Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 63 - 73 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Ruminant Beslemede NDF ve ADF'nin Önemi

Öz:
Hayvanbeslemedekullanılankabayemleryapısalolan (selüloz,lignin,hemiselüloz)veolmayankarbonhidratlardan (organik asitler, şekerler) oluşur. Monogastrik hayvanlar kaba yemlerdeki bu yapısal karbonhidratları sindiremezken, ruminatlarselülotikmikroorganizmalarsayesindebuyapısalkarbonhidratlarısindirebilmektedirler.Kabayemlerdebulunan yapısal karbonhidratlar NDF (selüloz, hemiselüloz ve lignin) ve ADF (selüloz, hemiselüloz) olarak iki gruba ayrılır. Yapısal karbonhidratların hayvan beslemede kullanımı, ruminatlarda yemden yaralanmanın artırılması ve rumen sağlığının korunması için önemlidir.Nitekim,NDF ve ADF rumintlarda tükürük salgısını teşvikederek rumen pHsının uygun sınırlar içindekalmasınısağlarveböylecemikrobiyalsindirimdegörevalanselülotikveamilolitikbakterilerileprotozoavemayalar içinuygunortamsağlamışolur.RuminatlarınfizyolojikdönemlerinegörerasyonilealmasıgerekenNDFveADFmiktarları, baştaasidozis,laminitis,rumenparaketozisigibidahabirçokçeşitlimetabolikhastalıklarınönlenmesiaçısındanönemlidir. Bu derlemede tüm bu nedenlerden dolayı oluşabilecekekonomikkayıpların önünegeçmekve hayvanların sağlıklı şekilde beslenmesinisağlamakiçinhayvanbeslemedeyapısalkarbonhidratlarınönemianlatılmayaçalışılmıştır
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Veterinerlik

The Importance of NDF and ADF in Ruminant Nutrition

Öz:
Roughages used in animal nutrition consists of structural (cellulose, lignin and hemicellulose) non- structural(organic acids, sugars) carbohydrates. While monogastric animals cannot digest the structural carbohydrates in forages,ruminants can digested the structural carbohydrates becoming of cellulotic microorganisms in their reticulo- rumens.Structural carbohydrates in the roughage feeds are divided into two groups as NDF (cellulose, hemiselulose, lignin) and ADF(cellulose, hemicellulose). The use of structural carbohydrates in animal nutrition is important for the protection rumenhealth and improving of feed conversion ratio in ruminants. In fact, NDF and ADF in ruminants couse the remaining ofrumen pH within the appropriate limits by promoting of the increase saliva and provide appropriate environment forcellulotic and amylolytic bacterias involved in microbial digestion and protozoa and yeast. The amount of NDF and ADF inration or diet is important for some physiologic periods of ruminants in terms of preventing various the metabolic diseasessuch as acidosis, laminitis and rumen parakeratosis. The aim of this review is to summarize the importance of structuralcarbohydrates such as NDF and ADF in animal nutrition and to avoideconomic losses resulting from all these reasons andto ensure a healthy nutrition of animals.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Veterinerlik
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • A kerholm M., Salmén L., 2003. The oriented structure of lignin and its viscoelastic properties studied by static and dynamic FT- IR spectroscopy. Holzforschung, 57, 459- 465.
  • Anonim, 2011a. Quality assurance for animal feed analysis laboratories. http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/home/documen ts/Network_Quality- control.pdf [ Erişim:20.05.2013] .
  • Anonim, 2011b. Nutritional requirements of dairy cattle, http://www.merckmanuals.com/vet/ management_and_nutrition/nutrition_cattle/nu tritional_requirements_of_dairy_cattle.html [ Erişim: 29.04.2013] .
  • Anonim, 2013. Carbohydrate testing of plants and feeds. http://www.hilllaboratories.com/filefileid /19962 [ Erişim: 20.05.2013] .
  • Argaman NA., Eshel O., Moallem U., Lehrer H., Uni Z., Arieli A., 2012. Effects of dietary carbohydrates on rumen epithelial metabolism of nonlactating heifers. J. Dairy Sci., 95, 3977– 3986.
  • Austin AT., Ballaré CL., 2010. Dual role of lignin in plant litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Environmental Sci., 107, 4618- 4622.
  • Avellaneda JH., Rodrıguez JMP., Gonzalez SS., Barcena R., Hernandez A., Cobos M., Hernandez H., Montanez O., 2009. Effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on ruminal fermentation and digestion of Guinea grass hay. Anim. Feed Sci. and Tech., 149, 70– 77.
  • Baldwin RL., Allison MJ., 1983. Rumen metabolism. J. Anim. Sci., 57, 461- 477.
  • Blanch M., Calsamiglia S., DiLorenzo N., DiCostanzo A., Muetzel S., Wallace R.J, 2009. Physiological changes in rumen fermentation during acidosis induction and its control using a multivalent polyclonal antibody preparation in heifers. J. Anim. Sci., 87, 1722– 1730.
  • Calsamiglia S., Cardozo PW., Ferret A., Bach A., 2008. Changes in rumen microbial fermentation are due to a combined effect of type of diet and ph.J. Anim. Sci., 86, 702- 711.
  • Campbell CP., Marshall SA., Mandell IB., Wilton WJ., 1992. Effects of source of dietary neutral detergent fiber on chewing behavior in beef cattle fed pelleted concentrates with or without supplemental roughage. J. Anim Sci., 70, 894-903.
  • Craninx M., Fievez V., Vlaeminck B., Baet B., 2008. Artificial neural network models of the rumen fermentation pattern in dairy cattle. Comput. Electron. Agr., 60, 226– 238.
  • Egues I., Alriols MG., Herseczki Z., Marton G., Labidi J., 2010. Hemicelluloses obtaining from rapeseed cake residue generated in the biodiesel production process. J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 16, 293–298.
  • Ferreira G., Mertens DR., 2007. Measuring detergent fibre and insoluble protein in corn silage using crucibles or filter bags. Anim. Feed. Sci. Tech., 133, 335– 340.
  • Guedes CM., Goncalves D., Rodrigues MAM., Silva AD., 2008. Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on ruminal fermentation and fibre degradation of maize silages in cows. Anim. Feed. Sci. Tech., 145, 27– 40.
  • Hansey NC., Lorenz JA., DeLeon N., 2010. Cell wall composition and ruminant digestibility of various maize tissues across development. Bioenerg. Res., 3, 28– 37.
  • Ishler V., Heinrichs J., Varga G., 1996. From Feed to Milk: Understanding Rumen Function. 1 th ed., The Pennsylvania State University Publ., USA. Ishler V., Varga G., 2001. Carbohydrate Nutrition for Lactating Dairy Cattle. 1th ed., t he Pennsylvania State University Publ., USA.
  • Jalali AR., Norgaard P., Weisbjerg MR., Nielsen MO., 2012. Effect of forage quality on intake, chewing activity, faecal particle size distribution, and digestibility of neutral detergent fibre in sheep, goats, and llamas. Small Rum. Res., 103, 143–151.
  • Jones L., Ennos AR., Turner SR., 2001. Cloning and characterization of irregular xylem4 (irx4): a severely lignin- deficient mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant J., 26, 205- 216.
  • Jung HG., Casler MD., 2006. Maize stem tissues: impact of development on cell wall degradability. Crop. Sci., 46, 1801– 1809.
  • Kaur A., Kim JR., Michie L., Dinsdale RM., Guwy AJ.,Premier CG., 2013. Microbial fuel cell type biosensor for specific volatile fatty acids using acclimated bacterial communities. Biosen. Bioelectron., 47, 50– 55.
  • Kendall C., Leonardi C., Hoffman PC., Combs DK., 2008. Intake and milk production of cows fed diets that differed in dietary neutral detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber digestibility. J. Dairy Sci., 92, 313– 323.
  • Khafipour E., Li S., Plaizier JC., Krause DO., 2009. Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis. Appl. Environ. Microb., 75, 7115– 7124.
  • Lauper M., Lechner I., Barboza PS., Collins WB., Hummel J., Codron D., Clauss M., 2013. Rumination of different- sized particles in muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) and moose (Alces alces) on grass and browse diets, and implications for rumination in different ruminant feeding types. Mamm. Biol., 78, 142– 152.
  • Lean JI., Annison F., Bramley E., Browning G., 2007. Ruminal Acidosis Understandings, Prevention and Treatment. A Review For Veterinarians and Nutritional Professionals by the Reference Advisory Group on Fermentative Acidosis of Ruminants (RAGFAR). 1th ed., Australian Veterinary Association Publ., Australian
  • Lettat A., Nozière P., Silberberg M., Morgavi DP., Berger C., Martin C., 2010. Experimental feed induction of ruminal lactic, propionic, or butyric acidosis in sheep. J. Anim. Sci., 88, 3041– 3046.
  • Li RW., Wu S., Baldwin RL., Li W., Li C., 2012. Perturbation dynamics of the rumen microbiota in response to exogenous butyrate. Plos One, 7, e29392.
  • Lynd LR., Weimer PJ., Zyl WH., PretoriusI S., 2002. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol., 66, 506–577.
  • Mendu V., Griffiths JS., Persson S., Stork J., Downie AB., Voiniciuc C., Haughn GW., DeBolt S., 2011. Subfunctionalization of cellulose synthases in seed coat epidermal cells mediates secondary radial wall synthesis and mucilage attachment. Plant Physiol., 157, 441– 453.
  • Mertens DR., 1987. Predicting intake and digestibility using mathematical models of ruminal function. J. Anim. Sci., 64, 1548- 1558.
  • McDonald P., Edwards RA., Greenhalgh JFD., Morgan CA., Sinclair LA., Wilkinson RG., 2010. Animal Nutrition, 7th ed., Pearson, Cambridge.
  • Moon YH., Lee SC., Lee SS., 2002. Chewing activities of selected roughages and concentrates by dairy steers. Asian- Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 15, 968- 973.
  • Naser M., Bayaz A., Ramin S., Alireza A., Abolfazı A., Mehdi M., 2011. Determining nutritive value of soybean straw for ruminants using nylon bags technique. Pak. J. Nutr., 10, 838- 841.
  • Oba M., Allen MS., 1999. Evaluation of the i mportance of the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber from forage: effects on dry matter intake and milk yield of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 82, 589– 596.
  • Özen N., Kirkpinar F., Özdoğan M., Ertürk MM., Yurtman İY., 2005. Hayvan besleme. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği VI. Teknik Kongresi, 3- 7 Ocak Ankara, 753- 771.
  • Phakachoed N., Lounglawan P., Suksombat W., 2012. Effects of xylanase supplementation on ruminal digestibility in fistulated non- lactating dairy cows fed rice straw. Livestock Sci., 149, 104–108.
  • Pilajun R., Wanapat M., Wachirapakorn C., 2010. Effect of coconut oiland sunflower oil ratio on ruminal fermantation Rumen microorganisms n- balance and digestibility in cattle. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 9, 1868- 1874.
  • Rencoret J., Gutierrez A., Nieto L., Barbero J., Faulds CB., Kim H., Ralph J., Martınez AT., Delrio JC., 2011. Lignin composition and structure in young versus adult eucalyptus globulus plants. Plant Physiol., 155, 667– 682.
  • Saçaklı P., Köksal BH., Tuncer ŞD., 2007. Süt ineklerinin beslenmesinde karbonhidratlar. Yem- magazin, 48, 43- 48.
  • Saki AA., Matin HRH., Tabatabai MM., Zamani P., Harsini RN., 2010. Microflora population, intestinal condition and performance of broilers in response to various rates of pectin and cellulose in the diet. Arch. Geflügelk., 74, 183–188.
  • Sridhar M., Senani S., 2011. Lignin in lignocellulosics - a boon or a bane for ruminants. Everyman’s Science, 66, 227- 232.
  • Sun J., Tian C., Diamond S., Glass NL., 2012. Deciphering transcriptional regulatory mechanisms associated with hemicellulose degradation in neurospora crassa. Eukaryotic Cell, 11, 482- 493.
  • Şehu A., Yalçın S., Önal AG., Koçak D., 1998. Kaba yemlerin bazı özelliklerinden yararlanarak kuzularda kuru madde tüketimi ve canlı ağırlık artışının belirlenmesi. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 22, 475– 483.
  • Ünay E., Yaman S., Karakaş V., 2008. Rumi nantlarda selülozun si ndi r i m i. Lalahan Hay. Araş. Enst. Dergisi, 48, 93- 99.
  • Van Soest PJ., Robertson JB., Lewis BA., 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74, 3583- 3597.
  • Várnai A., Siikaaho M., Viikari L., 2010. Restriction of the enzymatic hydrolysis of steam- pretreated spruce by lignin and hemicellulose. Enzyme Microb. Tech., 46, 185– 193.
  • Weng JK., Li X., Stout J., Chapple C., 2008. Independent origins of syringyl lignin in vascular plants. Plant Biol., 105, 7887- 7892.
  • Wolfrum EF., Lorenz AJ., DeLeon N., 2009. Correlating detergent fiber analysis and dietary fiber analysis data for corn stover collected by NIRS. Cellulose, 16, 577- 585.
  • Yang WZ., Beauchemin KA., 2006. Effects of physically effective fiber on chewing activity and ruminal ph of dairy cows fed diets based on barley silage. J. Dairy Sci., 89, 217– 228.
  • Yang WZ., Beauchemin KA., 2007. Altering physically effective fiber ıntake through forage proportion and particle length: chewing and ruminal ph. J. Dairy Sci., 90, 2826– 2838.
  • Yang WZ., Beauchemin KA., 2009. Increasing physically effective fiber content of dairy cow diets through forage proportion versus forage chop length: chewing and ruminal Ph. J. Dairy Sci., 92, 1603– 1615.
  • Yavuz M., 2005. Deterjan lif sistemi. G. O. Ü. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 22, 93- 96.
  • Zebelli Q., Dijkstra J., Tafaj M., Steingass H., Ametaj BN., Drochner W., 2008. Modeling the adequacy of dietary fibre in dairy cows based on the responses of ruminal pH and milk fat production to composition of the diet. J. Dairy Sci., 91, 2046- 2066.
  • Zhao XG., Wang M., Tan ZL., Tang SX., Sun ZH., Zhou CS., Han XF., 2009. Effects of rice straw particle size on chewing activity, feed intake, rumen fermentation and digestion in goats, Asian- Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 22, 1256– 1266.
  • Zhao XH., Zhang T., Xu M., Yao JH., 2011. Effects of physically effective fiber on chewing activity, ruminal fermentation, and digestibility in goats. J. Anim. Sci., 89, 501- 509.
APA TEKCE E, GÜL M (2014). Ruminant Beslemede NDF ve ADF'nin Önemi. , 63 - 73.
Chicago TEKCE EMRE,GÜL MEHMET Ruminant Beslemede NDF ve ADF'nin Önemi. (2014): 63 - 73.
MLA TEKCE EMRE,GÜL MEHMET Ruminant Beslemede NDF ve ADF'nin Önemi. , 2014, ss.63 - 73.
AMA TEKCE E,GÜL M Ruminant Beslemede NDF ve ADF'nin Önemi. . 2014; 63 - 73.
Vancouver TEKCE E,GÜL M Ruminant Beslemede NDF ve ADF'nin Önemi. . 2014; 63 - 73.
IEEE TEKCE E,GÜL M "Ruminant Beslemede NDF ve ADF'nin Önemi." , ss.63 - 73, 2014.
ISNAD TEKCE, EMRE - GÜL, MEHMET. "Ruminant Beslemede NDF ve ADF'nin Önemi". (2014), 63-73.
APA TEKCE E, GÜL M (2014). Ruminant Beslemede NDF ve ADF'nin Önemi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 63 - 73.
Chicago TEKCE EMRE,GÜL MEHMET Ruminant Beslemede NDF ve ADF'nin Önemi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi 9, no.1 (2014): 63 - 73.
MLA TEKCE EMRE,GÜL MEHMET Ruminant Beslemede NDF ve ADF'nin Önemi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.9, no.1, 2014, ss.63 - 73.
AMA TEKCE E,GÜL M Ruminant Beslemede NDF ve ADF'nin Önemi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi. 2014; 9(1): 63 - 73.
Vancouver TEKCE E,GÜL M Ruminant Beslemede NDF ve ADF'nin Önemi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi. 2014; 9(1): 63 - 73.
IEEE TEKCE E,GÜL M "Ruminant Beslemede NDF ve ADF'nin Önemi." Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi, 9, ss.63 - 73, 2014.
ISNAD TEKCE, EMRE - GÜL, MEHMET. "Ruminant Beslemede NDF ve ADF'nin Önemi". Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi 9/1 (2014), 63-73.