A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention

Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 6 Sayfa Aralığı: 2057 - 2086 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention

Öz:
The purpose of this study is to calculate the effect size, by running a meta-analysis, of the experimental studies carried out in Turkey between 2004 and 2014 that investigate the effect of learning styles on academic achievement, attitude, retention, and to define whether the academic achievement shows a significant difference in terms of learning styles model, experimental design and course type. For this purpose, a metaanalytical review method was employed to combine the outcome of the independent experimental studies. The studies included in this review were collected from CoHE National Thesis Archive (2015), ULAKBIM (2015), Google Academic (2015), ERIC (2015) and EBSCO (2015) databases. As a result of the searching process, 402 studies were assessed according to the inclusion criteria and 30 experimental studies were included in this study. Cohen's d coefficient was calculated for the effect size in this study. Because there was a high amount of heterogeneity (Q > x2, p < .05) among the effect sizes of the studies, the common effect size was calculated according to the random effect model. As a result of meta-analysis, it was determined that the instructional designs based on the learning styles model had a large effect on the academic achievement (d = 1.029), attitude (d = 1.113) and retention (d = 1.290). Moreover, the academic achievement did not show any significant difference according to learning style model, course type and experimental design.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • (The studies with asterisk indicate that the studies are included in this review.)
  • Alşan, E. U. (2009). Temel kimya laboratuvarı dersinde öğretmen adaylarının başarılarına öğrenme stili tercihlerinin etkisi [The effect of learning style preferences on pre-service teachers' performance in general chemistry laboratory course]. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 3(1), 117-133.
  • Altun, A., & Cakan, M. (2006). Undergraduate students' academic achievement, field dependent/independent cognitive styles and attitude toward computers. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 289-297.
  • *Aktaş, İ., & Bilgin, İ. (2012). 4MAT modelinin madde konusunda uygulanmasının ilköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin öğrenme stillerine etkisinin incelenmesi [The effect of the implementation of 4-Mat Model in the subject of matter for 7th grade student' learning styles]. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(1), 43-63.
  • *Ardıç, E. Ö. (2013). 8. Sınıf geometrik cisimler konusunun öğretiminde 4MAT öğretim modelinin etkisi [The effect of 4MAT Instruction Model on teaching geometrical objects topic of the 8th grade]. (Master's thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Arı, E., & Bayram, H. (2011). Yapılandırmacı yaklaşım ve öğrenme stillerinin laboratuar uygulamalarında başarı ve bilimsel süreç becerileri üzerine etkisi [The influence of constructivist approach and learning styles onachievement and science process skills in the laboratory]. İlköğretim Online, 10(1), 311-324.
  • Ariffin, I., Solemon, B., Din, M., & Anwar, R. (2014). Learning style and course performance: An emprical study of unite it students. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 4(2), 208-216.
  • *Aslan, A. (2012). Öğrenme stillerine uygun sanal öğrenme çevrelerinin öğrenci başarısına ve görüşlerine etkisi [Effect of virtual learning environments, appropriate with learning styles, on student success and opinions] (Master's thesis, Fırat University, Elazığ, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Aşkar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (1993). Kolb Öğrenme Sitili Envanteri [Kolb Learning Style Inventory]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 87, 37-47.
  • Ateş, S., & Çataloğlu, E. (2007). The effects of students' cognitive styles on conceptual understandings and problem-solving skills in introductory mechanics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(2), 167-178.
  • *Aydıntan, S., Şahin, H., & Uysal, F. (2012). Kesirler konusunun öğretiminde 4MAT Öğrenme Stili Modelinin akademik başarı ve kalıcılığa etkisi [The effect of 4MAT Learning Style Model on academic achievement and permanence while teaching "fractions"]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(23), 408-427.
  • *Babacan, E., & Gökbudak, Z. S. (2011). Algısal öğrenme stillerine dayalı öğretim etkinliklerinin başlangıç piyano eğitiminde öğrencilerin tutum ve performanslarına etkisi [The effect of teaching activities based on perceptual learning styles on attitudes and performance]. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 6(1), 67-92.
  • Bahar, H. H., Özen, Y., & Gülaçtı, F. (2009). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin cinsiyet ve branşa göre akademik başarı durumları ile öğrenme stillerinin incelenmesi [An investigation on academic achievement and learning styles as to branches and gender from faculty of education student]. Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 42(1), 69-86.
  • *Balcı, Ö. (2013). Öğrenme stillerine dayalı etkinliklerin İngilizce dersinde öğrencilerin okuduğunu anlama becerilerine ve öz yeterlilik algılarına etkisi [The effect of the activities based on learning style on students' reading comprehension skills and self-efficacy beliefs] (Doctoral dissertation, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • *Baş, G., & Beyhan, Ö. (2013). Effects of learning styles based instruction on academic achievement, retention level and attitudes towards English course. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 46(2), 133-158.
  • BECTA. (2005). Learning styles-an introduction to the research literature. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/14118/1/learning_styles.pdf
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • Borenstein, M. (2011, December 19). Comprehensive meta-analysis subgroups [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7X5ZbfJgDI
  • Boström, L. (2011). Effects of learning-style responsive versus traditional approaches on grammar achievement. Institute for Learning Styles Journal, 1. Retrieved from http://www. lenabostrom.se/files/1184
  • *Bozkurt, O., & Aydoğdu, M. (2009). İlköğretim 6. sınıf fen bilgisi dersinde Dunn ve Dunn Öğrenme Stili Modeline dayalı öğretim ile geleneksel öğretim yönteminin öğrencilerin akademik başarı düzeyleri ve tutumlarına etkisi [A comparative analysis of the effect of Dunn and Dunn Learning Styles Model and traditional teaching method on 6th grade students' achievement levels and attitudes in science educationlesson]. İlköğretim Online, 8(3), 741-754.
  • Bölükbaş, F. (2007). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının öğrenme biçimleri ile akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişki [The correlation among the learning styles, academic success and gender of the turkish teacher candidates]. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, 49-64.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel F. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research method]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
  • Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York, London: Guilford Press.
  • Cano, J. (1999). The relationship between learning style, academic major, and academic performance of college students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 40(1), 30-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5032/jae.1999.01030
  • Cengizhan, S. (2007). Proje temelli ve bilgisayar destekli öğretim tasarımlarının; bağımlı, bağımsız ve işbirlikli öğrenme stillerine sahip öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına ve öğrenme kalıcılığına etkisi [The effects of computer-assisted and project-based instructional designs on the academic achievement and long-term retention of students whose learning styles are dependent, independent and collaborative]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(3), 377-401.
  • Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. Retrieved from http://sxills.nl/ lerenlerennu/bronnen/Learning
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Constantinidou, F., & Baker, S. (2002). Stimulus modality and verbal learning performance in normal ageing. Brain and Language, 82, 296-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093- 934X(02)00018-4
  • Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis (A step by step approach) (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Curry, L. (1990). A critique of the research on learning styles. Educational Leadership, 50-56. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_199010_curry.pdf
  • Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2014). Analyzing the effect of learning styles and study habits of distance learners on learning performances: A case of an introductory programming course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(4), 161-185.
  • Çalışkan, H., & Kılınç, G. (2012). The relationship between the learning styles of students and their attitudes towards social studies course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 47-56.
  • Çolak, E. (2013). Yaşantısal öğrenme kuramının öğrencilerin motivasyonel inançları ve akademik başarılarına etkisi [Effects of the theory of experiential learning on students' motivational beliefs and academic achievement]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(3), 123-136.
  • Demir, B., & Usta, E. (2011). Eğitim yazılımlarında ön örgütleyicilerin öğrenme stillerine göre akademik başarıya etkisi [The effects of advance organizers according learning styles in computer assisted instruction software on academic achievement]. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 733-749.
  • *Demirel, B. (2006). The Effectiveness of establishing meaningful group in terms of their learning styles and administrating teachers accordingly (Master's thesis, Anadolu University, Institute of Educational Science, Eskişehir, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez. yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • *Dikkartın, F. T. (2006). Geometri öğretiminde 4MAT öğretim modelinin öğrenci başarısı ve tutumları üzerine etkisi [The effect of the 4MAT Education Model on the student success and attitude at the geometry education] (Master's thesis, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • *Dikkartın Övez, F. T. (2012). The effect of the 4MAT Model on student's algebra achievements and level of reaching attainments. International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences, 7(45), 2197-2205.
  • Dinçer, S. (2014). Eğitim bilimlerinde uygulamalı meta-analiz [Practical meta-analysis in educational science]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
  • Dunn, R. (2000). Learning styles: Theory, research, and practice. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 3-22.
  • Dunn, R., Griggs, S. A., Gorman, B. S., Olson, J., & Beasley, M. (1995). A meta-analytic validation of the Dunn and Dunn model of learning-style preferences. The Journal of Educational Research, 88(6), 353-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1995.9941181
  • Dyer, J. E., & Osborne, E. W. (1999). Effects of learning styles on short and long term of subject matter using various teaching approaches. Journal of Agricultural Education, 40(2), 11-18.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
  • *Elçi, A. N. (2008). Öğrenme stillerine uygun olarak seçilen öğretim yöntemlerinin öğrencinin başarısına, matematiğe yönelik tutumuna ve kaygısına etkileri [The effects of learning methods chosen in accordance to the learning styles on the achievements of the student, on his attitudes and his anxiety towards Mathematics] (Doctoral dissertation, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Ergin, S., & Atasoy, Ş. (2013). Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of 4MAT teaching method in removing pupils physics misconception of electricity. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(6), 730-746.
  • *Evin Gencel, İ. (2008). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde Kolb'un Deneyimsel Öğrenme Kuramına dayalı eğitimin tutum, akademik başarı ve öğrenmenin kalıcılığına etkisi [Learning Styles, Instruction Based On Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory, attitude and social studies achievement]. İlköğretim Online, 7(2), 401-420.
  • Felder, R. M. (1996). Matters of style. American Society of Electrical Engineers: Prism, 6(4), 18-23.
  • Gappi, L. L. (2013). Relationship between learning style preferences and academic performance of students. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 4(2), 70-76.
  • Garcia, P., Amandi, A., Schiaffino, S., & Campo, S. (2007). Evaluating Bayesian networks' precision for detecting student's learning styles. Computers & Education, 49, 794-808.
  • Glen, D. (2009). Matching teaching style to learning style may not help student. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Matching-TeachingStyle-to/49497
  • Gökalp, M. (2013). The effect of students' learning styles to their academic success. Creative Education, 4(10), 627-632. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.410090
  • *Gökova, V. (2010). Temel bilgisayar uygulamaları dersinde öğrencilerin öğrenme stillerine göre tasarlanan öğrenme içerik ve yönetim sisteminin öğrenci başarısına etkisi [The effect of learning content management system that were designed according to the students' learning styles over students' success in basic computer applications course] (Master's thesis, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • *Günay Ermurat, D. (2008). Lise biyoloji dersinde öğrenme stillerine dayalı öğretim etkinliklerinin öğrenci erişi ve tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of teaching activities based on students' learning styles on students' learning and attitudes in high school biology] (Master's thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov. tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Güven, B. (2008). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin öğrenme stilleri, tutumları ve akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [An investigation of the relationships among the learning styles of the primary school students, their attitudes and their academic success]. TSA, 12(1), 35-54.
  • *Güven, Z. Z. (2007). Öğrenme stillerine dayalı etkinliklerin öğrencilerin dinleme becerisi erişileri, İngilizce dersine yönelik tutumları ve öğrencilerin kalıcılığına etkisi [The effect of the learning-style-based activities on the achievements, attitudes and retention capacity of the students] (Doctoral dissertation, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Hedges, L. V. (1982). Fitting categorical models to effect sizes from a series of experiments. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 119-137.
  • Higgins, J. P. T., & Thomson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539-1558.
  • Higgins, J. P. T, Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 6(327), 557-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
  • Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (2006). The Learning Styles Questionnaire, 80-item version. Maidenhead, UK: Peter Honey.
  • *İnal, A. (2013). 9. Sınıf kimya dersi kimyasal bağlar konusunun öğrencilerin öğrenme stilleri ve geleneksel öğretim yaklaşımı ile işlenmesinin öğrenci akademik başarısına etkisinin incelenmesi [Determining the effect of teaching chemical bonds subject of 9th class with learning styles and traditional learning approach to a students' academic achievement] (Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok. gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Jackson, P. R. (2001). The effects of teaching methods and 4MAT learning styles on community college students" achievement, attitudes, and retention in introductory microbiology (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database, (UMI No. 3106372).
  • Jahanbakhsh, R. (2012). Learning style and academic achievement: A case study of Iranian high school girl's student. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 1030-1034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.282
  • Karadeniz Bayrak, B., & Bayram, H. (2012). Web ortamında probleme dayalı öğrenme yönteminin farklı öğrenme stiline sahip öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına etkisi [The effect of problem-based learning in a web environment on the academic achievement of students with different learning styles]. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 9(18), 479-497.
  • *Kaf Hasırcı, Ö. (2005). Görsel öğrenme stillerine göre düzenlenen öğretimin akademik başarı ve kalıcılığa etkisi [The effect of visual learning style instruction on the students' academic achievement and retention]. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(2), 299-314.
  • Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1987). Substance over style: Assessing the efficacy of modality testing and teaching. Exceptional Children, 54(3), 228-239.
  • Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), NASSP's Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1-17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School.
  • Keefe, J. W., & Ferrell, B. G. (1990). Developing a defensible learning style paradigm. Educational Leadership, 48(1), 57-61.
  • Kim, J-Y. (2013). Effect of personality traits and Kolb learning styles on learning outcome in blended learning environment. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, 7(13), 261-267.
  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Lovelace, M. K. (2005). Meta-analysis of experimental research based on the Dunn and Dunn Model. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 176-183.
  • *Mahiroğlu, A., & Bayır, E. A. (2009). Öğrenme Stillerine göre yapılandırılmış öğrenen kontrolünün öğrenci başarısına ve öğrenmenin kalıcılığına etkisi [The effect of the learner control constructed with learning style on the success of the student and the retention of the learning]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 169-183.
  • McCharty, B. (1990). Using the 4MAT System to bring learning styles to school. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
  • *Mutlu, M. (2004). İlköğretim 8. Sınıf fen bilgisi dersinde fotosentez-hücresel solunum konusunun 4MAT modeli kullanılarak öğretilmesinin öğrenci tutum ve başarısına etkisi [The effect of the 4mat teaching model on students' attitudes and success in science lesson during teaching photosynthesis-cellular respiration subject of a 8th grade science lesson] (Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok. gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • *Mutlu, İ., & Okur, M. (2012). The effect of 4 MAT teaching technique and learning styles on learning some geometrical concepts. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 14(2), 25-48.
  • *Önder, F. (2006). Fizik eğitiminde öğrenme stillerine dayalı öğretim yöntemlerinin öğrenci başarısı üzerindeki etkileri [The effects of instructional method based on learning styles on achievement in physics education] (Master's thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • *Önder, F. (2012). İşbirlikli gruplarda öğrenme stillerinin fizik dersi başarısı ile hatırda tutma düzeyine etkisinin incelenmesi [An investigation of the effects of cooperative learning groups, formed according to learning styles, on to students' physics achievement and retention of their learning] (Doctoral dissertation, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Özdemir, O. (2009). Bulanık mantık ile belirlenmiş öğrenme stillerine dayalı öğrenme ortamlarının öğrencilerin başarı ve tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of learning environment based learning styles determined by fuzzy logic to students' achievement and attitude] (Doctoral dissertation, Fırat University, Elazığ, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok. gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • *Özdemir, M. A., & Dindar, H. (2013). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersinde kavramsal değişim yaklaşımının, öğrenme stillerine göre öğrenci başarısına etkisi [The effects of conceptual change approach on primary school students' achievement according to their learning styles in science and technology course]. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 288-299.
  • *Özbek, Ö. (2006). Öğretim stillerine uygun olarak düzenlenen öğretim etkinliklerinin akademik başarı, hatırda tutma düzeyi ve tutumlara etkisi [The effect of the instructional activities according to learning styles on academic achievement, recall level and attitude] (Master's thesis, Çanakkale On sekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Özgen, K., & Alkan, H. (2014). Yapılandırmacı öğrenme yaklaşımı kapsamında, öğrencilerin öğrenme stillerine uygun öğrenme etkinliklerinin akademik başarı ve tutuma etkileri: Fonksiyon ve türev kavramı örneklemesi [The effects of learning activities according to students' learning styles on students' academic success and attitude: The sampling of function and derivative conception]. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 1-38.
  • *Öztürk, Z. (2007). Öğrenme stilleri ve 4MAT modeline dayalı öğretimin lise tarih derslerindeki öğrenci başarısına etkisi [The effect of teaching based on 4MAT Model on the student success for high school history lesson] (Master's thesis, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119.
  • Pigott, T. D. (2012). Advances in meta-analysis. Chicago, IL: Springer. Reiner, C., & Willingham, D. (2010). The myth of learning styles. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(5), 32-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2010.503139
  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
  • Reiner, C., & Willingham, D. (2010). The myth of learning styles. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(5), 32-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2010.503139
  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
  • Slemmer, D. L. (2002). The effect of learning styles on student achievement in various hypertext, hypermedia and technology enhanced learning environments: A meta-analysis (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3095975)
  • *Şeker, M., & Yılmaz, K. (2011). Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde öğrenme stillerinin kullanılmasının öğrencilerin öğrenme düzeyleri üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi [Investigation into the effect of the use of learning styles on students' learning levels in social studies teaching]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 19(1), 251-266.
  • *Tatar, E., & Dikici, R. (2009). The effect of the 4MAT method (learning styles and brain hemispheres) of instruction on achievement in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(8), 1027-1036.
  • Tie, H. H., & Umar, I. N. (2010). The impact of learning styles and instructional methods on students' recall and retention in programming education. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 191-195). Putrajaya, Malaysia: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
  • Tsai, H. S. (2004). Learning achievement satisfaction and retention with whole-brain instruction among nursing students at a technology college in Taiwan. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65(12), Section A, 4454.
  • *Usta, A., Bodur, H., Yağız, D., & Sünbül, A. M. (2011). İlköğretim fen bilgisi derslerinde öğrenme stillerine dayalı öğretim etkinliklerinin öğrenci erişi ve tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of teaching activities based on learning styles on their achievement and attitude related science lecture in primary school]. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31, 1-13.
  • Uyangör, S. M., & Dikkartın, F. T. (2009). 4MAT öğretim modelinin öğrencilerin erişileri ve öğrenme stillerine etkisi [The effects of the 4mat education model on the student achievements and learning style]. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 3(2), 178-194.
  • Uzun, A., & Şentürk A. (2008). Assessing learning styles of students at Uludağ Universty Faculty of Education. Retrieved from http://ietc2008.home.anadolu.edu.tr/ietc2008/9.doc
  • Üstüner, M. (2006). Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Yönelik Tutum Ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Reliability and validity study of an Attitude Scale of Teaching Profession]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 45, 109-127.
  • Warn, T. S. (2009). Students' learning style and their academic achievement for taxation course- a comparison study. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference of Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from https://my.laureate.net/Faculty
  • Yılmaz Soylu, M., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2002). The effect of learning styles on achievement in different learning environments. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(4), 43-50.
  • Yılmaz, A., & Dinçol Özgür, S. (2012). Tüketimci çoklu ortamın öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme stillerine göre başarı, tutum ve kalıcılığa etkisi [The effect of generative multimedia learning environment on teacher candidates' achievement, attitude and retention according to their learning styles]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, 441-452.
  • *Yazıcılar, Ö., & Güven, B. (2009). The effects of learning style activities on academic achievement, attitudes and recall level. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 2578-2583.
APA KANADLI S (2016). A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention. , 2057 - 2086.
Chicago KANADLI Sedat A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention. (2016): 2057 - 2086.
MLA KANADLI Sedat A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention. , 2016, ss.2057 - 2086.
AMA KANADLI S A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention. . 2016; 2057 - 2086.
Vancouver KANADLI S A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention. . 2016; 2057 - 2086.
IEEE KANADLI S "A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention." , ss.2057 - 2086, 2016.
ISNAD KANADLI, Sedat. "A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention". (2016), 2057-2086.
APA KANADLI S (2016). A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 16(6), 2057 - 2086.
Chicago KANADLI Sedat A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 16, no.6 (2016): 2057 - 2086.
MLA KANADLI Sedat A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, vol.16, no.6, 2016, ss.2057 - 2086.
AMA KANADLI S A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2016; 16(6): 2057 - 2086.
Vancouver KANADLI S A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2016; 16(6): 2057 - 2086.
IEEE KANADLI S "A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention." Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 16, ss.2057 - 2086, 2016.
ISNAD KANADLI, Sedat. "A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Instructional Designs based on the Learning Styles Models on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Retention". Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 16/6 (2016), 2057-2086.