(Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Düzce Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı, Bolu, Türkiye)
(Ahi Evran Üniversitesi,Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reaminasyon Anabilimdalı, Kırşehir, Türkiye)
(Ahi Evran Üniversitesi,Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reaminasyon Anabilimdalı, Kırşehir, Türkiye)
(Ahi Evran Üniversitesi,Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reaminasyon Anabilimdalı, Kırşehir, Türkiye)
(Ahi Evran Üniversitesi,Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reaminasyon Anabilimdalı, Kırşehir, Türkiye)
Hakan ATEŞ
(Ahi Evran Üniversitesi,Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reaminasyon Anabilimdalı, Kırşehir, Türkiye)
Yıl: 2016Cilt: 4Sayı: 2ISSN: 2148-2357 / 2148-2357Sayfa Aralığı: 73 - 76İngilizce

240 0
Is the Atraumatic Spinal Needle a Better Choice in Younger Patients? A Comparison of 25G Spinal Needles in a Group of General Surgical Patients Below 40 Years of Age
Fen > Tıp > Genel ve Dahili Tıp
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • Wulf HF. The centennial of spinal anesthesia. Anesthe- siology. 1998;89(2):500.
  • Pearce J. Walter Essex Wynter, Quincke, and lumbar puncture. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psy- chiatry. 1994;57(2):179.
  • Society HCSotIH. The international classification of headache disorders. Cephalalgia: an international journal of headache. 2004;24:9.
  • Turnbull DK, Shepherd D. Post-dural puncture head- ache: pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. British journal of anaesthesia. 2003;91(5):718-729.
  • Reynolds F. Dural puncture and headache. Bmj. 1993;306(6882):874-876.
  • Lybecker H, Djernes M, Schmidt J. Postdural punc- ture headache (PDPH): onset, duration, severity, and associated symptoms: an analysis of 75 consecutive patients with PDPH. Acta anaesthesiologica scandi- navica. 1995;39(5):605-612.
  • Kang S, Goodnough D, Lee Y, Olson R, Borshoff J, Fur- lano M, et al. Comparison of 26-and 27-G needles for spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery patients. An- esthesiology. 1992;76(5):734-738.
  • Geurts J, Haanschoten M, Wijk R, Kraak H, Besse T. Post-dural puncture headache in young patients. A comparative study between the use of 0.52 mm (25- gauge) and 0.33 mm (29-gauge) spinal needles. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 1990;34(5):350-353.
  • Campbell DC, Douglas MJ, Pavy TJ, Merrick P, Flana- gan ML, McMorland GH. Comparison of the 25-gauge Whitacre with the 24-gauge Sprotte spinal needle for elective caesarean section: cost implications. Cana- dian journal of anaesthesia. 1993;40(12):1131-1135.
  • Sinikoglu NS, Yeter H, Gumus F, Belli E, Alagol A, Turan N. Reinsertion of the stylet does not affect incidence of post dural puncture headaches (PDPH) after spi- nal anesthesia. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia. 2013;63(2):188-192.
  • Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Ciapponi A, Munoz L, Roqué i Figuls M, Bonfill Cosp X. Posture and fluids for preventing post- dural puncture headache. The Cochrane Library. 2013.
  • Matas SLdA. Why should we use atraumatic needles in lumbar puncture? Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria. 2013;71(9B):681-684.
  • Alam M, Raheen M, Iqbal K, Chowdhury M. Headache following spinal anaesthesia: a review on recent up- date. Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons. 2011;29(1):32-40.
  • Buettner J, Wresch K-P, Klose R. Postdural Puncture Headache:: Comparison of 25-Gauge Whitacre and Quincke Needles. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medi- cine. 1993;18(3):166-169.
  • Evans RW, Armon C, Frohman EM, Goodin DS. Assess- ment: Prevention of post-lumbar puncture headaches Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assess- ment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000;55(7):909-914.
  • Schmittner MD, Terboven T, Dluzak M, Janke A, Lim- mer ME, Weiss C, et al. High incidence of post-dural puncture headache in patients with spinal saddle block induced with Quincke needles for anorectal sur- gery: a randomised clinical trial. International journal of colorectal disease. 2010;25(6):775-781.
  • Holst D, Mollmann M, Ebel C, Hausman R, Wendt M. In vitro investigation of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after dural puncture with various spinal needles. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1998;87(6):1331-1335.
  • Morrison L, McCrae A, Foo I, Scott D, Wildsmith J. An in vitro comparison of fluid leakage after dural punc- ture with Atraucan, Sprotte, Whitacre, and Quincke needles. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 1996;21(2):139-143.
  • Vallejo MC, Mandell GL, Sabo DP, Ramanathan S. Post- dural puncture headache: a randomized comparison of five spinal needles in obstetric patients. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2000;91(4):916-920.
  • De Andrés J, Valia JC, Errando C, Rico G, Lopez-Alarcon MD. Subarachnoid anesthesia in young patients: a comparative analysis of two needle bevels. Regional anesthesia and pain medicine. 1999;24(6):547-552.
  • Sharma S, Gambling D, Joshi G, Sidawi J, Herrera E. Com- parison of 26-gauge Atraucan® and 25-gauge Whitacre needles: insertion characteristics and complications. Canadian journal of anaesthesia. 1995;42(8):706-710.
  • Pan PH, Fragneto R, Moore C, Ross V, Justis G. The in- cidence of failed spinal anesthesia, postdural puncture headache and backache is similar with Atraucan and Whitacre spinal needles. Canadian Journal of Anes- thesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie. 2002;49(6):636- 637.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.