUBUKÇU F (2011). The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, 1(2), 73 - 85.
Chicago ÇUBUKÇU FATMA FERYAL The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi 1, no.2 (2011): 73 - 85.
MLA ÇUBUKÇU FATMA FERYAL The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, vol.1, no.2, 2011, ss.73 - 85.
AMA ÇUBUKÇU F The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi. 2011; 1(2): 73 - 85.
Vancouver ÇUBUKÇU F The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi. 2011; 1(2): 73 - 85.
IEEE ÇUBUKÇU F "The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development." Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, 1, ss.73 - 85, 2011.
ISNAD ÇUBUKÇU, FATMA FERYAL. "The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development". Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi 1/2 (2011), 73-85.