Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 6 Sayfa Aralığı: 937 - 943 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Comparison Between Goose (Anser anser) and Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Eggshells During Embryonic Development by Scanning Electron Microscopy [1] [2]

Öz:
Bu çalışmada, taramalı electron mikroskop kullanılarak embriyonik gelişim sırasında kaz ve tavukların yumurta kabuğundaki değişiklikleri karşılaştırmak amaçlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada kaz ve tavuk yumurtası kullanılmıştır. Her iki türe ait yumurtalar üç gruba ayrıldı. Birinci gruba ait yumurta kabukları kuluçkaya konulmadan, ikinci gruba ait yumurta kabukları kuluçka süresinin ortasında ve üçüncü gruba ait olanlar ise kuluçkanın son günü olan çıkım gününde toplandı. Her bir yumurta kabuğunun ekvator kısmından 0,5 cm2 ebatında örnekler alındı. Bu örnekler rutin prosedürlerden geçirildikten sonra taramalı elektron mikroskobunda yapısal değişiklikler ve element oranı bakımından incelendi. Elektron mikroskop incelemesinde, kaz ve tavuk türlerinin kuluçka günlerine bağlı olarak yumurta kabuğu katmanlarında belirgin bir değişikliğin olmadığı tespit edildi. Her iki türün kendi içinde kuluçka günlerine göre yumurta kalınlığında ve kabuklardaki elementlerin oranlarında istatistiksel olarak benzerlik olduğu görüldü. Yumurta kabuğunun embriyonik gelişim boyunca uğradığı yapısal değişikliklerin kaz kuluçka veriminin düşük olmasında önemli bir etkiye sahip olmadığı sonucuna varıldı.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Veterinerlik

Kaz (Anser anser) ve Tavuk (Gallus gallus domesticus) Yumurta Kabuğunun Embriyonik Gelişim Sırasında Taramalı Elektron Mikroskop ile Karşılaştırılması

Öz:
The purpose of this study was to examine the comparative differences of eggshell structure between geese and chickens during embryonic development by SEM. Goose eggs and chicken eggs were used for the study. Eggs of each species were divided into three groups: The eggs within first group were used subsequent to collection, those of second group were collected during the mid-point of incubation and those of third group were collected at the end of the incubation. The eggshells samples with dimensions of 0.5 cm2 were taken from the equatorial region of eggshells. After these samples were passed through routine process, they were examined via SEM for structural changes of eggshells and rate of elements. In the examination, there were not changes of eggshell structure between two species for days of the incubation. Eggshells thickness of each species and the rate of calcium, oxygen, nitrogen and carbon of eggshells were not statistically different among groups. It was concluded that structural changes of eggshell did not have significant effect on low yield for hatching of goose.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Veterinerlik
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Yoshizaki N, Saito H: Canges in shell membranes during development of quail embryos. Poult Sci, 81, 246-251, 2002. DOI: 10.1093/ps/81.2.246
  • Rose MLH, Hincke MT: Protein constituents of the eggshell: Eggshell- specific matrix proteins. Cell Mol Life Sci, 66, 2707-2719, 2009. DOI: 1007/s00018-009-0046-y
  • Deeming DC: Failure to turn eggs during incubation: Development of the area vasculosa and embryonic growth. J Morphol, 201, 179-186, 1989. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1052010207
  • Van Schalkwyk SJ, Cloete SWP, Brown CR, Brand Z: Hatching success of ostrich eggs in relation to setting, turning and angle of rotation. Brit Poultry Sci, 41, 46-52, 2000. DOI: 10.1080/00071660086394
  • Bednarczyk M, Rosinski A: Comparison of egg hatchability and in vitro survival of goose embryos of various origins. Poultry Sci, 78, 579-585, DOI: 10.1093/ps/78.4.579
  • Arslan C, Saatci M: Egg yield and hatchability characteristics of native geese in the Kars region. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 27, 1361-1365, 2003.
  • Abiola SS, Meshioye OO, Oyerinde BO, Bamgbose MA: Effect of egg size on hatchability of broiler chicks. Arch Zootec, 57, 83-86. 2008.
  • Mahmud A, Pasha TN: Effect of strorage, pre-heating and turning during holding period on the hatchability of broiler breeders eggs. Pakistan Vet J, 28, 153-154, 2008.
  • Al-Shammari KIA, Batkowska J, Gryzinska MM: Assessment of ultraviolet light effect in hatching eggs disinfection on hatchability traits of two breeds of quails and chickens. Acta Sci Pol Zootechnicat, 14, 33- , 2015.
  • Meir M, Ar A: Compensation for seasonal changes in eggshell conductance and hatchability of goose eggs by dynamic control of egg water loss. Brit Poultry Sci, 32, 723-732, 1991. DOI: 10.1080/
  • Arias JL, Fink DJ, Xiao SQ, Heuer AH, Caplan AI: Biomineralization and eggshells: Cell-mediated acellular compartments of mineralized extracellular matrix. Int Rev Cytol, 145, 217-250, 1993.
  • Nys Y, Hincke JL, Arias JM, Garcia-Ruiz JM, Solomon SE: Avian eggshell mineralization. Poult Avian Biol Rev, 10, 143-166, 1999.
  • Schaffner FC, Swart PK: Influence of diet and environmental water on the carbon and oxygen istopic signatures of seabird eggshell carbonate. B Mar Sci, 48, 23-38, 1991.
  • Maurer G, Portugal SJ, Boomer I, Cassey P: Avian embryonic development does not change the stable isotope composition of the calcite eggshell. Reprod Fert Develop, 23, 339-345, 2011. DOI: 10.1071/ RD10138
  • Nakano T, Ikawa NI, Ozimek L: Chemical composition of chicken eggshell and shell membranes. Poult Sci, 82, 510-514, 2003. DOI: 10.1093/ ps/82.3.510
  • Nys Y, Gautron J, Garcia-Ruiz JM, Hincke MT: Avian eggshell mineralization: Biochemical and functional characterization of matrix proteins. CR Palevol, 3, 549-562, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.crpv.2004.08.002
  • Simkiss K: Calcium metabolism and avian reproduction. Biol Rev Camb Philos, 36, 321-367, 1961.
  • Ruiz J, Lunam CA: Ultrastructural analysis of the eggshell: Contribution of the individual calcified layers and the cuticle to hatchability and egg viability in broiler breeders. Brit Poultry Sci, 41, 584-592, 2000.
  • Hunton P: Understanding the architecture of the eggshell. World Poultry Sci J, 51, 141-147, 1995.
  • Keshavarz K: Laying hens respond differently to high dietary levels of phosphorus in monobasic and dibasic calcium phosphate. Poult Sci, , 687-703, 1994. DOI: 10.3382/ps.0730687
  • Fathi MM, Afifi YK, El-Safty SA: Ultrastructural diversity of eggshell quality in some egyption local breeds of chicken. Egypt Poult Sci, 30, 827, 2010.
  • Parsons AH: Structure of the eggshell. Poult Sci, 61, 2013-2021. 1982. DOI: 10.3382/ps.0612013
  • Abdel-Salam ZA, Abdou AM, Harith MA: Elemental and ultra- structural analysis of the eggshell: Ca, Mg and Na distribution during embryonic development via LIBS and SEM techniques. Int J Poult Sci, 5, 42, 2006.
  • Simons PCM, Wiertz G: Notes on the structure of shell and membranes of the hen's egg: A study with the scanning electron microscope. Ann Biol Anim Biochim Biophys, 10, 31-49, 1970.
  • Carnarius KM, Conrad KM, Mast MG, Macneil JH: Relationship of eggshell ultrastructure and shell strength to the soundness of shell eggs. Poult Sci, 75, 656-663, 1996.
  • Bönner BM, Lutz W, Redmann T, Jager S, Reinhardt B, Wissing J, Knickmeier W, Kaleta EF: Morphometric and allometric studies on eggshells and embryos of free-living Canada geese (Branta c. Canadensis Linnaeus, 1758). Eur J Wildl Res, 50, 179-186, 2004. DOI: 10.1007/s10344- 0061-0
  • Gualhanone A, Furlan RL, Fernandez-Alorcon MF, Macari M: Effect of breeder age on eggshell thickness, surface, temperature, hatchability and chick weigh. Braz J Poult Sci, 14, 9-14, 2012.
  • Yamak US, Sarıca M, Boz MA, Önder H: The effect of egg shell thickness of some hatching traits of broiler breeders. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 21, 421-424, 2015. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2014.12485
  • Turkyılmaz MK, Dereli E, Sahin T: Effects of shell thickness, shell porosity, shape index and egg weight loss on hatchability in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Kafkas Univ Vet Derg, 11, 147-150, 2005.
  • Nys Y, Gautron J: Structure and formation of the eggshell. In, Lopez- Fandino R, Anton M, Schade R (Eds): Bioactive Egg Compounds. 99-102, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007.
  • Marie P, Labas V, Brionne A, Harichaux G, Hennequet-Antier C, Nys Y, Gautron J: Quantitative proteomics and bioinformatic analysis provide new insight into protein function during avian eggshell biomineralization. J Proteomics, 113, 178-193, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.09.024
APA Bingol S, DEPREM T, KARADAĞ SARI E, KORAL TAŞÇI S, ASLAN Ş (2016). Comparison Between Goose (Anser anser) and Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Eggshells During Embryonic Development by Scanning Electron Microscopy [1] [2]. , 937 - 943.
Chicago Bingol Seyit Ali,DEPREM TURGAY,KARADAĞ SARI EBRU,KORAL TAŞÇI Serap,ASLAN Şahin Comparison Between Goose (Anser anser) and Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Eggshells During Embryonic Development by Scanning Electron Microscopy [1] [2]. (2016): 937 - 943.
MLA Bingol Seyit Ali,DEPREM TURGAY,KARADAĞ SARI EBRU,KORAL TAŞÇI Serap,ASLAN Şahin Comparison Between Goose (Anser anser) and Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Eggshells During Embryonic Development by Scanning Electron Microscopy [1] [2]. , 2016, ss.937 - 943.
AMA Bingol S,DEPREM T,KARADAĞ SARI E,KORAL TAŞÇI S,ASLAN Ş Comparison Between Goose (Anser anser) and Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Eggshells During Embryonic Development by Scanning Electron Microscopy [1] [2]. . 2016; 937 - 943.
Vancouver Bingol S,DEPREM T,KARADAĞ SARI E,KORAL TAŞÇI S,ASLAN Ş Comparison Between Goose (Anser anser) and Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Eggshells During Embryonic Development by Scanning Electron Microscopy [1] [2]. . 2016; 937 - 943.
IEEE Bingol S,DEPREM T,KARADAĞ SARI E,KORAL TAŞÇI S,ASLAN Ş "Comparison Between Goose (Anser anser) and Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Eggshells During Embryonic Development by Scanning Electron Microscopy [1] [2]." , ss.937 - 943, 2016.
ISNAD Bingol, Seyit Ali vd. "Comparison Between Goose (Anser anser) and Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Eggshells During Embryonic Development by Scanning Electron Microscopy [1] [2]". (2016), 937-943.
APA Bingol S, DEPREM T, KARADAĞ SARI E, KORAL TAŞÇI S, ASLAN Ş (2016). Comparison Between Goose (Anser anser) and Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Eggshells During Embryonic Development by Scanning Electron Microscopy [1] [2]. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(6), 937 - 943.
Chicago Bingol Seyit Ali,DEPREM TURGAY,KARADAĞ SARI EBRU,KORAL TAŞÇI Serap,ASLAN Şahin Comparison Between Goose (Anser anser) and Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Eggshells During Embryonic Development by Scanning Electron Microscopy [1] [2]. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 22, no.6 (2016): 937 - 943.
MLA Bingol Seyit Ali,DEPREM TURGAY,KARADAĞ SARI EBRU,KORAL TAŞÇI Serap,ASLAN Şahin Comparison Between Goose (Anser anser) and Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Eggshells During Embryonic Development by Scanning Electron Microscopy [1] [2]. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.22, no.6, 2016, ss.937 - 943.
AMA Bingol S,DEPREM T,KARADAĞ SARI E,KORAL TAŞÇI S,ASLAN Ş Comparison Between Goose (Anser anser) and Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Eggshells During Embryonic Development by Scanning Electron Microscopy [1] [2]. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016; 22(6): 937 - 943.
Vancouver Bingol S,DEPREM T,KARADAĞ SARI E,KORAL TAŞÇI S,ASLAN Ş Comparison Between Goose (Anser anser) and Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Eggshells During Embryonic Development by Scanning Electron Microscopy [1] [2]. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016; 22(6): 937 - 943.
IEEE Bingol S,DEPREM T,KARADAĞ SARI E,KORAL TAŞÇI S,ASLAN Ş "Comparison Between Goose (Anser anser) and Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Eggshells During Embryonic Development by Scanning Electron Microscopy [1] [2]." Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, ss.937 - 943, 2016.
ISNAD Bingol, Seyit Ali vd. "Comparison Between Goose (Anser anser) and Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) Eggshells During Embryonic Development by Scanning Electron Microscopy [1] [2]". Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 22/6 (2016), 937-943.