Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 54 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 37 - 44 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case

Öz:
Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'deki 1104 yayımcıdan derlenen verilerin yorumlanmasıylakamu yayım hizmetleri incelenmiştir. Bilgi ile yeni teknolojilerin benimsenmesive yayılması yoluyla insanların davranışlarını gönüllü olarak değiştirmelerinisağlayan yayım, Tarımsal Bilgi ve Enformasyon Sistemi'nin önemli bir parçasıdır.TBES farklı aktörler ve çok boyutlu bakış açılarından oluşan bir ağdır. Bu çalışmaTürk TBES'deki yayımın bağlantı, bütünleşme ve uyum düzeyleri ile sistemdekitıkanıklıkları tanımlamaktadır. TBES bileşenleri olan yayımın başarısını etkileyenunsurlar, bilgi kaynakları, yayım yöntemleri, aktör etkinliği ve uyumu Çok BoyutluÖlçekleme Analizinde kullanılmıştır. Bulgulara göre, teknoloji benimsemedüzeyinin düşüklüğü, çoğunlukla verimlilik artışına odaklanılması, yerel katılımınsınırlı olması Türk TBES'deki genel aksaklıklar olarak belirlenmiştir. Yayımetkinlikleri hedefe yönelik programlama yaklaşımına dayandırılmalıdır. TBES'deyerel aktörlerin güçlendirilmesi yanında, aktörler arası ilişkilerinin eklemlenmesineizin veren çok paydaşlı programlama ve değerlendirme süreci kullanılmalıdır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Ziraat Mühendisliği

Yayım Penceresinden Tarımsal Bilgi ve Enformasyon Sistemi: Türkiye Örneği

Öz:
In this study, public extension service was examined through interpretation ofdata collected from 1104 extension workers in Turkey. Extension as a one of themost important component in an AKIS is concerned with inducing people tochange their voluntary behavior through the dissemination of information andadoption of new technologies. An AKIS is a network consisted of the differentactors and multidimensional perspectives. This study investigates the linkages,integration and compatibility levels of extension in Turkish AKIS, and defines thebottlenecks in the system. The components of the AKIS such as factors affectingextension performance, information sources, extension methods, actoreffectiveness and compatibility were used in the multidimensional scaling (MDS)analysis. According to the findings low technology adoption levels, mostlyfocusing on production increases, limited local participation were emphasized asthe common disorders in Turkish AKIS. Extension activities must be based on theobjective oriented programming approach. Besides, empowering of local actors,multi-stakeholder programming and evaluation process should be employed forallowing to articulation of actors’ relations in the AKIS.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Ziraat Mühendisliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abudu, 2015. Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems (AKIS) in Extension Information Delivery in Nigeria, International Journal of Materials, Methods and Technologies Vol. 3, No. 1, October 2015.
  • Anonymous, 1938. Turkish Agriculture, I. Congress on Village and Agricultural Development, (in Turkish), State Publishing House, Istanbul, (1938), 304p.
  • Anonymous, 1990. Agricultural Extension the Next Step, Agricultural and Rural Development Policy and Research Series, No:13, Agricultural and Rural Development Department, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
  • Babu, S.C., Ramesh, N., Shaw, C., 2015. The Current Status and Role of Private Extension,: a Literature Review and Conceptual Framework, Knowledge Driven Development: Private Extension and Global Lessons, Eds: Zhou, Y., Babu, S.C. Academic Press.
  • Blandford, D., 2011. Recap of Some Issues Raised in the Meeting and the Policy Agenda for OECD Countries, OECD Conference on Agricultural Knowledge Systems (AKS): Responding to Global Food Security and Climate Change Challenges, 15-17 June, Paris, France
  • Blum, A., 1995. Comparative research on agricultural extension in Europe, Proceeding of The 12th. European Seminar on Extension Education, Thessalonica, Greece.
  • Boyaci, M., 1996. Agricultural Extension in European Union Countries and Turkey, (in Turkish), Ege University Agricultural Research and Extension Centre, Extension Series(3), Bornova, Izmir Turkey 21p.
  • Christoplos, I and Nitsch, U., 1993. Changing extension paradigm, IRDC Currents 6, Pp: 22-26.
  • Csaki, C., 1999. Agricultural higher education in transforming Central and Eastern Europe, Agricultural Economics 21 Pp: 109-120.
  • Expere, J.A., 1974. A Comparative Study of Job Performance under Two Approaches to Agricultural Extension Organization, Land Tenure Centre, Research Paper (61), USA, 62p.
  • Falloon, K., 2011. Institutional reforms of AKS in New Zealand and International Networks in AKS, New Zealand Mission to the European Union, Ministry of Science and Innovation, 15 June.
  • Hartwich, F. and Scheidegger, U., 2010. Fostering innovation networks the missing piece in rural development, Rural Development News 1/2010, Pp: 70-75.
  • Islam, F., 2010. Institutionalization of agricultural knowledge, Management System for Digital Marginalized Rural Farming Community, Innovation and Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Food, June 28 to July 1, Montpellier France.
  • ISNAR, 1998. Strengthening the Role of Universities in the National Agricultural Research Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa, Cotonou, Benin, The Hague: International, Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR)
  • Malhotra, N. K., 1996. Marketing Research an Applied Orientation: Second Edition, Prentice-Hall International Inc. 890p.
  • MARA, 1987. Extension Guide, Part I, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, (in Turkish), TYUAP, Ankara, Turkey, 28p.
  • MARA, 2009. Some Indicators on Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, http://www.tarim.gov.tr/arayuz/9/habergoster.asp?ID =967, Access: 7.10.2009
  • Munyua, C., Adams, P., Thomson, T., 2002. Designing effective linkages for sustainable agricultural extension information systems among developing countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, AIAEE 2002, Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference Durban, South Africa, 301-307p.
  • O’Reilly, P., 2010. Public/Private Roles, OECD Conference Agricultural Knowledge Systems Session 3.B. Business NZ, 16 June.
  • Oakley, P. and Garforth, C., 1992. Guide to Extension Training, FAO Training Series No:11, Rome Italy, 144p.
  • Perez., S.A., Klerkx, L., and Leeuwis, C., 2010. Innovation brokers and their roles in value chain-network innovation, ISDA 2010, Innovation and Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Food, 28 June-1 July, Montpellier France.
  • Raj, S., 2010. Agricultural Knowledge Information Systems and innovations for technology dissemination and sustainable agricultural development, ISDA 2010, Innovation and Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Food, June 28 to July 1, Montpellier France.
  • Rogers, A., 1993. Third generation extension towards and alternative model, Extension Bulletin (3), The University of Reading, Reading, UK.
  • Roling, N., 1988. Extension Science, Information Systems in Agricultural Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Roling, N., 1989. The Agricultural Research Technology Transfer Interface: A Knowledge System Perspective, ISNAR, Hague, Netherlands.
  • TUIK, 2015. Agricultural Census, Turkish Statistical Institute, http://www.tuik.gov.tr, Access: 16.9.2016
  • Werrij, F., 2005. An Agriculture Knowledge System for Europe, EURAGRI Secretary General XIX EURAGRI Members Conference, 22/23 September, Central Science Laboratory, York, UK.
APA BOYACI M, Yildiz O (2017). Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case. , 37 - 44.
Chicago BOYACI Murat,Yildiz Ozlem Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case. (2017): 37 - 44.
MLA BOYACI Murat,Yildiz Ozlem Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case. , 2017, ss.37 - 44.
AMA BOYACI M,Yildiz O Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case. . 2017; 37 - 44.
Vancouver BOYACI M,Yildiz O Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case. . 2017; 37 - 44.
IEEE BOYACI M,Yildiz O "Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case." , ss.37 - 44, 2017.
ISNAD BOYACI, Murat - Yildiz, Ozlem. "Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case". (2017), 37-44.
APA BOYACI M, Yildiz O (2017). Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 54(1), 37 - 44.
Chicago BOYACI Murat,Yildiz Ozlem Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 54, no.1 (2017): 37 - 44.
MLA BOYACI Murat,Yildiz Ozlem Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.54, no.1, 2017, ss.37 - 44.
AMA BOYACI M,Yildiz O Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017; 54(1): 37 - 44.
Vancouver BOYACI M,Yildiz O Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017; 54(1): 37 - 44.
IEEE BOYACI M,Yildiz O "Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case." Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 54, ss.37 - 44, 2017.
ISNAD BOYACI, Murat - Yildiz, Ozlem. "Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case". Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 54/1 (2017), 37-44.