Semih AŞİRET
(Mersin Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Anabilim Dalı, Mersin, Türkiye)
SEÇİL ÖMÜR SÜNBÜL
(Mersin Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Anabilim Dalı, Mersin, Türkiye)
Yıl: 2016Cilt: 16Sayı: 2ISSN: 1303-0485 / 2148-7561Sayfa Aralığı: 647 - 668İngilizce

64 0
Investigating Test Equating Methods in Small Samples Through Various Factors*
Sosyal > Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Kapalı
  • Angoff, W. H. (1984). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Babcock, B., Albano, A., & Raymond, M. (2012). Nominal weights mean equating: A method for very small samples. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(4), 608-628.
  • Bozdağ, S. (2010). Şans başarısının test eşitlemeye etkisi [The effect of chance of success on test equalization] (Master's thesis, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
  • Cui, Z., & Kolen, M. J. (2009). Evaluation of two new smoothing methods in equating: The cubic b-spline pre-smoothing method and the direct pre-smoothing method. Journal of Educational Measurement, 46(2), 135-158.
  • Devdass, S. (2011). Conditions affecting the accuracy of classical equating methods for small samples under the NEAT design: A simulation study (Doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina, NC.
  • Donlon, T. (Ed.). (1984). The College Board technical handbook for the scholastic aptitude test and achievement tests. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
  • Dorans, N. J., Moses, T. P., & Eignor, D. R. (2010). Principles and practices of test score equating (ETS Research Report No. RR-10-29). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
  • Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and Applications. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Hanson, B. A., Zeng, L., & Colton, D. (1994). A comparison of pre-smoothing and post- smoothing methods in equipercentile equating (ACT Research Report No. 94-4). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.
  • Harris, D. J., & Crouse, J. D. (1993). A study of criteria used in equating. Applied Measurement in Education, 6, 195-240.
  • Heh, V. K. (2007). Equating accuracy using small samples in the random groups design (Doctoral dissertation). Patton College of Education at Ohio University, Athens, OH.
  • Kim, S., vonDavier, A. A., & Haberman, S. (2006). An alternative to equating with small samples in the non-equivalent groups anchor test design. Paper presented at the annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco, CA.
  • Kim, S., vonDavier, A. A., & Haberman, S. (2008). Small-sample equating using a synthetic linking function. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45(4), 325-342.
  • Kolen, M. J. (1988). Traditional equating methodology. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 7(4), 29-37.
  • Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. J. (1995). Test equating: Methods and practices. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Method and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Kurtz, A. M., & Dwyer, A. C. (2013). Small sample equating: Best practices using a Sas Macro. Retrieved from http://analytics.ncsu.edu/sesug/2013/BtB-11.pdf
  • Livingston, S. A. (1993). Small-sample equating with log-linear smoothing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 23-39.
  • Livingston, S. A. (2004). Equating test scores (without IRT). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
  • Livingston, S. A., & Kim, S. (2009b). The circle-arc method for equating in small samples. Journal of Educational Measurement, 46(3), 330-343.
  • Livingston, S. A., & Kim, S. (2010). Random-groups equating with samples of 50 to 400 test takers. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 175-185.
  • Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Öztürk, N. (2010). Akademik personel ve lisansüstü eğitimi giriş sınavı puanlarının eşitlenmesi üzerine bir çalışma [A study on equating the scores of the academic staff and postgraduate education entrance exam] (Master's thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Öztürk, N., & Anıl, D. (2012). Akademik personel ve lisansüstü eğitimi giriş sınavı puanlarının eşitlenmesi üzerine bir çalışma [A study on equating the scores of the academic staff and postgraduate education entrance exam]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(165), 181-193.
  • Parshall, C. G., Houghton, P. D. B., & Kromrey, J. D. (1995). Equating error and statistical bias in small sample linear equating. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32(1), 37-54.
  • Skaggs, G. (2005). Accuracy of random groups equating with very small samples. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42(4), 309-330.
  • vonDavier, A. A., Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (2004). The kernel method of test equating. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.