Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental
Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 459 - 476 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental
Öz: This study aims to implement a science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education approach in an environmental education course. The research involved the design and implementation of STEM activities by researchers, as part of the environmental education course taught in the second year of a Primary School Teaching undergraduate program. In this study--a case study using qualitative research methods--after the implementation of STEM activities, some mind maps and the views of the pre-service teachers regarding STEM education were examined. A total of 42 pre-service teachers participated in the study and an examination of their mind maps showed that they have a rich conceptual structure regarding STEM education and also associate STEM fields both with one another and with environmental education. In the interviews conducted following the activities, the pre-service teachers stated that they found STEM education to be efficient, easy to retain, and fun
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
- Adıgüzel, T., Ayar, M. C., Çorlu, M. S., & Özel, S. (2012, June). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik (FeTeMM) eğitimi: Disiplinlerarası çalışmalar ve etkilişimler [STEM education in the Turkish context: Interdisciplinary investigations and interactions]. Paper presented at the X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Niğde, Turkey.
- Atasoy, E., & Ertürk, H. (2008). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin çevresel tutum ve çevre bilgisi üzerine bir alan araştırması [A field study about environmental knowledge and attitudes of elementary school students]. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 105-122.
- Balka, D. (2011). Standards of mathematical practice and STEM, Math-science connector newsletter. School Science and Mathematics Association. Retrieved from http://www. ssma.org/Websites/ssma/images/Newsletters/MathScienceConnector-summer2011.pdf
- Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11.
- Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70, 30-35.
- Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education, challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
- Capraro, M. M., & Nite, S. B. (2014). STEM integration in mathematics standards. Middle Grades Research Journal, 9(3), 1-10.
- Capraro, R. M., & Corlu, M. S. (2013). Changing views on assessment for STEM project- based learning. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro & J. J. Morgan (Eds.), STEM project- based learning an integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 109-118). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
- Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro & J. J. Morgan (Eds.), STEM project- based learning an integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 1-5). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
- Corlu, M. S. (2013). Insights into STEM education praxis: An assessment scheme for course syllabi. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13, 2477-2485.
- Corlu, M. S. (2014). FeTeMM eğitimi makale çağrı mektubu [Call for STEM education research in the Turkish context]. Turkish Journal of Education, 3(1), 4-10.
- Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers in the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74-85.
- Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62, 279-301.
- Dede, Y., & Yaman, S. (2005). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel problem kurma ve problem çözme becerilerinin belirlenmesi [Identification of mathematical problem posing and problem solving skills for prospective mathematics teachers']. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 18, 236-252.
- Donner, J., & Wang, Y. (2013). Shifting expectations, bringing STEM to scale through expanded learning systems. Afterschool Matters, 17, 50-57.
- Ernst, J., & Theimer, S. (2011). Evaluating the effects of environmental education programming on connectedness to nature. Environmental Education Research, 17(5), 577-598.
- Glesne, C. (2012). Nitel araştırmaya giriş [Becoming qualitative researchers] (E. Günel, Trans.). Ankara, Turkey: Anı Yayıncılık.
- Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service, CRS Report for Congress
- Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress. Hagedorn, L. S., & Purnamasari, A. V. (2012). A realistic look at STEM and the role of community colleges. Community College Review, 40(2), 145-164.
- Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/ED316506.pdf
- Johnson, C. C. (2012). Implementation of STEM education policy: Challenges, progress, and lessons learned. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 45-55.
- Kaya, İ., & Gündoğdu Y. (2007). Coğrafya öğretmenlerinin çevre bilincini oluşturma ve geliştirmedeki rolü: Diyarbakır örneği [The role of geography teachers in forming and raising environmental awareness: A diyarbakir case study]. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 12(18), 187-204.
- Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: Background, federal policy, and legislative action. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress. Retrieved from https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33434.pdf
- Labov, J. B., Singer, S. R., George, M. D., Schweingruber, H. A., & Hilton, M. L. (2009). Effective practices in undergraduate STEM education part 1: Examining the evidence. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 157-161.
- Lieflander, A. K., Fröhlich, G., Bogner, F. X., & Schultz, P. W. (2013). Promoting connectedness with nature through environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 19(3), 370-384.
- Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
- Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., & Roehrig, G. H. (2013). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In S. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. E. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in precollege settings: Synthesizing research, policy and practice (pp. 35-54). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
- National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1999). Innovating schools. Retrieved from http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/ innovating-schools_9789264181427-en#page6
- Retrieved from http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/ innovating-schools_9789264181427-en#page6
- P21- Partnership for the 21st Century Learning. (2015). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_framework_0515.pdf
- Pitt, J. (2009). Blurring the boundaries-STEM education and education for sustainable development. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 14(1), 37-48.
- Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution and directions in the 1990s. Columbus, OH, ERIC/SMEAC Information Reference Center. Retrieved from http://files. eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED348235.pdf
- Şahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adıgüzel, T. (2014). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik içerikli okul sonrası etkinlikler ve öğrenciler üzerindeki etkileri [STEM related after-school program activities and associated outcomes on student learning]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14, 297-322.
- Sarıer, Y. (2010). An evaluation of equal opportunities in education in the light of high school entrance exams (OKS-SBS) and PISA results. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(3), 107-129.
- Scholz, R. W. (2011). Environmental literacy in science and society from knowledge to decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Smith, K. A., Douglas, T. C., & Cox, M. F. (2009). Supportive teaching and learning strategies in STEM education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 117, 19-32.
- Suchman, E. L. (2014). Changing academic culture to improve undergraduate STEM education. Trends in Microbiology, 22(12), 657-659.
- Teksöz, G., Şahin, E., & Ertepınar, H. (2010). Çevre okuryazarlığı, öğretmen adayları ve sürdürülebilir bir gelecek [Environmental literacy, pre-service teachers, and a sustainable future]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39, 307-320.
- Wagner, T. (2008). Rigor redefined. Educational Leadership, 66(2), 20-24.
- Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences] (8th ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
- Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 12-19.
APA | OZÇAKIR SÜMEN O, ÇALIŞICI H (2016). Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental. , 459 - 476. |
Chicago | OZÇAKIR SÜMEN OZLEM,ÇALIŞICI HAMZA Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental. (2016): 459 - 476. |
MLA | OZÇAKIR SÜMEN OZLEM,ÇALIŞICI HAMZA Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental. , 2016, ss.459 - 476. |
AMA | OZÇAKIR SÜMEN O,ÇALIŞICI H Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental. . 2016; 459 - 476. |
Vancouver | OZÇAKIR SÜMEN O,ÇALIŞICI H Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental. . 2016; 459 - 476. |
IEEE | OZÇAKIR SÜMEN O,ÇALIŞICI H "Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental." , ss.459 - 476, 2016. |
ISNAD | OZÇAKIR SÜMEN, OZLEM - ÇALIŞICI, HAMZA. "Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental". (2016), 459-476. |
APA | OZÇAKIR SÜMEN O, ÇALIŞICI H (2016). Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 16(2), 459 - 476. |
Chicago | OZÇAKIR SÜMEN OZLEM,ÇALIŞICI HAMZA Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 16, no.2 (2016): 459 - 476. |
MLA | OZÇAKIR SÜMEN OZLEM,ÇALIŞICI HAMZA Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, vol.16, no.2, 2016, ss.459 - 476. |
AMA | OZÇAKIR SÜMEN O,ÇALIŞICI H Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2016; 16(2): 459 - 476. |
Vancouver | OZÇAKIR SÜMEN O,ÇALIŞICI H Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2016; 16(2): 459 - 476. |
IEEE | OZÇAKIR SÜMEN O,ÇALIŞICI H "Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental." Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 16, ss.459 - 476, 2016. |
ISNAD | OZÇAKIR SÜMEN, OZLEM - ÇALIŞICI, HAMZA. "Pre-service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental". Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 16/2 (2016), 459-476. |