OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Bekir PARLAK, (Uludağ Üniversitesi, Bursa, Türkiye)
Kadir Caner DOĞAN (Gümüşhane Üniversitesi, Gümüşhane, Türkiye)
Türk İdare Dergisi
22 0
Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 480 Sayfa Aralığı: 121 - 148 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Öz:
Ombudsman, kısaca vatandaşların kamu yönetimleri karşısında şikâyetlerini alan ve bu şikâyetleri inceleyen bir kamu kurumudur. Ombudsman, dünyada öncelikle İsveçte uygulanmaya başlamıştır ve günümüzde dünyanın tüm kıtalarında yüzlerce ülkede uygulanmaktadır. Bu şekilde ombudsmanın, dünyanın farklı siyasal ve yönetsel kültürlerinde uygulama alanı bulunsa da ombudsmanın kendi bünyesinde bulunan bir takım kendine özgü özellikleri, nitelikleri, yönleri ve işlevleri bulunmaktadır. Bu makale de ombudsmanın bu özeliklerine bağlı olarak seçilmiş ülke örneklerinden hareketle ombudsmanın sözü edilen yön ve niteliklerini daha belirgin kılma amacını gütmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Kamu Yönetimi

OMBUDSMAN CONCEPT AND OMBUDSMAN PRACTICES IN SELECTED COUNTRIES: AN EVALUATION ON BASIC ORIENTATION, QUALITY AND FEATURES

Öz:
The ombudsman, in short space of complaints in the face of public administration of citizens and and is a public institution to examine these complaints. The ombudsman, firstly in the world began to be implemented in Sweden and currently being implemented in hundreds of countries around the world on all continents. In this way, the ombudsman also possible to find applications in various political and administrative culture of the world s, ombudsman has unique characteristics, qualities, aspects and functions. This article also ombudsman depending on the properties, moving from selected countries mentioned example is the direction and nature of the ombudsman seeks to make it more obvious purpose.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Kamu Yönetimi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Diğer Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abedin, N. (2006). The Ombudsman Institution and Conflict Resolution in the Contemporary Third World Societies, Journal of Third World Studies, XXlll(1), 219-236.
  • Abraham, A. (2008). The Ombudsman as Part of the UK Constitution: A Contested Role?, Parliamentary Affairs, 61(1), 206-215.
  • Allen, M. C. (2001). European Ombudsman and National Ombudsmen or Similar Bodies-Comparative Tables-. Luxembourg: European Parliament, Political Series.
  • Altuğ, Y. (2002). Kamu Denetçisi (Ombudsman). İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Yayınları.
  • Al-Wahab, İ. (1979). The Swedish Institution of Ombudsman: An Instrument of Human Rights. Stockholm: Centraltryckeriet AB.
  • Beattie, A. (2006). Officers of Parliament-the New Zealand Model, Australasian Parliamentary Review, Autumn, 21(1), 143-156.
  • Bexelius, A. (1965). The Ombudsman for Civil Affairs, İçinde, Ed. Donald C. Rowat, The Ombudsman: Citizen’s Defender (pp. 22-44), Great Britain: Allen&Unwin.
  • Bexelius, A. (1968). The Origin, Nature, and Functions of the Civil and Military Ombudsmen in Sweden, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 377, The Ombudsman or Citizen’s Defender: A Modern Institution (May), 10-19.
  • Bogason, P. (1988). “Denmark”, İçinde, Ed. Donald C. Rowat, Public Administration in Developed Democracies: A Comparative Study (pp. 133-146), Public Administration and Public Policy/32, New York: Marcel Dekker.
  • Buck, T., Kirkham, R. and Thompson, B. (2011). The Ombudsman Enterprise and Administrative Justice. England: Ashgate Publishing.
  • Darling, L. (2013). The Role of Ombudsman in Canada&the USA, 1e Congresso Internacional de Ouvidores e Ombudsman. 13e Congresso Brasileriro de Ouvidores e Ombudsman 6e Seminario Nacional Ouvidores&Ouividorias Bello Horizonte, Brazil, July 29, 2010, (erişim tarihi 12 Şubat 2013) (TARIONOmbudspersonOffice ,http://www.tarion.com/NewHomeBuyers/Ombudsperson/Documents/The%20 Role%20of%20Ombudsmen%20in%20Canada%20and%20the%20United%20 States%20%20Bello%20Horizonte%20speech.pdf).
  • Eklundh, C. (2000). The Swedish Parliamentary Ombudsman System, İçinde, Ed. Kamal Hossain vd., Human Rights Commissions and Ombudsman Offices: National Experiences throughout the World (pp. 423-446), Great Britain: Kluwer Law International, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Elcock, H. (1993). Making Bricks without Straw: The Polish Ombudsman and the Transition to Democracy, İçinde, Ed. Neil Hawke, The Ombusdman: Twenty Five Years On (pp. 51-58), Great Britain: Cavendish Publishing Limited.
  • Elcock, H. (1996). The Polish Ombudsman and the Transition to Democracy, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 45(3) (July), 684-690.
  • Fendoğlu, H. T. (2011). Kamu Denetçiliği (Ombudsmanlık). Ankara: Yetkin Yayınları.
  • Finkel, E. (2006). Defending Rights, Promoting Democracy: The Institution of Ombudsman in Poland, Russia and Bulgaria, Helmut Kohl Institute for European Studies, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, European Forum at the Hebrew University, 2006, (erişim tarihi 2 Şubat 2013) (http://www.ef.huji.ac.il/publications/finkel. pdf).
  • Fitzharris, T. L. (1973). The Desirability of a Correctional Ombudsman. Govermental Studies, A Publication of the Institute’s Ombudsman Activities Project, Institute of Governmental Ombudsman, Berkeley: University of California.
  • Folketingets Ombudsmand (2013a). The Danish Parliamentary Ombudsman, (erişim tarihi 7 Haziran 2013) (http://en.ombudsmanden.dk/).
  • Folketingets Ombudsmand (2013b). The Ombudsman Act, The Danish Ombudsman, (erişim tarihi 25 Ağustos 2013) (http://en.ombudsmanden.dk/ loven/).
  • Frahm, M. (2013). Reports on Different Jurisdictions, New Zealand: Ombudsman, İçinde, Ed. International Ombudsman Institute, Australasia and Pacific Ombudsman Institutions: Mandates, Competences and Good Practice (pp. 221- 234), Vienna: Springer-Verlag.
  • Gammeltoft-Hansen, H. (1995). Communicating with Complainants, İçinde, Ed. Hans Gammeltoft-Hansen and Flemming Axmark, The Danish Ombudsman (pp. 105-115), Copenhagen: DJOF Publishing.
  • Gannett, J. (2003). Providing Guardianship of Fundemental Rights and Essential Governmental Oversight: An Examination and Comparative Analysis of the Role of Ombudsman in Sweeden and Poland, New England Journal of International and Comparative Law, 9(2), 519-547.
  • Gellhorn, W. (1966). The Ombudsman in Denmark, Mcgill Law Journal, 12(1), 1-40.
  • Gellhorn, W. (1966a). Ombudsmen and Others: Citizen’s Protectors in Nine Countries, The United States of America: Harward University Press.
  • Gellhorn, W. (1966b). When Americans Complain: Governmental Grievance Procedures, Cambridge: Harward University Press.
  • Giddings, P. (1995). Agencies and the Ombudsman, İçinde, Ed. Philip Giddings, Parliamentary Accountability: A Study of Parliament and Executive Agencies (pp. 139-152), New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Giddings, P. (2005). The Ombudsman: Accountability and Contracts, İçinde, Ed. Gavin Drewry vd., Contracts: Performance Measurement and Accountability in the Public Sector (pp. 91-102), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Giddings, P. (2008). “The Parliamentary Ombudsman: A Classical Watchdog”, İçinde, Ed. Oonagh Gay and, Barry K. Winetrobe, Parliament’s Watchdogs: At The Crossroads (pp. 93-104), London: UK Study of Parliament Group, December.
  • Gottehrer M., Feguson M. D. and Aufrecht S. E. (2000). Ombudsman Offices in the United States, İçinde Ed. Roy Gregory and Philip Giddings, Righting Wrongs: The Ombudsman in Six Continents (pp. 355-371), International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Gotze, M. (2009a). The Danish Ombudsman-A National Watchdog With European Reservations, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, No. 28 E SI/2009, 172-193.
  • Gotze, M. (2009b). The Danish Ombudsman-Citizens, Parliament and EU, The Annual Conference of the European Group of Public Administration, Permanent Study Group X (Law and Public Administration), Wednesday 2 September 2009, pp. 1-13, (erişim tarihi 2 Mart 2013) (http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/17119199/PDF).
  • Gotze, M. (2010). The Danish Ombudsman-A National Watchdog With Selected Preferences, Utrecht Law Review, 6(1) (January), 33-50.
  • Gregory, R. and Giddings P. (2000a). The Ombudsman Institution: Growth and Development, İçinde, Ed. Roy Gregory and Philip Giddings, Righting Wrongs: The Ombudsman in Six Continents (pp. 1-20). International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Gregory, R. and Giddings P. (2000b). The United Kingdom Parliamentary Ombudsman Scheme, İçinde, Ed. Roy Gregory and Philip Giddings, Righting Wrongs: The Ombudsman in Six Continents (21-45), International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Gregory, R. and Hutchesson P. (1975). The Parliamentary Ombudsman: A Study in the Control of Administration Action. Great Britain: Royal Institute of Public Administration, George Allen&Unwin.
  • Gregory, R. and Pearson J. (1993). “The Parliamentary Ombudsman after Twenty-five Years: Problems and Solutions”, İçinde, Ed. Neil Hawke, The Ombudsman: Twenty Five Years On (pp. 1-35), Great Britain: Cavendish Publishing Limited.
  • Gwyn, W. B. (1968). Transfferring the Ombudsman, İçinde, Ed. Stanley V. Anderson, Ombudsmen For American Government? (pp. 37-69), The American Assembly, Prentice-Hal, Inc., United States of America: Englewood Cliffs, N. J.
  • Gwyn, W. B. (1983). “The Conduct of Ombudsman Investigations of Complaints”, İçinde, Ed. Gerald E. Caiden, International Handbook of the Ombudsman: Evolution and Present Function (pp. 81-90), Vol. I, London: Greenwood Press.
  • Hill, L. B. (1974). Institutionalization, the Ombudsman, and Bureaucracy, The American Political Science Review, 68(3) (Sep.), 1075-1085.
  • Hill, L. B. (1976). The Model Ombudsman: Institutionalizing New Zealand’s Democratic Experiment. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Holm, N. E. (1986). The Danish Ombudsman and the European Convertion on Human Rights. Stockholm Institute for Scandianvian Law 1957-2009, Scandinavian Studies in Law, Almqvist&Wiksell.
  • Holmgren, K. (1988). “Sweeden”, İçinde, Ed. Donald C. Rowat, Public Administration in Developed Democracies: A Comparative Study (147-156), Public Administration and Public Policy/32, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
  • Howard, C. (2011). The Organizational Ombudsman: Origins, Roles, and Operations-A Legal Guide. USA: American Bar Association.
  • Jagerskiöld, S. (1961). The Swedish Ombudsman, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 109(8) (Jun.), 1077-1099.
  • Kopric, Ivan, Musa A. and Novak G. L. (2011). Good Administration as a Ticket to the European Administrative Space, Zbornik PFZ, 5(61), 1515-1560.
  • Lane, J. E. (2000). The Ombudsman in Denmark and Norway, İçinde, Ed. Roy Gregory and Philip Giddings, Righting Wrongs: The Ombudsman in Six Continents (pp. 143-153), International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Larsen, K. (1995). The Parliamnetary Ombudsman, İçinde, Ed. Hans Gammeltoft-Hansen and Flemming Axmark, The Danish Ombudsman (pp. 39- 77), Copenhagen: DJOF Publishing.
  • Letowska, E. (1990). The Polish Ombudsman (The Commissioner for The Protection of Civil Rights), The International and Comparative Law Quaterly, 39(1) (Jan.), 206-217.
  • Letowska, E. (1995). The Ombudsman and Basic Rights, İçinde, Ed. Stephen Holmes, East European Constitutional Review (pp. 63-65), Washington, D.C.: The National Council for Soviet and East European Research, Title VII Program, Winter.
  • Liu, E. (2000). Systems of Government in Some Foreign Countries: France. Hong Kong: Research and Library Services Division Legislative Council Secretariat, 12 April, p.20.
  • Lundvik, U. (1983a). New Zealand, İçinde, Ed. Gerald E. Caiden, International Handbook of the Ombudsman: Country Surveys (pp. 135-146), Vol. II, London: Greenwood Press.
  • Lundvik, U. (1983b). Sweden, İçinde, Ed. Gerald E. Caiden, International Handbook of the Ombudsman: Country Surveys (pp. 179-185), Vol. II, United State of America: Greenwood Press.
  • Magnette, P. (2005). The European Ombudsman: Protecting Citizens’ Rights and Strengthening Parliamentary Scrutiny, İçinde, Ed. The European Ombudsman and the Authors, The European Ombudsman: Origins, Establishment, Evolution (pp. 107-125), Belgium: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Marias, E. (2013). The European Ombudsman, European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht, 1994, (erişim tarihi 23 Ağustos 2013) ( http://www.eipa.eu/files/repository/eipascope/Scop94_1.pdf).
  • Marshall, G. (1968). The British Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 377, The Ombudsman or Citizen’s Defender: A Modern Institution (May), 87-96.
  • Menier, J. and Desfeuilles H. (1983). France, İçinde, Ed. Gerald E. Caiden, International Handbook of the Ombudsman: Country Surveys (pp. 105-112), Vol. II, United State of America: Greenwood Press.
  • Miewald, R. and Comer J. C. (1983). The Nebraska Ombudsman: An American Pionerr, İçinde, Ed. Gerald E. Caiden, International Handbook of the Ombudsman: Country Surveys( pp. 249-256), Vol. II, United State of America: Greenwood Press.
  • Mifsud, I. and Plaidy C. (2004). The Roles of Administrative Courts and Ombudsmen in France and Malta: A Review of Two Contrasting Systems, İçinde, Ed. Linda C. Reif, The International Ombudsman Yearbook (pp. 28-84), The International Ombudsman Institute, Vol: 8, Boston: Martinus Nihjhoff Publishers.
  • Modeen, T. (2000). The Sweedish and Finnish Parliamentary Ombudsmen, İçind, Ed. Roy Gregory and Philip Giddings, Righting Wrongs: The Ombudsman in Six Continents (pp. 315-322), International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • National Democratic Institute (NDI) (2005). The Role and Effectiveness of the Ombudsman Institution, Washington, DC.: National Democratic Institute For International Affairs.
  • Nielsen, L. N. (1983). Denmark, İçinde, Ed. Gerald E. Caiden, International Handbook of the Ombudsman: Country Surveys (pp. 73-79), Vol. II, United State of America: Greenwood Press.
  • Northey, J. F. (1965). New Zealand’s Parliamentary Commissioner, İçinde, Ed. Donald C. Rowat, The Ombudsman: Citizen’s Defender (pp. 127-143), Great Britain: Allen&Unwin.
  • Obaidullah, A. T. M. (2001). Democracy and Good Governance: The Role of Ombudsman, Bangladesh Institute of Parliammentary Studies, Dhaka, p.80, (erişim tarihi 10 Ekim 2012) (http://www.undp.org.bd/projects/prodocs/SPD/ Obaidullah.pdf).
  • Orfield, L. B. (1966). The Scandinavian Ombudsman, Administrative Law Review, 19(1), (November), 7-74.
  • Oytan, M. (1975). Ombudsman Eli İle İdarenin Denetimi Konusunda Kıyaslamalı Bir İnceleme, Danıştay Dergisi, 18-19, 193-214.
  • Pak-Kwan, C. (2006). The Jurisdiction of Ombudsman Systems in Selected Places, Hong Kong: Research and Library Services Division Legislative Council Secretariat, 22 June.
  • Pauti, M. (2000). The Ombudsman in France, İçinde, Ed. Roy Gregory and Philip Giddings, Righting Wrongs: The Ombudsman in Six Continents (pp. 175-188), International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Peters, A. (2005). The European Ombudsman and The European Constitution, Common Market Law Review, No. 42, 697-743.
  • Pino, A. M. M. (2011). The European Ombudsman in the Framework of the European Union, Revista Chilena de Derecho, 38(3), 421-455.
  • Poole, K. P. (1983). United Kingdom, İçinde, Ed. Gerald E. Caiden, International Handbook of the Ombudsman: Country Surveys (pp. 187-208), Vol. II, United State of America: Greenwood Press.
  • Pop, V. G. (1997). The Ombudsman of the European Union, A Dissertation Submitted for the Degree of LL.M at the University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, 1997, (10 Mart 2013) (http://www.academia.edu/10792/THE_OMBUDSMAN_OF_ THE_EUROPEAN_UNION).
  • Powles, S. G. (1982). The New Zealand Ombudsman-the early days, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, No. 207, 207-216.
  • Reif, L. C. (2004). The Ombudsman, Good Governance and the International Human Rights Systems, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Rosenthal, A. H. (1964). The Ombudsman-Swedish “Grievance Man, Public Administration Review, 24(4) (Dec.), 226-230.
  • Rowat, D. C. (1965). Introduction, İçinde, Ed. Donald C. Rowat, The Ombudsman: Citizen’s Defender (pp. 7-10), Great Britain: Allen&Unwin.
  • Rowat, D. C. (1968). The Spread of the Ombudsman Idea, İçinde, Ed. Stanley V. Anderson, Ombudsmen For American Government? (pp. 7-36), The American Assembly, Prentice-Hal, Inc., The United States of America: Englewood Cliffs, N. J.
  • Rowat, D. C. (1973). The Ombudsman Plan: Essays on the Worldwide Spread of an Idea. The Carleton Library No. 67, Canada: Canadian Publishers, McClelland and Stewart Limited.
  • Rowat, D. C. (1984). The Ombudsman in France, Canadian Public Administration, 27(1), March, 66-86.
  • Rowat, D. C. (1997). A Worldwide Survey of Ombudsmen, Occasional Paper No. 60, International Ombudsman Institute, Edmonton, March 1997, (erişim tarihi 12 Temmuz 2013) (http://www.theioi.org/publications/occasional-papers-1979-2008).
  • Sanford, G. (2002). Democratic Government in Poland: Constitutional Politics since 1989. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Sawer, G. (1964). Ombudsmen. Australia: Melbourne University Press.
  • Sawer, G. (1968). The Ombudsman and Related Institutions in Australia and New Zealand, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 377, The Ombudsman or Citizen’s Defender: A Modern Institution (May), 62-72.
  • Seneviratne, M. (1994). Ombudsmen in the Public Sector. USA: Open University Press, Law and Political Change.
  • Seneviratne, M. (2000). The European Ombudsman-The First Term, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 3(22), 329-337.
  • Seneviratne, M. (2002). Ombudsmen: Public Services and Administrative Justice, UK: Butterworths, Law in Context.
  • Söderman, J. (2013). How To Be A Good Ombudsman, IOI, Canada, (erişim tarihi 12 Mart 2013) (http://www.theioi.org/downloads/a38c1/IOI%20Canada_ Occasional%20paper_Jacob%20S%C3%B6derman_How%20to%20be%20a%20 Good%20Ombudsman.pdf). Stacey, F. (1971). The British Ombudsman. Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
  • Stacey, F. (1978). Ombudsmen Compared. Oxford, Great Britain: Clarendon Press.
  • Stern, J. (2008). Sweden, Ed. Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, European Ombudsman-Institutions: A Comparative Legal Analysis Regarding the Multifaceted Realisation of an Idea (pp. 409-416), Austuria: Springer-Verlag/Wien.
  • The Ombudsman Act 1975. No. 9, Article 13, New Zealand.
  • Thery, J. F. (1998). Mediateur, İçinde, çev. Cevdet Atay, Ed. İbrahim Ö. Kaboğlu, Bağımsız İdari Otoriteler (ss. 40-46), İstanbul: Alkım Yayınları.
  • Toxey, W. W. (1969). The Ombudsman in the Common Law System, William and Mary Law Review, 11(1), 138-150.
  • Weeks, K. M. (1978). Ombudsmen Around the World: A Comparative Chart, California: Institute of Governmental Studies.
  • Wheare, K. C. (1973). Maladministration and Its Remedies, The Hamlyn Lectures Twenty-fifth Series, London: Stevens&Sons.
  • Witalec, A. (2003), The Polish Path to Attaining the International Standard of Respect for and Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms, Association of Secret-General of Parliament, Geneva Meeting, 1st-3 October 2003, p.4, (11 Ekim 2013) (http://www.asgp.co/sites/default/files/documents// YQFHXIRTKNNWKQJRJXFYOGVBOZQSPQ.pdf).
  • Zagoria, S. (1988). The Ombudsmen: How Good Governments Handle Citizens’ Grievances. Washington, DC.: Seven Locks Press.
  • Zubik, M. (2008). The Commissioner for Civil Rights Protection of the Republic of Poland: 20 from 200 Years of the Ombudsman’s Existence in the World, Revista Jurídica-CCJ/FURB, 12(24), jul./dez., 3-13.
APA Parlak B, DOĞAN K (2015). OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. , 121 - 148.
Chicago Parlak Bekir,DOĞAN Kadir Caner OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. (2015): 121 - 148.
MLA Parlak Bekir,DOĞAN Kadir Caner OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. , 2015, ss.121 - 148.
AMA Parlak B,DOĞAN K OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. . 2015; 121 - 148.
Vancouver Parlak B,DOĞAN K OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. . 2015; 121 - 148.
IEEE Parlak B,DOĞAN K "OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME." , ss.121 - 148, 2015.
ISNAD Parlak, Bekir - DOĞAN, Kadir Caner. "OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME". (2015), 121-148.
APA Parlak B, DOĞAN K (2015). OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Türk İdare Dergisi, 0(480), 121 - 148.
Chicago Parlak Bekir,DOĞAN Kadir Caner OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Türk İdare Dergisi 0, no.480 (2015): 121 - 148.
MLA Parlak Bekir,DOĞAN Kadir Caner OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Türk İdare Dergisi, vol.0, no.480, 2015, ss.121 - 148.
AMA Parlak B,DOĞAN K OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Türk İdare Dergisi. 2015; 0(480): 121 - 148.
Vancouver Parlak B,DOĞAN K OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Türk İdare Dergisi. 2015; 0(480): 121 - 148.
IEEE Parlak B,DOĞAN K "OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME." Türk İdare Dergisi, 0, ss.121 - 148, 2015.
ISNAD Parlak, Bekir - DOĞAN, Kadir Caner. "OMBUDSMAN KAVRAMI VE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE OMBUDSMANLIK UYGULAMALARI: TEMEL YÖN, NİTELİK VE ÖZELLİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME". Türk İdare Dergisi 480 (2015), 121-148.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 22:44

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları